Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Implementing a Care Coordination Strategy for Children with Medical Complexity in Ontario, Canada: A Process Evaluation Cover

Implementing a Care Coordination Strategy for Children with Medical Complexity in Ontario, Canada: A Process Evaluation

Open Access
|Apr 2022

Figures & Tables

ijic-22-2-6073-g1.png
Figure 1

Strategic Framework of Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO) strategy.

ijic-22-2-6073-g2.png
Figure 2

Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO) Logic Model.

Table 1

Characteristics of key informants, parent caregivers and their children with medical complexity.

CHARACTERISTICS OF KEY INFORMANTS(N = 38)%
Gender
    Female3387
    Male513
Age (years)
    25–34513
    35–441539
    45–541334
    55–64513
Years of experience in complex care
    Less than 6 months38
    6 to 11 months25
    1 to 2 years411
    3 to 4 years821
    5 to 10 years1539
    11 to 20 years616
Role in CCKO strategy
    Leadership Table member*1129
    Nurse practitioner821
    Physician616
    Allied health professional411
    Home and community care coordinator513
    Administrative staff411
CHARACTERISTICS OF PARENT CAREGIVERS AND THEIR CHILDREN WITH MEDICAL COMPLEXITY(N = 10)%
Of the Parents Gender
    Female990
    Male110
Home setting
    Urban550
    Rural550
Education level
    Some post-secondary220
    Completed secondary/high school110
    Completed post-secondary770
Family structure
    Never married- single parent330
    Married- dual parent660
    Divorced- single parent110
Of the Parent’s Child with Medical Complexity
    Age in months, median (IQR)28.5 (99.75)
Gender
    Male550
    Female550
Primary diagnoses
    Neurologic440
    Congenital/Genetic defect330
    Malignancy220
    Miscellaneous/Not elsewhere classified110
    # of diagnoses, mean (SD)5.9 (2.0)
    Medications used, mean (SD)4.7 (2.5)
    Technology devices used, mean (SD)2.4 (1.5)
    Hospital outpatient visits, mean (SD)14 (17.0)

[i] Characteristics of key informants, parent caregivers and their children with medical complexity, n (%) unless otherwise stated.

* Key Informants include clinical and administrative leads of regional hub sites, and ex officio members.

Table 2

Existing and required elements within each subdomain of the geographical, political, socio-cultural, and socio-economic CICI domains.

DOMAINSSUB-DOMAINSEXISTING ELEMENTSREQUIRED ELEMENTS
  • 1.0 Geographical

  • 1.1 Infrastructure

  • 1.2 Access to specialized community services

  1. Utilizing existing physical infrastructure (i.e., children’s rehabilitation institutions)

  1. Availability of specialized clinic space

  2. Consistent resourcing and access to specialized services between rural and urban regions

  3. Help with workforce challenges outside of major urban centres

  • 2.0 Political

  • 2.1 Project governance

  • 2.2 Cross-regional community of practice

  • 2.3 Resources

  • 2.4 Teamwork

  1. Strong provincial policy foundation and support by the Provincial Council of Maternal and Child Health (PCMCH)

  2. Established regions able to share experiences with newer regions

  3. Leadership Table facilitates cross-regional collaboration

  4. Quarterly Leadership Table meetings

  5. Complex Care Kids in Ontario (CCKO) funded as a time-limited pilot project with concurrent evaluation of its effectiveness

  6. Partnerships with home and community care services and children’s rehabilitation institutions

  7. Effective teamwork between members of the care team

  1. Greater policy-level integration of the health and social care systems that CMC and their families frequently interface

  2. Integration between the hospital and community care sector

  3. Consistent resourcing and access to specialized services

  4. Secure and sufficient funding for clinic, home and community care

  5. Additional funding for allied health professionals and multidisciplinary team dedicated to complex care

  6. Staff recruitment and retention across all positions

  • 3.0 Socio-cultural

  • 3.1 Ideas and values shared among members

  • 3.2 Relationships/Partnerships

  • 3.3 Coordination/involvement with community

  1. Relationships between care sectors to facilitate information sharing

  2. Regular steering committee meetings between sites

  3. Knowledge sharing between regions and care settings

  4. Strong family involvement during program design and dissemination

  1. Consistent approach to integrating cross-sectoral services

  2. Role clarity between community providers and the complex care team

  3. Need to understand each team member’s role across the care continuum

  4. Greater buy-in from community providers

  5. More mental health supports for families

  6. Additional video conferencing technologies available at community clinics

  • 4.0 Socio-economic

  • 4.1 Social resources

  • 4.2 Economic resources

  1. Family contributions to clinic expansion and securing clinic funding through advocacy work

  2. Leveraging existing public infrastructure to run complex care clinics

  3. Disparities between urban centres and remote parts of the province for accessing resources and services

  4. Financial burdens and out-of-pocket expenses for families

  1. Additional resources for families to receive therapies not covered through public sector (i.e., behavioural therapies)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.6073 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 3, 2021
|
Accepted on: Apr 11, 2022
|
Published on: Apr 28, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Samantha Quartarone, Jia Lu Lilian Lin, Julia Orkin, Nora Fayed, Simon French, Nathalie Major, Joanna Soscia, Audrey Lim, Sanober Diaz, Myla Moretti, Eyal Cohen, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.