Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Underwater Drones as a Low-Cost, yet Powerful Tool for Underwater Archaeological Mapping: Case Studies from the Mediterranean Cover

Underwater Drones as a Low-Cost, yet Powerful Tool for Underwater Archaeological Mapping: Case Studies from the Mediterranean

Open Access
|Jan 2025

Figures & Tables

jcaa-8-1-184-g1.png
Figure 1

Flowchart illustrating the three main stages of surveying an underwater cultural heritage site using underwater drones.

jcaa-8-1-184-g2.png
Figure 2

Map of the Phournoi archipelago, North Aegean Sea, Greece, and the locations of the two case studies (Late Roman shipwreck site and anchorage site) presented in the paper.

jcaa-8-1-184-g3.png
Figure 3

Left: The underwater drone Blueye X3 ready for deployment. Right: The underwater drone’s full photogrammetric setup.

jcaa-8-1-184-g4.png
Figure 4

Calibration data from the underwater drone’s internal camera.

jcaa-8-1-184-g5.png
Figure 5

The underwater drone’s trajectories over the wreck site. The white dashed line shows the path of the vehicle, which follows the terrain of the site, while keeping a constant altitude h thanks to the DVL sensor. The dimensions of the robot with respect to the wreck site are distorted for visualization purposes.

jcaa-8-1-184-g6.png
Figure 6

Up: The field of view of the three cameras of the photogrammetric setup. Down: Snapshots from the photogrammetric recording of the byzantine wreck by the underwater drone.

jcaa-8-1-184-g7.png
Figure 7

Up: Real-time map creation of the wreck through ORB-SLAM3 implementation. Down: Synchronized footage from the trifocal camera system of the underwater drone.

jcaa-8-1-184-g8.png
Figure 8

Results of the 3D reconstruction of the byzantine Late Roman wreck (in overview and detail).

jcaa-8-1-184-g9.png
Figure 9

Four different anchor types found at the bay of Kamari. From left to right: a) lead stock of a Roman anchor, b) grapnel anchor of the Ottoman period, c) admiralty type anchor (18th–19th century), d) composite stone anchor (prehistoric).

jcaa-8-1-184-g10.png
Figure 10

The DTX2 underwater drone surveying the Kamari anchorage site.

jcaa-8-1-184-g11.png
Figure 11

Left: the transects of the underwater drone following the bathymetry of the anchorage area, at a constant diving altitude of 5 meters above the seabed. Right: the localization of the 21 anchors off the shore of the bay of Kamari and the existing bathymetric model provided by RPM Nautical Foundation.

jcaa-8-1-184-g12.png
Figure 12

Georeferenced orthophotomosaic of the anchorage site of Kamari.

jcaa-8-1-184-g13.png
Figure 13

Anchors distribution map at the Kamari bay.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.184 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 7, 2024
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2024
Published on: Jan 24, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Eleni Diamanti, Øyvind Ødegård, Vasilis Mentogiannis, George Koutsouflakis, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.