Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Model-Based Statistical Classification Analysis for Karamattepe Arrowheads Cover

A Model-Based Statistical Classification Analysis for Karamattepe Arrowheads

Open Access
|Mar 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Distribution of arrowheads according to the typology developed by Baykan (2012).

TypologyFrequency%
Type 128959.8
Type 212926.7
Type 3285.8
Type 4132.7
Type 581.7
Type 651
Type 720.4
N/A91.9
Total483100
Table 2

Descriptive statistics of the arrowheads.

TotalType
Type 1Type 2Type 3Type 4Type 5Type 6Type 7N/A
MeannMeannMeannMeannMeannMeannMeannMeannMeann
Weight8.924568.0527411.871235.08288.70124.3864.43210.68211.129
Length5.674715.792865.591235.74285.62133.5683.7544.4025.997
Width1.053241.022681.15241.3730.96121.2470.9731.5011.576
Thickness0.802200.801280.94570.45180.7730.6660.4010.8520.665
Case width1.1311001.16102000.704.070301.21
Helve thickness0.552950.552481.3450.40240.50120.80100.3010.754
Stem width1.43280.90101.442501.30101.7010
Driller length3.654254.122612.591164.52262.57122.5042.3524.4012.733
Elevation437.2419436.9257437.5110439.423435.68436.98434.934372438.18
AbsYes103463837502
No33822577204326
MaterialIron4682891292813008
Bronze150000821
jcaa-2-1-20-g1.png
Figure 1

Distribution of missing values.

Table 3

Descriptive statistics before and after data completion.

Original DataMissing DataCompleted Data (N:483)
NMeanStandard DeviationFrequency%MeanStandard Deviation
Weight4568.913.822768.923.86
Length4715.671.301225.671.30
Width3241.041.19159331.161.20
Thickness2200.800.24263540.780.33
Case Width1101.120.25373771.000.31
Helve Thickness2950.550.75188390.600.72
Stem Width281.420.18455941.510.29
Driller Length4253.641.0358123.621.05
Elevation419437.203.326413437.223.38
Table 4

Goodness-of-fit criteria.

CriteriaValue
AIC (ideal)882.815
AIC (restricted)453.427
Cox and Snell’s Pseudo R20.647
Nagelkerke R20.750
McFadden0.524
Pearson Chi – Squared11443.137
Relative Chi – Squared417.427
Table 5

Measures of good compliance with the multi-territorial logistic regression model.

GoF (Restricted Model)Likelihood Ratio Test
AICBIC–2logλχ2dfp
Intercept453.427527.030417.427a0.0000
WEIGHT * LENGTH581.545642.881551.545b134.11830.000
MATERIAL518.147579.482488.147  70.71930.000
DRILLER LENGTH744.169805.504714.169b296.74230.000
ABS456.826518.162426.826b9.39930.024
ELEVATION461.745523.081431.745b14.31830.003

[i] a This reduced model is equivalent to the final model because omitting the effect does not increase the degrees of freedom.

b Unexpected singularities in the Hessian matrix are encountered. This indicates that either some predictor variables should be excluded or some categories should be merged.

Table 6

Parameter estimates of the multinomial logistic model.

TypeaVariablesBSt. ErrorWalddfp.Exp(β)%95 CI for Exp(B)
Lower BoundUpper Bound
2Intercept–91.24735.726.52210.01
WEIGHT * LENGTH0.0570.00852.0510.001.0581.0421.075
[MATERIAL=IRON]–1.2780.00010.2790.2790.279
[MATERIAL=BRONZE]0b0
DRILLER LENGTH–2.7450.27599.6410.000.0640.0370.110
[ABS=YES]0.9610.4364.84310.022.6131.1116.147
[ABS=NO]0b0
ELEVATION0.2230.0827.39310.001.2501.0641.467
3Intercept–106.9338.357.77410.00
WEIGHT * LENGTH–0.1250.02426.6510.000.8820.8420.925
[MATERIAL=IRON]–0.1120.00010.8940.8940.894
[MATERIAL=BRONZE]0b0
DRILLER LENGTH2.2810.43427.5610.009.7874.17722.934
[ABS=YES]0.8260.7561.19310.272.2840.51910.054
[ABS=NO]0b0
ELEVATION0.2280.0876.80310.001.2561.0581.490
4Intercept–43.91812280.00110.97
WEIGHT * LENGTH0.0450.01020.2110.001.0471.0261.068
[MATERIAL=IRON]–20.95812270.00010.987.907E-100.000.c
[MATERIAL=BRONZE]0b0
DRILLER LENGTH–2.2800.37437.2410.000.1020.0490.213
[ABS=YES]1.6370.5957.56710.005.1381.60116.491
[ABS=NO]0b0
ELEVATION0.1530.1271.46110.221.1660.9091.495

[i] a The reference category is: Type 1.

b This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.

c Floating point overflow occurred while computing this statistic. Its value is therefore set to system missing.

Table 7

Classification results.

TypePredicted
1234Percent Correct (%)
Observed1255142094.1%
220950082.6%
31607030.4%
451211443.8%
Overall Percentage %67.1%27.4%2.3%3.2%84.1%
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.20 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 4, 2018
Accepted on: Jan 25, 2019
Published on: Mar 4, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Tutku Tuncali Yaman, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.