Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Effectiveness Cover

An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Effectiveness

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. 1Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press. 2001.
  2. 2World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice. 2010.
  3. 3Way D, Jones L, Busing N. Implementation strategies: collaboration in primary care—family doctors & nurse practitioners delivering shared care. Toronto: Ontario College of family physicians. 2000; 8.
  4. 4Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. In the Netherlands, rich interaction among professionals conducting disease management led to better chronic care. Health Affairs. 2012; 31(11): 2493500. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1304
  5. 5Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Relational coordination promotes quality of chronic care delivery in Dutch disease-management programs. Health care management review. 2012; 37(4): 3019. DOI: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182355ea4
  6. 6Moore A, Patterson C, White J, House ST, Riva JJ, Nair K, et al. Interprofessional and integrated care of the elderly in a family health team. Canadian Family Physician. 2012; 58(8): e436e41.
  7. 7Yin J, Wei X, Li H, Jiang Y, Mao C. Assessing the impact of general practitioner team service on perceived quality of care among patients with non-communicable diseases in China: a natural experimental study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016; 28(5): 55460. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw075
  8. 8San Martin-Rodriguez L, D’Amour D, Leduc N. Outcomes of interprofessional collaboration for hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer nursing. 2008; 31(2): E18E27. DOI: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000305701.99411.ac
  9. 9Borrill C, West M, Shapiro D, Rees A. Team working and effectiveness in health care. British Journal of Healthcare Management. 2000; 6(8): 36471. DOI: 10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.8.19300
  10. 10Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009(3). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2
  11. 11Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(6). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
  12. 12Singh D. Transforming chronic care: a systematic review of the evidence. Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine. 2005; 9(2): 91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebcm.2005.03.011
  13. 13Bosch M, Faber MJ, Cruijsberg J, Voerman GE, Leatherman S, Grol RP, et al. Effectiveness of patient care teams and the role of clinical expertise and coordination. Medical Care Research and Review. 2009; 66(6_suppl): 5S35S. DOI: 10.1177/1077558709343295
  14. 14Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
  15. 15Pollock M, Fernandes RM, Becker LA, Featherstone R, Hartling L. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary. Systematic reviews. 2016; 5(1): 190. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5
  16. 16Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CM, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. JBI Evidence Implementation. 2015; 13(3): 13240. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000055
  17. 17Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2014: methodology for JBI umbrella reviews. University of Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute. 2014.
  18. 18Moher D, Liberati AA, Tetzlaff J, Altman, DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009 339: b2535. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
  19. 19Starfield B. Primary care: balancing health needs, services, and technology: Religion in America. 1998.
  20. 20Robinson KA, Chou R, Berkman ND, Newberry SJ, Fu R, Hartling L, et al. Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2016; 70: 3844. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.035
  21. 21Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JP, Caldwell DM, Reeves BC, Shea B, et al. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2016; 69: 22534. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
  22. 22Ballard M, Montgomery P. Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist. Research Synthesis Methods. 2017; 8(1): 92108. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1229
  23. 23Pieper D, Antoine S-L, Mathes T, Neugebauer EA, Eikermann M. Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2014; 67(4): 36875. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.007
  24. 24Barrett J, Curran V, Glynn L, Godwin M. CHSRF synthesis: interprofessional collaboration and quality primary healthcare. Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. 2007.
  25. 25DeLoach CC. The Impact of Interprofessional Collaboration on Diabetes Outcomes in Primary Care Settings. 2018.
  26. 26Gougeon L, Johnson J, Morse H. Interprofessional collaboration in health care teams for the maintenance of community-dwelling seniors’ health and well-being in Canada: a systematic review of trials. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 2017; 7: 2937. DOI: 10.1016/j.xjep.2017.02.004
  27. 27Martin JS, Ummenhofer W, Manser T, Spirig R. Interprofessional collaboration among nurses and physicians: making a difference in patient outcome. Swiss medical weekly. 2010; 140(3536). DOI: 10.4414/smw.2010.13062
  28. 28Proia KK, Thota AB, Njie GJ, Finnie RK, Hopkins DP, Mukhtar Q, et al. Team-based care and improved blood pressure control: a community guide systematic review. American journal of preventive medicine. 2014; 47(1): 8699. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.004
  29. 29Schepman S, Hansen J, De Putter ID, Batenburg RS, De Bakker DH. The common characteristics and outcomes of multidisciplinary collaboration in primary health care: a systematic literature review. International journal of integrated care. 2015; 15. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.1359
  30. 30Trivedi D, Goodman C, Gage H, Baron N, Scheibl F, Iliffe S, et al. The effectiveness of inter-professional working for older people living in the community: a systematic review. Health & social care in the community. 2013; 21(2): 11328. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01067.x
  31. 31Wranik WD, Price S, Haydt SM, Edwards J, Hatfield K, Weir J, et al. Implications of interprofessional primary care team characteristics for health services and patient health outcomes: A systematic review with narrative synthesis. Health Policy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.015
  32. 32Norful AA, Swords K, Marichal M, Cho H, Poghosyan L. Nurse practitioner-physician comanagement of primary care patients: The promise of a new delivery care model to improve quality of care. Health care management review. 2017. DOI: 10.7916/D8BK1QQG
  33. 33Mitchell G, Del Mar C, Francis D. Does primary medical practitioner involvement with a specialist team improve patient outcomes? A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2002; 52(484): 9349.
  34. 34Mitchell GK, Burridge L, Zhang J, Donald M, Scott IA, Dart J, et al. Systematic review of integrated models of health care delivered at the primary–secondary interface: how effective is it and what determines effectiveness? Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2015; 21(4): 391408. DOI: 10.1071/PY14172
  35. 35Smith SM, Cousins G, Clyne B, Allwright S, O’Dowd T. Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017(2). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004910.pub3
  36. 36Carmont S-A, Mitchell G, Senior H, Foster M. Systematic review of the effectiveness, barriers and facilitators to general practitioner engagement with specialist secondary services in integrated palliative care. BMJ supportive & palliative care. 2018; 8(4): 38599. DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001125
  37. 37Foy R, Hempel S, Rubenstein L, Suttorp M, Seelig M, Shanman R, et al. Meta-analysis: effect of interactive communication between collaborating primary care physicians and specialists. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010; 152(4): 24758. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-4-201002160-00010
  38. 38Health Quality Ontario. Community-based care for the management of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario health technology assessment series. 2009; 9(23): 1.
  39. 39Hazen AC, De Bont AA, Boelman L, Zwart DL, De Gier JJ, De Wit NJ, et al. The degree of integration of non-dispensing pharmacists in primary care practice and the impact on health outcomes: A systematic review. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2018; 14(3): 22840. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.04.014
  40. 40Kwint H-F, Bermingham L, Faber A, Gussekloo J, Bouvy ML. The relationship between the extent of collaboration of general practitioners and pharmacists and the implementation of recommendations arising from medication review. Drugs & aging. 2013; 30(2): 91102. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-012-0048-6
  41. 41Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, Lovell K, Richards D, Gask L, et al. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012(10). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2
  42. 42Thota AB, Sipe TA, Byard GJ, Zometa CS, Hahn RA, McKnight-Eily LR, et al. Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of preventive medicine. 2012; 42(5): 52538. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.019
  43. 43Sighinolfi C, Nespeca C, Menchetti M, Levantesi P, Murri MB, Berardi D. Collaborative care for depression in European countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2014; 77(4): 24763. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.006
  44. 44van Steenbergen-Weijenburg KM, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Horn EK, van Marwijk HW, Beekman AT, Rutten FF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care. A systematic review. BMC health services research. 2010; 10(1): 19. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-19
  45. 45Bower P, Gilbody S, Richards D, Fletcher J, Sutton A. Collaborative care for depression in primary care: making sense of a complex intervention: systematic review and meta-regression. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2006; 189(6): 48493. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.023655
  46. 46Coventry PA, Hudson JL, Kontopantelis E, Archer J, Richards DA, Gilbody S, et al. Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials. PloS one. 2014; 9(9): e108114. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108114
  47. 47Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J, Richards D, Sutton AJ. Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Archives of internal medicine. 2006; 166(21): 231421. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.21.2314
  48. 48Gunn J, Diggens J, Hegarty K, Blashki G. A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care. BMC health services research. 2006; 6(1): 88. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-88
  49. 49Panagioti M, Bower P, Kontopantelis E, Lovell K, Gilbody S, Waheed W, et al. Association between chronic physical conditions and the effectiveness of collaborative care for depression: an individual participant data meta-analysis. JAMA psychiatry. 2016; 73(9): 97889. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1794
  50. 50Huang Y, Wei X, Wu T, Chen R, Guo A. Collaborative care for patients with depression and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry. 2013; 13(1): 260. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-260
  51. 51Muntingh AD, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, van Marwijk HW, Spinhoven P, van Balkom AJ. Collaborative care for anxiety disorders in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC family practice. 2016; 17(1): 62. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0466-3
  52. 52Butler M, Kane R, McAlpine D, Kathol R, Fu S, Hagedorn H, et al. Integration of mental health/substance abuse and primary care. Evidence report/technology assessment No. 173. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2008.
  53. 53Fuller JD, Perkins D, Parker S, Holdsworth L, Kelly B, Roberts R, et al. Effectiveness of service linkages in primary mental health care: a narrative review part 1. BMC Health Services Research. 2011; 11(1): 72. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-72
  54. 54Craven M, Bland R. Better practices in collaborative mental health care: An analysis of the evidence base. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2006.
  55. 55Dham P, Colman S, Saperson K, McAiney C, Lourenco L, Kates N, et al. Collaborative care for psychiatric disorders in older adults: a systematic review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2017; 62(11): 76171. DOI: 10.1177/0706743717720869
  56. 56Davies SL, Goodman C, Bunn F, Victor C, Dickinson A, Iliffe S, et al. A systematic review of integrated working between care homes and health care services. BMC health services research. 2011; 11(1): 320. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-320
  57. 57Martin-Misener R, Valaitis R, Wong ST, MacDonald M, Meagher-Stewart D, Kaczorowski J, et al. A scoping literature review of collaboration between primary care and public health. Primary health care research & development. 2012; 13(4): 32746. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423611000491
  58. 58Felce D, Perry J. Quality of life: Its definition and measurement. Research in developmental disabilities. 1995; 16(1): 5174. DOI: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)00028-8
  59. 59Donnelly C, Ashcroft R, Mofina A, Bobbette N, Mulder C. Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective. Primary health care research & development. 2019; 20. DOI: 10.1017/S1463423619000409
  60. 60Haddara W, Lingard L. Are we all on the same page? A discourse analysis of interprofessional collaboration. Academic Medicine. 2013; 88(10): 150915. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a31893
  61. 61Dinh T. Improving primary health care through collaboration: Briefing 2, barriers to successful interprofessional teams. The Conference Board of Canada’s Canadian Alliance for Sustainable Health Care (CASHC): Conference Board of Canada; 2012.
  62. 62Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Consortium IHOR. Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: cross-national findings. International Journal for quality in Health care. 2002; 14(1): 514. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/14.1.5
  63. 63Cohidon C, Wild P, Senn N. Practice organization characteristics related to job satisfaction among general practitioners in 11 countries. The Annals of Family Medicine. 2019; 17(6): 5107. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2449
  64. 64Heinemann GD, Zeiss AM. Team performance in health care: assessment and development. Springer Science & Business Media; 2002.
  65. 65Xyrichis A, Ream E. Teamwork: a concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing. 2008; 61(2): 23241. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04496.x
  66. 66D’Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, San Martin Rodriguez L, Beaulieu M-D. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of interprofessional care. 2005; 19(sup1): 11631. DOI: 10.1080/13561820500082529
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5588 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 19, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 3, 2021
Published on: Jun 22, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Tania Carron, Cloe Rawlinson, Chantal Arditi, Christine Cohidon, Quan Nha Hong, Pierre Pluye, Ingrid Gilles, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.