Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of the Self on the Big Two and their Facets: Exploring the Model and its Nomological Network Cover

Evaluation of the Self on the Big Two and their Facets: Exploring the Model and its Nomological Network

By: Andrea E. Abele  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Descriptive Statistics, Correlations, and Regression of Social Desirable Responding on the Dimensions (a) and on the Facets (b) (Study 1).

(a)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONREGRESSION
12
Social desirable respondingy0.58 (0.18).30***.37***R = .42F(2,111) = 12.12, p < .001
1 Vertical3.67 (0.49).27***β = .22p = .01
2 Horizontal4.25 (0.53)β = .31p < .001
(b)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONREGRESSION
1234
Social desirable responding.32***.18*.27**.38***R = .45F(4,109) = 7.02, p < .001
1 A3.45 (0.57).43***.12.22β = .25p = .009
2 Ab3.89 (0.49).22**.24**β = –.02p = .85
3 F4.22 (0.60).55***β = .08p = .42
4 M4.27 (0.60)β = .28p = .008

[i] Notes. V = Vertical; H = Horizontal; A = Assertiveness; Ab = Ability; F = Friendliness; M = Morality; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Table 2

Valence Ratings and Correlations with Self-Evaluation (a) Big Two and (b) Facets (Study 2).

(a)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONS WITH SELF-EVALUATION
VH
Valence items V5.30 (0.59).31***–.10
Valence items H6.21 (0.53)–.10.30***
Self-rating V5.08 (0.74)
Self-rating H5.81 (0.70)
(b)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONS WITH SELF-EVALUATION
AAbFM
Valence items A4.95 (0.65).40***.06.10.10
Valence items Ab5.66 (0.75).14.18*.05.13
Valence items F6.05 (0.61)–.07–.05.41***.20*
Valence items M6.38 (0.59)–.15–.10.15.09
Self-rating A4.89 (1.00)
Self-rating Ab5.27 (0.81)
Self-rating F5.75 (0.90)
Self-rating M5.86 (0.80)

[i] Notes. V = Vertical; H = Horizontal; A = Assertiveness; Ab = Ability; F = Friendliness; M = Morality; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Table 3

Descriptive Statistics, Correlations, and Regressions of Self Efficacy on the Big Two (a) and the Facets (b) (Study 2).

(a)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONSREGRESSION
12
Self-efficacy3.41 (0.65).60***.10R = .60F(2,113) = 31.23, p < .001
1 V.36***β = .60p < .001
2 Hβ = .03p = .70
(b)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONSREGRESSION
1234
Self-efficacy3.41 (0.64).62***.31***.04.15R = .64F(4,111) = 19.08, p = .001
1 A.27**.05.05β = .58p < .001
2 Ab–.04.23**β = .13p = .12
3 F.48***β = –.03p = .69
4 Mβ = .10p = .24

[i] Notes. V = Vertical; H = Horizontal; A = Assertiveness; Ab = Ability; F = Friendliness; M = Morality; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Table 4

Descriptive Statistics, Correlations, and Regression of Life Satisfaction on the Big Two (a) and on the Facets (b) (Study 2).

(a)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONSREGRESSION
12
Life satisfaction3.49 (0.69).27**.11R = .28F(2,122) = 5.00, p = .008
1 Vertical.13β = .26p = .004
2 Horizontalβ = .08p = .40
(b)
VARIABLECORRELATIONSREGRESSION
1234
Life satisfaction.28**.15.22*–.05R = .41F(4,120) = 6.01, p = .01
1 Aβ = .23p = .01
2 Abβ = .14p = .12
3 Fβ= .33p = .001
4 Mβ = –.25p = .01

[i] Notes. V = Vertical; H = Horizontal; A = Assertiveness; Ab = Ability; F = Friendliness; M = Morality; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Table 5

Descriptive Statistics, Correlations, and Regressions of Dominance- and Status-Orientation on the Big Two (a) and the Facets (b) (Study 3).

(a)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONSREGRESSION
12
Dominance Orientation4.87 (1.12).48***.16R = .47F(2,119) = 17.52, p < .001
1 V5.05 (0.87).38***β = .49p < .001
2 H5.80 (0.80)β = –.02p = .79
(b)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONSREGRESSION
1234
Dominance Orientation.51***.36***.16.13R = .51F(4,117) = 1.33, p < .001
1 A4.76 (1.02).72***.19*.30***β = .52p < .001
2 Ab5.35 (0.86).31***.52***β = –.02p = .90
3 F5.74 (0.93).62***β = .04p = .66
4 M5.85 (0.85)β = –.01p = .92

[i] Notes. V = Vertical; H = Horizontal; A = Assertiveness; Ab = Ability; F = Friendliness; M = Morality; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Table 6

Descriptive Statistics, Correlations, and Regressions of Social Value Orientation on the Big Two (a) and the Facets (b) (Study 3).

(a)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONSREGRESSION
12
Social Value Orientation0.56 (0.21)–.07.20*R = .26F(2,119) = 4.23, p < .02
1 V.36***β = –.18p = .07
2 Hβ = .27p = .006
(b)
VARIABLECORRELATIONSREGRESSION
1234
Social Value Orientation–.10–.03.19*.17*R = .26F(4,117) = 2.08, p = .09
1 Aβ = –.11p = .38
2 Abβ = –.08p = .61
3 Fβ = .16p = .25
4 Mβ = .15p = .20

[i] Notes. V = Vertical; H = Horizontal; A = Assertiveness; Ab = Ability; F = Friendliness; M = Morality; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

Table 7

Descriptive Statistics, Correlations, and Regressions of Self-Consciousness on the Big Two (a) and the Facets (b) (Study 3).

(a)
VARIABLEM (SD)CORRELATIONSREGRESSION
12
Public Self-consciousness3.50 (0.54)–.12–.05R = .12F < 1
1 Vβ = –.12p = .22
2 Hβ = .01p = .94
Private self-consciousness3.57 (0.55).25**.19*R = .27F(2, 119) = 4.63, p = .01
1 Vβ = .21p = .03
2 Hβ = .11p = .26
(b)
VARIABLECORRELATIONSREGRESSION
1234
Public Self-consciousness–.16–.06–.04–.06R = .20F(4,117) = 1.09, p = .54
1 Aβ = –.26p = .055
2 Abβ = .16p = .28
3 Fβ = .–.07p = .60
4 Mβ = .00p = .98
Private self-consciousness.18.30**–.04–.06R = .31F(4,117) = 3.05, p = .02
1 Aβ = –.07p = .58
2 Abβ = .32p < .03
3 Fβ = .05p = .73
4 Mβ = .03p = .82

[i] Notes. V = Vertical; H = Horizontal; A = Assertiveness; Ab = Ability; F = Friendliness; M = Morality; * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.688 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2022
|
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2022
|
Published on: Oct 3, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Andrea E. Abele, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.