Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of the Self on the Big Two and their Facets: Exploring the Model and its Nomological Network Cover

Evaluation of the Self on the Big Two and their Facets: Exploring the Model and its Nomological Network

By: Andrea E. Abele  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. Abele, A. E. (2014). Pursuit of communal values in an agentic manner: A way to happiness? Frontiers of Psychology, 5, 1320. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01320
  2. Abele, A. E., & Hauke, N. (2019). Comparing the facets of the Big Two in global evaluation of self versus other people. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 969982. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2639
  3. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751763. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
  4. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content. A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195255. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
  5. Abele, A., Bruckmüller, S., & Uchronski, M. (2009). Establishing agency, communion and valence norms for German trait names. University of Erlangen-Nürnberg: Unpublished research report.
  6. Abele, A., & Wojciszke, W., Eds. (2018). Agency and Communion in Social Psychology. Series: Current Issues in Social Psychology. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203703663
  7. Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Special issue: Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 10631224. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.574
  8. Abele, A. E., Ellemers, N., Fiske, S., Koch, A., & Yzerbyt, V. (2021). Navigating the social world: Shared horizontal and vertical dimensions for evaluating self, individuals, and groups. Psychological Review, 128, 290314. DOI: 10.1037/rev0000262
  9. Abele, A., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness – Communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1810. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  11. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  12. Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., & Goodwin, G. (2021). The primacy of Morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 64. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.03.001
  13. Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347356. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000176
  14. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349354. DOI: 10.1037/h0047358
  15. Ellemers, N. (2017). Morality and the regulation of social behavior: Groups as moral anchors. Milton Park. UK. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315661322
  16. Elphinstone, B., & Whitehead, R. (2019). The benefits of being less fixated on self and stuff: Nonattachment, reduced insecurity, and reduced materialism. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 202208. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.019
  17. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39(2), 175191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
  18. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 7783. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  19. Diener, E. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67, 590597. DOI: 10.1037/a0029541
  20. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 175. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  21. Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self awareness. Cambridge, Mass.: Academic Press.
  22. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M., & Buss, A. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522527. DOI: 10.1037/h0076760
  23. Filipp, S. H., & Freudenberg, E. (1989). Fragebogen zur Erfassung dispositionaler Selbst-aufmerksamkeit. Göttingen: Hogrefe. [Assessment of dispositional self-consciousness]
  24. Hauke, N., & Abele, A. E. (2019). Two faces of the self: Actor-self perspective and observer-self perspective are differentially related to agency versus communion. Self and Identity, 19(3), 346368. DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2019.1584582
  25. Hauke, N., & Abele, A.E. (2020). Communion and self-esteem: No relationship? A closer look at the association of agency and communion with different components of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 160, 109957. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109957
  26. Holden, R. R., & Passey, J. (2009). Social Desirability. In M. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Individual differences in social behavior (pp. 441454). New York: Guilford Press.
  27. Janke, S., & Glöckner-Rist, A. (2014). Deutsche Version der Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). https://zis.gesis.org/skala/Janke-Gl%C3%B6ckner-Rist-Deutsche-Version-der-Satisfaction-with-Life-Scale-(SWLS). [German version of the satisfaction with life scale]. DOI: 10.6102/zis147
  28. Koch, A., Imhoff, R., Dotsch, R., Unkelbach, C., & Alves, H. (2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative–progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 675709. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000046
  29. Koch, A., Yzerbyt, V., Abele, A., Ellemers, N., & Fiske, S. (2021). Social evaluation: Comparing models across interpersonal, intragroup, intergroup, several-group, and many-group contexts. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 168. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.11.001
  30. Louvet, E., Cambon, L., Milhabet, I., & Rohmer, O. (2019). The relationship between social status and the components of agency. Journal of Social Psychology, 159, 3045. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1441795
  31. Murphy, R., Ackermann, K., & Handgraaf, M. (2011). Measuring social value orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 771781. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1804189
  32. Paulhus, D. (2018). The Big Two Dimensions of DesirAbility. In Abele, A. & Wojciszke, W. (Eds.). Agency and Communion in Social Psychology (pp 7989). Series: Current Issues in Social Psychology. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203703663-7
  33. Paulhus, D. L. & Trapnell, P. D. (2008). Self-Presentation of Personality: An Agency-Communion Framework. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology: Theory and research (3rd ed.). (pp. 492517). New York, NY US: Guilford Press.
  34. Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 6179. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.61
  35. Schuler, H., & Prochaska, M. (2001). Leistungsmotivationsinventar: Dimensionen berufsbezogener Leistungsorientierung. Göttingen: Hogrefe. [Achievement motivation inventory: Dimensions of job-related achievement motivation]
  36. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (Hrsg.) (1999). Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen. Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der Wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen. Berlin: Freie Universität. http://www.fu-berlin.de/gesund/ [Scales for measuring teacher-and pupils’ characteristics. Documentation of the psychometric measures used in the project of self-efficient schools]
  37. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131142. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
  38. Stöber, J. (1999). Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Development and first findings on reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 45, 173177. DOI: 10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173
  39. Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2008). The role of valence in the perception of agency and communion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 10731082. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.525
  40. Wojciszke, B., Baryla, W., Parzuchowski, M., Szymkow, A., & Abele, A. E. (2011). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 617627. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.791
  41. Ybarra, O., Chan, E., Park, H., Burnstein, E., Monin, B., & Stanik, C. (2008). Life’s recurring challenges and the fundamental dimensions: An integration and its implications for cultural differences and similarities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 10831092. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.559
  42. Yzerbyt, V. (2018). The Dimensional Compensation Model: Reality and Strategic Constraints on Warmth and Competence in Intergroup Perceptions. In Abele, A. & Wojciszke, W. (Eds.) Agency and Communion in Social Psychology (pp 126141). Series: Current Issues in Social Psychology. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203703663-11
  43. Yzerbyt, V., Provost, V., & Corneille, O. (2005). Not competent but warm… really? Compensatory stereotypes in the French-speaking world. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(3), 291308. DOI: 10.1177/1368430205053944
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.688 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2022
|
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2022
|
Published on: Oct 3, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Andrea E. Abele, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.