References
- 1Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
- 2Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
- 3Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2011). Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 242–266. DOI: 10.1037/a0021840
- 4Damer, E., Webb, T. L., & Crisp, R. J. (2018). Diversity may help the uninterested: Evidence that exposure to counter-stereotypes promotes cognitive reflection for people low (but not high) in need for cognition. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. DOI: 10.1177/1368430218811250
- 5Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010).
Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview . In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 3–28). SAGE Publications Inc. DOI: 10.4135/9781446200919.n1 - 6Esteban, J., & Schneider, G. (2008). Polarization and conflict: Theoretical and empirical issues. Journal of Peace Research, 45(2), 131–141. DOI: 10.1177/0022343307087168
- 7Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2007). G * Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- 8Fayant, M. P., Sigall, H., Lemonnier, A., Retsin, E., & Alexopoulos, T. (2017). On the limitations of manipulation checks: An obstacle toward cumulative science. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 125–130. DOI: 10.5334/irsp.102
- 9Foddy, M., Platow, M. J., & Yamagishi, T. (2009). Group-based trust in strangers: The role of stereotypes and expectations. Psychological Science, 20(4), 419–422. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02312.x
- 10Hewstone, M. (2015). Consequences of diversity for social cohesion and prejudice: The missing dimension of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 71(2), 417–438. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12120
- 11Hutchison, P., Jetten, J., Christian, J., & Haycraft, E. (2006). Protecting threatened identity: Sticking with the group by emphasizing ingroup heterogeneity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1620–1632. DOI: 10.1177/0146167206292235
- 12Kleiman, T., & Enisman, M. (2018). The conflict mindset: How internal conflicts affect self-regulation. Scoial and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(5),
e12387 . DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12387 - 13Kleiman, T., Hassin, R. R., & Trope, Y. (2014). The control-freak mind: Stereotypical biases are eliminated following conflict-activated cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 498–503. DOI: 10.1037/a0033047
- 14Lakens, D. (2014). Calculating confidence intervals for Cohen’s d and eta-squared using SPSS, R, and Stata [Web log message]. Retrieved from
http://daniellakens.blogspot.de/2014/06/calculating-confidence-intervals-for.html . - 15Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
- 16Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). Irwin.
- 17Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
- 18Noor, M., Brown, R. J., & Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 481–495. DOI: 10.1348/014466607X238751
- 19Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_01
- 20Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1998.926617
- 21Sassenberg, K., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Don’t stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 506–514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.002
- 22Sigall, H., & Mills, J. (1998). Measures of independent variables and mediators are useful in social psychology experiments: But are they necessary? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 218–226. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_5
- 23Steffens, N. K., Gocłowska, M. A., Cruwys, T., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). How multiple social identities are related to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(2), 188–203. DOI: 10.1177/0146167215619875
- 24Steiger, J. H. (2004). Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 164–182. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.2.164
- 25Steinel, W., Utz, S., & Koning, L. (2010). The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: Revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 85–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.07.001
- 26Stern, C., & Kleiman, T. (2015). Know thy outgroup: Promoting accurate judgments of political attitude differences through a conflict mindset. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 950–958. DOI: 10.1177/1948550615596209
- 27van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
- 28Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
- 29Vosgerau, J., Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). 99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(9), 1628–1639. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000663
- 30Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31–47. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00507-3
- 31Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701728302
- 32Winter, K., Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2021). A matter of flexibility: Changing outgroup attitudes through messages with negations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 956–976. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000305
- 33Xin, S., Xin, Z., & Lin, C. (2016). Effects of trustors’ social identity complexity on interpersonal and intergroup trust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 428–440. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2156