Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Women and Ethnic Minority Candidates Face Dynamic Party Divergent Glass Cliff Conditions in French Elections Cover

Women and Ethnic Minority Candidates Face Dynamic Party Divergent Glass Cliff Conditions in French Elections

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. 1Abou-Chadi, T., & Orlowski, M. (2016). Moderate as necessary: The role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts. Journal of Politics, 78(3), 868881. DOI: 10.1086/685585
  2. 2Achin, C., Lévêque, S., Durovic, A., Lépinard, E., & Mazur, A. G. (2019). France: Parity sanctions and campaign financing in France: Increased numbers, little concrete gender transformation. In R. L. Muriaas, V. Wang, & R. Murray (Eds.), Gendered electoral financing (pp. 2754). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429284311-2
  3. 3Adams, S. M., Gupta, A., & Leeth, J. D. (2009). Are female executives over-represented in precarious leadership positions? British Journal of Management, 20(1), 112. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00549.x
  4. 4Aelenei, C., Assilaméhou-Kunz, Y., Iacoviello, V., & Kulich, C. (2020). The political glass cliff: When left-wing orientation leads to minority candidate choices for hard-to-win seats. European Review of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 100514. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2019.100514
  5. 5Afonso, A., & Rennwald, L. (2018). Social class and the changing welfare state agenda of radical right parties in Europe. In B. Manow, P. Schwander, & H. Palier (Eds.), Electoral politics and welfare state reforms (pp. 171198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198807971.003.0007
  6. 6Arbuckle, J. L. (2017). Amos (Version 25.0) [computer software]. IBM SPSS.
  7. 7Baron, D., Lauderdale, B. & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2023). A leader who sees the world as I do: Voters prefer candidates whose statements reveal matching social-psychological attitudes. Political Psychology, 44, 893916. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12891
  8. 8Bauer, N. M. (2015). Who stereotypes female candidates? Identifying individual differences in feminine stereotype reliance. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(1), 94110. DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2014.992794
  9. 9Bauer, N. M. (2018). Untangling the relationship between partisanship, gender stereotypes, and support for female candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 39(1), 125. DOI: 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268875
  10. 10Beaman, J., & Petts, A. (2020). Towards a global theory of colorblindness: Comparing colorblind racial ideology in France and the United States. Sociology Compass, 14(4), e12774. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12774
  11. 11Beauchemin, C., Hamel, C., & Simon, P. (Eds.) (2018). Trajectories and origins: Survey on the diversity of the French population. Springer International Publishing. https://www.ined.fr/fichier/s_rubrique/19558/working_paper_2010_168_population.diversity.france.en.pdf
  12. 12Bechtoldt, M. N., Bannier, C. E., & Rock, B. (2019). The glass cliff myth?–Evidence from Germany and the UK. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(3), 273297. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.004
  13. 13Bernard, M. (2017). 4. La banalisation de l’alternance dans la vie politique française au début du XXIe siècle: expression d’une maturité démocratique ou rejet de l’offre politique? Regards croisés sur l’économie, 1(20), 4756. DOI: 10.3917/rce.020.0047
  14. 14Bird, K. (2005). The political representation of visible minorities in electoral democracies: A comparison of France, Denmark, and Canada. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 11(4), 425465. DOI: 10.1080/13537110500379211
  15. 15Bird, K., Saalfeld, T., & Wüst, A. M. (2010). Ethnic diversity, political participation and representation: A theoretical framework. In K. Bird, T. Saalfeld, & A. M. Wüst (Eds.), The political representation of immigrants and minorities (pp. 2142). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203843604
  16. 16Blais, A., & Loewen, P. J. (2009). The French electoral system and its effects. West European Politics, 32(2), 345359. DOI: 10.1080/01402380802670651
  17. 17Bloemraad, I., & Schönwälder, K. (2013). Immigrant and ethnic minority representation in Europe: Conceptual challenges and theoretical approaches. West European Politics, 36(3), 564579. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2013.773724
  18. 18Brewer, M. B., & Crano, W. D. (2000). Research design and issues of validity. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, (pp. 316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. 19Bruckmüller, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 433451. DOI: 10.1348/014466609X466594
  20. 20Bruni, T. (12 July 2022). Le Communautarisme Blanc progresse à l’Assemblée Nationale [blog]. Mediapart. Retrieved from https://blogs.mediapart.fr/thiaba-bruni/blog/120722/le-communautarisme-blanc-progresse-lassemblee-nationale
  21. 21Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315757421
  22. 22Campbell, R., & Erzeel, S. (2018). Exploring gender differences in support for rightist parties: The role of party and gender ideology. Politics & Gender, 14(1), 80105. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X17000599
  23. 23Carroll, S. J., & Sanbonmatsu, K. (2013). More women can run: Gender and pathways to the state legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199322428.001.0001
  24. 24Carsenat, E. (2021). NamsorAPI_Lic_v0.0.07 [web application]. https://v2.namsor.com/NamSorAPIv2
  25. 25Casas-Arce, P., & Saiz, A. (2015). Women and power: Unpopular, unwilling, or held back? Journal of Political Economy, 123(3), 641669. DOI: 10.1086/680686
  26. 26Centre de Données Socio-Politiques, CDSP. (2020). Elections législatives 1958–2012. Sciences Po. Retrieved from https://cdsp.sciences-po.fr/fr/le-cdsp/resultats-electoraux/
  27. 27Cheah, J. H., Amaro, S., & Roldán, J. L. (2023). Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113539. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113539
  28. 28Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64(3), 170180. DOI: 10.1037/a0014564
  29. 29Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 3967. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310388419
  30. 30Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2013). Glass cliffs and organizational saviors: Barriers to minority leadership in work organizations? Social Problems, 60(2), 168187. DOI: 10.1525/sp.2013.60.2.168
  31. 31Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2014). Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO? Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 10801089. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2161
  32. 32Crano, W., & Siegel, J. (2017). Social signals and persuasion. In J. Burgoon, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, M. Pantic, & A. Vinciarelli (Eds.), Social Signal Processing (pp. 97109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316676202.009
  33. 33Crowley, J. E. (2004). When tokens matter. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29(1), 109136. DOI: 10.3162/036298004X201113
  34. 34Development Engagement Lab. (2023). Sondage: Ce que les gouvernements devraient faire pour faire progresser l’égalité femmes-hommes dans le monde. Focus 2030. Retrieved from https://focus2030.org/Sondage-ce-que-les-gouvernements-devraient-faire-pour-faire-progresser-l
  35. 35Dolan, K. (2004). Voting for women: How the public evaluates women candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195180824.003.0003
  36. 36Dolan, K., & Lynch, T. (2014). It takes a survey: Understanding gender stereotypes, abstract attitudes, and voting for women candidates. American Politics Research, 42(4), 656676. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X13503034
  37. 37Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
  38. 38Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301315. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000494
  39. 39Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology, (pp. 458476). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249222
  40. 40Esteve-Volart, B., & Bagues, M. (2012). Are women pawns in the political game? Evidence from elections to the Spanish Senate. Journal of Public Economics, 96(3–4), 387399. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.12.004
  41. 41European Network Against Racism. (2019). ENAR’s election analysis: Ethnic minorities in the new European parliament, 19952025. Retrieved from https://www.enar-eu.org/enar-s-election-analysis-ethnic-minorities-in-the-new-european-parliament-2019/
  42. 42Eurostat. (2019). Women in EU parliament and governments. European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/EDN-20190306-2
  43. 43Firzli, M. N. J. (2018). La République En Marche: Macron’s resolute walk towards radical centrism. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3167188
  44. 44Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 7783. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  45. 45Gartzia, L., & Ryan, M. (2021). The subtlety of gender stereotypes in the workplace: Current and future directions for research on the glass cliff. In C. Tileagă, M. Augoustinos, & K. Durrheim (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Discrimination, Prejudice and Stereotyping (pp. 5872). Oxford: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429274558-5
  46. 46Gertzog, I. N., & Simard, M. M. (1981). Women and “hopeless” congressional candidacies. American Politics Quarterly, 9(4), 449466. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X8100900404
  47. 47Gervais, S. J., & Hillard, A. L. (2011). A role congruity perspective on prejudice toward Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11(1), 221240. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01263.x
  48. 48Hayes, D. (2005). Candidate qualities through a partisan lens: A theory of trait ownership. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 908923. DOI: 10.2307/3647705
  49. 49Hayes, D. (2011). When gender and party collide: Stereotyping in candidate trait attribution. Politics & Gender, 7(2), 133165. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X11000055
  50. 50Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E., III. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 258304. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X11000055
  51. 51Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 119147. DOI: 10.2307/2111526
  52. 52Imai, K., Keele, L., Tingley, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2011). Unpacking the black box of causality: Learning about causal mechanisms from experimental and observational studies. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 765789. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000414
  53. 53Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). (2022). Women in parliament in 2021. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/reports/2022-03/women-in-parliament-in-2021
  54. 54Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?” Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 6172. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
  55. 55Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2013). Political ideologies and their social psychological functions. In M. Freeden & M. Stears (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political ideologies (pp. 232250). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.001.0001
  56. 56Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339375. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
  57. 57Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule--Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383393. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383
  58. 58Juenke, E. G., & Shah, P. (2016). Demand and supply: Racial and ethnic minority candidates in White districts. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 1(1), 6090. DOI: 10.1017/rep.2015.2
  59. 59Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965990. DOI: 10.1086/226425
  60. 60Karl, K. L., & Ryan, T. J. (2016). When are stereotypes about Black candidates applied? An experimental test. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 1(2), 253279. DOI: 10.1017/rep.2015.6
  61. 61King, D. C., & Matland, R. E. (2003). Sex and the grand old party: An experimental investigation of the effect of candidate sex on support for a Republican candidate. American Politics Research, 31(6), 595612. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X03255286
  62. 62Koch, J. W. (2000). Do citizens apply gender stereotypes to infer candidates’ ideological orientations? The Journal of Politics, 62(2), 414429. DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00019
  63. 63Krupnikov, Y., & Bauer, N. M. (2014). The relationship between campaign negativity, gender and campaign context. Political Behavior, 36, 167188. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9221-9
  64. 64Kulich, C., Gartzia, L., Komarraju, M., & Aelenei, C. (2021). Contextualizing the think crisis-think female stereotype in explaining the glass cliff: Gendered traits, gender, and type of crisis. PloS one, 16(3), e0246576. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246576
  65. 65Kulich, C., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Iacoviello, V., Faniko, K., & Ryan, M. K. (2015). Signaling change during a crisis: Refining conditions for the glass cliff. Journal of experimental social psychology, 61, 96103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.002
  66. 66Kulich, C., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2014). The political glass cliff: Understanding how seat selection contributes to the underperformance of ethnic minority candidates. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 8495. DOI: 10.1177/1065912913495740
  67. 67Le Corre, M. (2022). Seulement 37% de femmes élues députées: pourquoi la parité recule-t-elle à l’Assemblée nationale? Madmoizelle, France. Retrieved from https://www.madmoizelle.com/seulement-37-de-femmes-elues-deputees-pourquoi-la-parite-recule-t-elle-a-lassemblee-nationale-1399097
  68. 68Lépinard, E., & Lieber, M. (2015). The policy on gender equality in France: In-depth analysis. Report PE510.024 for the European Parliament: Women’s Rights & Gender Equality Committee (FEMM). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/510024/IPOL_IDA(2015)510024_EN.pdf
  69. 69Mackey, J. D., Roth, P. L., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & McFarland, L. A. (2019). A meta-analysis of gender proportionality effects on job performance. Group & Organization Management, 44(3), 578610. DOI: 10.1177/1059601117730519
  70. 70Masclet, O. (2017). Sociologie de la diversité et des discriminations. Armand Colin. DOI: 10.3917/arco.sclet.2017.01
  71. 71Mason, L. (2015, May). Distinguishing the polarizing effects of ideology as identity, issue positions, and issue-based identity. Paper presented at the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics Conference on Political Polarization: Media and Communication Influences, Princeton University.
  72. 72Mateos, P., Longley, P. A., & Sullivan, D. O. (2011). Ethnicity and population structure in personal naming networks. PLoS ONE, 6(9). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022943
  73. 73Matson, M., & Fine, T. S. (2006). Gender, ethnicity, and ballot information: Ballot cues in low-information elections. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 6(1), 4972. DOI: 10.1177/153244000600600103
  74. 74Mazur, A. G., Lépinard, E., Durovic, A., Achin, C., & Lévêque, S. (2020). Party penalties for parity: less than meets the eye. French Politics, 18(1), 2849. DOI: 10.1057/s41253-020-00111-z
  75. 75McAvay, H., & Safi, M. (2023). Class versus race? Multidimensional inequality and intersectional identities in France. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46(15), 31673198. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2023.2193259
  76. 76McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895918. DOI: 10.1177/106591299805100403
  77. 77McDermott, M. L. (2016). Masculinity, femininity, and American political behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190462802.001.0001
  78. 78Morgenroth, T., Kirby, T. A., Ryan, M. K., & Sudkämper, A. (2020). The who, when, and why of the glass cliff phenomenon: A meta-analysis of appointments to precarious leadership positions. Psychological Bulletin, 146(9), 797. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000234
  79. 79Murray, R. (2007). How parties evaluate compulsory quotas: A study of the implementation of the ‘parity’ law in France. Parliamentary Affairs, 60(4), 568584. DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsm039
  80. 80Murray, R. (2016). The political representation of ethnic minority women in France. Parliamentary Affairs, 69, 586602. DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsv064
  81. 81Murray, R., Krook, M. L., & Opello, K. A. (2012). Why are gender quotas adopted? Party pragmatism and parity in France. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 529543. DOI: 10.1177/1065912911414590
  82. 82Owens, T. J., Robinson, D. T., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2010). Three faces of identity. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 477499. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134725
  83. 83Pew Research Center. (2019). European public opinion three decades after the fall of communism. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/gender-equality-2/
  84. 84Plateforme ouverte des données publiques françaises. (2020). Elections législatives des 11 et 18 juin 2017 – Résultats du 1er tour. Etalab. Retrieved from https://www.data.gouv.fr/fr/datasets/elections-legislatives-des-11-et-18-juin-2017-resultats-du-1er-tour/
  85. 85Ramstetter, L., & Habersack, F. (2019). Do women make a difference? Analysing environmental attitudes and actions of Members of the European Parliament. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 10631084. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2019.1609156
  86. 86Rast, D., & Hogg, M. (2016). Leadership in the face of crisis and uncertainty. In J. Storey, J. Hartley, J. L. Denis, P. Hart, & D. Ulrich (Eds.), The Routledge companion to leadership (pp. 7486). New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315739854-15
  87. 87R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.Rproject.org/
  88. 88Reinwald, M., Zaia, J., & Kunze, F. (2023). Shine bright like a diamond: When signaling creates glass cliffs for female executives. Journal of Management, 1, 32. DOI: 10.1177/01492063211067518
  89. 89Rink, F., Ryan, M. K., & Stoker, J. I. (2013). Social resources at a time of crisis: How gender stereotypes inform gendered leader evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 381392. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.1954
  90. 90Robinson, S. L., Kulich, C., Aelenei, C., & Iacoviello, V. (2021). Political Ideology Modifies the Effect of Glass Cliff Candidacies on Election Outcomes for Women in American State Legislative Races (2011-2016). Psychology of women quarterly, 45(2), 155177. DOI: 10.1177/0361684321992046
  91. 91Ross, G. (2019). The French enigma: Macron, centrist reformism, and the labor movement. New Labor Forum, 28(1), 7683. DOI: 10.1177/1095796018817044
  92. 92Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165179. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
  93. 93Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 8190. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x
  94. 94Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549572. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.24351856
  95. 95Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2011). Thinkcrisis–think female: Glass cliffs and contextual variation in the think manager–think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 470484. DOI: 10.1037/a0022133
  96. 96Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., Kulich, C., & Atkins, C. (2007). Opting out or pushed off the edge? The glass cliff and the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 266279. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00007.x
  97. 97Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., Kulich, C., & Wilson-Kovacs, M. D. (2009). The stress of working on the edge: Implications of glass cliffs for both women and organizations. In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 153169). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/11863-007
  98. 98Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Kulich, C. (2010). Politics and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 5664. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01541.x
  99. 99Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K. (2016). Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 446455. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008
  100. 100Safi, M. (2013). Les inégalités ethno-raciales. la Découverte. DOI: 10.3917/dec.safi.2013.01
  101. 101Sanbonmatsu, K., & Dolan, K. (2009). Do gender stereotypes transcend party? Political Research Quarterly, 62(3), 485494. DOI: 10.1177/1065912908322416
  102. 102Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 675688. DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00235
  103. 103Sénécat, A. (2017). “Comment “Le Monde” a enquêté sur les candidats de La République en marche”. Les Décodeurs, Le Monde, ISSN 1950–6244. Retrieved from https://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2017/06/06/comment-le-monde-a-enquete-sur-les-candidats-de-la-republique-en-marche_5139679_4355770.html
  104. 104Simon, P. (2008). Les statistiques, les sciences sociales françaises et les rapports sociaux ethniques et de “race”. Revue Française de Sociologie, 49(1), 153162. DOI: 10.3917/rfs.491.0153
  105. 105Simon, P. (2015). The choice of ignorance: The debate on ethnic and racial statistics in France. In P. Simon, V. Piché, & A. A. Gagnon (Eds.), Social Statistics and Ethnic Diversity: Cross-National Perspectives in Classifications and Identity Politics (pp. 6587). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20095-8
  106. 106Simon, P., & Tiberj, V. (2018). Registers of identity. The relationships of immigrants and their descendants to French national identity. In C. Beauchemin, C. Hamel, & P. Simon (Eds.), Trajectories and origins: Survey on the diversity of the French population (pp. 277305). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-76638-6_11
  107. 107Somer-Topcu, Z. (2015). Everything to everyone: The electoral consequences of the broad-appeal strategy in Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 841854. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12165
  108. 108Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In P. Diamond & M. Rothschild (Eds.), Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281306). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50025-5
  109. 109Stokes, S. C. (2014). A defense of observational research. In D. L. Teele (Ed.), Field experiments and their critics: Essays on the uses and abuses of experimentation in the social sciences (pp. 3357). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. DOI: 10.12987/9780300199307-004
  110. 110Sundström, A., & Stockemer, D. (2022). Political party characteristics and women’s representation: the case of the European Parliament. Representation, 58(1), 119137. DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2021.1898458
  111. 111Thomas, M., & Bodet, M. A. (2013). Sacrificial lambs, women candidates, and district competitiveness in Canada. Electoral Studies, 32(1), 153166. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.001
  112. 112Webb, P., & Childs, S. (2012). Gender politics and conservatism: The view from the British Conservative Party grassroots. Government and Opposition, 47(1), 2148. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2011.01355.x
  113. 113Winter, N. J. G. (2010). Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior, 32(4), 587618. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z
  114. 114Zhou, X., & Yamamoto, T. (2023). Tracing causal paths from experimental and observational data. The Journal of Politics, 85(1), 250265. DOI: 10.1086/720310
  115. 115Zingher, J. N., & Farrer, B. (2016). The electoral effects of the descriptive representation of ethnic minority groups in Australia and the UK. Party Politics, 22(6), 691704. DOI: 10.1177/1354068814556895
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.770 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 17, 2022
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2024
Published on: Jun 7, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Sarah L. Robinson, Clara Kulich, Yvette Assilaméhou-Kunz, Cristina Aelenei, Vincenzo Iacoviello, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.