Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Complements Two-Dimensional Synthetic Mammography for Secondary Examination of Breast Cancer Cover

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Complements Two-Dimensional Synthetic Mammography for Secondary Examination of Breast Cancer

Open Access
|Nov 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of the breasts analyzed.

AGEBREAST COMPOSITIONCANCER (N = 52)HISTOLOGICALLY BENIGN (N = 28)
31–82 years
(median: 45 years)
A: 1 /B: 22 /C: 57 /D: 13
Dense breast 70 (75.3%)
DCIS 9 (17.3%)
IDC 43 (82.7%)
Fibroadenoma 7
Intraductal papilloma 2
Apocrine metaplasia 1
Hemangioma 1
Phyllodes tumor 1
Negative 16

[i] 186 breasts in 93 nationality women.

A. fatty, B. scattered fibroglandular densities, C. heterogeneously dense, D. extremely dense, DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; Negative, no indication of cancer.

jbsr-105-1-2457-g1.png
Figure 1

Two sequential modes were full-field digital mammography (FFDM) followed by FFDM/digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) (Group 1), and two-dimensional synthetic mammography (SM) followed by SM/DBT (Group 2). FFDM/DBT and SM/DBT were compared using Fisher’s exact test.

Table 2

Radiation dose for image acquisition.

RADIATION DOSE (MGY)MEDIAN
FFDMMLO0.69–6.29
CC0.70–6.181.47
DBT (=SM/DBT)MLO0.92–5.43
CC0.93–5.031.50
FFDM/DBTMLO1.64–11.72
CC1.63–11.212.95

[i] FFDM, full-field digital mammography; DBT, digital breast tomosynthesis; SM, two-dimensional synthetic mammography; MLO, mediolateral oblique; CC, craniocaudal.

Table 3

Inter-rater reliability with Cohen’s Kappa coefficients.

COMPARISONCOHEN’S KAPPA COEFFICIENTS
ReadersI and II reading FFDM/DBT0.780 (substantial agreement)
III and IV reading SM/DBT0.773 (substantial agreement)
InterpretationFFDM/DBT and SM/DBT0.745 (substantial agreement)

[i] FFDM, full-field digital mammography; DBT, digital breast tomosynthesis; SM, two-dimensional synthetic mammography.

Table 4

FFDM/DBT compared with SM/DBT for the detection of breast cancer.

INTERPRETATIONFISHER’S EXACT TEST
SensitivityFFDM/DBT38/52 (73.1%)
SM/DBT37/52 (71.2%)p = 1.000
SpecificityFFDM/DBT109/134 (81.3%)
SM/DBT111/134 (82.8%)p = 0.874
AccuracyFFDM/DBT147/186 (79.0%)
SM/DBT148/186 (79.6%)p = 1.000

[i] FFDM, full-field digital mammography; DBT, digital breast tomosynthesis; SM, two-dimensional synthetic mammography.

jbsr-105-1-2457-g2.jpg
Figure 2

An ill-defined mass was detected with subtle margins in the lower area of the full-field digital mammography (FFDM) mediolateral oblique (MLO) image (a) and the inner area of the FFDM craniocaudal (CC) image (b). The mass was rated unclear on the two-dimensional synthetic mammography (SM) MLO (c) and CC (d) images.

jbsr-105-1-2457-g3.jpg
Figure 3

Segmental amorphous microcalcifications were detected in the lower area of the full-field digital mammography (FFDM) mediolateral oblique (MLO) image (a-1 and a-2), and grouped amorphous microcalcifications with distortion were detected in the inner area of the FFDM craniocaudal (CC) image (b-1 and b-2). On the two-dimensional synthetic mammography (SM) images, there were diffuse calcifications in the left breast (c-1 and d-1), which were coarse (c-2 and d-2).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2457 | Journal eISSN: 2514-8281
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 26, 2021
|
Accepted on: Aug 29, 2021
|
Published on: Nov 5, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Eiji Nakajima, Hiroko Tsunoda, Mariko Ookura, Kanako Ban, Yuko Kawaguchi, Mami Inagaki, Norihiko Ikeda, Kinya Furukawa, Takashi Ishikawa, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.