Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Complements Two-Dimensional Synthetic Mammography for Secondary Examination of Breast Cancer Cover

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Complements Two-Dimensional Synthetic Mammography for Secondary Examination of Breast Cancer

Open Access
|Nov 2021

References

  1. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013; 267(1): 4756. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12121373
  2. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA. 2014; 311(24): 24992507. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.6095
  3. Conant EF, Beaber EF, Sprague BL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography compared to digital mammography alone: A cohort study within the PROSPR consortium. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 156(1): 109116. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3695-1
  4. McDonald ES, Oustimov A, Weinstein SP, et al. Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography: Outcomes analysis from 3 years of breast cancer screening. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2(6): 737743. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5536
  5. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): A prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(7): 583589. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7
  6. McCarthy AM, Kontos D, Synnestvedt M, et al. Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106(11): dju316. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju316
  7. Skaane P. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast Cancer. 2017; 24(1): 3241. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-016-0699-y
  8. Houssami N. Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015; 12(4): 377379. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1028362
  9. Diekmann F, Bick U. Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Recent advances in digital mammography. Eur Radiol. 2007 Dec; 17(12): 30863092. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0715-x
  10. Svahn TM, Houssami N, Sechopoulos I, et al. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. Breast. 2015; 24(2): 9399. DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.002
  11. Gur D, Zuley ML, Anello MI, et al. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: An observer performance study. Acad Radiol. 2012; 19(2): 166171. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.003
  12. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, et al. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: Comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiology. 2014; 271(3): 655663. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131391
  13. Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, et al. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): A population-based prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(8): 11051113. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2
  14. Zuckerman SP, Conant EF, Keller BM, et al. Implementation of synthesized two-dimensional mammography in a population-based digital breast tomosynthesis screening program. Radiology. 2016; 281(3): 730736. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160366
  15. Aujero MP, Gavenonis SC, Benjamin R, et al. Clinical performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography combined with tomosynthesis in a large screening population. Radiology. 2017; 283(1): 7076. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162674
  16. Zuley ML, Guo B, Catullo VJ, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. Radiology. 2014; 271(3): 664671. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131530
  17. Choi JS, Han BK, Ko EY, et al. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2016; 26(8): 25382546. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4083-7
  18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1): 159174. DOI: 10.2307/2529310
  19. Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, et al. Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for depicting breast cancer subgroups in a UK retrospective reading study (TOMMY Trial). Radiology. 2015; 277(3): 697706. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142566
  20. Chikarmane SA, Yeh ED, Wang A, et al. Conspicuity of screen-detected malignancies on full field digital mammography vs. synthetic mammography. Acad Radiol. 2020; 27(6): 757763. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.008
  21. Zuckerman SP, Maidment ADA, Weinstein SP, et al. Imaging with synthesized 2D mammography: Differences, advantages, and pitfalls compared with digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 209(1): 222229. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.17476
  22. Spear GG. User experience with Clarity HD and Intelligent 2DTM technology. WP-00143-002, Hologic, Inc. 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2457 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 26, 2021
|
Accepted on: Aug 29, 2021
|
Published on: Nov 5, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Eiji Nakajima, Hiroko Tsunoda, Mariko Ookura, Kanako Ban, Yuko Kawaguchi, Mami Inagaki, Norihiko Ikeda, Kinya Furukawa, Takashi Ishikawa, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.