References
- 1Age UK. (2019). More harm than good – why more isn’t always better with older people’s medicines.
https://www.ageuk.org.uk/notts/about-us/news/articles/2019/more-harm-than-good/ - 2Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- 3Allen, N., Angers, H., Bhogal, A., Ching, C., Davididan, S., Digpal, S., … Hughes, L. (2015). British MPs on British PMs: Parliamentary evaluations of prime ministerial success. Politics, 35(2), 111–127. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9256.12074
- 4Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(2), 219–235. DOI: 10.1177/1088868309341564
- 5Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4), 511–536. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.324
- 6Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x
- 7Bettencourt, B. A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychology Bulletin, 127(4), 520–542. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520
- 8Biernat, M., & Crandall, C. S. (1996). Creating stereotypes and capturing their content. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(6), 867–898. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199611)26:6<;867::AID-EJSP792>3.0.CO;2-V
- 9Bird, J., & Swabey, P. (2014). Decisive action: How businesses make decisions and how they could do it better. London: Economic Intelligence Unit.
- 10Boucher, J., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). The Pollyanna hypothesis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(1), 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80002-2
- 11Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message receipients’ power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1040–1053. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1040
- 12Bruckmüller, S., Reese, G., & Martiny, S. (2017). Is higher inequality less legitimate? Depends on how you frame it! British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(4), 766–781. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12202
- 13Campbell, D. T. (1967). Stereotypes and the perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 22(10), 817–829. DOI: 10.1037/h0025079
- 14Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. DOI: 10.1037/a0015854
- 15Cho, M., & Keltner, D. (2020). Power, approach, and inhibition: Empirical advances of a theory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 196–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.013
- 16Claxton, G., Owen, D., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Hubris in leadership: A peril of unbridled intuition? Leadership, 11(1), 57–78. DOI: 10.1177/1742715013511482
- 17Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.23463682
- 18Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 238–257. DOI: 10.1177/1088868309352251
- 19Fast, N. J., Sivanathan, N., Mayer, N. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Power and overconfident decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(2), 249–260. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.009
- 20Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- 21Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
- 22Fiske, S. T. (2010).
Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination . In S. T. Fiske, G. Linzey, & D. T. Gilbert (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 941–982). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002026 - 23Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1970).
Linguistic structure and focus of comparison in processing of comparative sentences . In: G. B. Flores D’Arcais & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.). Advances in psycholinguistics (pp. 307–321). Amsterdam: North-Holland. - 24Ford, T. E., & Stangor, C. (1992). The role of diagnosticity in stereotype formation: Perceiving group means and variances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 356–367. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.356
- 25Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453–466. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
- 26Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, R. R., Mello, J., & Hansen, J. (2019). Relative to what? Dynamic updating of fluency standards and between-participants illusions of truth. Acta Psychologica, 195, 71–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.02.006
- 27Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
- 28Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S. T., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3(3), 227–256. DOI: 10.1177/1368430200003003001
- 29Grable, J., Lytton, R., & O’Neill, B. (2004). Projection bias and financial risk tolerance. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(3), 142–147. DOI: 10.1207/s15427579jpfm0503_2
- 30Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (2011). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 107–141. DOI: 10.1177/1088868310367640
- 31Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 697–721. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
- 32Guinote, A. (2017). How power affects people: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353–381. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153
- 33Guinote, A. (2010a).
The situated focus theory of power . In A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds), The social psychology of power (pp. 141–173). New York, NY: Guilford Press. - 34Guinote, A. (2010b). In touch with your feelings: Power increases reliance on bodily information. Social Cognition, 28(1), 110–121. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.110
- 35Guinote, A., Brown, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Minority status decreases sense of control and increases interpretive processing. Social Cognition, 24(2), 170–187. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.169
- 36Guinote, A., & Lammers, J. (2017).
Accentuation of tending and befriending among the powerless . In M. Bukowski, I. Fritsche, A. Guinote, & M. Kofta (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 185–202). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. - 37Guinote, A., & Phillips, A. (2010). Power can increase stereotyping: Evidence from managers and subordinates in the hotel industry. Social Psychology, 41(1), 3–9. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000002
- 38Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2013).
Fluency in context: Discrepancy makes processing experiences informative . In C. Unkelbach and R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 70–84). Psychology Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780203078938 - 39Hegarty, P., & Pratto, F. (2001). The effect of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 723–735. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.723
- 40Hilbig, B. E. (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 983–986. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
- 41Hilbig, B. E. (2012). How framing statistical statements affects subjective veracity: Validation and application of a multinominal model for judgments of truth. Cognition, 125(1), 37–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.009
- 42Hohle, S. M., & Teigen, K. H. (2017). More than 50% or less than 70% chance: Pragmatic implications of single-bound probability estimates. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(1), 138–150. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2052
- 43Holyoak, K. J., Dumais, S. T., & Moyer, R. S. (1979). Semantic association effects in a mental comparison task. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 303–313. DOI: 10.3758/BF03197604
- 44Hoorens, V., & Bruckmüller, S. (2015). Less is more? Think again! A cognitive fluency-based more-less asymmetry in comparative communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(5), 753–766. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000032
- 45Jacoby, J., & Sassenberg, K. (2011). Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 180–190. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.762
- 46Johnson, C. S., & Lammers, J. (2012). The powerful disregard social comparison information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 329–334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.010
- 47Jouffre, S. (2015). Power modulates over-reliance on false cardiac arousal when judging target attractiveness: The powerful are more centered on their own false arousal than the powerless. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 116–126. DOI: 10.1177/0146167214559718
- 48Judd, C. M., McClelland, G. H., & Ryan, C. S. (2011). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203892053
- 49Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive predictions: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Sciences, 12, 313–327.
- 50Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265–284. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
- 51Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1997). Defending the status quo: Power and bias in social conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(10), 1066–1077. DOI: 10.1177/01461672972310007
- 52Khatri, N., & Ng, H. A. (2000). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. Human Relations, 53(1), 57–86. DOI: 10.1177/0018726700531004
- 53Lammers, J., & Burgmer, P. (2017). Power increases anchoring effects on judgment. Social Cognition, 35(1), 40–53. DOI: 10.1521/soco.2017.35.1.40
- 54Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 776–779. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.008
- 55Lammers, J., Stoker, J. I., & Stapel, D. A. (2009). Differentiating social and personal power: Opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychological Science, 20(2), 1543–1548. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x
- 56Leach, S., & Weick, M. (2018). From grumpy to cheerful (and back): How power impacts mood in and across different contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 107–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.004
- 57Leach, S., & Weick, M. (2020). When smiles (and frowns) speak words: Does power impact the correspondence between self-reported affect and facial expressions? British Journal of Psychology, 111(4), 683–701. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12433
- 58Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1093–1096. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.025
- 59Matthews, W. J., & Dylman, A. S. (2014). The language of magnitude comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 510–520. DOI: 10.1037/a0034143
- 60Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247. DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
- 61Mussweiler, T., & Epstude, K. (2009). Relatively fast! Efficiency advantages of comparative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 1–21. DOI: 10.1037/a0014374
- 62Ng, S.-H. (1980). The social psychology of power. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- 63Overbeck, J. R., & Droutman, V. (2013). One for all: Social power increases self-anchoring of traits, attitudes, and emotions. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1466–1476. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612474671
- 64Petkanopoulou, K., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Willis, G. B., & van Kleef, G. A. (2019). Powerless people don’t yell but tell: The effects of social power on direct and indirect expression of anger. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 533–547. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2521
- 65Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781–799. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781
- 66Reyna, V. F., Chick, C. F.,Corbin, J. C., & Hsia, A. N. (2014). Developmental reversals in risky decision making: Intelligence agents show larger decision biases than college students. Psychological Science, 25(1), 76–84. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613497022
- 67Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 68Schmid Mast, M., Jonas, K., & Hall, J. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 835–850. DOI: 10.1037/a0016234
- 69Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2014). Where could we stand if I had…? How social power impacts counterfactual thinking after failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 51–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.005
- 70Schubert, T. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbos of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.1
- 71Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348. DOI: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2
- 72Schwarz, N. (2012).
Feelings-as-information-theory . In P. A. M., Van Lange, A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249215.n15 - 73Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195–202. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195
- 74Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 317–338. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.317
- 75Segui, J., & Fourment, M.-C. (1979). Présupposition et inférence: Une étude des structures comparatives. L’Année Psychologique, 79(1), 105–121. DOI: 10.3406/psy.1979.1354
- 76Silva, R. R., & Unkelbach, C. (2021). Fluent processing leads to positive stimulus evaluations even when base rates suggest negative evaluations. Consciousness and Cognition, 96, 103238. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2021.103238
- 77Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21-word solution. Dialogue, 26(2), 4–7. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2160588
- 78Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112(4), 881–911. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.881
- 79Topolinski, S. (2011). A process model of intuition. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 274–315. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2011.640078
- 80Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Gaining insight into the “Aha” experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(6), 402–405. DOI: 10.1177/0963721410388803
- 81Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (Eds.). (2013). The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- 82Vlaev, I., Chater, N., & Stewart, N. (2007). Financial prospect relativity: Context effects in financial decision-making under risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(3), 373–304. DOI: 10.1002/bdm.555
- 83Vlaev, I., Chater, N., Stewart, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2011). Does the brain calculate value? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 546–554. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.008
- 84Wänke, M., & Hansen, J. (2015). Relative processing fluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 195–199. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414561766
- 85Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2008). When subjective experiences matter: Power increases reliance on the ease of retrieval. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 956–970. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.956
- 86Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2010). How long will it take? Power biases time predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 595–604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.005
- 87Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(6), 716–732. DOI: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2
- 88Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003).
The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment . In J. Murch & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 205–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: 10.4324/9781410606853-14 - 89Woltin, K.-A., & Guinote, A. (2015). I can, I do, and so I like: From power to action and aesthetic preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(6), 1124–1136. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000095
- 90Zelmer, J. (2016). De-prescribing: When less is more in healthcare. Healthcare Policy/Politiques de Santé, 11(3), 6–10. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2016.24540