Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
GIS-Based Throwshed Analysis for Conflict Archaeology Cover

GIS-Based Throwshed Analysis for Conflict Archaeology

Open Access
|May 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Flowchart of throwshed general method.

Figure 2

Graphical description of throwshed general method. The procedures shown are the construction of the trajectory in detail (A), the generation of the trajectory set (B), the selection of the target chunk (C), and the iterative search for the target cell’s intersecting trajectory (D).

Figure 3

Three scenarios of the intersection: target cell intersected and accessible (A), target cell intersected but inaccessible (B), and target cell out of reach (C). Note that the first and last trajectories of the set are also depicted.

Figure 4

Theoretical (green) and computed (red) envelopes of trajectories with omitted (grey) and accessible (yellow) areas depicted on the trajectory set (black).

Table 1

Input parameters for throwshed tool.

MANDATORY
Initial height h (m)Height above the terrain from which the projectile starts its trajectory
Elevation θ (°)Also known as shooting angle; it is set as a range in interval <–90, +90>
Gravitational acceleration g (m/s–2)Causes projectile’s attraction vertically down, usually around 9.80
Initial velocity v0 (m/s)Or muzzle velocity; the speed at which the projectile leaves the weapon
Temperature T (°C)Important to recalculate the temperature at different relative heights
Air density ρ (kg/m3)One of the factors causing air resistance, a standard value of 1.225
Mass m (kg)Mass of the projectile
Area A (m2)
(d (m))
The area of the projectile perpendicular cross-section; can also be set as the diameter of the rotationally symmetric body
Drag coefficient CDNondimensional aerodynamic drag coefficient unique for projectile
Azimuth α (°)Set as a range in interval <0, 360>
OPTIONAL
Shooter’s eyes height hE (m)Applicable for viewshed analysis
Target height hT (m)
Wall height hW (m)Applicable for burning artificial wall obstacles into DEM, negative wall height value is considered as a depth of artificial ditch
Wall width wW (m)
Oscillation frequency f (Hz)Frequency of oscillating/rotating projectile (e.g. wobbling arrow)
Oscillation distance dO (m)The distance at which the oscillating effect ceases to be present
Peak drag coefficient CDPDrag coefficient of oscillating projectile at its max
Peak area AP (m2)Area of oscillating projectile at its max
Table 2

Values of input parameters of sling and rifle projectiles for throwshed demonstration.

PARAMETERSLING PROJECTILERIFLE PROJECTILE
Initial height (m)1.7001.700
Elevation (°)<–90, +90><–90, +90>
Gravitational acceleration (m/s–2)9.8109.810
Initial velocity (m/s)70.000808.000
Temperature (°C)15.015.0
Air density (kg/m3)1.0581.058
Mass (kg)0.25000.0109
Diameter (m)0.05000.0078
Drag coefficient0.47Drag-to-Mach data in Table 3
Azimuth (°)<0, 360><0, 360>
Table 3

Drag-to-Mach coefficient values of 0.308 Sierra 168 gr bullet.

Mach0.0000.8000.8500.9000.9501.0001.0501.100
CD0.1400.1400.1420.1600.2400.4300.4490.447
Mach1.2001.4001.6001.8002.0002.2002.500
CD0.4340.4100.3850.3650.3500.3390.320
Figure 5

DTM with shooting points, location for sling throwshed (A), and location for rifle throwshed (B).

Figure 6

Simple 1-point throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B). Each smaller circle represents the shooting range of a weapon with a shooting angle of 0° in terrain shaped like a horizontal plane. The larger circles represent each weapon’s range with the shooting angle set to 45°.

Figure 7

Simple 3-point binary throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B).

Figure 8

Simple 3-point cumulative throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B).

Figure 9

Simple 1-point throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B) clipped by viewshed.

Table 4

Standard deviations of input parameters and DTM for probable throwshed.

STANDARD DEVIATION OF PARAMETERSLING PROJECTILERIFLE PROJECTILE
Initial height (m)0.1000.100
Gravitational acceleration (m/s–2)0.0100.010
Initial velocity (m/s)2.5005.000
Temperature (°C)5.05.0
Air density (kg/m3)0.0500.050
Mass (kg)0.01000.0005
Diameter (m)0.00500.0001
Drag coefficient0.050.00
DTM elevation (m)0.1600.160
Figure 10

Simple 1-point probable throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B).

Figure 11

Classic and direct 1-point throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B).

Figure 12

Classic and indirect 1-point throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B).

Figure 13

Classic and direct 3-point cumulative throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B).

Figure 14

Classic and direct 1-point throwshed using walls for sling (A) and rifle (B) with adjusted azimuth interval.

Figure 15

Classic and direct 1-point throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B) with adjusted shooting angle range.

Figure 16

Classic and indirect 1-point throwshed for sling (A) and rifle (B) with adjusted shooting angle range.

Table 5

Deviations of experimental ranges and limiting parameters of the cannons.

CANNON TYPECALIBRE (lb)DISTANCE DEVIATION OF RANGE (%)MIN–MAX ELEVATION OF THE REAR RING (zoll)MIN–MAX ELEVATION ANGLE (°)
Field cannons6110–100.6000–11.1000
1280–180.6000–15.4167
1860–200.6000–15.0000
Battery cannons1270–300.5667–16.2333
1870–320.5833–15.8167
2480–340.6000–15.9500
Defence cannons690–200.4833–13.2333
12100–220.4500–12.0667
1870–220.5000–11.5500
Table 6

Technical parameters of the cannons and cannonballs from the Handbook (Smola 1839).

CANNON TYPECALIBRE (lb)BORE DIAMETER (m)BORE DEPTH (m)CANNONBALL DIAMETER (m)CANNONBALL MASS (kg)GUNPOWDER CHARGE (kg)INITIAL VELOCITY (m/s)
Field cannons60.09461.35680.09052.74750.8400499.68
120.11831.70960.11395.49951.4000471.81
180.13481.97320.13058.25582.5200497.61
Battery cannons120.11832.74240.11395.49952.2400597.10
180.13483.00870.13058.25583.0801575.42
240.14803.16810.143611.02083.9201561.56
Defence cannons60.09462.25720.09052.74751.1200603.35
120.11832.70680.11395.49952.2400595.56
180.13482.83760.13058.25583.0801568.84
Table 7

Simulated and experimental shooting ranges of the cannons according to elevation angles.

PARAMETERS P: ELEVATION ANGLE EA (°), EXPERIMENTAL RANGE ER (m), SIMULATED RANGE SR (m)ELEVATION OF REAR RING (ZOLL)
CANNON TYPECAL. (lb)P012345678
Field cannons6EA0.60001.70002.7833
ER379683910
SR4287631012
12EA0.60001.46672.31673.20004.0500
ER45572191011381290
SR42371594411441312
18EA0.60001.36672.11672.80003.5333
ER45575998611761366
SR46575998911671334
Battery cannons12EA0.56671.10001.65002.20002.73333.28333.8333
ER3797599101100125213961517
SR5477829741135127512721514
18EA0.58331.06671.56672.06672.56673.06673.55004.0500
ER37968393610371214136614871631
SR55177496411241266139315041611
24EA0.60001.06671.55002.01672.48332.96673.43333.90004.3667
ER531759910106212141366146716691770
SR556778969112712681399151416211721
Defence cannons6EA0.48331.15001.80002.46673.1167
ER37964586010621214
SR47873893110961235
12EA0.45001.00001.53332.08332.61673.16673.7167
ER379645835986116313051517
SR4867409341101124113701488
18EA0.50001.03331.55002.06672.58333.10003.61674.1333
ER37968391011001252140415931644
SR50075094611121257138715061614
Figure 17

1794 map of the Fortress of Luxembourg (Lefort 1905) with four forts of interest (A). DTM with the ditch and forts (B).

Table 8

Coordinates of shooting places in LUREF and NGL data and calibres used within forts (Waersegers).

FORTE (m)N (m)H (m)CALIBRE (lb)
Rumigny78376.0075163.00307.646
Rubamprez78186.0075108.00297.376, 12, 18
Wallis77536.0074403.00305.006, 12, 18
Neipperg78040.0074418.00312.126, 12
Table 9

Technical parameters of the cannons and recovered cannonballs. Mean technical parameters of the cannonballs were provided by Waersegers and Theis (unpublished work).

CANNON TYPECALIBRE (lb)BORE DIAMETER (m)BORE DEPTH (m)CANNONBALL DIAMETER (m)CANNON-BALL MASS (kg)GUNPOWDER CHARGE (kg)INITIAL VELOCITY (m/s)MIN–MAX ELEVATION ANGLE (°)
Field cannons60.09461.35680.09002.64260.8400509.500.6000–11.1000
120.11921.70960.11255.30561.4000481.780.6000–15.4167
180.13641.97320.13058.16082.5200503.000.6000–15.0000
Battery cannons120.11922.74240.11255.30562.2400609.720.5667–16.2333
180.13483.00870.13058.16083.0801581.410.5833–15.8167
Defence cannons60.09462.25720.09002.64261.1200615.210.4833–13.2333
120.11922.70680.11255.30562.2400608.160.4500–12.0667
180.13642.83760.13058.16083.0801574.820.5000–11.5500
Figure 18

Cumulative throwshed for the 6-pounder field (A) and defence cannons (B).

Figure 19

Cumulative throwshed for 12-pounder (A) and 18-pounder field cannons (B).

Figure 20

Cumulative throwshed for 12-pounder (A) and 18-pounder battery cannons (B).

Figure 21

Cumulative throwshed for 12-pounder (A) and 18-pounder defence cannons (B).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.217 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Page range: 198 - 224
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2026
Published on: May 28, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Tadeáš Červík, Yann Waersegers, Andreas Paul Zischg, Tibor Lieskovský, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.