1ArvidsonM, KaraH. Valuing third sector achievements in a service delivery context: evaluations and social value. In: Developments, Innovations and Challenges. Bristol University Press; 2016. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447322399.003.0008
2BenningtonJ, MooreMH. Public value in complex and changing times. In: BenningtonJ, MooreMH, editors. Public value theory & practice. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. pp. 1–30. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-36431-8_1
3HarlockJ. From outcomes-based commissioning to social value? Implications for performance managing the third sector [Internet]. Third Sector Research Centre; 2014 [cited 2025 Apr 17]. (Working Paper). https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-policy/.tsrc/working-papers/working-paper-123.pdf.
4LindsayC, PearsonS, BattyE, CullenAM, EadsonW. Streetlevel practice and the co-production of third sector-led employability services. Policy and Politics. 2018;46(4):571–87. DOI: 10.1332/030557317X15120417452025
5SalamonLM, ToeplerS. Government–nonprofit cooperation: Anomaly or necessity?Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 2015;26:2155–77. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6
7WHO. Framework on integrated, people-centred health services [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2019 [cited 2025 Apr 22]. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/integrated-health-services-%28ihs%29/csy/ipchs/framework_q-a.pdf.
10WaardenburgM, GroenleerM, de JongJ, KeijserB. Paradoxes of collaborative governance: investigating the real-life dynamics of multi-agency collaborations using a quasi-experimental action-research approach. Public Management Review. 2020;22(3):386–407. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1599056
11KorkAA, AntoniniC, García-ToreaN, Luque-VílchezM, CostaE, SennJ, et al. Collective health research assessment: developing a tool to measure the impact of multistakeholder research initiatives. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2022;20(1):49. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00856-9
12BeirãoG, PatrícioL, FiskRP. Value co-creation in service ecosystems: investigating health care at the micro, meso, and macro levels. Journal of Service Management. 2017;28(2):227–49. DOI: 10.1108/josm-11-2015-0357
13BeirãoG, PatrícioL, FiskRP. Value co-creation in service ecosystems: investigating health care at the micro, meso, and macro levels. Journal of Service Management. 2017;28(2):227–49. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
14VerleyeK, JaakkolaE, HodgkinsonIR, JunGT, Odekerken-SchröderG, QuistJ. What causes imbalance in complex service networks? Evidence from a public health service. Journal of Service Management. 2017;28(1):34–56. DOI: 10.1108/JOSM-03-2016-0077
15DessersE, PlessS. Shifting organisational solidarity in health and social care ecosystems. In: Van HoyweghenI, PulignanoV, MeyersG, editors. Shifting solidarities: trends and developments in European societies. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 175–90. [cited 2025 Apr 17]. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-44062-6_9
16TrischlerJ, SvenssonPO, WilliamsH, WikströmF. Citizens as an innovation source in sustainability transitions – linking the directionality of innovations with the locus of the problem in transformative innovation policy. Public Management Review. 2023;25(11):2093–115. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2062041
17RothM, VakkuriJ, JohansonJE. Value creation mechanisms in a social and health care innovation ecosystem – an institutional perspective. Journal of Management and Governance. 2024;28(4):1017–48. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-024-09696-x
19ArvidsonM, KaraH. Valuing third sector achievements in a service delivery context: evaluations and social value. In: ReesJ, MullinsD, editors. The third sector delivering public services: developments, innovations and challenges. Third sector research series. Bristol University Press; 2016. pp. 149–66. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447322399.003.0008
20ZonneveldN, DriessenN, StüssgenRAJ, MinkmanMMN. Values of integrated care: a systematic review. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2018;18(4):9. https://ijic.org/articles/10.5334/ijic.4172.
21MartinGP. The third sector, user involvement and the public sector reform: a case study in the co-governance of health service provision. Public Administration. 2011;89(3):909–32. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01910.x
22PestoffV. Hybridity, coproduction, and third sector social services in Europe. American Behavioral Scientist. 2014;58(11):1412–24. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214534670
23EwersB, EvettA. An ambiguous concept: On the meanings of co-production for health care users and user organizations?Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 2014;25:425–42. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-012-9345-2
24CharlesA. The King’s Fund. 2022 [cited 2025 Apr 17]. Integrated Care Systems Explained. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/long-reads/integrated-care-systems-explained.
25BassiA. A Pact with the Third Sector. Between Co-Production and Civic Participation. The Italian Case. Polish Political Science Yearbook [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Apr 17];52(Special):69–83. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1202625. DOI: 10.15804/ppsy202354
26KhareP, JoshiK. Systems Approach to Map Determinants of a Social Enterprise’s Impact: A Case from India. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2018Jan2;9(1):31–51. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2017.1409254
27SärkeläRM. Järjestöt julkisen kumppanista markkinoiden puristukseen: sosiaali- ja terveysjärjestöjen muutos sosiaalipalvelujen tuottajana vuosina 1990–2010. [NGOs: From public partnership to the mercy of the markets. How the NGOs in social and health care changed as providers of social services 1990–2010] [Academic Doctoral Dissertation]. [Helsinki]: University of Lapland; 2016.
28Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Sote-palveluiden yhteensovittamisessa on eroja eri asiakasryhmien ja hyvinvointialueiden välillä [Coordination of social and health services varies across groups and regions]. [webpage on the internet]. [20April2025]. https://thl.fi/-/sote-palveluiden-yhteensovittamisessa-on-eroja-eri-asiakasryhmien-ja-hyvinvointialueiden-valilla.
29TynkkynenLK, PulkkiJ, Tervonen-GonçalvesL, SchönP, BurströmB, KeskimäkiI. Health system reforms and the needs of the ageing population—an analysis of recent policy paths and reform trends in Finland and Sweden. European Journal of Ageing. 2022Jun1;19(2):221–32. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-022-00699-x
30Finnish Government. Occupational barometer: increase in labour shortages has slowed down but health and social services continue to account for top shortage occupations. [webpage on the internet]. [cited 20 April 2025]. https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/-/1410877/occupational-barometer-increase-in-labour-shortages-has-slowed-down-but-health-and-social-services-continue-to-ac-count-for-top-shortage-occupations.
31KoivistoJ, TiirinkiH, LiukkoE. Identifying individuals for integrated multidisciplinary care: lessons from Finland. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2022;22(3):8. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6000.
32TuurnasS, PaananenH, TynkkynenLK. Agile, institutionalised, and dependency-driven: multifaceted forms of the collaboration agency of third-sector organisations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit. 2022;34:573–84. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-022-00485-4
33TuurnasS, KilkkuN. The role and position of the third sector in social and health care system? Reflections from Finnish reform. Nordic Journal of Wellbeing and Sustainable Welfare Development. 2023;2023(2):1–5. DOI: 10.18261/njwel.2.2.1
34RantamäkiN. Onko enää kolmatta vaihtoehtoa? Kolmannen sektorin erityisyys ja ammattimainen sosiaalipalvelujen tuottaminen. [Does a third alternative still exist? The specificity of the third sector and professional social services provision ]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka. 2016;81(6):632–43. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201704126075.
35KoskiahoB. Tehdään enemmän vähemmällä. Kansalainen ja kansalaisyhteiskunta sosiaalipolitiikan voimavarana. [Doing more with less. Citizen and civil society as a resource of social policy]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka. 2015;80(1):54–63. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2015060310000.
37SchornA. The ‘Theme-centered interview’. A method to decode manifest and latent aspects of subjective realities. FQS (Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research). 2000;1(2). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-1.2.1092
38MatthesJ, KohringM. The content analysis of media frames: toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication. 2008;58(2):258–79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
39ReeseSD, GandyJ, GrantAE, editors. Framing public life: perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. New York: Routledge; 2001. DOI: 10.4324/9781410605689
42BjörnehedE, EriksonJ. Making the most of the frame: developing the analytical potential of frame analysis. Policy Studies Policy Studies. 2018Mar4;39(2):109–26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01442872.2018.1434874.
44RasmussenAC. Contraception as Health? The Framing of Issue Categories in Contemporary Policy Making. Administration & Society. 2011;43(8):930–53. DOI: 10.1177/0095399711413878
45MeriluotoTM. Between expertise and authenticity – Co-creation in Finnish Housing First Initiatives from the Experts’-by-experience Perspective. European Journal of Homelessness. 2018;12(1):61–83.
46CaseyJ. Third sector participation in the policy process: a framework for comparative analysis. Policy & Politics. 2004;32(2):241–57. DOI: 10.1332/030557304773558170
47StrokoschK, RoyM. Health and social care integration: fixing a fixed service ecosystem for value co-creation. Public Management Review. 2025Mar4;27(3):794–816. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2024.2375566
48van BochoveM, TonkensE, VerplankeL, RoggeveenS. Reconstructing the professional domain: Boundary work of professionals and volunteers in the context of social service reform. Current Sociology. 2018May1;66(3):392–411. DOI: 10.1177/0011392116677300
49ArvidsonM, JohanssonH, ScaramuzzinoR. Advocacy Compromised: How Financial, Organizational and Institutional Factors Shape Advocacy Strategies of Civil Society Organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit. 2018;29(4):844–56. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-017-9900-y
50PapeU, BrandsenT, PahlJB, PieliskiB, BaturinaD, BrookesN, et al. Changing Policy Environments in Europe and the Resilience of the Third Sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit. 2020;31(1):238–49. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-00087-z
51EnjolrasB, SalamonLM, SivesindKH, ZimmerA, EnjolrasB, SivesindKH. The roles and impacts of the third sector in Europe. In: BantaHD, SchouI, editors. The third sector as a renewable resource for Europe: concepts, impacts, challenges and opportunities. Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 95–124. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-71473-8_4
52ConquerS, IlesR, WindleK, HeathershawR, SkiCF. Transforming integrated care through co-production: a systematic review using meta-ethnography. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2024;24(1):17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10921964/. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.7603