Dyadic Dynamic in Generalized Political Attitudes: Homophily, Relationship Satisfaction, and Convergence

Andreas Miculka; Roland Imhoff

doi:10.5334/irsp.1102

Dyadic Dynamic in Generalized Political Attitudes: Homophily, Relationship Satisfaction, and Convergence

International Review of Social Psychology

Volume 39 (2026): Issue 1

By: Andreas Miculka and Roland Imhoff

Open Access

|Apr 2026

Abstract

Despite the social nature of generalized political attitudes such as conspiracy mentality, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO), dyadic phenomena concerning these attitudes have not been comprehensively investigated. Employing Response Surface Analysis on two longitudinal samples of couples in romantic relationships (N_1;T1 = 249 couples, N_1;T2 = 76, N_2;T1 = 312, N_2;T2 = 263), this research examined a) couple similarity in generalized political attitudes, b) whether similarity concurrently and longitudinally predicted relationship satisfaction, and c) whether couples converged in their attitudes over time. Partners exhibited substantial similarity in all attitude dimensions. However, there was only little support that similarity predicted relationship satisfaction. Finally, romantic partners did not converge in their attitudes over time, indicating that couple similarity reflected initial assortment rather than convergence. The wide prevalence of ideologically congruent relationships may restrict the range of political views that individuals are exposed to, potentially playing a role in political polarization.

References

Ackermann, R. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2016). APIMPowerR: An interactive tool for Actor-Partner Interdependence Model power analysis [Computer software]. https://robert-a-ackerman.shinyapps.io/APIMPowerRdis/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aichholzer, J. (2019). Kurzskala Soziale Dominanzorientierung (KSDO-3). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). 10.6102/ZIS269
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. SAGE Publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ajzen, I. (1974). Effects of information on interpersonal attraction: Similarity versus affective value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 374–380. 10.1037/h0036002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 362–379. 10.1017/S0022381611000016
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1054–1068. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Arránz Becker, O. (2013). Effects of similarity of life goals, values, and personality on relationship satisfaction and stability: Findings from a two-wave panel study. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 443–461. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01417.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bale, J. M. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns of Prejudice, 41(1), 45–60. 10.1080/00313220601118751
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bauer, P. C., Barberá, P., Ackermann, K., & Venetz, A. (2017). Is the left-right scale a valid measure of ideology?: Individual-level variation in associations with “left” and “right” and left-right self-placement. Political Behavior, 39(3), 553–583. 10.1007/s11109-016-9368-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beck, P. A. (1991). Voters’ intermediation environments in the 1988 presidential contest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3), 371. 10.1086/269269
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beierlein, C., Asbrock, F., Kauff, M., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Kurzskala autoritarismus (KSA-3). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). 10.6102/ZIS228
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308. 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Personality and psychopathology: Vol. 11. Academic Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cohrs, J. C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5(1), 263–276. 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00071.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cozzolino, P. J., & Snyder, M. (2008). Good times, bad times: How personal disadvantage moderates the relationship between social dominance and efforts to win. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1420–1433. 10.1177/0146167208321595
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). The dual process motivational model of ideology and prejudice. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (1st ed., pp. 188–221). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316161579.009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). Jossey-Bass/Wiley. 10.1037/e576892011-020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Springer US. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garcia, R., & Kenny, D. A. (2018). DATIC: Dyadic Data Analysis 2018 Workshop. Retrieved April 26, 2022. https://randilgarcia.github.io/week-dyad-workshop/index.html
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GESIS-Leibniz-Institut Für Sozialwissenschaften. (2019). German General Social Survey—ALLBUS 2012. German General Social Survey—ALLBUS 2012 (Version 1.0.0) [Dataset]. GESIS Data Archive. 10.4232/1.13418
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. Yale University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npp6m
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118(3), 430–439. 10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.430
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gutiérrez, A. S., & Unzueta, M. M. (2013). Are admissions decisions based on family ties fairer than those that consider race? Social dominance orientation and attitudes toward legacy vs. affirmative action policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 554–558. 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.011
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hacker, J., & Pierson, P. (2015). Confronting asymmetric polarization. In N. Persily (Ed.), Solutions to political polarization in America. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316091906.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hendrick, S. S., Dicke, A., & Hendrick, C. (1998). The relationship assessment scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(1), 137–142. 10.1177/0265407598151009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Higgins, E. T., Rossignac-Milon, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2021). Shared reality: From sharing-is-believing to merging minds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 103–110. 10.1177/0963721421992027
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. 10.1037/pspi0000033
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 583–606. 10.1177/0146167211432765
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 269–283. 10.1086/687533
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65–95. 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humbad, M. N., Donnellan, M. B., Iacono, W. G., McGue, M., & Burt, S. A. (2010). Is spousal similarity for personality a matter of convergence or selection? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 827–830. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.010
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humberg, S., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2019). Response surface analysis in personality and social psychology: Checklist and clarifications for the case of congruence hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 409–419. 10.1177/1948550618757600
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Humberg, S., Schönbrodt, F. D., Back, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2022). Cubic response surface analysis: Investigating asymmetric and level-dependent congruence effects with third-order polynomial models. Psychological Methods, 27(4), 622–649. 10.1037/met0000352
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Imhoff, R. (in press). The psychology of conspiracy mentality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 10.1016/bs.aesp.2025.10.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (Un–)Truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. 10.1002/per.1930
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Imhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021). Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(1), 71–79. 10.1177/1948550619896491
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., António, J. H. C., Babinska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., Blanuša, N., Bovan, K., Bužarovska, R., Cichocka, A., Delouvée, S., Douglas, K. M., Dyrendal, A., Etienne, T., Gjoneska, B., Graf, S., Gualda, E., Hirschberger, G., … Van Prooijen, J. W. (2022). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(3), 392–403. 10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Leite, A. C., & Schrader, T. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crime. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 534–549. 10.1111/bjso.12311
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lampard, R. J. (1997). Party political homogamy in Great Britain. European Sociological Review, 13(1), 79–99. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018207
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Larsson, M. R., Björklund, F., & Bäckström, M. (2012). Right-wing authoritarianism is a risk factor of torture-like abuse, but so is social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 927–929. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.015
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leikas, S., Ilmarinen, V. J., Verkasalo, M., Vartiainen, H. L., & Lönnqvist, J. E. (2018). Relationship satisfaction and similarity of personality traits, personal values, and attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 191–198. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.024
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lepièce, B., Reynaert, C., Van Meerbeeck, P., & Dory, V. (2016). Social dominance theory and medical specialty choice. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(1), 79–92. 10.1007/s10459-015-9612-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lönnqvist, J. E., & Kivikangas, M. (2019). Economic attitudes, social attitudes and their psychological underpinnings – A study of the Finnish political elite. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 602. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00602
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mäenpää, E., & Jalovaara, M. (2014). Homogamy in socio-economic background and education, and the dissolution of cohabiting unions. Demographic Research, 30, 1769–1792. 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.65
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moskalenko, S., Burton, B. S., Fernández-Garayzábal González, J., & Bloom, M. M. (2023). Secondhand conspiracy theories: The social, emotional and political tolls on loved ones of QAnon followers. Democracy and Security, 19(3), 231–250. 10.1080/17419166.2022.2111305
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mousaw, C. (2022). I love who he was but hate who he’s become: The impacts of conspiracy theories on interpersonal relationships [Master’s thesis, University of Colorado]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/a423f94393fef92217383ba31c955efb/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126. 10.1017/S0003055402004264
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nießen, D., Schmidt, I., Beierlein, C., & Lechner, C. M. (2019). Authoritarianism Short Scale (KSA-3). ZIS – The Collection of Items and Scales for the Social Sciences. 10.6102/ZIS272
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Olsen, J. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 127–141. 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Peter, J. P., Churchill, G. A. Jr., & Brown, T. J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 655. 10.1086/209329
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Phillips, J. B. (2025). “I’m so worried about my whole family”: Modeling r/QAnonCasualties to better understand the effects of (QAnon) conspiracy beliefs on families. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(7), 1517–1536. 10.1177/02654075251328116
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., Réale, D., Dochtermann, N. A., Garamszegi, L. Z., & Araya-Ajoy, Y. G. (2020). Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 1141–1152. 10.1111/2041-210X.13434
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schönbrodt, F. D., Humberg, S., & Nestler, S. (2018). Testing similarity effects with Dyadic response surface analysis. European Journal of Personality, 32(6), 627–641. 10.1002/per.2169
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schwartz, S., Breyer, B., & Danner, D. (2015). Human values scale (ESS). ZIS – The Collection Items and Scales for the Social Sciences. 10.6102/ZIS234
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schwartz, S., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519–542. 10.1177/0022022101032005001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W. (2007). Birds of a feather don’t always fly farthest: Similarity in big five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 666–675. 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.666
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279. 10.1177/1088868308319226
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., & Navarrete, C. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 433–449. 10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Six, B., Wolfrath, U., & Zick, A. (2001). Autoritarismus und Soziale Dominanz als generalisierte Einstellungen. Zeitschrift Für Politische Psychologie, 9, 23–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toribio-Flórez, D., Green, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2024). Belief in conspiracy theories and satisfaction in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 54(10), 603–627. 10.1111/jasp.13061
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van Assche, J., Dhont, K., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2019). The social-psychological bases of far-right support in Europe and the United States. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 385–401. 10.1002/casp.2407
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
van der Linden, S. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Watson, D., Beer, A., & McDade-Montez, E. (2014). The role of active assortment in spousal similarity. Journal of Personality, 82(2), 116–129. 10.1111/jopy.12039
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A., Nus Simms, E., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in Newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72(5), 1029–1068. 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00289.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weidmann, R., Schönbrodt, F. D., Ledermann, T., & Grob, A. (2017). Concurrent and longitudinal dyadic polynomial regression analyses of Big Five traits and relationship satisfaction: Does similarity matter? Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 6–15. 10.1016/j.jrp.2017.04.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article