Worldviews and Values as Bases for Political Orientations

Girts Dimdins; Henry Montgomery; Maria Sandgren

doi:10.5334/irsp.741

Abstract

This study used structural equation modelling to test how political orientations (self-reported placement on socially liberal-conservative and economically left-right continuums) could be predicted from basic worldviews (a generally humanistic vs. normativistic orientation) and basic personal values (concepts pertaining to desirable end states or behaviors) in conjunction with core political values (normative principles about functioning of society) in a population sample from Sweden. In general, political orientation was much more strongly predicted by social-focus values (conservation and self-transcendence), and only weakly predicted by personal-focus values (self-enhancement and openness to change). The results also showed that basic personal values in conjunction with core political values mediated the relationship between basic worldviews and political orientation.

References

1Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal ideology and the justification of inequality in capitalist societies: Why social and economic dimensions of ideology are intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 49–88. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12310
Back to article
2Beattie, P., Chen, R., & Bettache, K. (2021). When left is right and right is left: The psychological correlates of political ideology in China. Political Psychology, 43(3), 457–488. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12776
Back to article
3Braithwaite, V. (1998). The value orientations underlying liberalism-conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 575–589. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00111-1
Back to article
4Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Mediational role of values in linking personality traits to political orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 82–94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01274.x
Back to article
5Carlson, R., & Levy, N. (1970). Self, values and affects: Derivations from Tomkin’s Polarity Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 338–345. DOI: 10.1037/h0029846
Back to article
6Choma, B. L., Hafer, C. L., Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., & Busseri, M. A. (2012). Political liberalism and political conservatism: Functionally independent? Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 431–436. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.012
Back to article
7Cichocka, A., & Dhont, K. (2018). The personality bases of political ideology and behavior. In The SAGE Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences: Volume III: Applications of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 323–351). DOI: 10.4135/9781526451248.n14
Back to article
8Cochrane, C. (2010). Left/right ideology and Canadian politics. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 43(3), 583–605. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40983510
Back to article
9Cochrane, C. (2011). The asymmetrical structure of left/right disagreement: Left-wing coherence and right-wing fragmentation in comparative party policy. Party Politics, 19(1), 104–121. DOI: 10.1177/1354068811398057
Back to article
10Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 1–74. DOI: 10.1080/08913810608443650
Back to article
11de St. Aubin, E. (1996). Personal ideology polarity: Its emotional foundation and its manifestation in individual value systems, religiosity, political orientation, and assumptions concerning human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 152–165. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.152
Back to article
12Dimdins, G., Sandgren, M., & Montgomery, H. (2016). Psychological variables underlying political orientations in an old and a new democracy: A comparative study between Sweden and Latvia. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57, 437–445. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12314
Back to article
13Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337–358. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12055
Back to article
14Hermida, R. (2015). The problem of allowing correlated errors in structural equation modeling: Concerns and considerations. Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 3, 5–17. DOI: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=417198
Back to article
15Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Back to article
16Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651
Back to article
17Jost, J. T. (2009). Elective affinities: On the psychological bases of left-right differences. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 129–141. DOI: 10.1080/10478400903028599
Back to article
18Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
Back to article
19Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Back to article
20Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031–1051. DOI: 10.1037/a0036170
Back to article
21Mieriņa., I. (2018). Beyond “left” and “right”? The role of culture and context in young people’s understanding of ideology. H. Pilkington, G. Pollock, & R. Franc (Eds.), Understanding Youth Participation across Europe (pp. 37–66). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59007-7_3
Back to article
22Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Altine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
Back to article
23Nilsson, A. (2014). Humanistic and normativistic worldviews: Distinct and hierarchically structured. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 135–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.037
Back to article
24Nilsson, A., & Jost, J. T. (2020). Rediscovering Tomkins’ polarity theory: Humanism, normativism, and the bipolar structure of left-right ideology in the U.S. and Sweden. PLoS ONE, 15(7), e0236627. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236627
Back to article
25Nilsson, A., & Strupp-Levitsky, M. (2016). Humanistic and normativistic methaphysics, epistemology, and conative orientation: Two fundamental systems of meaning. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 85–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.050
Back to article
26Nilsson, A., Montgomery, H., Dimdins, G., Sandgren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Taleny, A. (2020). Beyond ‘Liberals’ and ‘Conservatives’: Complexity in ideology, moral intuitions, and worldview among Swedish voters. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 448–469. DOI: 10.1002/per.2249
Back to article
27Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32(4), 537–561. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00828.x
Back to article
28Prosser, C. (2016). Dimensionality, ideology and party positions towards European integration. West European Politics, 39(4), 731–754. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1116199
Back to article
29Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. Academic Press. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Back to article
30Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
Back to article
31Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva, (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally – Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169–203). London: Sage.
Back to article
32Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x
Back to article
33Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Bain, P., Bianchi, G., Caprara, M. G., et al. (2014). Basic personal values underlie and give coherence to political values: A cross national study in 15 countries. Political Behavior, 36, 899–930. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9255-z
Back to article
34Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Rischer, R., Beilerlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. DOI: 10.1037/a0029393
Back to article
35Tomkins, S. S. (1965). Affect and the psychology of knowledge. In S. S. Tomkins, & C. E. Izard (Eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Personality. (pp. 72–97). New York, NY, US: Springer.
Back to article
36Tomkins, S. S. (1995). Ideology and affect. E. V. Demos (Ed.), Exploring Affect: The Selected Writings of Silvan S. Tomkins (pp. 109–167). University of Cambridge Press.
Back to article
37Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434–447. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.434
Back to article
38Von Collani, G., & Grumm, M. (2009). On the dimensional structure of personality, ideological beliefs, social attitudes, and personal values. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, 107–119. DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.30.2.107
Back to article
39Zmigrod, L. (2022). A psychology of ideology: Unpacking the psychological structure of ideological thinking. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1072–1092. DOI: 10.1177/17456916211044140
Back to article

Worldviews and Values as Bases for Political Orientations

Abstract

Paradigm

My account