Have a personal or library account? Click to login
AIKoGAM: An AI-driven Knowledge Graph of the Antiquities Market: Toward Automatised Methods to Identify Illicit Trafficking Networks Cover

AIKoGAM: An AI-driven Knowledge Graph of the Antiquities Market: Toward Automatised Methods to Identify Illicit Trafficking Networks

Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Volume 7 (2024): Issue 1
By: Riccardo Giovanelli and  Arianna Traviglia  
Open Access
|Jan 2024

References

  1. 1Ahmad, I, Akhtar, MU, Noor, S and Shahnaz, A. 2020. Missing Link Prediction using Common Neighbor and Centrality based Parameterized Algorithm. Scientific Reports, 10(364). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57304-y
    Back to article
  2. 2Akers, T. 2023. Manhattan District Attorney’s Office returns two looted statues to Libya from the collection of disgraced former dealer Robin Symes. The Art Newspaper, 17 July [online access at https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/07/17/manhattan-district-attorneys-office-returns-looted-statues-robin-symes last accessed 18 July 2023].
    Back to article
  3. 3Albertson, L. 2020a. Provenance Research Today. Principle, Practice, Problems. In: Tompkins, A (ed.), From Soil to Showroom: Tracing Illicit Antiquities Across the World. Lund Humphries, pp. 172–184.
    Back to article
  4. 4Albertson, L. 2020b. Some background on Erdal Dere and Faisal Khan and Fortuna Fine Arts ltd., charged in the sd/new York. Association for Research into Crime against Art, September [online access at https://art-crime.blogspot.com/2020/09/some-background-on-erdal-dere-and.html last accessed 01 October 2023].
    Back to article
  5. 5Barabási, A-L and Pósfai, M. 2016. Network Science. Cambridge University Press.
    Back to article
  6. 6Bastian, M, Heymann, S and Jacomy, M. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1): 361–362. DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
    Back to article
  7. 7Bogdanos, M and Iyer, A. 2021. In the Matter of A Grand Jury Investigation into a Private New York Antiquities Collector, 06 December. Available at https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/292/102693/2021-12-06-Steinhardt-Complete-Agreement-w-Exhibits-Filed.pdf [Last accessed 16 June 2023].
    Back to article
  8. 8Boyd, D and Crawford, K. 2011. Six Provocations for Big Data. In: A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, September 2011.
    Back to article
  9. 9Brennan, M and Tsirogiannis, C. 2022. Illicit Antiquities Network. Available at https://illicitantiquities.net/about [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  10. 10Brodie, N. 2009. Consensual relations? Academic involvement in the illegal trade in ancient manuscripts. In: Mackenzie, S and Green, P (eds.), Criminology and archaeology: studies in looted antiquities. London: Hart Publishing, pp. 41–59. DOI: 10.5040/9781472564931.ch-003
    Back to article
  11. 11Brodie, N. 2011. Congenial bedfellows? The academy and the antiquities trade. Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 27(4): 408–437. DOI: 10.1177/1043986211418885
    Back to article
  12. 12Brodie, N. 2015. The Internet Market in Antiquities. In: Desmarais, F (ed.), Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: the global challenge of protecting the world’s heritage. The International Council of Museums.
    Back to article
  13. 13Brodie, N, Kersel, MM, Mackenzie, S, Sabrine, I, Smith, E and Yates, D. 2022. Why There is Still an Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects and What We Can Do About It. Journal of Field Archaeology, 47(2): 117–130. DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2021.1996979
    Back to article
  14. 14Brughmans, T, Collar, A and Coward, F. (eds.) 2016. The Connected Past: Challenges to Networks Studies in Archaeology and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198748519.003.0006
    Back to article
  15. 15Brughmans, T and Peeples, MA. 2018. Network Science. In: Varela, SLL (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0402
    Back to article
  16. 16Brughmans, T and Peeples, MA. 2023. Network Science in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009170659
    Back to article
  17. 17Campbell, PB. 2013. The Illicit Antiquities Trade as a Transnational Criminal Network: Characterizing and Anticipating Trafficking of Cultural Heritage. International Journal of Cultural Property, 20: 113–153. DOI: 10.1017/S0940739113000015
    Back to article
  18. 18Campfens, E. 2020. Whose Cultural Objects? Introducing Heritage Title for Cross-Border Cultural Property Claims. Neth Int Law Rev, 67: 257–295. DOI: 10.1007/s40802-020-00174-3
    Back to article
  19. 19CECOJI-CNRS-UMR6224 and European Commission, Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs. 2019. Study on Preventing and Fighting Illicit Trafficking in Cultural Goods. Pubblications Office. DOI: 10.2766/183649
    Back to article
  20. 20Chandra, RV and Varanasi, BS. 2015. Python requests essentials. Packt Publishing Ltd.
    Back to article
  21. 21Chappell, D and Polk, K. 2011. Unraveling the “Cordata”: Just How Organized Is the International Traffic in Cultural Objects? In: Manacorda, S and Chappel, D (eds.), Crime in the Art and Antiquities World. New York: Springer New York, pp. 99–113. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7946-9_6
    Back to article
  22. 22Chasing Aphrodite. 2012. The Getty List: 10 Objects At The J. Paul Getty Museum That Turkey Says Were Looted. Chasing Aphrodite, 20 April [online access at https://chasingaphrodite.com/2012/04/20/the-getty-list-10-objects-at-the-j-paul-getty-museum-that-turkey-says-were-looted/ last accessed 01 October 2023].
    Back to article
  23. 23Christie’s. 2012. RELEASE: Christie’s Announces First in a Series of Online-Exclusive Sales Optimized for a Global Collecting Audience, 25 June. Christie’s. Available at: https://www.christies.com/about-us/press-archive/details?PressReleaseID=5690 [Last accessed 10 July 2023].
    Back to article
  24. 24Christie’s. 2023a. A Greek Bronze Zeus Hurling A Thunderbolt. Christie’s. Available at: https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-6436491 [Last accessed 10 July 2023].
    Back to article
  25. 25Christie’s. 2023b. Antiquities. Christie’s. Available at https://www.christies.com/en/auction/antiquities-29962/ [Last accessed 10 July 2023].
    Back to article
  26. 26Collar, A, Coward, F, Brughmans, T and Mills, B. 2015. Networks in archaeology: phenomena, abstraction, representation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22: 1–32. DOI: 10.1007/s10816-014-9235-6
    Back to article
  27. 27Comando Carabinieri Tutela Patrimonio Culturale. 2023a. Attività Operativa 2022.
    Back to article
  28. 28Comando Carabinieri Tutela Patrimonio Culturale. 2023b. Reperti Archeologic Confiscati. Available at https://tpcweb.carabinieri.it/SitoPubblico/home/contenuti/beni-confiscati [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  29. 29CORDIS. 2022a. Applying New solutions for Cultural Heritage protection by Innovative, Scientific, social and economic Engagement. European Commission. Available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101094824 [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  30. 30CORDIS. 2022b. Artwork Unique RecognitiOn and tRacking through chemicAl encoded data, miniaturized devices and blockchain alliance. European Commission. Available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101094245 [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  31. 31CORDIS. 2022c. ENDORSING SAFEGUARDING, PROTECTION, AND PROVENANCE MANAGEMENT OF CULTURAL HERITAGE. European Commission. Available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101094237 [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  32. 32Costabello, L, Bernardi, A, Janik, A, Pai, S, Van, CL, McGrath, R, McCarthy, N and Tabacof, P. 2019. AmpliGraph: a Library for Representation Learning on Knowledge Graphs. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.2595043
    Back to article
  33. 33Cuno, JB. (ed.) 2012. Whose culture? the promise of museums and the debate over antiquities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Back to article
  34. 34D’Ippolito, M. 2014. New Methods of Mapping. The Application of Social Network Analysis to the Study of the Illegal Trade in Antiquities. In: Kennedy, GW, Agarwal, N and Yang, SJ (eds.), Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05579-4_31
    Back to article
  35. 35Davis, T. 2020. The Return of the Plundered: Case Studies in the Provenance of Illicit Antiquities. In: Tompkins, A (ed.) Provenance research today: principle, practice, problems. Lund Humphries: pp. 185–193.
    Back to article
  36. 36Dijkstra, EW. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1: 269–271. DOI: 10.1007/BF01386390
    Back to article
  37. 37Dörpinghaus, J, Klante, S, Christian, M, Meigen, C and Düing, C. 2022. From social networks to knowledge graphs: A plea for interdisciplinary approaches. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1): 100337. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100337
    Back to article
  38. 38eBay Inc. Staff. 2014. Ebay and Sotheby’s join forces on new live auction experience, 14 July. Available at https://www.ebayinc.com/stories/news/ebay-and-sothebys-join-forces-new-live-auction-experiences/ [Last accessed 10 June 2023].
    Back to article
  39. 39Ehrlinger, L and Wöß, W. 2016. Towards a Definition of Knowledge Graphs. SEMANTiCS (Posters, Demos, SuCCESS).
    Back to article
  40. 40EC-DGEAC, Brodie, N, Batura, O, Hoog, G, Slot, B, Wanrooij, N and Yates, D. 2019. Illicit trade in cultural goods in Europe: characteristics, criminal justice responses and an analysis of the applicability of technologies in the combat against the trade: final report. Publications Office. DOI: 10.2766/183649
    Back to article
  41. 41EUROPOL. 2023. International art trafficking sting leads to 60 arrests and over 11 000 objects recovered. EUROPOL, 04 May [online access at https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/international-art-trafficking-sting-leads-to-60-arrests-and-over-11-000-objects-recovered last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  42. 42Eyharabide, V, Bekkouch, I, Imad, EI and Constantin, ND. 2021. Knowledge Graph Embedding-Based Domain Adaption for Musical Instrument Recognition. Computers, 10(8). DOI: 10.3390/computers10080094
    Back to article
  43. 43Fabiani, MD and Marrone, JV. 2021. Transiting Through the Antiquities Market. In: Oosterman, N and Yates, D (eds.), Crime and Art. Studies in Art, Heritage, Law and the Market. Springer International Publishing, pp. 11–28. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_2
    Back to article
  44. 44Fensel, D, Şimşek, U, Angele, K, Huaman, E, Kärle, E, Panasiuk, O, Toma, I, Umbrich, J and Wahler, A. 2020. Knowledge Graphs. Methodology, Tools and Selected Use Cases. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-37439-6
    Back to article
  45. 45Fletcher, G. 2020. The Ethics of Provenance Research and the Art Market. In: Tompkins, A (ed.), Provenance Research Today. Principle, Practice, Problems. Lund Humphries, pp. 124–134.
    Back to article
  46. 46Frammolino, R and Flech, J. 2005. Murky World of Antiquities Trade. Los Angeles Times, 28 December [online access at https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-dec-28-me-dealers28-story.html last accessed 01 October 2023].
    Back to article
  47. 47Freeman, LC. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3): 215–239. DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
    Back to article
  48. 48Gerstenblith, PG. 2020. Provenience and Provenance Intersecting with International Law in the Market for Antiquities. North Carolina Journal of International Law, 45(2): 457–496. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3573208
    Back to article
  49. 49Gill, DWJ. 2019. Context matters: Nicolas Koutoulakis, the antiquities market and due diligence. Journal of art crime, 22: 71–78.
    Back to article
  50. 50Gill, DWJ and Tsirogiannis, C. 2016. Polaroids from the Medici Dossier: Continued Sightings on the Market. In: Charney, N (ed.), Art Crime: Terrorists, Tomb Raiders, Forgers and Thieves. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 229–239. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-40757-3_17
    Back to article
  51. 51Giovanelli, R. 2018. Provenance non verificabili nel mercato di antichità romane: case study sui 300 oggetti di più alto valore in vendita in eBay US. Archeomafie, X: 115–135.
    Back to article
  52. 52Giovanelli, R. 2021a. 150 oggetti trafficati in 30 anni di attività da Almagià potranno tornare in Italia. The Journal of Culural Heritage Crime, 21 December [online access at https://www.journalchc.com/2021/12/21/150-oggetti-trafficati-in-30-anni-di-attivita-da-almagia-potranno-tornare-in-italia/ last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  53. 53Giovanelli, R. 2021b. Michael Steinhardt: nessuna condanna per il magnate americano che acquistava antichità di dubbia provenienza. The Journal of Cultural Heritage Crime, 14 December [online access at https://www.journalchc.com/2021/12/14/michael-steinhardt-nessuna-condanna-per-il-magnate-americano-che-acquistava-antichita-di-dubbia-provenienza/ last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  54. 54Giovanelli, R. 2023. Operazione Pandora VII. 60 arresti e 11.000 opere d’arte rubate, recuperate in 14 paesi. The Journal of Cultural Heritage Crime, 04 May [online access at https://www.journalchc.com/2023/05/04/operazione-pandora-vii-60-arresti-e-11000-opere-darte-rubate-recuperate-in-14-paesi/ last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  55. 55Giovanelli, R and Traviglia, A. 2023. riccardogvn/AIKoGAM: An AI-driven Knowledge Graph of the Antiquities market: toward automatised methods to identify illicit trafficking networks (v.1.1.2-alpha). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8241780
    Back to article
  56. 56Graham, S, Yates, D and El-Roby, A. 2023. Investigating antiquities trafficking with generative pre-trained transformer (gpt)-3 enabled knowledge graphs: a case study [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]}. Open Res Europe, 3(100). DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.16003.1
    Back to article
  57. 57Graham, S, Yates, D, El-Roby, A, Brousseau, C, Ellens, J and McDermott, C. 2023. Relationship Prediction in a Knowledge Graph Embedding Model of the Illicit Antiquities Trade. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 11(2): 126–138. DOI: 10.1017/aap.2023.1
    Back to article
  58. 58Granovetter, M. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1: 201–233. DOI: 10.2307/202051
    Back to article
  59. 59Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510. DOI: 10.1086/228311
    Back to article
  60. 60Goh, KI, Khang, EOB and Kim, D. 2003. Betweennes centrality correlation in social networks. Physical Review E, 67(1). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.017101
    Back to article
  61. 61Gujral, G and Shivarama, J. 2023. Knowledge Graphs. Connecting Information over the Semantic Web. In: Patel, A and Debnath, NC (eds.), Data Science with Semantic Technologies. Deployment and Exploration. CRC Press, pp. 13–28. DOI: 10.1201/9781003310792-2
    Back to article
  62. 62Gur, I, Nachum, O, Miao, Y, Safdari, M, Huang, A, Chowdhery, A, Narang, S, Fiedel, N and Faust, A. 2023. Understanding html with large language models. ArXiv, 2210.03945. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.185
    Back to article
  63. 63Heafield, K, Kshirsagar, R and Barona, S, 2015. Language identification and modeling in specialized hardware. Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics and the 7th international joint conference on natural language processing. Beijing, China: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 384–389. DOI: 10.3115/v1/P15-2063
    Back to article
  64. 64Hixenbaugh, R. 2019. The Current State of the Antiquities Trade: An Art Dealer’s Perspective. International Journal of Cultural Property, 26(3): 227–238. DOI: 10.1017/S0940739119000183
    Back to article
  65. 65Hogan, A, Blomqvist, E, Cochez, M, D’amato, C, Melo, GD, Gutierrez, C, Kirrane, S, Gayo, JEL, Navigli, R, Neumaier, S, Ngomo, A-CN, Polleres, A, Rashid, SM, Rula, A, Schmelzeisen, L, Sequeda, J, Staab, S and Zimmermann, A. 2021. Knowledge graphs. ACM computing surveys, 54(4): 1–37. DOI: 10.1145/3447772
    Back to article
  66. 66Huang, S. 2022. Relationship Extraction with GPT-3, Medium, 7 April [online access at https://medium.com/geekculture/relationship-extraction-with-gpt-3-bb019dcf41e5 last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  67. 67Isman, F. 2009. I predatori dell’arte perduta. Il saccheggio dell’archeologia in Italia. Skira.
    Back to article
  68. 68Jaccard, P. 1912. The Distribution of the Flora in the Alpine Zone. New Phytologist, 11(2): 37–50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1912.tb05611.x
    Back to article
  69. 69Jackson, MO. 2010. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvcm4gh1
    Back to article
  70. 70Kanyou, C, Kouokam, E and Emvudu, Y. 2022. Structural network analysis: Correlation between centrality measures. CARI 2022. Yaoundé, Dschang, Cameroon. Available at https://hal.science/hal-03714191 [Last accessed 16 December 2023].
    Back to article
  71. 71Klie, J-C, Bugert, M, Boullosa, B, Eckart de Castilho, R and Gurevych, I. 2018. The INCEpTION platform: machine-assisted and knowledge-oriented interactive annotation. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on computational linguistics: system demonstrations. Santa Fe, New Mexico, pp. 5–9. Available at https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C18-2002 [Last accessed 16 December 2023].
    Back to article
  72. 72Krátký, M, Bača, R, Bednář, D, Walder, J, Dvorský, J and Chovanec, P. 2011. Index-based n-gram extraction from large document collections. 2011 sixth international conference on digital information management, Melbourne, Australia: IEEE, pp. 73–78. DOI: 10.1109/ICDIM.2011.6093324
    Back to article
  73. 73La Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Sezione II penale. 2011. Sentenza N. 2870/204 R.G. N.8028/2010, 7 dicembre 2011, sui ricorsi proposti da Jacques Albert Henry e Medici Giacomo.
    Back to article
  74. 74Lawler, A. 2005. Looted tablets pose scholar’s dilemma. Science, 309(5736): 869. DOI: 10.1126/science.309.5736.869
    Back to article
  75. 75Levine, JA. 2009. The Importance of Provenance Documentation in the Market for Ancient Art and Artifacts: The Future of the Market May Depend on Documenting the Past. DePaul J. Art, Tech. and Intell. Prop. L., 19(2). Available at https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol19/iss2/2 [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  76. 76Liew, CY, Labadin, J, Kok, WC and Eze, MO. 2023. A methodology framework for bipartite network modeling. Applied Network Science, 8(6): 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s41109-023-00533-y
    Back to article
  77. 77Lü, L and Zhou, T. 2011. Link prediction in complex networks: A survey. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390(6): 1150–1170. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2010.11.027
    Back to article
  78. 78Mackenzie, S. 2011. The Market as Criminal and Criminals in the Market: Reducing Opportunities for Organised Crime in the International Antiquities Market. In: Manacorda, S and Chappel, D (eds.), Crime in the Art and Antiquities World. New York: Springer New York, pp. 69–85. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7946-9_4
    Back to article
  79. 79Mackenzie, S, Brodie, N, Yates, D and Tsirogiannis, C. (eds.) 2019. Trafficking Culture. New Directions in Researching the Global Market in Illicit Antiquities: New Directions in Researching the Global Market in Illicit Antiquities. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315532219
    Back to article
  80. 80Mackenzie, S and Davis, T. 2014. Temple looting in Cambodia: Anatomy of a statue trafficking network. British Journal of Criminology, 45: 722–740. DOI: 10.26686/wgtn.12972851
    Back to article
  81. 81Mackenzie, S and Yates, D. 2020. Researching the Structure of the Illicit Antiquities Trade. In: Tompkins, A (ed.) Provenance Research Today. Principle, Practice, Problems. Lund Humphries, pp. 162–171.
    Back to article
  82. 82Marchi, E and Miguel, O. 1974. On the Structure of the Teaching-learning Interactive Process. International Journal of Game Theory, 3: 83–99. DOI: 10.1007/BF01766394
    Back to article
  83. 83Marsden, PV. 2005. Recent Developments in Network Measurement. In: Carrington, PJ, Scott, J and Wasserman, S (eds.), Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–30. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511811395.002
    Back to article
  84. 84Meirelles, I, Schich, M and Malina, R. 2014. Arts and Humanities, Complex Network Analysis of. In: Alhajii, R and Rokne, J (eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer New York, pp. 56–60. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8
    Back to article
  85. 85Montani, I, Honnibal, M, Honnibal, M, Landeghem, SV, Boyd, A, Peters, H, Samsonov, M, Geovedi, J, Regan, J, Orosz, G, McCann, PO, Kristiansen, SL, Altinok, D, Roman, Fiedler, L, Howard, G, Phatthiyaphaibun, W, Bot, E, Bozek, S, Amery, M, Tamura, Y, Böing, B, Tippa, PK, Vogelsang, LU, Balakrishnan, R, Mazaev, V, Dubbin, G, Fukumaru, J, Møllerhøj, JD and Patel, A. 2020. Explosion/spacy: v3.0.0rc: transformerbased pipelines, new training system, project templates, custom models, improved component api, type hints & lots more (v.v3.0.0rc1). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4091419
    Back to article
  86. 86Neo4j. 2023a. Neo4j cypher manual. Neo4j. Available at https://neo4j.com/docs/cypher-manual/current/introduction/ [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  87. 87Neo4j. 2023b. Neo4j desktop. Neo4j. Available at https://neo4j.com/docs/ [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  88. 88Newman, MEJ. 2003. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. SIAM Rev, 45(2): 167–256. DOI: 10.1137/S003614450342480
    Back to article
  89. 89Nguyen, Q, Nguyen, N-K-K, Cassi, D and Bellingeri, M. 2021. New Betweenness Centrality Node Attack Strategies for Real-World Complex Weighted Networks. Complexity, 2021(1677445). DOI: 10.1155/2021/1677445
    Back to article
  90. 90Oosterman, N. 2019. Regional Overviews of the Policing of Art Crime in the European Union. In: Hufnaget, S and Chappell, D (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 213–235. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-54405-6_10
    Back to article
  91. 91OpenAI. 2023. Gpt3.5. OpenAi. Available at https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5 [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  92. 92Palombo, C and Yates, D. 2023. Digital transit ports for the illicit trade in antiquities: the case of the ‘Afghan Genizah’. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38(1): 257–276. DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqac032
    Back to article
  93. 93Patias, P and Georgiadis, C. 2023. Fighting Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Goods: The ENIGMA Project. Remote Sensing, 15(10). DOI: 10.3390/rs15102579
    Back to article
  94. 94Pellegrini, M. 2023. Ritorno al futuro. The Journal of Cultural Heritage Crime, 01 January, [online access at https://www.journalchc.com/2023/02/01/ritorno-al-futuro/ last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  95. 95Pellegrini, M and Rizzo, D. 2021. The Italian Archaeological Heritage Abroad Between Agreements, Debates and Indifference. In: Traviglia, A, Milano, L, Tonghini, C and Giovanelli, R (eds.), Stolen Heritage. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Heritage in the EU and the MENA Region. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. DOI: 10.30687/978-88-6969-517-9/005
    Back to article
  96. 96Pellegrino, MA, Scarano, V and Spagnuolo, C. 2022. Move cultural heritage knowledge graphs in everyone’s pocket. Semantic Web, 14(2): 323–359. DOI: 10.3233/SW-223117
    Back to article
  97. 97Perry, BL, Pescosolido, BA and Borgatti, SP. 2018. Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316443255
    Back to article
  98. 98Phoenix Ancient Art. 2023a. Graeco Roman Bronze Statuette of Dionysus. Phoenix Ancient Art. Available at https://phoenixancientart.com/work-of-art/graeco-roman-bronze-statuette-of-dyonisus/ [Last accessed 10 July 2023].
    Back to article
  99. 99Phoenix Ancient Art. 2023b. Works of Art. Phoenix Ancient Art. Available at https://phoenixancientart.com/works-of-art/ [Last accessed 10 July 2023].
    Back to article
  100. 100Ramasco, JJ and Morris, SA. 2006. Social inertia in collaboration networks. Phisical reviewe, 73. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.016122
    Back to article
  101. 101Richardson, L. 2019. Beautiful Soup Documentation, 24 December. Available at https://readthedocs.org/projects/beautiful-soup-4/downloads/pdf/latest/ [Last accessed 10 June 2023].
    Back to article
  102. 102RITHMS. 2023. Research, Intelligence and technology for heritage and market security. European Commission. Available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101073932 [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  103. 103Rogers, F, Vere-Hodge, T and Dimmek, A. 2021. New York art dealers charged with fabricating provenance information and impersonating deceased collectors. Art At Law, 18 January. Available at https://www.artatlaw.com/new-york-art-dealers-charged-with-fabricating-provenance-information-and-impersonating-deceased-collectors [Last accessed 01 October 2023].
    Back to article
  104. 104Roodt, C. 2016. Stolen Art Databases and Due Diligence. In: 6th International Conference of Experts on the Return of Cultural Property, Gyeongju-si, Republic of Korea, 17–19 Oct 2016, pp. 215–225.
    Back to article
  105. 105Rush, L and Millington, LB. 2015. The Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Property: Saving the World’s Heritage. Heritage Matters. Boydell & Brewer. DOI: 10.1017/9781782045373
    Back to article
  106. 106Ryan, YC and Ahnert, SE. 2021. The Measure of the Archive: The Robustness of Network Analysis in Early Modern Correspondence. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 6(3): 57–88. DOI: 10.22148/001c.25943
    Back to article
  107. 107SeatGeek. 2023. TheFuzz. GitHub. Available at https://github.com/seatgeek/thefuzz [Last accessed 20 June 2023].
    Back to article
  108. 108Singhal, A. 2012. Introducing the Knowledge Graph: things, not strings, 16 May. Available at https://blog.google/products/search/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not/ [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  109. 109Smith, J. 2018. Toward “Big Data” in Museum Provenance. In: Schiuma, G and Carlucci, D (eds.), Big Data in the Arts and Humanities. Theory and Practice. CRC Press, pp. 41–50.
    Back to article
  110. 110Sotheby’s. 2019. The untold story of Stephen Junkunc III, one of the great Chinese art collectors, 20 August. Available at https://www.sothebys.com/en/articles/the-untold-story-of-stephen-junkunc-iii-one-of-the-great-chinese-art-collectors [Last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  111. 111The Value. 2018. Sotheby’s Withdrew Chinese Buddha Statue Which Could Be Lost Relic From Longmen Grottoes. The Value, 16 September [online access at https://en.thevalue.com/articles/stephen-junkunc-iii-sothebys-buddha-head-longmen-caves last accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  112. 112Trafficking Culture. 2023. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/ [Last Accessed 19 June 2023].
    Back to article
  113. 113Tribunale di Roma. 2004. Sentenza N. 40402/00 R.G. notizie di reato N.3553/01 R.G. G.I.P, 13 dicembre 2004, nei confronti di Medici Giacomo e Jacques Albert Henry.
    Back to article
  114. 114Trouillon, T, Welbl, J, Riedel, S, Gaussier, E and Bouchard, G, 2016. Complex embeddings for simple link prediction. In: Balcan, MF and Wienberger KQ (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on machine learning. New York, USA: PMLR, pp. 2071–2080. Available at https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/trouillon16.html [Last accessed 01 June 2023].
    Back to article
  115. 115Tsirogiannis, C. 2015a. ‘Due Diligence’? Christie’s antiquities auction, London, October 2015. Journal of Art Crime, 14: 27–37.
    Back to article
  116. 116Tsirogiannis, C. 2015b. Mapping the supply: usual suspects and identified antiquities in ‘reputable’ auction houses in 2013. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, 25: 107–144.
    Back to article
  117. 117Tsirogiannis, C. 2016. Something is Confidential in the State of Christie’s. In: Charney, N (ed.), Art Crime: Terrorists, Tomb Raiders, Forgers and Thieves. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 220–228. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-40757-3_17
    Back to article
  118. 118Tsirogiannis, C. 2021. The antiquities market we deserve: ‘Royal-Athena Galleries’ (1942–2020). Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia, 32: 147–175. DOI: 10.5617/acta.9024
    Back to article
  119. 119Tsirogiannis, C and Tsirogiannis, C. 2016. Uncovering the Hidden Routes: Algorithms for Identifying Paths and Missing Links in Trade Networks. In: Brughmans, T, Collar, A and Coward, F (eds.), The Connected Past: Challenges to Network Studies in Archaeology and History. Oxford, pp. 103–120. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198748519.003.0012
    Back to article
  120. 120U.S. Department of Commerce and National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2015. Secure Hash Standard (SHS). FIPRS PUB 184–0. Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.180-4
    Back to article
  121. 121UNESCO. 2021. Follow-up to the Recommendations of the Working Group established by the Eighth Session of the Subsidiary Committee on the Public Statements of the Director-General. In: Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 6th, Paris, 2021. UNESCO. Available at https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377431_eng [Last accessed 16 June 2023].
    Back to article
  122. 122UNESCO. 2022a. Presentation of the procedures to be followed for the restitution of cultural property. In: Subsidiary Committee of the Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 10th, Paris, 2022. UNESCO. Available at https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381462 [Last accessed 16 June 2023].
    Back to article
  123. 123UNESCO. 2022b. Report on the results of the consultations with the art market on the revisions to the International Code of Ethics for Dealers in Cultural Property. In: Subsidiary Committee of the Meeting of States Parties to the Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 10th, Paris, 2022. UNESCO. Available at https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381462 [Last accessed 16 June 2023].
    Back to article
  124. 124Wang, Y, Zhao, Y, Schutte, D, Bian, J and Zhang, R. 2021. Deep learning models in detection of dietary supplement adverse event signals from Twitter. Jamia open, 4(4). DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab081
    Back to article
  125. 125Watson, P and Todeschini, C. 2007. The Medici Conspiracy: The Illicit Journey of Looted Antiquities from Italy’s Tomb Raiders to the World’s Greates Museums. BBS Public Affairs.
    Back to article
  126. 126Wilkinson, MD, Dumontier, M, Aalbersberg, IJ, Appleton, G, Axton, M, Baak, A, Blomberg, N, Boiten, J-W, Silva Santos, LB. da, Bourne, PE, Bouwman, J, Brookes, AJ, Clark, T, Crosas, M, Dillo, I, Dumon, O, Edmunds, S, Evelo, CT, Finkers, R, Gonzalez-Beltran, A, Gray, AJ, Groth, P, Goble, C, Grethe, JS, Heringa, J, Hoen, P, Hooft, R, Kuhn, T, Kok, R, Kok, J, Lusher, SJ, Martone, ME, Mons, A, Packer, AL, Persson, B, Serra, PR, Roos, M, Schaik, R. van, Sansone, SA, Schultes, E, Sengstag, T, Slater, T, Strawn, G, Swertz, MA, Thompson, M, Lei, J. van der, Mulligen, E. van, Velterop, J, Waagmeester, A, Wittenburg, P, Wolstencroft, K, Zhao, J and Mons, B. 2016. The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci data, 160018(3). DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
    Back to article
  127. 127Williams, P and Godson, R. 2002. Anticipating organized and transnational crime. Crime, Law & Social Change, 37: 311–355. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016095317864
    Back to article
  128. 128Yates, D. 2015. Value and doubt: the persuasive power of ‘authenticity’ in the antiquities market. Parse, 2: 71–84.
    Back to article
  129. 129Yates, D. 2022. What auction catalogues analysis cannot tell us about the market. In: Fabiani, MD, Burmon, KM and Hufnagel, S (eds.), Global Perspectives on Cultural Property Crime. Routledge, pp. 43–60. DOI: 10.4324/9780367823801-6
    Back to article
  130. 130Yogev, T and Grund, T. 2012. Network Dynamics and Market Structure: The Case of Art Fairs. Sociological Focus, 45(1): 23–40. DOI: 10.1080/00380237.2012.630846
    Back to article
  131. 131Yu, S, Xu, C, Bai, X, Kuncheerathodi, R, Firmin, S and Xia, F. 2022. Deep Learning Meets Knowledge Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey. Research Square Platform. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2021923/v1
    Back to article
  132. 132Zhang, Z, Yu, B, Liu, T, Wang, Y and Guo, L. 2023. Learning structural co-occurrences for structured web data extraction in low-resource settings. Proceedings of the acm web conference 2023. Austin, TX, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1683–1692. DOI: 10.1145/3543507.3583387
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jcaa.130 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8362
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 26, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 16, 2023
Published on: Jan 15, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
antiquities,
looting,
Knowledge Graph,
network analysis,
SNA

© 2024 Riccardo Giovanelli, Arianna Traviglia, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 7 (2024): Issue 1Next article