Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mimics, Miscalls, and Misses in Pancreatic Imaging Cover

Mimics, Miscalls, and Misses in Pancreatic Imaging

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Figures & Tables

jbsr-109-1-4127-g1.png
Figure 1

Axial fat‑suppressed contrast‑enhanced T1‑WI shows an ill‑defined hypovascular pancreatic head mass (arrow) with dilatation of the CBD and pancreatic duct. The suspected diagnosis was PDAC.

jbsr-109-1-4127-g2.png
Figure 2

Coronal oblique thick‑slab MRCP image shows 2 MRCP signs that suggest the mass may be inflammatory in nature rather than neoplastic: (a) the “duct penetrating sign” (the pancreatic duct runs through the mass and is not interrupted), and (b) the “attraction sign” (the common bile duct is bent at a 90° angle and attracted to the mass). The final diagnosis was indeed inflammatory pseudomass.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.4127 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 30, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 5, 2025
Published on: Nov 13, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Koenraad J. Mortele, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.