Have a personal or library account? Click to login
New Zealand’s Integration- Based Policy for Driving Local Health System Improvement – Which Conditions Underpin More Successful Implementation? Cover

New Zealand’s Integration- Based Policy for Driving Local Health System Improvement – Which Conditions Underpin More Successful Implementation?

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 21 (2021): Issue 2
By: Tim Tenbensel,  Pushkar Raj Silwal,  Lisa Walton and  Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke  
Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. 1Nolte E, Bain C, McKee M. Population health. In: Smith PC, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I, Leatherman S, (eds.), Performance Measurement for Health System Improvement: Experiences, Challenges and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 27–62. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511711800.003
    Back to article
  2. 2Leutz WN. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. Milbank Quarterly. 1999; 77(1): 77–110. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00125
    Back to article
  3. 3Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications–a discussion paper. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2002; 2: e12. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.305
    Back to article
  4. 4Goodwin N, Stein V, Amelung V. What is integrated care? In: Handbook of Integrated Care. Springer; 2017. p. 3–23. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56103-5_1
    Back to article
  5. 5Busse R, Stahl J. Integrated care experiences and outcomes in Germany, the Netherlands, and England. Health Affairs. 2014; 33(9): 1549–58. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0419
    Back to article
  6. 6Valentijn PP. Rainbow of Chaos: A study into the Theory and Practice of Integrated Primary Care. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University; 2016.
    Back to article
  7. 7Minkman M. Suitable Scales; Rethinking Scale for Innovative Integrated Care Governance. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2020; 20(1). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.5468
    Back to article
  8. 8Suter E, Oelke ND, da Silva Lima MAD, Stiphout M, Janke R, Witt RR, et al. Indicators and measurement tools for health systems integration: a knowledge synthesis. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2017; 17(6). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3931
    Back to article
  9. 9Goodwin N. Understanding and evaluating the implementation of integrated care: A ‘three pipe’problem. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2016; 16(4). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2609
    Back to article
  10. 10Nuti S, Vola F, Bonini A, Vainieri M. Making governance work in the health care sector: evidence from a ‘natural experiment’in Italy. J Health Economics, Policy & Law. 2016; 11(1): 17–38. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133115000067
    Back to article
  11. 11Rosenberg BL, Kellar JA, Labno A, Matheson DH, Ringel M, VonAchen P, et al. Quantifying geographic variation in health care outcomes in the United States before and after risk-adjustment. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12): e0166762. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166762
    Back to article
  12. 12Gullery C, Hamilton G. Towards integrated person-centred healthcare–the Canterbury journey. Future Hospital Journal. 2015; 2(2): 111. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.2-2-111
    Back to article
  13. 13Doolan-Noble F, Barson S, Lyndon M, Cullinane F, Gray J, Stokes T, et al. Establishing gold standards for System-Level Measures: a modified Delphi consensus process. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2018; 31(3): 205–11. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy122
    Back to article
  14. 14Ashton T. Measuring health system performance: A new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand. Health Policy. 2015; 119(8): 999–1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.04.012
    Back to article
  15. 15Chalmers LM, Ashton T, Tenbensel T. Measuring and managing health system performance: An update from New Zealand. Health Policy. 2017; 121(8): 831–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.012
    Back to article
  16. 16Gordon D, McKay S, Marchildon G, Bhatia RS, Shaw J. Collaborative Governance for Integrated Care: Insights from a Policy Stakeholder Dialogue. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2020; 20(1) DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4684
    Back to article
  17. 17Denis JL, Lamothe L, Langley A, Breton M, Gervais J, Trottier LH, et al. The reciprocal dynamics of organizing and sense-making in the implementation of major public-sector reforms. Canadian Public Administration. 2009; 52(2): 225–48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00073.x
    Back to article
  18. 18Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, McGivern G, Dopson S, Bennett C. Making wicked problems governable?: the case of managed networks in health care. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2013. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603015.001.0001
    Back to article
  19. 19Lamarche P, Maillet L. The performance of primary health care organisations depends on interdependences with the local environment. Journal of Health Organisation and Management. 2016; 30(6): 836–854. DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2015-0150
    Back to article
  20. 20Tenbensel T, Miller F, Breton M, Couturier Y, Morton-Chang F, Ashton T, et al. How do policy and institutional settings shape opportunities for community-based primary health care? A comparison of Ontario, Québec and New Zealand. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2017; 17(2) 13: 1–15. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2514
    Back to article
  21. 21Gauld R. The Unintended Consequences of New Zealand’s Primary Health Care Reforms. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law. 2008; 33(1): 93–115. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-2007-048
    Back to article
  22. 22Cumming J, Mays N. New Zealand’s Primary Health Care Strategy: early effects of the new financing and payment system for general practice and future challenges. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2011; 6(1): 1–21. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133109990260
    Back to article
  23. 23Tenbensel T, Ashton T. New Zealand’s Healthcare System: Rapid Reform and Incremental Change. In: Okma KGH, Tenbensel T (eds.), Health Reforms Across The World: The Experience Of Twelve Small and Medium-sized Nations With Changing Their Healthcare Systems. Singapore: World Scientific Press; 2020. p. 249–73. DOI: 10.1142/9789811208928_0011
    Back to article
  24. 24Health and Disability System Review. Health and Disability System Review – Interim Report. Hauora Manaaki ki Aotearoa Whānui – Pūrongo mō Tēnei Wā. Wellington: Health and Disability System Review; 2019. [cited 12 March 2020]. Available from: https://systemreview.health.govt.nz/interim-report/.
    Back to article
  25. 25Gauld R. The theory and practice of integrative health care governance: The case of New Zealand’s alliances. Journal of Integrated Care. 2017; 25(1): 61–72. DOI: 10.1108/JICA-10-2016-0035
    Back to article
  26. 26New Zealand Ministry of Health. System Level Measures Framework Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2016.[cited 12 March 2020]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/new-zealand-health-system/system-level-measures-framework.
    Back to article
  27. 27New Zealand Ministry of Health. Guide to Using the System Level Measures Framework for Quality Improvement Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2018. [cited 12 March 2020]. Available from: https://nsfl.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/pages/guide_to_using_slms_for_quality_improvement_2018.pdf.
    Back to article
  28. 28Evans JM, Palmer KS, Brown AD, Marani H, Russell KK, Martin D, et al. Out of sync: a Shared Mental Models perspective on policy implementation in healthcare. Journal of Health Research Policy Systems. 2019; 17(1): 1–6. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0499-x
    Back to article
  29. 29Ansell C, Sørensen E, Torfing J. Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy and Politics. 2017; 45(3): 467–86. DOI: 10.1332/030557317X14972799760260
    Back to article
  30. 30McConnell A. Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy. 2010; 30(3): 345–62. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X10000152
    Back to article
  31. 31Dickinson H. Implementing Policy. In: Glasby J, (ed.) Evidence, Policy and Practice: Critical Perspectives in Health and Social Care. Bristol: Policy Press; 2011. p. 71–84. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt9qgp17.9
    Back to article
  32. 32Lipsky M. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1980. DOI: 10.2307/1288305
    Back to article
  33. 33Exworthy M, Powell M. Big windows and little windows: Implementation in the ‘congested state’. Public Administration. 2004; 82(2): 263–81. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00394.x
    Back to article
  34. 34Honig MI. Where’s the “Up” in Bottom-Up Reform? Educational Policy. 2004; 18(4): 527–61. DOI: 10.1177/0895904804266640
    Back to article
  35. 35Nilsen P, Ståhl C, Roback K, Cairney P. Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science. 2013; 8(1). DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-63
    Back to article
  36. 36May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implementation Science. 2016; 11(1): 141. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0506-3
    Back to article
  37. 37Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
    Back to article
  38. 38Pollitt C. Context: what kind of missing link? In: Context in Public Policy and Management. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2013. DOI: 10.4337/9781781955147
    Back to article
  39. 39Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2012; 22(1): 1–29. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur011
    Back to article
  40. 40Tenbensel T. Bridging complexity theory and hierarchies, markets, networks, communities: a ‘population genetics’ framework for understanding institutional change from within. Public Management Review. 2018; 20(7): 1032–51. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1364409
    Back to article
  41. 41Stokes T, Tumilty E, Doolan-Noble F, Gauld R. HealthPathways implementation in a New Zealand health region: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e025094. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025094
    Back to article
  42. 42Keast R, Mandell M. The collaborative push: moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of Management & Governance. 2014; 18(1): 9–28. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-012-9234-5
    Back to article
  43. 43Tenbensel T. Health System Regionalization - the New Zealand Experience. Healthcare Papers. 2016; 16(1): 27–33. DOI: 10.12927/hcpap.2016.24771
    Back to article
  44. 44Bromley P, Hwang H, Powell WW. Decoupling revisited: Common pressures, divergent strategies in the US nonprofit sector. M@n@gement. 2012; 15(5): 469–501. DOI: 10.3917/mana.155.0469
    Back to article
  45. 45Blackman T, Wistow J, Byrne D. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of factors associated with trends in narrowing health inequalities in England. Social Science and Medicine. 2011; 72(12): 1965–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.003
    Back to article
  46. 46Byrne D. Complex realist and configurational approaches to cases: A radical synthesis. In: Byrne D, Ragin C, editors. The Sage Handbook of Case-based methods. London: Sage; 2009. p 101–12. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249413.n6
    Back to article
  47. 47Byrne D, Ragin C. (eds). The SAGE Handbook of Case-based Methods; London: Sage; 2009. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249413
    Back to article
  48. 48Sager F, Andereggen C. Dealing with complex causality in realist synthesis: The promise of qualitative comparative analysis. American Journal of Evaluation. 2012; 33(1): 60–78. DOI: 10.1177/1098214011411574
    Back to article
  49. 49Berg-Schlosser D, De Meur G, Rihoux B, Ragin C. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach. In Rihoux, B and Ragin, C. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. p 1–18. http://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569. DOI: 10.4135/9781452226569.n1
    Back to article
  50. 50Ragin CC. Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press; 2000.
    Back to article
  51. 51van Dooren W, Hoffmann C. Performance Management in Europe: An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone? In: Ongaro E, Van Thiel S (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2018. p. 207–25. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_10
    Back to article
  52. 52van Dooren W, Bouckaert G, Halligan J. Performance Management in the Public Sector. London: Routledge; 2010. DOI: 10.4324/9780203030806
    Back to article
  53. 53Grudniewicz A, Tenbensel T, Evans JM, Steele Gray C, Baker GR, Wodchis WP. ‘Complexity-compatible’ policy for integrated care? Lessons from the implementation of Ontario’s Health Links. Social Science and Medicine. 2018; 198: 95–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.029
    Back to article
  54. 54Mischen PA. Collaborative Network Capacity. Public Management Review. 2015; 17(3): 380–403. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.822527
    Back to article
  55. 55Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008; 18(4): 543–71. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5602 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 11, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2021
Published on: Apr 23, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
New Zealand,
inter-organisational collaboration,
implementation,
Qualitative Comparative Analysis,
data sharing

© 2021 Tim Tenbensel, Pushkar Raj Silwal, Lisa Walton, Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 21 (2021): Issue 2Next article