Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Managing Institutional Diversity in Integrated Care: A Systematic Literature Review of Institutional Logics and Management Strategies Cover

Managing Institutional Diversity in Integrated Care: A Systematic Literature Review of Institutional Logics and Management Strategies

By: Marco Roth  
Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. 1Van Kemenade E, van der Vlegel-Brouwer W. Integrated care: a definition from the perspective of the four quality paradigms. Journal of Integrated Care. 2019; 27(4): 35767. DOI: 10.1108/JICA-06-2019-0029
  2. 2Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications—a discussion paper. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2002; 2(4). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.67
  3. 3Friedland R, Alford, RR. Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell, WW, DiMaggio, PJ. editors. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991. pp. 23263.
  4. 4Thornton PH, Ocasio W. Institutional logics. In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008. pp. 99128. DOI: 10.4135/9781849200387.n4
  5. 5Shaw JA, Kontos P, Martin W, Victor C. The institutional logic of integrated care: an ethnography of patient transitions. Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2017; 31(1): 8295. DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2016-0123
  6. 6Oksavik JD, Aarseth T, Solbjør M, Kirchhoff R. ‘What matters to you?’ Normative integration of an intervention to promote participation of older patients with multi-morbidity – a qualitative case study. BMC Health Services Research. 2021; 21(1): 117. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06106-y
  7. 7Pulido-Fuentes M, Gonzalez LA, Reneo IA, Cipriano-Crespo C, Flores-Martos JA, Santos AP. Towards a liquid healthcare: primary care organisational and management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic – a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2022; 22(1): 665. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07855-0
  8. 8Fisch C, Block J. Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly. 2018; 68: 1036. DOI: 10.1007/s11301-018-0142-x
  9. 9Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2009; 26(2): 91108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  10. 10Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy. 2009; 89(9): 87380. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/89.9.873
  11. 11Al-Tabbaa O, Ankrah S, Zahoor N. Systematic literature review in management and business studies: a case study on university–industry collaboration. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2019. DOI: 10.4135/9781526467263
  12. 12Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal. 2008; 22(2): 33842. DOI: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  13. 13Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis in practice: Los Angeles, California: Sage; 2012. DOI: 10.4135/9781529682571
  14. 14Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M. The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
  15. 15Friedland R, Arjaliès DL. Putting things in place: institutional objects and institutional logics. In: On practice and institution. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited. Leeds; 2021. pp. 4586. DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20200000071003
  16. 16Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals. 2011; 5(1): 31771. DOI: 10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
  17. 17Ragin CC. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press; 1989.
  18. 18Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Limited; 2021.
  19. 19Edmondson AC, McManus SE. Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review. 2007; 32(4): 115579. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
  20. 20Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(2): 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  21. 21Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2014.
  22. 22Kokko P, Laihonen H. Performance management and hybridization of healthcare – case of the accountable care organization. Journal of public budgeting, accounting & financial management. 2022; 34(3): 41129. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2021-0066
  23. 23Mæhle PM, Hajdarevic S, Håland E, Aarhus R, Smeland S, Mørk BE. Exploring the triggering process of a cancer care reform in three Scandinavian countries. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2021; 36(6): 223147. DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3278
  24. 24Mansfield E, Sandercock J, Dowedoff P, Martel S, Marcinow M, Shulman R, et al. Implementing integrated care pilot projects in hospital settings – an exploration of disruptive practices. Journal of Integrated Care. 2021; 29(2): 12640. DOI: 10.1108/JICA-12-2019-0051
  25. 25Allen D. Lost in translation? ‘Evidence’ and the articulation of institutional logics in integrated care pathways: from positive to negative boundary object? Sociology of Health & Illness. 2014; 36(6): 80722. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12111
  26. 26Dent M, Tutt D. Electronic patient information systems and care pathways: the organisational challenges of implementation and integration. Health Informatics Journal. 2014; 20(3): 17688. DOI: 10.1177/1460458213518545
  27. 27Novotna G. Competing institutional logics in the development and implementation of integrated treatment for concurrent disorders in Ontario: a case study. Journal of Social Work. 2014; 14(3): 26078. DOI: 10.1177/1468017313476613
  28. 28Goodrick E, Reay T. An institutional perspective on accountable care organizations. Medical Care Research and Review. 2016; 73(6): 68593. DOI: 10.1177/1077558716641832
  29. 29Gadolin C. Professional employees’ strategic employment of the managerial logic in healthcare. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management. 2018; 13(2): 12643. DOI: 10.1108/QROM-02-2016-1359
  30. 30ten Dam EM, Waardenburg M. Logic fluidity: how frontline professionals use institutional logics in their day-to-day work. Journal of Professions and Organization. 2020; 7(2): 188204. DOI: 10.1093/jpo/joaa012
  31. 31Wollter F. Identity of clients and social workers in service provision: an institutional logics perspective. Social Work & Social Sciences Review. 2020; 21(3). DOI: 10.1921/swssr.v21i3.1340
  32. 32Reay T, Hinings CR. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies. 2009; 30(6): 62952. DOI: 10.1177/0170840609104803
  33. 33Roth M, Vakkuri J, Johanson JE. Value creation mechanisms in a social and health care innovation ecosystem – an institutional perspective. Journal of management and governance. 2024; 28(4): 101748. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-024-09696-x
  34. 34Roth M, Vakkuri J. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan innovaatioekosysteemi hybridihallinnan järjestelmänä – institutionaalisten logiikkojen näkökulma. [The social and healthcare innovation ecosystem as a hybrid governance system: an institutional logics perspective.]. In: Rannisto PH, Leponiemi U, Nordling N, Kolehmainen J, editors. Sosiaali- ja terveysalan innovaatioekosysteemit. [Social and healthcare innovation ecosystems.]. Tampere: Tampere University Press; 2023. pp. 85114. [in Finnish]. DOI: 10.61201/tup.878.c1267
  35. 35Johanson JE, Vakkuri J. Why do monsters exist? Public, private, and hybrid organisations in perspective. In: Governing hybrid organisations. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2017. pp. 1542. DOI: 10.4324/9781315622293-2
  36. 36Vakkuri J, Johanson JE, Feng NC, Giordano F. Governance and accountability in hybrid organizations – past, present and future. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management. 2021; 33(3): 24560. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2021-0033
  37. 37Grossi G, Vakkuri J, Sargiacomo M. Accounting, performance and accountability challenges in hybrid organisations: a value creation perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2022; 35(3): 57797. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2021-5503
  38. 38Mannan A, Sutingco N, Djurkovic S, Reyes M, Desai M, Groves S, et al. Service line care delivery model for COVID-19 patient-centric care. American Journal of Managed Care. 2022; 28(3). 8087. DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88731
  39. 39Khurshid Z, McAuliffe E, De Brún A. Exploring healthcare staff narratives to understand the role of quality improvement methods in innovative practices during COVID-19. BMC Health Services Research. 2021; 21(1): 1271. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07297-0
  40. 40Austin J. Strategic Healthcare Change: Balancing Change and Stability. Journal of healthcare management. 2023; 68(1): 914. DOI: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00228
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8587 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jan 6, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 15, 2025
Published on: Mar 27, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Marco Roth, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.