Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Co-designing an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub With and for Families Experiencing Adversity Cover

Co-designing an Integrated Health and Social Care Hub With and for Families Experiencing Adversity

Open Access
|Apr 2023

References

  1. Arnstein S. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. JAIP. 1969; 35(4): 21624. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
  2. Suomi A, Freeman B, Banfield M. Framework for the engagement of people with a lived experience in program implementation and research: Review and report prepared for the LifeSpan suicide prevention project. Canberra: Australian National University; 2016.
  3. Organization WH. WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services: interim report. World Health Organization; 2015.
  4. Schubotz D. Participatory Research: Why and How to Involve People in Research. a: SAGE Publications; 2019. DOI: 10.4135/9781529799682
  5. World Health Organization. Health promotion glossary. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1998.
  6. O’Mara-Eves A, Brunton G, McDaid D, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, et al. Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis. Public Health Research. 2013; 1(4). DOI: 10.3310/phr01040
  7. Blomkamp E. The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2018; 77(4): 72943. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.12310
  8. Oliver K, Kothari A, Mays N. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Res Policy Syst. 2019; 17(1): 33. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3
  9. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners. 1969; 35(4): 21624. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
  10. Bazzano AN, Martin J, Hicks E, Faughnan M, Murphy L. Human-centred design in global health: A scoping review of applications and contexts. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11): e0186744. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186744
  11. Green T, Bonner A, Teleni L, Bradford N, Purtell L, Douglas C, et al. Use and reporting of experience-based codesign studies in the healthcare setting: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020; 29(1): 6476. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009570
  12. Mulvale A, Miatello A, Hackett C, Mulvale G. Applying experience-based co-design with vulnerable populations: Lessons from a systematic review of methods to involve patients, families and service providers in child and youth mental health service improvement. Patient Experience Journal. 2016; 3(1): 11729. DOI: 10.35680/2372-0247.1104
  13. Palmer VJ, Weavell W, Callander R, Piper D, Richard L, Maher L, et al. The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement. Med Humanit. 2019; 45(3): 24757. DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011398
  14. Greenhalgh T, Hinton L, Finlay T, Macfarlane A, Fahy N, Clyde B, et al. Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expect. 2019; 22(4): 785801. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12888
  15. Doughty C, Tse S. Can consumer-led mental health services be equally effective? An integrative review of CLMH services in high-income countries. Community Ment Health J. 2011; 47(3): 25266. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-010-9321-5
  16. Slattery P, Saeri AK, Bragge P. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020; 18(1): 17. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9
  17. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014; 7(4): 38795. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0
  18. Productivity Commission. Mental Health. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2020.
  19. State of Victoria. Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System, Final Report, Summary and recommendations; 2021.
  20. Australian Government National Mental Health Commission. National Children’s Mental Health and Wellbeing Strategy (draft). Canberra: Australian Government; 2021.
  21. Karatekin C, Hill M. Expanding the original definition of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. 2019; 12(3): 289306. DOI: 10.1007/s40653-018-0237-5
  22. Rockliffe L, Chorley AJ, Marlow LAV, Forster AS. It’s hard to reach the “hard-to-reach”: the challenges of recruiting people who do not access preventative healthcare services into interview studies. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018; 13(1): 1479582. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1479582
  23. Ellard-Gray A, Jeffrey NK, Choubak M, Crann SE. Finding the Hidden Participant. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2015; 14(5). DOI: 10.1177/1609406915621420
  24. Moll S, Wyndham-West M, Mulvale G, Park S, Buettgen A, Phoenix M, et al. Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(11). DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038339
  25. Robert G, Williams O, Lindenfalk B, Mendel P, Davis LM, Turner S, et al. Applying Elinor Ostrom’s Design Principles to Guide Co-Design in Health(care) Improvement: A Case Study with Citizens Returning to the Community from Jail in Los Angeles County. Int J Integr Care. 2021; 21(1): 7. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5569
  26. Price-Robertson R, Obradovic A, Morgan B. Relational recovery: beyond individualism in the recovery approach. Advances in Mental Health. 2017; 15(2): 10820. DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2016.1243014
  27. Malachowski C, Skopyk S, Toth K, MacEachen E. The Integrated Health Hub (IHH) Model: The Evolution of a Community Based Primary Care and Mental Health Centre. Community Ment Health J. 2019; 55(4): 57888. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-018-0339-4
  28. Elrod JK, Fortenberry JL. The hub-and-spoke organization design: an avenue for serving patients well. BMC Health Services Research. 2017; 17(1): 457. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2341-x
  29. British Design Council. Framework for Innovation. London: British Design Council; 2004. Available from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond.
  30. Hall T, Goldfeld S, Loftus H, Honisett S, Liu H, De Souza D, et al. Integrated Child and Family Hub models for detecting and responding to family adversity: protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation in two sites. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(5): e055431. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055431
  31. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2016 Census Community Profiles. Wyndham Canberra, Australia: ABS; 2016. Available from: https://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/communityprofile/21305?opendocument.
  32. Eastwood JG, De Souza DE, Shaw M, Garg P, Woolfenden S, Tyler I, et al. Designing Initiatives for Vulnerable Families: From Theory to Design in Sydney, Australia. International journal of integrated care. 2019; 19(3): 9-. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3963
  33. Tyler I, Lynam J, O’Campo P, Manson H, Lynch M, Dashti B, et al. It takes a village: a realist synthesis of social pediatrics program. Int J Public Health. 2019; 64(5): 691701. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-018-1190-7
  34. Sahle BW, Reavley NJ, Li W, Morgan AJ, Yap MBH, Reupert A, et al. The association between adverse childhood experiences and common mental disorders and suicidality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. European child & adolescent psychiatry; 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-021-01745-2
  35. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
  36. Hall T, Honisett S, Paton K, Loftus H, Constable L, Hiscock H. Prioritising interventions for preventing mental health problems for children experiencing adversity: a modified nominal group technique Australian consensus study. BMC Psychology. 2021; 9(1): 165. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00652-0
  37. O’Brien N, Heaven B, Teal G, Evans EH, Cleland C, Moffatt S, et al. Integrating Evidence From Systematic Reviews, Qualitative Research, and Expert Knowledge Using Co-Design Techniques to Develop a Web-Based Intervention for People in the Retirement Transition. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(8): e210. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5790
  38. Pruitt J, Grudin J, (eds.). Personas: practice and theory. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences; 2003. DOI: 10.1145/997078.997089
  39. Barbera-Guillem R, Poveda-Puente R, Neumann S, Becker H, Ramírez M, Wienholtz A, et al. Example of the application of the PERSONA methodology in the definition of needs and requirements for the WeTakeCare system. Assistive Technology. IOS Press; 2015: 91722.
  40. Hanington B, Martin B. Universal methods of design expanded and revised: 125 Ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport publishers; 2019.
  41. Abelson J, Li K, Wilson G, Shields K, Schneider C, Boesveld S. Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations: development and usability testing of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool. Health Expectations. 2016; 19(4): 81727. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12378
  42. Noble K, Hurley P, Macklin S. COVID-19, employment stress and student vulnerability in Australia. Melbourne: Mitchell Institute for Education and Health Policy, Victoria University; 2020.
  43. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC health services research. 2014; 14(1): 89. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89
  44. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? The Journal of continuing education in the health professions. 2006; 26(1): 1324. DOI: 10.1002/chp.47
  45. Clarke D, Jones F, Harris R, Robert G, Collaborative Rehabilitation Environments in Acute Stroke t. What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(7): e014650. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014650
  46. Hackett CL, Mulvale G, Miatello A. Co-designing for quality: Creating a user-driven tool to improve quality in youth mental health services. Health Expect. 2018; 21(6): 101323. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12694
  47. De Weger E, Van Vooren N, Luijkx KG, Baan CA, Drewes HW. Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review. BMC Health Services Research. 2018; 18(1): 285. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1
  48. Holzer JK, Ellis L, Merritt MW. Why we need community engagement in medical research. J Investig Med. 2014; 62(6): 8515. DOI: 10.1097/JIM.0000000000000097
  49. Tindall RM, Ferris M, Townsend M, Boschert G, Moylan S. A first-hand experience of co-design in mental health service design: Opportunities, challenges, and lessons. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2021; 30(6): 1693702. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12925
  50. Moore A, Wu Y, Kwakkenbos L, Silveira K, Straus S, Brouwers M, et al. The patient engagement evaluation tool was valid for clinical practice guideline development. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2022; 143: 6172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.034
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6975 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 21, 2022
|
Accepted on: Mar 29, 2023
|
Published on: Apr 5, 2023
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Teresa Hall, Sarah Loveday, Sandie Pullen, Hayley Loftus, Leanne Constable, Kate Paton, Harriet Hiscock, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.