Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Legitimating Discrimination Against Students with Disability in School: The Role of Justifications of Discriminatory Behavior Cover

Legitimating Discrimination Against Students with Disability in School: The Role of Justifications of Discriminatory Behavior

International Review of Social Psychology
Volume 34 (2021): Issue 1
By: Jennifer Bastart,  Odile Rohmer and  Maria-Antoneta Popa-Roch  
Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. 1Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the Structure of Interpersonal Closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
    Back to article
  2. 2Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European journal of special needs education, 17(2), 129–147. DOI: 10.1080/08856250210129056
    Back to article
  3. 3Baker, E. T., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1995). Synthesis of research: The effects of inclusion on learning. The Inclusive School, 52(4), 33–35.
    Back to article
  4. 4Bastart, J., Branscombe, N. R., Sarda, E., & Delmas, F. (in press). Sexism and racism perception: It depends on who does it and why. European Journal of Social Psychology.
    Back to article
  5. 5Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Rusconi, P., Cherubini, P., & Yzerbyt, V. (2012). You want to give a good impression? Be honest! Moral traits dominate group impression formation. The British Journal of Social Psychology/The British Psychological Society, 51(1), 149–166. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02011.x
    Back to article
  6. 6Brauer, M., & McClelland, G. (2005). L’utilisation des contrastes dans l’analyse des données: Comment tester les hypothèses spécifiques dans la recherche en psychologie? L’année Psychologique, 105(2), 273–305. DOI: 10.3406/psy.2005.29696
    Back to article
  7. 7Bukvic, Z. (2014). Teachers competency for inclusive education. European Journal and Behavioural Science. DOI: 10.15405/ejsbs.141
    Back to article
  8. 8Cambon, L., & Yzerbyt, V. (2017). Compensation is for real: Evidence from existing groups in the context of actual relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(6), 745–756. DOI: 10.1177/1368430215625782
    Back to article
  9. 9Cambon, L., & Yzerbyt, V. (2018). An investigation into the mechanisms of compensation for high- and low-status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77(November 2017), 24–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.002
    Back to article
  10. 10Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45(5), 347–356. DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000176
    Back to article
  11. 11Cary, L. A., Chasteen, A. L., Remedios, J., & Pruchno, R. (2017). The ambivalent ageism scale: Developing and validating a scale to measure benevolent and hostile ageism. Gerontologist, 57(2), e27–e36. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnw118
    Back to article
  12. 12Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 414–446. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
    Back to article
  13. 13Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. T. (2002). Social Norms and the Expression and Suppression of Prejudice: The Struggle for Internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 359–378. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.359
    Back to article
  14. 14Czopp, A. M., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 532–544. DOI: 10.1177/0146167202250923
    Back to article
  15. 15De Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2010). Attitudes of parents towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education (October 2014), 37–41. DOI: 10.1080/08856251003658694
    Back to article
  16. 16Dickter, C. L., & Newton, V. A. (2013). To confront or not to confront: Non-targets’ evaluations of and responses to racist comments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E262–E275. DOI: 10.1111/jasp.12022
    Back to article
  17. 17Ebersold, S., Plaisance, E., & Zander, C. (2016). Inclusive school for students in handicap. Accessibility, academic achievement and individual pathways. National School System Evaluation Board.
    Back to article
  18. 18Eidelman, S., & Biernat, M. (2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 602–609. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00042-8
    Back to article
  19. 19Eidelman, S., Silvia, P. J., & Biernat, M. (2006). Responding to Deviance: Target Exclusion and Differential Devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1153–1164. DOI: 10.1177/0146167206288720
    Back to article
  20. 20Fiske, S. T. (2018). Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 67–73. DOI: 10.1177/0963721417738825
    Back to article
  21. 21Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
    Back to article
  22. 22Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
    Back to article
  23. 23Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., … & López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(5), 763. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.763
    Back to article
  24. 24Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/Ability: Theorising disablism and ableism. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203366974
    Back to article
  25. 25Hayes, A. F. (2014). SPSS, SAS, and Mplus macros and code. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/spss-sas-and-mplus-macros-and-code.html.
    Back to article
  26. 26Hernandez, A.-L., Redersdorff, S., & Martinot, D. (2015). Minimizing a sexist act and derogating the female victim: To be or not to be in the same boat? L’Année Psychologique, 115(03), 327–350. DOI: 10.4074/S000350331400013X
    Back to article
  27. 27Iyer, A., Jetten, J., Branscombe, N. R., Jackson, S., & Youngberg, C. (2014). The difficulty of recognizing less obvious forms of group-based discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(5), 577–589. DOI: 10.1177/1368430214522139
    Back to article
  28. 28Jetten, J., Iyer, A., Branscombe, N. R., & Zhang, A. (2013). How the disadvantaged appraise group-based exclusion: The path from legitimacy to illegitimacy. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 194–224. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2013.840977
    Back to article
  29. 29Kappen, D. M., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The effects of reasons given for ineligibility on perceived gender discrimination and feelings of injustice. The British Journal of Social Psychology/The British Psychological Society, 40(Pt 2), 295–313. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11446232. DOI: 10.1348/014466601164768
    Back to article
  30. 30Klonis, S. C., Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2005). Internal and external motivation to respond without sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(9), 1237–1249. DOI: 10.1177/0146167205275304
    Back to article
  31. 31Loi nº2005-102 du 11 février 2005 pour l’égalité des droits et des chances, la participation et la citoyenneté des personnes handicapées.
    Back to article
  32. 32Lüke, T., & Grosche, M. (2018). What do I think about inclusive education? It depends on who is asking. Experimental evidence for a social desirability bias in attitudes towards inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(1), 38–53. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1348548
    Back to article
  33. 33Major, B., & Sawyer, P. J. (2009). Attributions to discrimination: Antecedents and consequences. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination (pp. 89–110). Psychology Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.027
    Back to article
  34. 34Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180308
    Back to article
  35. 35Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2009). Anger and shame elicited by discrimination: Moderating role of coping on action endorsements and salivary cortisol. European Journal of Social Psychology, 185, 163–185. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.522
    Back to article
  36. 36Monteith, M. J., & Walters, G. L. (1998). Egalitarianism, Moral Obligation, and Prejudice-Related Personal Standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 186–199. DOI: 10.1177/0146167298242007
    Back to article
  37. 37Nugier, A., Chekroun, P., Pierre, K., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2010). Group membership influences social control of perpetrators of uncivil behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology Eur., 40(June 2009), 625–634. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp
    Back to article
  38. 38Phelan, J. E., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 406–413. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00454.x
    Back to article
  39. 39Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and External Motivation to Respond Without Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 811–832. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811
    Back to article
  40. 40Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2018). Implicit stereotyping against people with disability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 127–140. DOI: 10.1177/1368430216638536
    Back to article
  41. 41Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Glick, P., & Phelan, J. E. (2012). Reactions to vanguards: Advances in backlash theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1st ed., Vol. 45). Elsevier Inc. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00004-4
    Back to article
  42. 42Ruggiero, K. M., & Taylor, D. M. (1995). Coping with discrimination: How disadvantaged group members perceive the discrimination that confronts them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 826–838. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.5.826
    Back to article
  43. 43Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (2004). When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self-presentation and need for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 111–122. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.111
    Back to article
  44. 44Simon, S., Moss, A. J., & O’Brien, L. T. (2019). Pick your perspective: Racial group membership and judgments of intent, harm, and discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(2), 215–232. DOI: 10.1177/1368430217735576
    Back to article
  45. 45Subban, P., & Sharma, U. (2006). Primary school teachers’s perceptions of inclusive education in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Special Education, 21(1), 42–52.
    Back to article
  46. 46Swim, J. K., Scott, E. D., Sechrist, G. B., Campbell, B., & Stangor, C. (2003). The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 944–959. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.944
    Back to article
  47. 47Vanbeselaere, N., Boen, F., Van Avermaet, E., & Buelens, H. (2010). The Janus Face of Power in Intergroup Contexts: A Further Exploration of the Noblesse Oblige Effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 146(6), 685–699. DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.146.6.685-699
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.357 | Journal eISSN: 2397-8570
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 17, 2019
Accepted on: Oct 21, 2020
Published on: Jan 13, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
ableism,
benevolent discrimination,
hostile discrimination,
distancing

© 2021 Jennifer Bastart, Odile Rohmer, Maria-Antoneta Popa-Roch, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 34 (2021): Issue 1Next article