Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implementing the interRAI Check-Up Comprehensive Assessment: Facilitating Care Planning and Care Coordination during the Pandemic Cover

Implementing the interRAI Check-Up Comprehensive Assessment: Facilitating Care Planning and Care Coordination during the Pandemic

Open Access
|Apr 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Survey respondents’ demographics.

N (%)
Gender
    Female48 (100.0%)
Age
    Less than 40 years old15 (31.3%)
    40 to 49 years old18 (37.5%)
    50 years and older15 (31.3%)
Experience as a Care Coordinator
    Less than 5 years17 (35.42%)
    5 years to less than 10 years16 (33.3%)
    10 years or greater15 (31.25%)
Designated Health Profession
    Registered Nurse (RN)31 (64.6%)
    Social Worker (SW)8 (16.7%)
    Therapies9 (18.75%)

[i] HNHB = Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant; WW = Waterloo Wellington.

Therapies = Occupational Therapist, Physiotherapist, and Speech Language Pathologist.

Table 2

Care Coordinators’ use of the CU.

N (%)
Time to administer the CU during a telephone assessmenta
    <20 minutes3 (6.3%)
    20–29 minutes8 (16.7%)
    30–39 minutes14 (29.2%)
    40–49 minutes13 (27.1%)
    >50 minutes10 (20.8%)
Patient populations that the CU was administered for
    Community independence47
    Chronic – initial13
    Chronic – reassessment29
    Complex – initial2
    Complex – reassessment6
    Patients with cognitive impairment (or their caregivers)6
    Long-term care – reassessment3
Primary respondentb
    Caregiver4 (8.3%)
    Caregiver (primarily) and the patient provided some responses11 (22.9%)
    The caregiver and patient equally6 (12.5%)
    Patient (primarily) and the caregiver provided some responses17 (35.4%)
    Patient10 (20.8%)
Based on the CU results, how often Care Coordinators identified and prioritized patients needing a more comprehensive assessment
    Always6 (12.5%)
    Most of the time9 (18.8%)
    Sometimes17 (35.4%)
    Rarely9 (18.8%)
    Never4 (8.3%)
    No response (blank)3 (6.3%)
How often the CU completed over the phone provides a sufficient picture of the patient to create a care plan
    Always6 (12.5%)
    Most of the time17 (35.4%)
    Sometimes15 (31.3%)
    Rarely6 (12.5%)
    Never1 (2.1%)
    No response (blank)3 (6.3%)

[i] HNHB = Hamilton Niagara Haldimand Brant; WW = Waterloo Wellington.

a On average.

b Most often.

c Such as when the example provided in the assessment did not apply to the person.

Table 3

Barriers to administering the CU.

EXPERIENCE AS A CARE COORDINATORDESIGNATED HEALTH PROFESSION
LESS THAN 5 YEARS5 YEARS TO 10 YEARS10 YEARS OR GREATERRNSWTHERAPIES
How often the assessor was uncertain about the person’s response to questions and documented these potential discrepancies
    All of the time0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
    Most of the time0 (0.0%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)3 (6.3%)1 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)
    Sometimes4 (8.3%)6 (12.5%)6 (12.5%)11 (22.9%)2 (4.2%)3 (6.3%)
    Rarely8 (16.7%)7 (14.6%)5 (10.4%)13 (27.1%)4 (8.3%)3 (6.3%)
    Never5 (10.4%)1 (2.1%)2 (4.17%)4 (8.3%)1 (2.1%)3 (6.3%)
How often alternate examples for questions were provided
    All of the time1 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)
    Most of the time6 (12.5%)6 (12.5%)3 (6.3%)11 (22.9%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)
    Sometimes4 (8.3%)7 (14.6%)10 (20.8%)14 (29.2%)3 (6.3%)4 (8.3%)
    Rarely5 (10.4%)3 (6.3%)2 (4.2%)6 (12.5%)2 (4.2%)2 (4.2%)
    Never1 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.1%)
How often the Care Coordinator accessed the patient’s history or other information before administering the CU
    All of the time11 (22.9%)6 (12.5%)7 (14.6%)13 (27.1%)7 (14.6%)4 (8.3%)
    Most of the time5 (10.4%)7 (14.6%)4 (8.3%)11 (22.9%)1 (2.1%)4 (8.3%)
    Sometimes1 (2.1%)2 (4.2%)4 (8.3%)7 (14.6%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
    Rarely0 (0.0%)1 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.1%)
    Never0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)

[i] RN = Registered Nurse; SW = Social Worker.

Therapies = Occupational Therapist, Physiotherapist, and Speech Language Pathologist.

Table 4

Care Coordinators’ use of CU results for care planning.

HOW OFTEN THE CU RESULTS…N (%)
MEDICAL ISSUESFUNCTIONAL STATUS/ADLSMOODCOGNITIONSOCIAL ISOLATIONINFORMAL SUPPORTS/IADLS
Help gain an understanding of the patient’s:
    Very often3 (6.3%)9 (18.8%)4 (8.3%)5 (10.4%)5 (10.4%)5 (10.4%)
    Often15 (31.3%)25 (52.1%)20 (41.7%)16 (33.3%)16 (33.3%)29 (60.4%)
    Sometimes21 (43.8%)9 (19.8%)14 (29.2%)18 (37.5%)17 (35.4%)9 (18.8%)
    Rarely5 (10.4%)2 (4.2%)7 (14.6%)5 (10.4%)5 (10.4%)1 (2.1%)
    Never1 (2.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.1%)2 (4.2%)1 (2.1%)
    No response (blank)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)
Help in the development of care planning related to:
    Very often1 (2.1%)9 (18.8%)3 (6.3%)4 (8.3%)3 (6.3%)8 (16.7%)
    Often18 (37.5%)23 (47.9%)15 (31.3%)16 (33.3%)15 (31.3%)23 (47.9%)
    Sometimes14 (29.2%)10 (20.8%)17 (35.4%)17 (35.4%)20 (41.7%)11 (22.9%)
    Rarely10 (20.8%)3 (6.3%)9 (18.8%)7 (14.6%)5(10.4%)2 (4.2%)
    Never2 (4.2%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.1%)1 (2.1%)2 (4.2%)1 (2.1%)
    No response (blank)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)3 (6.3%)

[i] ADLs = Activities of daily living; IADLs = Instrumental activities of daily living.

Table 5

Care Coordinators’ use of scales for care planning (n = 45).

EXPERIENCE AS A CARE COORDINATORDESIGNATED HEALTH PROFESSION
LESS THAN 5 YEARS5 YEARS TO 10 YEARS10 YEARS OR GREATERRNSWTHERAPIES
How often the DIVERT scale score was used
    With all patients2 (4.4%)2 (4.4%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.2%)3 (6.7%)
    With those who were DIVERT 3 or more1 (2.2%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.2%)1 (2.2%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.2%)
    With those who were DIVERT 5 or 63 (6.7%)4 (8.9%)2 (4.4%)8 (17.8%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.2%)
    Do not use11 (24.4%)8 (17.8%)11 (24.4%)19 (42.2%)7 (15.6%)4 (8.9%)
How often the CHESS scale score was used
    With all patients3 (6.7%)4 (8.9%)2 (4.4%)4 (8.9%)2 (4.4%)3 (6.7%)
    With those who scored 3 or more0 (0.0%)1 (2.2%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.2%)
    With those who scored 4 or more3 (6.7%)2 (4.4%)4 (8.9%)7 (15.6%)1 (2.2%)1 (2.2%)
    With those who scored End-Stage1 (2.2%)1 (2.2%)0 (0.0%)2 (4.4%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
    Do not use10 (22.2%)6 (13.3%)8 (17.8%)15 (33.3%)5 (11.1%)4 (8.9%)

[i] N = Registered Nurse; SW = Social Worker; OT = Occupational Therapist; PT = Physiotherapist; SLP = Speech Language Pathologist.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7007 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 18, 2022
|
Accepted on: Mar 29, 2023
|
Published on: Apr 10, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Connie Louise Schumacher, Rebecca Correia, Sophie Hogeveen, Megan Salter, Bailey Donaldson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.