Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
GIS-Based Throwshed Analysis for Conflict Archaeology Cover

GIS-Based Throwshed Analysis for Conflict Archaeology

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Ando, R, Okawa, K, Miyazaki, T and Sugiura, H. 2014. ‘Aerodynamic properties of an archery arrow: Influence of flexural oscillation’. The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress, Japan, 2014(0): J0520102. DOI: 10.1299/jsmemecj.2014._j0520102-
  2. Archer, L, Neal, JC, Bates, PD and House, JI. 2018. ‘Comparing TanDEM-X Data With Frequently Used DEMs for Flood Inundation Modeling’. Water Resources Research, 54(12): 1020510222. DOI: 10.1029/2018wr023688
  3. Athanson, M. 2010. Modelling bullet trajectories on historic battlefields using exterior ballistics simulation and target-oriented visibility. PhD Thesis, University of Oxford.
  4. Baće, M, Ilijić, S, Narančić, Z and Bistričić, L. 2002. ‘The envelope of projectile trajectories’. European Journal of Physics, 23(6): 637642. DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/23/6/305
  5. Bashforth, FA. 1870. Reports on Experiments Made with the Bashforth Chronograph to Determine the Resistance of the Air to the Motion of Projectiles, 1865–1870. London: HM Stationery Office.
  6. Bellamy, C. 1990. The evolution of modern land warfare: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
  7. Biagi, L and Negretti, MA. 2001. New Approach to the Polygons Rasterization in GRASS, May 2019. Available at https://geomatica.como.polimi.it/workbooks/n2/articoli/lbmn.pdf [Last accessed 18 January 2025].
  8. Boulton, SJ and Stokes, M. 2018. ‘Which DEM is best for analyzing fluvial landscape development in mountainous terrains’. Geomorphology, 310: 168187. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.002
  9. Brandt, S. 2014. Data analysis: Statistical and computational methods for scientists and engineers. 4th ed. London: Springer International Publishing.
  10. Brown, CJ. 2021. Critical applications of KOCOA in Western Europe c. 26 BC – 1745 AD. PhD Thesis. DOI: 10.7488/ERA/1840
  11. Brown, CJ, Torres-Martínez, JF, Fernández-Götz, M and Martínez-Velasco, A. 2017. ‘Fought under the walls of Bergida: KOCOA analysis of the Roman attack on the Cantabrian oppidum of Monte Bernorio (Spain)’. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 12(2): 115138. DOI: 10.1080/15740773.2017.1440993
  12. Brown, VM and Craig, N. 2009. ‘New experimental data on the distance of sling projectiles’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(6): 12641268. 10.1016/j.jas.2009.01.018
  13. Bundesamt für Landestopografie swisstopo. 2022. SwissALTI3D: Das hoch aufgelöste Terrainmodell der Schweiz. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft: Bundesamt für Landestopografie swisstopo.
  14. Butikov, EI. 2003. ‘Comment on The envelope of projectile trajectories’. European Journal of Physics, 24(4): L5L9. DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/24/4/101
  15. Butikov, EI. 2015. ‘The envelope of ballistic trajectories and elliptic orbits’. American Journal of Physics, 83(11): 952958. DOI: 10.1119/1.4928176
  16. Chudinov, P, Eltyshev, V and Barykin, Y. 2018. ‘Simple and convenient analytical formulas for studying the projectile motion in midair’. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 40(1): e1308. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2017-0145
  17. Collins, AR. 2015. Smooth Bore Cannon Ballistics. MISCELLANY: Miscellaneous technical articles by Dr. A. R. Collins, 2015. Available at https://2015fallhw.github.io/arcidau/CannonBallistics.html [Last accessed 18 January 2025].
  18. Conolly, J and Lake, M. 2006. Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511807459
  19. Demian, JA. 1812. Anleitung zum Selbst-Studium der militärischen Dienstwissenschaft: Handbuch der Waffenlehre, zum Selbststudium über die Einrichtung, Wirkung und dem Gebrauche der in der k.k. österreichischen Armee eingeführten Waffen aller Art. Wien: Katharina Gräffer und Compagnie.
  20. Denny, M. 2025. ‘Internal ballistics of the sling’. American Journal of Physics, 93(5): 367375. DOI: 10.1119/5.0226263
  21. Didion, I. 1857. Lois de la résistance de l’air sur les projectiles. Paris: Librairie Militaire.
  22. Dohrenwend, RE. 2002. ‘The Sling: Forgotten Firepower of Antiquity’. Journal of Asian Martial Arts, 11(2): 2849
  23. Donnelly, D. 1992. ‘The parabolic envelope of constant initial speed trajectories’. American Journal of Physics, 60(12): 11491150. DOI: 10.1119/1.16965
  24. Elsaadany, A and Wen-jun, Y. 2014. ‘Accurate trajectory prediction for typical artillery projectile’. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Chinese Control Conference. Nanjing, China: IEEE, pp. 63686374. DOI: 10.1109/chicc.2014.6896037
  25. Esparza, CH. 1984. ‘Parabolic trajectory of a projectile’. The Physics Teacher, 22(6): 385385. DOI: 10.1119/1.2341586
  26. Fisher, PF. 1993. ‘Algorithm and implementation uncertainty in viewshed analysis’. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(4): 331347. DOI: 10.1080/02693799308901965
  27. Harrison, C. 2006. ‘The Sling in Medieval Europe’. The Bulletin of Primitive Technology, 31: 7481
  28. Hawker, L, Uhe, P, Paulo, L, Sosa, J, Savage, J, Sampson, C and Neal, J. 2022. ‘A 30 m global map of elevation with forests and buildings removed’. Environmental Research Letters, 17(2): 024016. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f
  29. Holas, M. 2022. ‘Landscape Analysis of a Battlefield of the Austro-Prussian War of 1866 near Hospital Kuks’. Interdisciplinaria Archaeologica Natural Sciences in Archaeology, XIII(1): 6377. DOI: 10.24916/iansa.2022.1.6
  30. Hutton, C. 1805. New Principles of Gunnery: Containing the Determination of the Force of Gunpowder, and Investigation of the Difference in the Resisting Power of the Air to Swift and Slow Motions. By Benjamin Robins with an Account of His Life and Writings, by James Wilson, M. D. London: F. Wingrave.
  31. Hutton, C. 1812. Tracts on Mathematical and Philosophical Subjects; Comprising, Among Numerous Important Articles, the Theory of Bridges, with Several Plans of Recent Improvement. Also the Results of Numerous Experiments on the Force of Gunpowder, with Applications to the Modern Practice of Artillery. London: F. C. and J. Rivington.
  32. Kay, S and Sly, T. 2001. ‘An Application of Cumulative Viewshed Analysis to a Medieval Archaeological Study: The Beacon System of the Isle of Wight, United Kingdom’. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 12: 167179.
  33. Ko, A, Chang, K, Sheen, D-J, Lee, C-H, Park, Y and Park, SW. 2020. ‘Prediction and Analysis of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Spinning Projectile Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics’. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020: 112. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6043721
  34. Kooi, B and Sparenberg, J. 1997. ‘On the mechanics of the arrow: Archer’s Paradox’. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 31: 285303. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004262424363
  35. Kooi, BW. 1998. ‘Bow-arrow interaction in archery’. Journal of Sports Sciences, 16(8): 721731. DOI: 10.1080/026404198366353
  36. Korfmann, M. 1973. ‘The Sling as a Weapon’. Scientific American, 229(4): 3442. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican1073-34
  37. Kreins, JM. 2003. Histoire du Luxembourg. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  38. Lacey, C. 2003. Fireshed: The application of GIS based techniques to historic military data. MsC Thesis, University of Southhampton.
  39. Lefort, A. 1905. Histoire du département des Forêts (Le duché de Luxembourg de 1795 à 1814), d’après les archives du gouvernement grand-ducal et des documents français inédits. Luxembourg: Imprimerie Worré-Mertens.
  40. Leitmannová, K, Gálová, L, Lieskovský, T, Bisták, P and Zachar, J. 2022. ‘Projekt leteckého laserového skenovania Slovenskej republiky a jeho využitie v manažmente ochrany archeologického dedičstva’. Geodetický a kartografický obzor, 68/110(3): 5368.
  41. Marsh, CB, Harder, P and Pomeroy, JW. 2023. ‘Validation of FABDEM, a global bare-earth elevation model, against UAV-lidar derived elevation in a complex forested mountain catchment’. Environmental Research Communications, 5(3): 031009. DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/acc56d
  42. Maune, DF. (ed.). 2007. Digital Elevation Model Technologies and Applications: The DEM Users Manual. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
  43. McConnell, D. 1988. British smooth-bore artillery: A technological study to support identification, acquisition, restoration, reproduction, and interpretation of artillery at national historic parks in Canada. Ottawa, Canada: National Historic Parks and Sites, Environment Canada-Parks.
  44. McCoy, RL. 1990a. The Aerodynamic Characteristics of .50 Ball M33, API, M8, and APIT, M20 Ammunition. Memorandum Report BRL-MR-3810. Aberdeen, MD: Aberdeen Proving Ground.
  45. McCoy, RL. 1990b. The Aerodynamic Characteristics of Caliber .22 Long Rifle Match Ammunition. Memorandum Report BRL-MR-3877. Aberdeen, MD: Aberdeen Proving Ground.
  46. McCoy, RL. 2012. Modern Exterior Ballistics: The Launch and Flight Dynamics of Symmetric Projectiles. 2nd ed. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing.
  47. McShane, EJ, Kelley, JL and Reno, FV. 1953. Exterior Ballistics. Denver: University of Denver Press.
  48. Merda, T and Magier, M. 2017. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Supersonic Mortar Projectiles. 30th International Symposium on Ballistics. DOI: 10.12783/ballistics2017/16783
  49. Miller, DG and Bailey, AB. 1979. ‘Sphere drag at Mach numbers from 0.3 to 2.0 at Reynolds numbers approaching 107. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 93 (3): 449464. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112079002597
  50. Miller, DP. 2010. Ballistics of 17th Century Muskets. MsC Thesis, Cranfield University.
  51. Mokarram, M and Hojati, M. 2017. ‘Morphometric analysis of stream as one of resources for agricultural lands irrigation using high spatial resolution of digital elevation model (DEM)’. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 142: 190200. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.09.001
  52. NASA. 2015. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Collection User Guide. NASA.
  53. Neumann, M. 2021. Doklady bojovej činnosti z obdobia 2. svetovej vojny v priestore medzi Trnavou a Trstínom (juhozápadné Slovensko). Možnosti aplikácie metódy KOCOA. Musaica Archaeologica, 6 (1–2): 197215. DOI: 10.46283/musarch.2021.1.2.08
  54. O’Neill, ME. 2014. PCG: A Family of Simple Fast Space-Efficient Statistically Good Algorithms for Random Number Generation. Claremont, CA: Harvey Mudd College.
  55. Ogburn, DE. 2006. ‘Assessing the level of visibility of cultural objects in past landscapes’. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33 (3): 405413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.005
  56. Park, JL. 2011. ‘Arrow behaviour in free flight. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P’. Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 225(4): 241252. DOI: 10.1177/1754337111398542
  57. Pascoal, F, Castro, EAy, Rosa, FSS. 2011. ‘The influence of the drag force on the safety domain’. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 33(2): 2301. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-11172011000200002
  58. Petrasova, A, Harmon, B, Petras, V, Mitasova, H. 2015. ‘Viewshed Analysis’. In: Petrasova et al. Tangible Modeling with Open Source GIS. London: Springer, pp. 7782. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25775-4_6
  59. Robins, B. 1742. New Principles of Gunnery: Containing the Determination of the Force of Gunpowder, and Investigation of the Difference in the Resisting Power of the Air to Swift and Slow Motions. London: J. Nourse.
  60. Rocha, J, Gomes, E, Boavida-Portugal, I, Viana, CM, Truong-Hong, L and Thu Phan, A (eds.). 2023. GIS and Spatial Analysis. London: IntechOpen. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.100705
  61. Shin, G, Cheon, K, Shin, B, Go, J, Lee, J and Hur, J. 2022. ‘The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Trajectory of Howitzer Shell’. Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 25(4): 364371. DOI: 10.9766/kimst.2022.25.4.364
  62. Schmidt, LE. 1954. Aerodynamic properties of 4.9-calibers long, square based shell at transonic speeds. Aberdeen, MD: Aberdeen Proving Ground.
  63. Siacci, F. 1880. ‘Balistique rationnelle et balistique pratique: Nouvelle méthode pour résoudre les problèmes du tir’. Revue d’Artillerie, 17: 4577.
  64. Silliman, GW and Batt, B. 2015. ‘Modelling small-arms projectile distribution on eighteenth- and nineteenth-century battlefield sites’. Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 10(3): 177191. DOI: 10.1080/15740773.2016.1189066
  65. Sivilich, ED and Sivilich, DM. 2015. ‘Surveying, Statistics, and Spatial Mapping: KOCOA Landscape Analysis of Eighteenth-Century Artillery Placements at Monmouth Battlefield State Park, New Jersey’. Historical Archaeology, 49(2): 5071. DOI: 10.1007/bf03377139
  66. Smola, JF. 1839. Handbuch für k.k. österreichische Artillerie-Offiziere: mit Benützung der hinterlassenen Schriften des k.k. Generalmajors in der Artillerie Joseph Freiherrn von Smola. Wien: In Commission der Fr. Beck’schen Universitäts-Buchhandlung. DOI: 10.3931/E-RARA-79240
  67. Spennemann, DH. 2020. ‘Using KOCOA Military Terrain Analysis for the Assessment of Twentieth Century Battlefield Landscapes’. Heritage, 3(3): 753781. DOI: 10.3390/heritage3030042
  68. Tandy, CRV. 1967. ‘The isovist method of landscape survey’. Methods of Landscape Analysis, 10: 910.
  69. Turkyilmazoglu, M. 2016. ‘Highly accurate analytic formulae for projectile motion subjected to quadratic drag’. European Journal of Physics, 37(3): 035001. DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/37/3/035001
  70. U.S. Marine Corps. 1988. Commander’s Tactical Handbook. Washington, DC: HQ USMC.
  71. U.S. Marine Corps. 2018. Artillery Operations. Washington, DC: HQ USMC.
  72. Ulveling, J. 1869. ‘Notice historique supplémentaire sur la ci-devant forteresse de Luxembourg’. Publications de la Section Historique de l’Institut Grand-Ducal, 24(2): 239270.
  73. Unterberger, F. 1807. Nöthige Kenntnisse von dem Geschütze, und dessen Gebrauch: Für die Infanterie und Cavallerie-Officiere der k. k. Oestreichischen Armee. Wien: Christian Friedrich Wappler und Beck. DOI: 10.3931/E-RARA-29847
  74. Úrad geodézie kartografie a katastra Slovenskej republiky. 2019. Terén: ZBGIS. Základná mapa, 2019. Available at https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/teren/ [Last accessed 31 December 2024].
  75. Waersegers, Y. 2023. Opération de fouilles archéologiques: Projet d’aménagement résidentiel au lieu-dit « An de Laangen Deelen » à Bonnevoie. Rapport de fouilles préventives, Bascharage: Archeo Diag Sàrl.
  76. Waersegers, Y, Brou, L, Theis, A and Wagner, R. 2023. 1794–1795 Blockade of Luxembourg. The soil excavation ditch for the breastwork of a French artillery battery in Bonnevoie. Poster presentation at Archaeology of Conflicts (Archeologie Konfliktů), 2023, September 12–14. Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
  77. Waersegers, Y, Brou, L, Theis, A and Wagner, R. 2025. ‘Excavation of a French artillery battery of the 1794–95 blockade of the Luxembourg fortress’. In: Drnovský, P, Hejhal, P, Rytíř, L (eds.) Archaeology of Conflicts III. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart Publishing.
  78. Weinacht, P, Cooper, GR and Newell, JF. 2005. Analytical Prediction of Trajectories for High-Velocity Direct-Fire Munitions. Aberdeen, MD: Aberdeen Proving Ground.
  79. Wheatley, D. 1995. ‘Cumulative viewshed analysis: a GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application’. In: Lock, GR and Stančić, Z (eds.) Archaeology and geographical information systems. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 171186. DOI: 10.1201/9780367810467-13
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.217 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Page range: 198 - 224
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2026
Published on: May 28, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Tadeáš Červík, Yann Waersegers, Andreas Paul Zischg, Tibor Lieskovský, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.