References
- 1Arora, S. D., Singh, G. P., Chakraborty, A., & Maity, M. (2022). Polarization and social media: A systematic review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121942. 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121942
- 2Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2022). Cross-country trends in affective polarization. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 106(2), 557–565. 10.1162/rest_a_01160
- 3Brandt, M. J., & Crawford, J. T. (2020).
Worldview conflict and prejudice . In B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 61, pp. 1–66). Elsevier. 10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.09.002 - 4Braveman, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2011). The social determinants of health: Coming of age. Annual Review of Public Health, 32(1), 381–398. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218
- 5Bressler, S. L., & Seth, A. K. (2011). Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology. NeuroImage, 58(2), 323–329. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.059
- 6Broockman, D. E., Kalla, J. L., & Westwood, S. J. (2022). Does affective polarization undermine democratic norms or accountability? Maybe not. American Journal of Political Science, 67(3), 808–828. 10.1111/ajps.12719
- 7Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems, and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6), 745–778. 10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<;745::AID-EJSP24>3.0.CO;2-O
- 8Carmines, E., & Nassar, R. (2022). Comparing stereotypes across racial and partisan lines: A study in affective polarisation. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 32(3), 727–738. 10.1080/17457289.2021.1942015
- 9Casey, J. P., Vanman, E. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2023). Empathic conservatives and moralizing liberals: Political intergroup empathy varies by political ideology and is explained by moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(5), 678–700. 10.1177/01461672231198001
- 10Chen, M. K., & Rohla, R. (2018). The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties. Science, 360(6392), 1020–1024. 10.1126/science.aaq1433
- 11Chopik, W. J., & Motyl, M. (2016). Ideological fit enhances interpersonal orientations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 759–768. 10.1177/1948550616658096
- 12Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988).
Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States . In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31–67). Sage Publications. - 13Collett, J. L., & Childs, E. (2011). Minding the gap: Meaning, affect, and the potential shortcomings of vignettes. Social Science Research, 40(2), 513–522. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.008
- 14Cox, D. A. (2021). The state of American friendship: Change, challenges, and loss. Survey Center on American Life.
https://www.americansurveycenter.org/research/the-state-of-american-friendship-change-challenges-and-loss/ - 15Cutrona, C., & Russell, D. (1987).
The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress . In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 37–67). JAI Press, Greenwich. - 16Ditto, P. H., Liu, B. S., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Chen, E. E., Grady, R. H., Celniker, J. B., & Zinger, J. F. (2019). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 273–291. 10.1177/1745691617746796
- 17Dormann, C., & Griffin, M. A. (2015). Optimal time lags in panel studies. Psychological Methods, 20(4), 489–505. 10.1037/met0000041
- 18Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2021). How affective polarization shapes Americans’ political beliefs: A study of response to the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 8(3), 223–234. 10.1017/XPS.2020.28
- 19Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79. 10.1017/S0003055412000500
- 20Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. 10.1111/bjop.12046
- 21Engelhardt, A. M., & Utych, S. M. (2020). Grand old (tailgate) party? Partisan discrimination in apolitical settings. Political Behavior, 42(3), 769–789. 10.1007/s11109-018-09519-4
- 22Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M. C., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., Skitka, L. J., Tucker, J. A., Van Bavel, J. J., Wang, C. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536. 10.1126/science.abe1715
- 23Flora, D. B. (2020). Your coefficient alpha is probably wrong, but which coefficient omega is right? A tutorial on using r to obtain better reliability estimates. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 484–501. 10.1177/2515245920951747
- 24Fraser, T., Aldrich, D. P., Panagopoulos, C., Hummel, D., & Kim, D. (2022). The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health. PNAS Nexus, 1(1), pgac011. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac011
- 25Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2023). Who dislikes whom? Affective polarization between pairs of parties in western democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 997–1015. 10.1017/S0007123422000394
- 26Gift, K., & Gift, T. (2015). Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Political Behavior, 37(3), 653–675. 10.1007/s11109-014-9286-0
- 27Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
- 28Hackett, J. D., Gaffney, A. M., & Data, L. (2018). Intergroup anxiety and political loss: The buffering effects of believing in the open marketplace of ideas and openness to diverse political discussions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(3), 150–164. 10.1111/jasp.12500
- 29Hagan, M. J., Sladek, M. R., Luecken, L. J., & Doane, L. D. (2020). Event-related clinical distress in college students: Responses to the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Journal of American College Health, 68(1), 21–25. 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515763
- 30Hamaker, E. L. (2023). The curious case of the cross-sectional correlation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1–12. 10.1080/00273171.2022.2155930
- 31Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. 10.1037/a0038889
- 32Hernández, E., Anduiza, E., & Rico, G. (2021). Affective polarization and the salience of elections. Electoral Studies, 69, 102203. 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102203
- 33Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 269–283. 10.1086/687533
- 34Huddy, L., & Yair, O. (2021). Reducing Affective Polarization: Warm Group Relations or Policy Compromise? Political Psychology, 42(2), 291–309. 10.1111/pops.12699
- 35Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2004). The construction and interpretation of vignettes in social research. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 11(1), 36–51. 10.1921/swssr.v11i1.428
- 36Iyengar, S., Konitzer, T., & Tedin, K. (2018). The home as a political fortress: Family agreement in an era of polarization. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1326–1338. 10.1086/698929
- 37Iyengar, S., & Krupenkin, M. (2018). The strengthening of partisan affect: Strengthening of partisan affect. Political Psychology, 39, 201–218. 10.1111/pops.12487
- 38Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. 10.1093/poq/nfs038
- 39Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization: fear and loathing across party lines. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. 10.1111/ajps.12152
- 40Jenke, L. (2023). Affective polarization and misinformation belief. Political Behavior, 46, 825–884. 10.1007/s11109-022-09851-w
- 41Jylhä, M. (2009). What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science & Medicine, 69(3), 307–316. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013
- 42Kekkonen, A., & Ylä-Anttila, T. (2021). Affective blocs: Understanding affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 72, 102367. 10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102367
- 43Kingzette, J., Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2021). How affective polarization undermines support for democratic norms. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(2), 663–677. 10.1093/poq/nfab029
- 44Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2018). Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 379–390. 10.1093/poq/nfy014
- 45Knudsen, E. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems? Comparing affective polarization towards voters and parties in Norway and the United States. Scandinavian Political Studies, 44(1), 34–44. 10.1111/1467-9477.12186
- 46Koppel, L., Andersson, D., Johannesson, M., Strømland, E., & Tinghög, G. (2022). Comprehension in economic games. 10.31234/osf.io/krzsb
- 47Lee, A. H. Y. (2022). Social trust in polarized times: How perceptions of political polarization affect Americans’ trust in each other. Political Behavior, 44(3), 1533–1554. 10.1007/s11109-022-09787-1
- 48Lee, B. (2021). Close relationships in close elections. Social Forces, 100(1), 400–425. 10.1093/sf/soaa101
- 49Lee, E.-H. (2012). Review of the psychometric evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale. Asian Nursing Research, 6(4), 121–127. 10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004
- 50Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017). The limits of partisan prejudice. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 485–501. 10.1086/688223
- 51Lucas, R. E. (2023). Why the cross-lagged panel model is almost never the right choice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 1–22. 10.1177/25152459231158378
- 52Major, B., & Schmader, T. (2017).
Stigma, social identity threat, and health . In B. Major, J. F. Dovidio, & B. G. Link (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of stigma, discrimination, and health (pp. 85–104). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190243470.013.3 - 53McConnell, C., Margalit, Y., Malhotra, N., & Levendusky, M. (2018). The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 5–18. 10.1111/ajps.12330
- 54McMurtrie, B. (2024). Differences in affective polarization, need for closure, intellectual humility, identity strength, and authoritarianism among liberals and conservatives: A secondary data analysis of McMurtrie (2024). 10.31234/osf.io/msn4z
- 55McMurtrie, B., Philipp, M., Hebden, R., & Williams, M. (2024). Development and validation of the affective polarization scale. International Review of Social Psychology, 37(1), 11. 10.5334/irsp.926
- 56McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. 10.1037/met0000144
- 57McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
- 58Mefford, M. T., Mittleman, M. A., Li, B. H., Qian, L. X., Reynolds, K., Zhou, H., Harrison, T. N., Geller, A. C., Sidney, S., Sloan, R. P., Mostofsky, E., & Williams, D. R. (2020). Sociopolitical stress and acute cardiovascular disease hospitalizations around the 2016 presidential election. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(43), 27054–27058. 10.1073/pnas.2012096117
- 59Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. E. (2014). Political polarization & media habits. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/ - 60Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758.
- 61Mulder, J. D. (2023). Power analysis for the random intercept cross-lagged panel model using the powRICLPM r-package. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(4), 645–658. 10.1080/10705511.2022.2122467
- 62Mulder, J. D., & Hamaker, E. L. (2021). Three extensions of the random intercept cross-lagged panel model. Structural Equation Modelling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 638–648. 10.1080/10705511.2020.1784738
- 63Nayak, S. S., Fraser, T., Panagopoulos, C., Aldrich, D. P., & Kim, D. (2021). Is divisive politics making Americans sick? Associations of perceived partisan polarization with physical and mental health outcomes among adults in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 284, 113976. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113976
- 64Nelson, M. H. (2022). Resentment is like drinking poison? The heterogeneous health effects of affective polarization. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 63(4), 508–524. 10.1177/00221465221075311
- 65Nicholson, S. P., Coe, C. M., Emory, J., & Song, A. V. (2016). The politics of beauty: The effects of partisan bias on physical attractiveness. Political Behavior, 38(4), 883–898. 10.1007/s11109-016-9339-7
- 66Orriols, L., & León, S. (2020). Looking for affective polarisation in Spain: Psoe and Podemos from conflict to coalition. South European Society and Politics, 25(3–4), 351–379. 10.1080/13608746.2021.1911440
- 67Orth, U., Meier, L. L., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Krauss, S., Messerli, D., & Robins, R. W. (2024). Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects. Psychological Methods, 29(2), 421–433. 10.1037/met0000499
- 68Panagopoulos, C., Fraser, T., Aldrich, D. P., Kim, D., & Hummel, D. (2022). Bridging the divide: Does social capital moderate the impact of polarization on health? Political Research Quarterly, 75(3), 875–891. 10.1177/10659129211034561
- 69R Core team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software].
- 70Renström, E. A., Bäck, H., & Carroll, R. (2021). Intergroup threat and affective polarization in a multi-party system. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(2), 553–576. 10.5964/jspp.7539
- 71Renström, E. A., Bäck, H., & Carroll, R. (2023). Threats, emotions, and affective polarization. Political Psychology, 44(6), 1337–1366. 10.1111/pops.12899
- 72Ridge, R. D., Hawk, C. E., Hartvigsen, L. D., & McCombs, L. D. (2025). To meme or not to meme? Political social media posts and ideologically motivated aggression in job recommendations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 165(2), 171–188. 10.1080/00224545.2024.2316619
- 73Roche, M. J., & Jacobson, N. C. (2019). Elections have consequences for student mental health: An accidental daily diary study. Psychological Reports, 122(2), 451–464. 10.1177/0033294118767365
- 74Rosman, L., Salmoirago–Blotcher, E., Mahmood, R., Yang, H., Li, Q., Mazzella, A. J., Lawrence Klein, J., Bumgarner, J., & Gehi, A. (2021). Arrhythmia risk during the 2016 us presidential election: The cost of stressful politics. Journal of the American Heart Association, 10(11),
e020559 . 10.1161/JAHA.120.020559 - 75Shafranek, R. M. (2021). Political considerations in nonpolitical decisions: A conjoint analysis of roommate choice. Political Behavior, 43(1), 271–300. 10.1007/s11109-019-09554-9
- 76Slavich, G. M. (2016). Life stress and health: A review of conceptual issues and recent findings. Teaching of Psychology, 43(4), 346–355. 10.1177/0098628316662768
- 77Smith, K. B. (2022). Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the Trump administration. PLOS ONE, 17(1),
e0262022 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0262022 - 78Smith, K. B., Hibbing, M. V., & Hibbing, J. R. (2019). Friends, relatives, sanity, and health: The costs of politics. PLOS ONE, 14(9),
e0221870 . 10.1371/journal.pone.0221870 - 79Stanford, K. (2023).
Underdetermination of scientific theory . In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Universityhttps://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2023/entries/scientific-underdetermination - 80Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Morrison, K. R. (2009).
Intergroup threat theory . In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice (pp. 43–59). Lawrence Erlbaum. - 81Sturgis, P., Thomas, R., Purdon, S., Bridgwood, A., & Dodd, T. (2001). Comparative Review and Assessment of Key Health State Measures of the General Population. Department of Health.
- 82Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (2001).
An integrative theory of intergroup conflict . In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 94–109). Psychology Press. - 83Taylor, S. E. (2012).
Social support: A review . In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (1st ed., pp. 190–214). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.013.0009 - 84Torcal, M., & Thomson, Z. A. (2023). Social trust and affective polarization in Spain (2014–19). Electoral Studies, 81, 102582. 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102582
- 85Van Bavel, J. J., Gadarian, S. K., Knowles, E., & Ruggeri, K. (2024). Political polarization and health. Nature Medicine, 30, 3085–3093. 10.1038/s41591-024-03307-w
- 86Wagner, M. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 69, 102199. 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199
- 87Westwood, S. J., Iyengar, S., Walgrave, S., Leonisio, R., Miller, L., & Strijbis, O. (2018). The tie that divides: Cross-national evidence of the primacy of partyism: The tie that divides. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 333–354. 10.1111/1475-6765.12228
- 88World Medical Association. (2024). WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human participants.
https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/