Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Typology of Public-Private Partnerships in Integrated Care: Evidence from a Municipality in Seoul, Korea Cover

Typology of Public-Private Partnerships in Integrated Care: Evidence from a Municipality in Seoul, Korea

Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Hodge GA, Greve C, Boardman AE. Introduction: The PPP phenomenon and its evaluation. In International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2010. DOI: 10.4337/9781849804691
  2. Warsen R, Nederhand J, Klijn EH, Grotenbreg S, Koppenjan, J. What makes public–private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs. Public Management Review. 2018;20(8):11651185. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1428415
  3. Wollmann H. Public and personal social services in European countries: From public/municipal to private—and back to municipal and “third sector” provision. International Public Management Journal. 2018;21(3):413431. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2018.1428255
  4. Sekhri N, Feachem R, Ni A. Public–private integrated partnerships demonstrate the potential to improve healthcare access, quality and efficiency. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2011;30(8):14981507. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0461
  5. Flinders M. Splintered logic and political debate. In International Handbook on Public–Private Partnerships. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2010. DOI: 10.4337/9781849804691.00014
  6. Torchia M, Calabrò A, Morner M. Public–private partnerships in the health care sector: A systematic review of the literature. Public Management Review. 2015;17(2):236261. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.792380
  7. Akomea-Frimpong I, Jin X, Osei-Kyei R. Mapping studies on sustainability in the performance measurement of public–private partnership projects: A systematic review. Sustainability. 2022;14(12):7174. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/su14127174
  8. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Promotion group for the establishment of the next-generation social security information system of the Ministry of Health and Welfare. [in Korean]; 2019.
  9. Lee EK. Working atmosphere and the role of agency influencing collaborative working between health and social welfare services: The application of E-S Model to two pilot projects. Korean Journal of Social Welfare. 2010;62(1):155183. [in Korean]. DOI: 10.20970/kasw.2010.62.1.007
  10. Kim J. The effect of the elderly’s need for care services on community-integrated care and the mediating effect of governance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange. 2022;8(11):417431. [in Korean]. DOI: 10.47116/apjcri.2022.11.32
  11. Min SY. Reorganizing experiments and alternatives of public delivery system: Focusing on the health and welfare delivery system reinforcement demonstration project. Korea Social Policy Review. 2022;29(2):4377. [in Korean].
  12. Kim I-H, Kim C-S, Ryu J-Y, Kim M. Insights into public–private collaborative network in the healthcare setting: Focusing on a district in Seoul. Korea Journal of Population Studies. 2022;45(2):4972. [in Korean]. DOI: 10.31693/KJPS.2022.03.45.2.49
  13. Joudyian N, Doshmangir L, Mahdavi M, Tabrizi JS, Gordeev VS. Public–private partnerships in primary health care: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research. 2021;21(4). DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05979-9
  14. Sanderson L. Performance management, evaluation and learning in “modern” local government. Public Administration. 2002;79(2):297313.
  15. Rosenau PV. Introduction: The strengths and weaknesses of public–private policy partnerships. American Behavioral Scientist. 1999;43(1):1034. DOI: 10.1177/0002764299043001002
  16. William C, Simmons R. Beyond politics: Markets, welfare, and the failure of bureaucracy. Westview Press; 1994.
  17. Finn D. The “welfare market”: The role of the private sector in the delivery of benefits and employment services. In J. Millar (Ed.), Understanding social security: Issues for policy and practice (pp. 275293). Policy Press; 2009.
  18. Hodge GA, Greve C. Public–private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review. 2007;67(3):545558. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x
  19. Klijn EH, Teisman GR. Institutional and strategic barriers to public–private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money & Management. 2003;23(3):137146. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00361
  20. Defourny J, Nyssens M. Conceptions of social enterprise and social economy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations. 2010;21(1):525.
  21. Gidron B, Kramer RM, Salamon LM. (Eds.). Government and the third sector: Emerging relationships in welfare states. Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1992.
  22. Cope M. Between welfare and work: The roles of social service organizations in the social regulation of labor markets and regulation of the poor. Urban Geography. 2001;22(5):391406. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.22.5.391
  23. Jo Y. A study on compared case management practice of the public sector and the private field: Department of case manager perception of Gyeonggi-do Moohan care center and social welfare center (Master’s thesis). Department of Social Welfare, Sungkonghoe University. [in Korean]; 2014.
  24. Ryu A. A study of the positive analysis of the public sector care manager’s role. Korea Association of Community Welfare Studies. 2013;44:181201. [in Korean]. DOI: 10.15300/jcw.2013.03.44.181
  25. Ham CH. Case management performance of case managers in public delivery system and influential factors. Korea Association of Community Welfare Studies. 2013;44:131. [in Korean]. DOI: 10.15300/jcw.2013.03.44.1
  26. Gilbert DT. Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In Uleman JS, Bargh JA (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189211). Guilford Press; 1989.
  27. Gould RV, Fernandez RM. Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology. 1989;19:89126. DOI: 10.2307/270949
  28. Burt RS. Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. American Journal of Sociology. 2012;118:543591. DOI: 10.1086/667856
  29. Verbrugge LM, Yang L. Aging with disability and disability with aging. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 2002;12(4), 253267. DOI: 10.1177/104420730201200405
  30. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press; 1994. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815478
  31. Choi J. Performance analysis of integrated care policy for local communities: Focused on Gyeonggi-do pilot project (Master’s thesis). Myongji University. [in Korean]; 2022.
  32. Han D. Community-based welfare provision system: Positioning and network of social welfare agencies. Journal of Korean Social Welfare Administration. 2013;15(3), 285311. [in Korean].
  33. Ryu JY, Kim CS, Kim IH. Exploratory study on the network pattern between district office organisations and social welfare organisations performing community integrated care. Social Welfare Policy and Practice. 2022;8(2), 161201. [in Korean]. DOI: 10.37342/swpp.2022.8.2.161
  34. Won S. Current status and improvement tasks of the Elderly Welfare Act in response to the super-aged society. National Assembly Research Service. 2023;137. [in Korean].
  35. Cope M. Social economy organisations and their intermediary role in welfare networks. Journal of Social Policy. 2001;30(2):145162.
  36. Salamon LM, Anheier HK. Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations. 1996;9(3). DOI: 10.1023/A:1022058200985
  37. Schwartz DF, Jacobson E. Organisational communication network analysis: The liaison communication role. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance. 1977;18(1), 158174. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(77)90026-5
  38. Tushman ML, Katz R. External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science. 1980;26(11):10701085. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.26.11.1071
  39. Lee J. Fiscal decentralization initiatives and fiscal federalism agenda for building the federal-level decentralized state. The Korea Journal of Local Public Finance. 2019;24(1):3364. [in Korean].
  40. Lukersmith S, Hartley S, Kuipers P, Madden R, Llewellyn G, Dune T. Community-based rehabilitation (CBR) monitoring and evaluation methods and tools: A literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2013;35(23):19411953. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2013.770078
  41. Shim S. A critical review on the personal assistance services for people with disabilities: Applying the policy analysis framework of Gilbert & Terrell (2010) and the principle of personal assistance services. Journal of Critical Social Policy. 2017;56:237268. [in Korean].
  42. Pestoff V. Social enterprise and social economy in public service delivery. Public Management Review. 2009;11(4):569589.
  43. Alter CF. Building community partnerships and networks. In The handbook of human services management (pp. 435454). 2009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.9045 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 21, 2024
|
Accepted on: Jan 29, 2026
|
Published on: Feb 27, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Il-Ho Kim, Cheong-Seok Kim, Bon Kim, Dong Hee Joo, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.