References
- 1Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142. DOI: 10.1006/game.1995.1027
- 2Billiet, J., Maddens, B., & Frognier, A. P. (2006). Does Belgium (still) exist? Differences in political culture between Flemings and Walloons. West European Politics, 29, 912–932. DOI: 10.1080/01402380600968802
- 3De Visscher, C., & Laborderie, V. (2013). Belgique: Stop ou encore? Entre fédéralisme, confédéralisme et séparatisme. Politique Étrangère, 4, 23–35. DOI: 10.3917/pe.134.0023
- 4Desmet, P. T., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2011). Trust recovery following voluntary or forced financial compensations in the trust game: The role of trait forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 267–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.027
- 5Dhami, M. K. (2012). Offer and acceptance of apology in victim-offender mediation. Critical Criminology, 20, 45–60. DOI: 10.1007/s10612-011-9149-5
- 6Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
- 7Fehr, R., Gelfand, M. J., & Nag, M. (2010). The road to forgiveness: a meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914. DOI: 10.1037/a0019993
- 8Haesevoets, T., Reinders Folmer, C. P., De Cremer, D., & Van Hiel, A. (2013). Money isn’t all that matters: The use of financial compensation and apologies to preserve relationships in the aftermath of distributive harm. Journal of Economic Psychology, 35, 95–107. DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.02.003
- 9Hareli, S., & Eisikovits, Z. (2006). The role of communicating social emotions accompanying apologies in forgiveness. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 189–197. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-006-9025-x
- 10Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045
- 11Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- 12Hornsey, M. J., Okimoto, T. G., & Wenzel, M. (2017). The appraisal gap: Why victim and transgressor groups disagree on the need for a collective apology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 135–147. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2279
- 13Hornsey, M. J., & Wohl, M. J. (2013). We are sorry: Intergroup apologies and their tenuous link with intergroup forgiveness. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 1–31. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2013.822206
- 14Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1998).
Differential distrust of groups and individuals . In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior (pp. 75–107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. - 15Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., Finkel, E. J., Brazil, D. M., Cecil, C. L., & Montoya, M. R. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95–111. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.95
- 16Lerner, M. J. (1991).
Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement . In: R. Vermunt & H. Steensma (Eds), Social Justice in Human Relations (Vol. 1, pp. 13–32). New York: Plenum Press. - 17Leunissen, J. M., De Cremer, D., Reinders Folmer, C. P., & Van Dijke, M. (2013). The apology mismatch: Asymmetries between victim’s need for apologies and perpetrator’s willingness to apologize. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 315–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.005
- 18Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_06
- 19Okimoto, T. G., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). Is compensation enough? Relational concerns in responding to unintended inequity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 399–420. DOI: 10.1177/1368430207078701
- 20Pemberton, M. B., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1996). Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 953–966. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.953
- 21Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474–487. DOI: 10.1177/0146167207311283
- 22Pinter, B., Insko, C. A., Wildschut, T., Kirchner, J. L., Montoya, R. M., & Wolf, S. T. (2007). Reduction of interindividual–intergroup discontinuity: The role of leader accountability and proneness to guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 250–265. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.250
- 23Reinders Folmer, C. P., Klapwijk, A., De Cremer, D., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2012). One for all: What representing a group may do to us. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1047–1056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.009
- 24Reinders Folmer, C. P., Wildschut, T., De Cremer, D., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2019). Coping with noise in social dilemmas: Group representatives fare worse than individuals because they lack trust in others’ benign intentions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 200–214. DOI: 10.1177/1368430217722036
- 25Reuchamps, M., Boerjan, H., Niessen, C., & Randour, F. (2021). More or less regional autonomy? A qualitative analysis of citizen arguments towards (de)centralization in Belgium. Comparative European Politics, 1–23. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-020-00234-1
- 26Rimé, B., Bouchat, P., Klein, O., & Licata, L. (2015). When collective memories of victimhood fade: Generational evolution of intergroup attitudes and political aspirations in Belgium. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 515–532. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2104
- 27Rychlowska, M., Van Der Schalk, J., Gratch, J., Breitinger, E., & Manstead, A. S. (2019). Beyond actions: Reparatory effects of regret in intergroup trust games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 74–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.006
- 28Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Drigotas, S. M., Wieselquist, J., Pemberton, M., & Cox, C. (1995). The role of identifiability in the reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 553–574. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1995.1025
- 29Schopler, J., Insko, C. A., Wieselquist, J., Pemberton, M. B., Witcher, B., Kozar, R., … Wildschut, T. (2001). When groups are more competitive than individuals: The domain of the discontinuity effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 632–644. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.632
- 30Schumann, K. (2014). An affirmed self and a better apology: The effect of self-affirmation on transgressors’ responses to victims. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 89–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.013
- 31Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2015). The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes: The perspective of the needs-based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 477–483. DOI: 10.1177/0963721415601625
- 32Shnabel, N., Nadler, A., Ullrich, J., Dovidio, J. F., & Carmi, D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030. DOI: 10.1177/0146167209336610
- 33Shore, D. M., Rychlowska, M., van der Schalk, J., Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. (2019). Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games. Emotion, 19, 605. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000463
- 34Slocum, D., Allan, A., & Allan, M. M. (2011). An emerging theory of apology. Australian Journal of Psychology, 63, 83–92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00013.x
- 35Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea Culpa: A Sociology of Apology and Reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- 36Van Assche, J., Bostyn, D., De keersmaecker, J., Dardenne, B., & Hansenne, M. (2017). Intergroup reconciliation between Flemings and Walloons: The predictive value of cognitive style, authoritarian ideology, and intergroup emotions. Psychologica Belgica, 57, 132–155. DOI: 10.5334/pb.333
- 37Verhaegen, S., Dupuy, C., & Van Ingelgom, V. (2021). Experiencing and supporting institutional regionalization in Belgium: A normative and interpretive policy feedback perspective. Comparative European Politics, 1–28. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-020-00235-0
- 38Wenzel, M. (2004).
A social categorisation approach to distributive justice . In: W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 219–257). Hove: Psychology Press. DOI: 10.1080/10463280440000035 - 39Wenzel, M., Lawrence-Wood, E., Okimoto, T. G., & Hornsey, M. J. (2018). A long time coming: Delays in collective apologies and their effects on sincerity and forgiveness. Political Psychology, 39, 649–666. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12421
- 40Wildschut, T., & Insko, C. A. (2006).
A paradox of individual and group morality: Social psychology as empirical philosophy . In P. A. M. van Lange (Ed.), Bridging Social Psychology: The Benefits of Transdisciplinary Approaches (pp. 377–384). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. - 41Wildschut, T., & Insko, C. A. (2007). Explanations of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 175–211. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701676543
- 42Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Gaertner, L. (2002). Intergroup social influence and intergroup competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 975–992. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.975
- 43Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Pinter, B. (2004).
The perception of outgroup threat: Content and activation of the outgroup schema . In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The Psychology of Group Perception (pp. 335–359). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. - 44Wildschut, T., Insko, C. A., & Pinter, B. (2007). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a joint function of acting as a group and interacting with a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 390–399. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.374
- 45Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual–intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698–722. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.698
- 46Wohl, M. J., Hornsey, M. J., & Bennett, S. H. (2012). Why group apologies succeed and fail: Intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 306–322. DOI: 10.1037/a0024838