Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrated System Responses for Families Impacted by Violence: A Scoping Review Cover

Integrated System Responses for Families Impacted by Violence: A Scoping Review

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 24 (2024): Issue 2
By: Claire Gear,  Chien Ting,  Carey Manuel,  Elizabeth Eppel and  Jane Koziol-McLain  
Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. 1Family Violence Death Review Committee. Fifth Report. Wellington, NZ: Health Quality & Safety Commission; 2016. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/our-programmes/mrc/fvdrc/publications-and-resources/publication/2434/.
    Back to article
  2. 2Garcia-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira AF, Koziol-McLain J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2015; 385(9977): 1567–79. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61837-7
    Back to article
  3. 3World Health Organisation. Global plan of action to strengthen the role of the health system within a national multisectorial response to address interpersonal violence, in particular against women and girls, and against children. Geneva, Switzerland; 2016. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/global-plan-of-action/en/.
    Back to article
  4. 4Fanslow JL, Mellar BM, Gulliver PJ, McIntosh TKD. Ethnic-specific prevalence rates of intimate partner violence against women in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2023; 47(6): 100105. DOI: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100105
    Back to article
  5. 5Fanslow JL, Mellar BM, Gulliver PJ, McIntosh TKD. Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. DOI: 10.1177/08862605231163646
    Back to article
  6. 6Family Violence Death Review Committee. Sixth report. Wellington, NZ: Health Quality & Safety Commission; 2020. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/our-programmes/mrc/fvdrc/publications-and-resources/publication/3985/.
    Back to article
  7. 7Ministry of Social Development. Elder abuse in Aotearoa: The proposed future strategy for elder abuse response services. Wellington, NZ; 2020. https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/initiatives/family-and-sexual-violence/elder-abuse-in-aotearoa-the-proposed-future-strategy-for-elder-abuse-response-services.pdf.
    Back to article
  8. 8Hughes G, Shaw SE, Greenhalgh T. Why doesn’t integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case. Sociol Health Illn. 2022; 44(1): 113–29. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13398
    Back to article
  9. 9Hughes G, Shaw SE, Greenhalgh T. Rethinking Integrated Care: A Systematic Hermeneutic Review of the Literature on Integrated Care Strategies and Concepts. The Milbank Quarterly. 2020; 98(2): 446–92. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12459
    Back to article
  10. 10Cumming J, Middleton L, Silwal P, Tenbensel T. Integrated Care in Aotearoa New Zealand 2008–2020. International journal of integrated care; 2021. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5679
    Back to article
  11. 11Fleming MD, Safaeinili N, Knox M, Hernandez E, Brewster AL. Between health care and social services: Boundary objects and cross-sector collaboration. Soc Sci Med. 2023; 320: 115758. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115758
    Back to article
  12. 12New Zealand Government. Te Aorerekura. Wellington, NZ; 2021. https://violencefree.govt.nz/assets/National-strategy/Finals-translations-alt-formats/Te-Aorerekura-National-Strategy.pdf.
    Back to article
  13. 13Pihama L, Cameron N, Te Nana R. Historical trauma and whānau violence. Auckland, NZ: NZ Family Violence Clearinghouse, University of Auckland; 2019. https://nzfvc.org.nz/issues-paper-15-historical-trauma.
    Back to article
  14. 14Kruger T, Pitman M, Grennell D, McDonald T, Mariu D, Pomare A, et al. Transforming Whanau Violence: A Conceptual Framework. Wellington, NZ: Te Puni Kokiri; 2004. https://nzfvc.org.nz/sites/default/files/transforming_whanau_violence.pdf.
    Back to article
  15. 15Tolmie J, Smith R, Short J, Wilson D, Sach J. Social entrapment: A realistic understanding of the criminal offending of primary victims of intimate partner violence New Zealand Law Review. 2018; 2018(2): 181–217
    Back to article
  16. 16Rolleston AK, Cassim S, Lawrenson R, Keenan R, Kidd J, Hokowhitu B. Seeing the unseen: evidence of kaupapa Māori health interventions. AlterNative. 2020; 16(2): 129–36. DOI: 10.1177/1177180120919166
    Back to article
  17. 17Pihama L, Smith Tuhiwai L. (eds.) Ora Healing Ourselves: Indigenous knowledge healing and wellbeing. Wellington, Aotearoa NZ: Huia; 2023.
    Back to article
  18. 18Dobbs T, Eruera M. Kaupapa Māori wellbeing framework: The basis for whānau violence prevention and intervention. Auckland, NZ: NZ Family Violence Clearinghouse, University of Auckland; 2014. https://nzfvc.org.nz/issues-papers-6
    Back to article
  19. 19Boulton AF, Gifford HH. Whānau ora; He whakaaro ā whānau: Māori: Family views of family wellbeing. The International Indigenous Policy Journal. 2014; 5(1): 1–18. DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2014.5.1.1
    Back to article
  20. 20Mossman E, Wehipeihana N, Bealing M. Evaluation of the family violence Integrated Safety Response pilot: Phase II Final Report. Wellington, NZ: Joint Venture Business Unit; 2019. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/nIG96VfM-ISR-Evaluation-Synthesis-Report.pdf.
    Back to article
  21. 21Gear C, Eppel E, Koziol-McLain J. Advancing complexity theory as a qualitative research methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2018; 17(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/1609406918782557
    Back to article
  22. 22Thompson DS, Fazio X, Kustra E, Patrick L, Stanley D. Scoping review of complexity theory in health services research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 87. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1343-4
    Back to article
  23. 23McDaniel RR, Driebe DJ. Complexity science and health care management. 2001. In: Advances in health care management [Internet]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 11–36. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-8231(01)02021-3
    Back to article
  24. 24Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67(12): 1291–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
    Back to article
  25. 25Gear C, Ting CJ, Eraki M, Eppel E, Koziol-McLain J. Integrated system responses for families impacted by violence: a scoping review protocol. BMJ open. 2021; 11(11): e051363. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051363
    Back to article
  26. 26Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8(1): 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
    Back to article
  27. 27Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science. 2010; 5(1): 69. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
    Back to article
  28. 28Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020; 18(10). DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
    Back to article
  29. 29Pollock D, Davies EL, Peters MDJ, Tricco AC, Alexander L, McInerney P, et al. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. J Adv Nurs. 2021. n/a(n/a). DOI: 10.1111/jan.14743
    Back to article
  30. 30Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia.
    Back to article
  31. 31Schmidt VA. Theorizing Ideas and Discourse in Political Science: Intersubjectivity, Neo-Institutionalisms, and the Power of Ideas. Critical Review. 2017; 29(2): 248–63. DOI: 10.1080/08913811.2017.1366665
    Back to article
  32. 32Gear C, Koziol-McLain J, Eppel E. Exploring sustainable primary care responses to intimate partner violence in New Zealand: Qualitative use of complexity theory. BMJ open. 2019; 9(11): e031827. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031827
    Back to article
  33. 33Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7): 467–73. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850
    Back to article
  34. 34Stanley N, Miller P, Foster HR, Thomson G. Children’s Experiences of Domestic Violence: Developing an Integrated Response From Police and Child Protection Services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2011; 26(12). DOI: 10.1177/0886260510383030
    Back to article
  35. 35Humphreys C, Healey L, Kirkwood D, Nicholson D. Children Living with Domestic Violence: A Differential Response through Multi-agency Collaboration. Australian Social Work. 2018; 71(2): 162–74. DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2017.1415366
    Back to article
  36. 36Wehipeihana N. What’s working for Māori? A Kaupapa Māori perspective on the responsiveness of the Integrated Safety Response pilot to Māori: Synthesis Evaluation Report. Wellington, NZ: Joint Venture Business Unit; 2019. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/nOD858un-Kaupapa-Maori-Report.pdf.
    Back to article
  37. 37Midgley G. The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking. In: Jackson MC, Mansell GJ, Flood RL, Blackham RB, Probert SVE (eds.), Systems thinking in Europe. Boston, MA: Springer; 1991. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3748-9_55
    Back to article
  38. 38Cilliers P, Preiser R. Complexity, difference and identity. Springer Science; 2010. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9187-1
    Back to article
  39. 39Chung D, Upton-Davis K, Cordier R, Campbell E, Wong T, Salter M, et al. Improving accountability: The role of perpetrator intervention systems. Sydney, NSW: ANROWS; 2020. https://anrowsdev.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Chung-RR-Improved-Accountability.pdf.
    Back to article
  40. 40Macvean M, Humphrey C, Healey L, Albers B, Mildon R, Connolly M, et al. The PATRICIA Project: PAThways and research In collaborative inter-agency working: State of knowledge paper. Sydney, NSW: ANROWS; 2015.https://anrowsdev.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/14_4.5-Landscapes-PATRICIA_F_0.pdf.
    Back to article
  41. 41Breckenridge J, Rees S, Valentine K, Murray S. Meta-evaluation of existing interagency partnerships, collaboration, coordination and/or integrated interventions and service responses to violence against women: State of knowledge paper Sydney, NSW: ANROWS; 2015. https://www.anrows.org.au.
    Back to article
  42. 42Family Law Council. Family Law Council report to the Attorney-General on families with complex needs and the intersection of the Family Law and child protection systems: Final report – June 2016 (Terms 3, 4 & 5). Australia: Family Law Council; 2016.https://www.ag.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/Family-with-Complex-Needs-Intersection-of-Family-Law-and-Child-Protection-Systems-Final-Report-Terms-3-4-5.PDF.
    Back to article
  43. 43Cripps K, Habibis D. Improving housing and service responses to domestic and family violence for Indigenous individuals and families. Melbourne, Victoria: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute; 2019. https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/320. DOI: 10.18408/ahuri-7116201
    Back to article
  44. 44Blagg H, Williams E, Cummings E, Hovane V, Torres M, Woodley KN. Innovative models in addressing violence against Indigenous women: Final report. Sydney, NSW: ANROWS; 2018. https://anrowsdev.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/4.3-Blagg-Final-Report.pdf.
    Back to article
  45. 45McArthur M, Thomson L. Families’ views on a coordinated family support service. Family Matters [Internet]. 2011. Available from: https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/fm89h_0.pdf.
    Back to article
  46. 46Herbert JL, Bromfield L. National comparison of cross-agency practice in investigating and responding to severe child abuse: A report to the NSW Ombudsman’s Office (Report 1 of 2). Adelaide, SA: Australian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia; 2017. https://unisa.edu.au/siteassets/episerver-6-files/global/eass/research/accp/national-comparison-of-cross-agency-practice-in-investigating-and-responding-to-severe-child-abuse-.pdf.
    Back to article
  47. 47Ministry of Justice. Family violence risk assessment and management framework: A common approach to screening, assessing and managing risk. NZ; 2017. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/family-violence-ramf.pdf.
    Back to article
  48. 48ANROWS. Working across sectors to meet the needs of clients experiencing domestic and family violence: Research synthesis. NSW, Australia ANROWS; 2020. https://www.anrows.org.au
    Back to article
  49. 49Mossman E, Wehipeihana N, Bealing M. Evaluation of the family violence Integrated Safety Response pilot: Phase II – years 2 & 3: Final report. Wellington, NZ Joint Venture Business Unit; 2019. https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Publications/nIG96VfM-ISR-Evaluation-Synthesis-Report.pdf.
    Back to article
  50. 50Family Violence Death Review Committee. Family Violence Death Review Committee: Fifth report: January 2014 to December 2015. Wellington, NZ: Health Quality and Safety Commission; 2016. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/Our-work/Mortality-review-committee/FVDRC/Publications-resources/FVDRC-5th-report-Feb-2016-v2.pdf.
    Back to article
  51. 51Kaspiew R, Maio JD, Deblaquiere J, Horsfall B. Evaluation of a pilot of legally assisted and supported family dispute resolution in family violence cases. Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2012. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2012-12/apo-nid33293.pdf. DOI: 10.1037/e567312013-001
    Back to article
  52. 52Carswell S, Atkin S, Wilde V, Lennan M, Kalapu L. Evaluation of the Family Violence Interagency Response System (FVIARS): Summary of findings. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Social Development; 2010. https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/evaluation/family-violence-interagency-response-system/index.html.
    Back to article
  53. 53Marjavi A, Family Violence Prevention Fund, Ybanez V, Red Wind Consulting. Building domestic violence health care responses in Indian Country: A promising practices report. United States: The Family Violence Prevention Fund; 2010. http://ipvhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Promising-Practices-Report-Online-version.pdf. DOI: 10.1037/e603702012-001
    Back to article
  54. 54Campbell JL. Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. Theory and Society. 1998; 27(3): 377–409. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006871114987
    Back to article
  55. 55Morin E. On complexity. United States of America: Hampton Press Inc.; 2008.
    Back to article
  56. 56Hester M. The Three Planet Model: Towards an Understanding of Contradictions in Approaches to Women and Children’s Safety in Contexts of Domestic Violence. The British Journal of Social Work. 2011; 41(5): 837–53. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr095
    Back to article
  57. 57Center for Integrated Health Solutions. Standard Framework for Levels of Integrated Healthcare. Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2020. https://www.thenationalcouncil.org/resources/standard-framework-for-levels-of-integrated-care/.
    Back to article
  58. 58Cilliers P. Knowledge, limits and boundaries. Futures. 2005; 37(7 SPEC.ISS.): 605–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2004.11.001
    Back to article
  59. 59Braithwaite J. Between-group behaviour in health care: Gaps, edges, boundaries, disconnections, weak ties, spaces and holes. A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-330
    Back to article
  60. 60Star SL. This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2010; 35(5): 601–17. DOI: 10.1177/0162243910377624
    Back to article
  61. 61Tarzia L, Cameron J, Watson J, Fiolet R, Baloch S, Robertson R, et al. Personal barriers to addressing intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis of healthcare practitioners’ experiences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1): 567. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06582-2
    Back to article
  62. 62Fiolet R, Cameron J, Tarzia L, Gallant D, Hameed M, Hooker L, et al. Indigenous People’s Experiences and Expectations of Health Care Professionals When Accessing Care for Family Violence: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2022; 23(2): 567–80. DOI: 10.1177/1524838020961879
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7542 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Dec 13, 2022
Accepted on: May 7, 2024
Published on: May 21, 2024
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
system integration,
service delivery,
violence,
health care,
Indigenous,
complexity theory

© 2024 Claire Gear, Chien Ting, Carey Manuel, Elizabeth Eppel, Jane Koziol-McLain, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2024): Issue 2Next article