Table 1
Distribution of arrowheads according to the typology developed by Baykan (2012).
| Typology | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | 289 | 59.8 |
| Type 2 | 129 | 26.7 |
| Type 3 | 28 | 5.8 |
| Type 4 | 13 | 2.7 |
| Type 5 | 8 | 1.7 |
| Type 6 | 5 | 1 |
| Type 7 | 2 | 0.4 |
| N/A | 9 | 1.9 |
| Total | 483 | 100 |
Table 2
Descriptive statistics of the arrowheads.
| Total | Type | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Type 5 | Type 6 | Type 7 | N/A | ||||||||||||
| Mean | n | Mean | n | Mean | n | Mean | n | Mean | n | Mean | n | Mean | n | Mean | n | Mean | n | ||
| Weight | 8.92 | 456 | 8.05 | 274 | 11.87 | 123 | 5.08 | 28 | 8.70 | 12 | 4.38 | 6 | 4.43 | 2 | 10.68 | 2 | 11.12 | 9 | |
| Length | 5.67 | 471 | 5.79 | 286 | 5.59 | 123 | 5.74 | 28 | 5.62 | 13 | 3.56 | 8 | 3.75 | 4 | 4.40 | 2 | 5.99 | 7 | |
| Width | 1.05 | 324 | 1.02 | 268 | 1.15 | 24 | 1.37 | 3 | 0.96 | 12 | 1.24 | 7 | 0.97 | 3 | 1.50 | 1 | 1.57 | 6 | |
| Thickness | 0.80 | 220 | 0.80 | 128 | 0.94 | 57 | 0.45 | 18 | 0.77 | 3 | 0.66 | 6 | 0.40 | 1 | 0.85 | 2 | 0.66 | 5 | |
| Case width | 1.13 | 110 | 0 | 1.16 | 102 | 0 | 0 | 0.70 | 4 | .070 | 3 | 0 | 1.2 | 1 | |||||
| Helve thickness | 0.55 | 295 | 0.55 | 248 | 1.34 | 5 | 0.40 | 24 | 0.50 | 12 | 0.80 | 1 | 0 | 0.30 | 1 | 0.75 | 4 | ||
| Stem width | 1.43 | 28 | 0.90 | 1 | 0 | 1.44 | 25 | 0 | 1.30 | 1 | 0 | 1.70 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| Driller length | 3.65 | 425 | 4.12 | 261 | 2.59 | 116 | 4.52 | 26 | 2.57 | 12 | 2.50 | 4 | 2.35 | 2 | 4.40 | 1 | 2.73 | 3 | |
| Elevation | 437.2 | 419 | 436.9 | 257 | 437.5 | 110 | 439.4 | 23 | 435.6 | 8 | 436.9 | 8 | 434.9 | 3 | 437 | 2 | 438.1 | 8 | |
| Abs | Yes | 103 | 46 | 38 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | ||||||||||
| No | 338 | 225 | 77 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Material | Iron | 468 | 289 | 129 | 28 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 8 | ||||||||||
| Bronze | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||

Figure 1
Distribution of missing values.
Table 3
Descriptive statistics before and after data completion.
| Original Data | Missing Data | Completed Data (N:483) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | Standard Deviation | Frequency | % | Mean | Standard Deviation | |
| Weight | 456 | 8.91 | 3.82 | 27 | 6 | 8.92 | 3.86 |
| Length | 471 | 5.67 | 1.30 | 12 | 2 | 5.67 | 1.30 |
| Width | 324 | 1.04 | 1.19 | 159 | 33 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Thickness | 220 | 0.80 | 0.24 | 263 | 54 | 0.78 | 0.33 |
| Case Width | 110 | 1.12 | 0.25 | 373 | 77 | 1.00 | 0.31 |
| Helve Thickness | 295 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 188 | 39 | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| Stem Width | 28 | 1.42 | 0.18 | 455 | 94 | 1.51 | 0.29 |
| Driller Length | 425 | 3.64 | 1.03 | 58 | 12 | 3.62 | 1.05 |
| Elevation | 419 | 437.20 | 3.32 | 64 | 13 | 437.22 | 3.38 |
Table 4
Goodness-of-fit criteria.
| Criteria | Value |
|---|---|
| AIC (ideal) | 882.815 |
| AIC (restricted) | 453.427 |
| Cox and Snell’s Pseudo R2 | 0.647 |
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.750 |
| McFadden | 0.524 |
| Pearson Chi – Squared | 11443.137 |
| Relative Chi – Squared | 417.427 |
Table 5
Measures of good compliance with the multi-territorial logistic regression model.
| GoF (Restricted Model) | Likelihood Ratio Test | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIC | BIC | –2logλ | χ2 | df | p | |
| Intercept | 453.427 | 527.030 | 417.427a | 0.000 | 0 | |
| WEIGHT * LENGTH | 581.545 | 642.881 | 551.545b | 134.118 | 3 | 0.000 |
| MATERIAL | 518.147 | 579.482 | 488.147 | 70.719 | 3 | 0.000 |
| DRILLER LENGTH | 744.169 | 805.504 | 714.169b | 296.742 | 3 | 0.000 |
| ABS | 456.826 | 518.162 | 426.826b | 9.399 | 3 | 0.024 |
| ELEVATION | 461.745 | 523.081 | 431.745b | 14.318 | 3 | 0.003 |
[i] a This reduced model is equivalent to the final model because omitting the effect does not increase the degrees of freedom.
b Unexpected singularities in the Hessian matrix are encountered. This indicates that either some predictor variables should be excluded or some categories should be merged.
Table 6
Parameter estimates of the multinomial logistic model.
| Typea | Variables | B | St. Error | Wald | df | p. | Exp(β) | %95 CI for Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||||
| 2 | Intercept | –91.247 | 35.72 | 6.522 | 1 | 0.01 | |||
| WEIGHT * LENGTH | 0.057 | 0.008 | 52.05 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.058 | 1.042 | 1.075 | |
| [MATERIAL=IRON] | –1.278 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.279 | 0.279 | 0.279 | |||
| [MATERIAL=BRONZE] | 0b | 0 | |||||||
| DRILLER LENGTH | –2.745 | 0.275 | 99.64 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.064 | 0.037 | 0.110 | |
| [ABS=YES] | 0.961 | 0.436 | 4.843 | 1 | 0.02 | 2.613 | 1.111 | 6.147 | |
| [ABS=NO] | 0b | 0 | |||||||
| ELEVATION | 0.223 | 0.082 | 7.393 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.250 | 1.064 | 1.467 | |
| 3 | Intercept | –106.93 | 38.35 | 7.774 | 1 | 0.00 | |||
| WEIGHT * LENGTH | –0.125 | 0.024 | 26.65 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.882 | 0.842 | 0.925 | |
| [MATERIAL=IRON] | –0.112 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.894 | 0.894 | 0.894 | |||
| [MATERIAL=BRONZE] | 0b | 0 | |||||||
| DRILLER LENGTH | 2.281 | 0.434 | 27.56 | 1 | 0.00 | 9.787 | 4.177 | 22.934 | |
| [ABS=YES] | 0.826 | 0.756 | 1.193 | 1 | 0.27 | 2.284 | 0.519 | 10.054 | |
| [ABS=NO] | 0b | 0 | |||||||
| ELEVATION | 0.228 | 0.087 | 6.803 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.256 | 1.058 | 1.490 | |
| 4 | Intercept | –43.918 | 1228 | 0.001 | 1 | 0.97 | |||
| WEIGHT * LENGTH | 0.045 | 0.010 | 20.21 | 1 | 0.00 | 1.047 | 1.026 | 1.068 | |
| [MATERIAL=IRON] | –20.958 | 1227 | 0.000 | 1 | 0.98 | 7.907E-10 | 0.000 | .c | |
| [MATERIAL=BRONZE] | 0b | 0 | |||||||
| DRILLER LENGTH | –2.280 | 0.374 | 37.24 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.102 | 0.049 | 0.213 | |
| [ABS=YES] | 1.637 | 0.595 | 7.567 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.138 | 1.601 | 16.491 | |
| [ABS=NO] | 0b | 0 | |||||||
| ELEVATION | 0.153 | 0.127 | 1.461 | 1 | 0.22 | 1.166 | 0.909 | 1.495 | |
[i] a The reference category is: Type 1.
b This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.
c Floating point overflow occurred while computing this statistic. Its value is therefore set to system missing.
