Percutaneous Embolization for Painful Varicocele: An 8-Year Tertiary Centre Experience

Philippe Haroun; Salvatore Murgo; Georges Mjaess; Thierry Roumeguère; Fadi Tannouri

doi:10.5334/jbsr.3769

Percutaneous Embolization for Painful Varicocele: An 8-Year Tertiary Centre Experience

Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology

Volume 109 (2025): Issue 1

By: Philippe Haroun, Salvatore Murgo, Georges Mjaess, Thierry Roumeguère and Fadi Tannouri

Open Access

|Feb 2025

Abstract

Background: Varicocele is a common condition in men that can lead to several clinical problems. Treatment modalities include surgical and non‑surgical methods. There has been no randomized controlled trial proving the superiority of one treatment approach over another.

Materials and methods: We conducted an 8‑year retrospective analysis of varicocele embolization procedures at our department of Interventional Radiology. Demographic data, procedure details, procedure success and complications were collected. Telephone interviews were also conducted at the time of the study.

Results: A total of 182 interventions were performed. Median age of patients at presentation was 31 years (range, 12–71). Median follow‑up duration was 44.5 months (range, 3.4–106.9). Employed embolic agents were coils in 171/182 (91.94%) cases. Technical success rate was 88.15%. Ultrasonographic success was accomplished in 44.87% patients. Clinical success rate in patients referred for scrotal pain was 70.42%. Fluoroscopy time was 20.3 ± 14.9 min (mean ± SD), dose area product was 63.2 ± 50.5 Gy∙cm² (mean ± SD) and kinetic energy released per unit mass was 193.2 ± 173.6 (mean ± SD). Minor complications were encountered in 19/182 (10.45%) of the interventions.

Conclusions: Varicocele embolization was found to be an efficient and safe procedure for patients referred for scrotal pain. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to elaborate treatment algorithms in varicocele patients.

References

Ierardi AM, Biondetti P, Tsetis D, Del Giudice C, Uberoi R. CIRSE standards of practice on varicocele embolisation. CardioVascr Intervent Radiol. 2023 January;46(1):19–34. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03293-x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tiralongo F, Distefano G, Palermo M, et al. Liquid and solid embolic agents in gonadal veins. J Clin Med. 2021 April 9;10(8):1596. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081596.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jarow JP, Coburn M, Sigman M. Incidence of varicoceles in men with primary and secondary infertility. Urology. 1996 January 1;47(1):73–76. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80385-9.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jargiello T, Drelich‑Zbroja A, Falkowski A, Sojka M, Pyra K, Szczerbo‑Trojanowska M. Endovascular transcatheter embolization of recurrent postsurgical varicocele: Anatomic reasons for surgical failure. Acta Radiologica. 2015 January;56(1):63–99. DOI: 10.1177/0284185113519624.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sheehan M, Briody H, O’Neill DC, et al. Pain relief after varicocele embolization: The patient’s perspective. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 April;64(2):215–219. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13001.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Puche‐Sanz I, Flores‐Martín JF, Vázquez‐Alonso F, Pardo‐Moreno PL, Cózar‐Olmo JM. Primary treatment of painful varicocoele through percutaneous retrograde embolization with fibred coils. Andrology. 2014 September;2(5):716–720. DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00253.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
D’Andrea S, Barbonetti A, Castellini C, et al. Reproductive hormones and sperm parameters after varicocele repair: An observational study. Andrologia. 2018 December;50(10):e13118. DOI: 10.1111/and.13118.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Favard N, Moulin M, Fauque P, et al. Comparison of three different embolic materials for varicocele embolization: Retrospective study of tolerance, radiation and recurrence rate. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2015 December;5(6):806. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2015.10.10.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Locke JA, Noparast M, Afshar K. Treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr Urol. 2017 October 1;13(5):437–445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.07.008.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shridharani A, Owen RC, Elkelany OO, Kim ED. The significance of clinical practice guidelines on adult varicocele detection and management. Asian J Androl. 2016 March;18(2):269. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.172641.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970 August 1;21(8):606–609. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)37684-1.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sarteschi M. Lo studio del varicocele con eco‑color‑Doppler. G It Ultrason. 1993;4:43–49.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Halpern J, Mittal S, Pereira K, Bhatia S, Ramasamy R. Percutaneous embolization of varicocele: Technique, indications, relative contraindications, and complications. Asian J Androl. 2016 March;18(2):234. DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.169985.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prasivoravong J, Marcelli F, Lemaître L, et al. Beneficial effects of varicocele embolization on semen parameters. Basic Clin Androl. 2014 May 16;24(1):1–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna: Austria; 2022.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riede P, McCarthy E, Cary R, Boardman P, Tapping CR. Neck or groin access for varicocele embolisation: Is it important? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 December;60(6):728–732. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12495.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morag B, Rubinstein ZJ, Goldwasser B, Yerushalmi A, Lunnenfeld B. Percutaneous venography and occlusion in the management of spermatic varicoceles. Am J Roentgenol. 1984 September 1;143(3):635–640. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.143.3.635.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cantoro U, Polito M, Muzzonigro G. Reassessing the role of subclinical varicocele in infertile men with impaired semen quality: A prospective study. Urology. 2015 April 1;85(4):826–830. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.015.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nabi G, Asterlings S, Greene DR, Marsh RL. Percutaneous embolization of varicoceles: Outcomes and correlation of semen improvement with pregnancy. Urology. 2004 February 1;63(2):359–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.026.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shlansky‑Goldberg RD, VanArsdalen KN, Rutter CM, et al. Percutaneous varicocele embolization versus surgical ligation for the treatment of infertility: Changes in seminal parameters and pregnancy outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 September 1;8(5):759–767. DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70657-2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bilreiro C, Donato P, Costa JF, Agostinho A, Carvalheiro V, Caseiro‑Alves F. Varicocele embolization with glue and coils: A single center experience. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 July 1;98 (7–8):529–534. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.006.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
D’Andrea S, Barbonetti A, Castellini C, et al. Left spermatic vein reflux after varicocele repair predicts pregnancies and live births in subfertile couples. J Endocrinol Invest. 2019 October;42:1215–1221. DOI: 10.1007/s40618-019-01042-5.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kroese ACJ, de Lange NM, Collins J, Evers JL. Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 October 17;(10):CD000479. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000479.pub5.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Çayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: A meta‐analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009 January 2;30(1):33–40. DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.108.005967.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Punekar SV, Prem AR, Ridhorkar VR, Deshmukh HL, Kelkar AR. Post‐surgical recurrent varicocele: Efficacy of internal spermatic venography and steel‐coil embolization. Br J urol. 1996 January;77(1):124–128. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.82321.x.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ferguson JM, Gillespie IN, Chalmers N, Elton RA, Hargreave TB. Percutaneous varicocele embolization in the treatment of infertility. Br J Radiol. 1995 July;68(811):700–703. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-811-700.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tanahatoe SJ, Maas WM, Hompes PG, Lambalk CB. Influence of varicocele embolization on the choice of infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2004 June 1;81(6):1679–1683. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.044.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Çayan S, Orhan I, Akbay E, Kadıoğlu A. Systematic review of treatment methods for recurrent varicoceles to compare post‐treatment sperm parameters, pregnancy and complication rates. Andrologia. 2019 December;51(11):e13419. DOI: 10.1111/and.13419.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL. CIRSE quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: The CIRSE classification system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 August;40:1141–1146. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1703-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chalmers N, Hufton AP, Jackson RW, Conway B. Radiation risk estimation in varicocele embolization. Br J Radiol. 2000 March;73(867):293–297. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.867.10817046.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article