Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Scoping Review of Alternative Payment Models in Maternity Care: Insights in Key Design Elements and Effects on Health and Spending Cover

A Scoping Review of Alternative Payment Models in Maternity Care: Insights in Key Design Elements and Effects on Health and Spending

Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. 1Euro-Peristat Project. Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant woman and babies in Europe in 2015. November 2018. Available at: http://www.europeristat.com. Accessed Jan. 05, 2019.
  2. 2World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. 2015. Availale at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/. Accessed Jan. 05, 2019.
  3. 3Euro-Peristat Project. Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant woman and babies in Europe in 2015. November 2018. Available at: http://www.europeristat.com. Accessed Jan. 05, 2019.
  4. 4Frakt AB, Mayes R. Beyond capitation: how new payment experiments seek to find the ‘sweet spot’ in amount of risk providers and payers bear. Health Affairs, 2012; 31(9): 19518. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0344
  5. 5The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. 2013. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Health-at-a-Glance-2013.pdf. Accessed Oct. 10, 2018.
  6. 6Robinson JC. Theory and Practice in the Design of Physician Payment Incentives. The Milbank quarterly, 2001; 79(2): 28. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.00202
  7. 7Miller HD. From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care. Health Affairs, 2009; 28(5): 14188. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1418
  8. 8Ruwaard S. Purchasing healthcare; Beyond setting the financial incentives right. Tilburg: Tilburg University. 2018. Available at: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/purchasing-healthcare-beyond-getting-the-financial-incentives-rig Accessed Oct. 10, 2018
  9. 9Miller HD. An alternative payment model for maternity care. Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform (CHQPR) Available at: http://www.chqpr.org/downloads/MaternityCare_APM.pdf. Accessed Jan. 05, 2019.
  10. 10Friedberg MW, Chen PG, White C, Jung O, Raaen L, Hirshman S, Tutty M. Effects of health care payment models on physician practice in the United States. Rand health quarterly, 2015; 5(1). DOI: 10.7249/RR869
  11. 11De Brantes F, Rosenthal MB, Struijs JN. Ensuring the Adoption of the Health Care Warranty: A Well-defined Model to Resolve Issues with Risk and Uncertainty. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery, 2020. 1(4).
  12. 12Nijagal MA, Shah NT, Levin-Scherz J. Both patients and maternity care providers can benefit from payment reform: four steps to prepare. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2018; 218(4): 411. e1e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.014
  13. 13Wing DA. The Future of Obstetrics and Gynecology: MACRA, Electronic Health Records, and More. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2017; 60(4): 840852. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000326
  14. 14Alternative Payment Model Framework and Progress Tracking (APM FPT) Work Group. Alternative Payment Model (APM) Framework. Final White Paper. 2016. Available at: https://hcp-lan.org/workproducts/apm-whitepaper.pdf. Accessed Feb. 10, 2019.
  15. 15De Vries E, Drewes H, Struijs J, Heijink R, Baan CA. Barriers to payment reform: experiences from nine Dutch population health management sites. Health Policy, 2019; 123(11): 11007. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.006
  16. 16Porter M, Kaplan R. How should we pay for healthcare? 2015. Harvard Business School. https://hbr.org/2016/07/how-to-pay-for-health-care
  17. 17The Clinical Episode Payment (CEP) Work Group. Accelerating and aligning clinical episode payment models: maternity care. 2016. Available at: https://hcp-lan.org/groups/cep/clinical-episode-payment/. Accessed Dec. 03, 2018.
  18. 18Rosenthal MB, Cutler DM, Feder J. The ACO rules--striking the balance between participation and transformative potential. N Engl J Med, 2011. 365(4): e6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1106012
  19. 19The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Better Ways to Pay for Health Care. 2016. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/publications/better-ways-to-pay-for-health-care-9789264258211-en.htm. Accessed Jan. 05, 2019.
  20. 20Struijs JN, Hayen A, Van Der Swaluw K. When Designing Bundled Payments, Don’t Ignore The Lessons Of Behavioral Economics. Health Affairs Blog, 2018. Available at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20180420.640240/full/. Accessed Jan 05, 2019.
  21. 21Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 2009; 6(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  22. 22Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Available at: https://merst.ca/ephpp. Accessed March 14, 2019.
  23. 23Ertok M. Evaluation of a Pay for Performance Scheme in Maternity Care: The Commissioning Quality and Innovation Payment Framework in England. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015(195): 93102. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.333
  24. 24Dahlen HM, McCullough JM, Fertig AR, Dowd BE, Riley, WJ. Texas Medicaid Payment Reform: Fewer Early Elective Deliveries And Increased Gestational Age And Birthweight. Health Affairs, 2017; 36(3): 460467. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0910
  25. 25Butcher L. Bundled Payment for Bundles of Joy. Manag Care, 2018; 27(2): 1822. https://www.managedcaremag.com/linkout/2018/2/18
  26. 26Conrad DA, Perry L. Quality-based financial incentives in health care: can we improve quality by paying for it? Annu Rev Public Health, 2009; 30: 357371. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100243
  27. 27Jarlenski M, Borrero S, La Charite T, Zite NB. Episode-Based Payment for Perinatal Care in Medicaid: Implications for Practice and Policy. Obstet Gynecol, 2016; 127(6): 108014. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001423
  28. 28Smith D, Hanlon C. Case Study: Tennessee’s Perinatal Episode of Care Payment Strategy Promotes Improved Birth Outcomes. National Institute for Childen’s Health Quality (NICHQ). 2017. Available at: https://nashp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Tennessee-Case-Study-Final.pdf. Accessed Dec. 10, 2018.
  29. 29DeRoche M, Guerette PJ, and Janjan N. The perinatal episode of care model: how will it affect you and your high-risk patients? Contemp Obstet Gynecol, 2015; 19.
  30. 30Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network (HCP-LAN). Establishing Maternity Episode Payment Models: Experiences from Ohio and Tennessee. 2018. Available at: https://hcp-lan.org/workproducts/mac/Establishing-Maternity-Episode-Payment-Models.pdf. Accessed Jan. 10, 2019.
  31. 31Tennessee Division of Health Care Finance & Administration. Executive summary: Perinatal episode. 2017. Available at: https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/tenncare/documents2/Perinatal.pdf. Accessed Dec. 10, 2018.
  32. 32Carroll C, Chernew M, Fendrick AM, Thompson J, Rose S. Effects of episode-based payment on health care spending and utilization: Evidence from perinatal care in Arkansas. Journal of Health Economics, 2018; 61: 4762. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.06.010
  33. 33Lally S. Transforming Maternity Care: A Bundled Payment Approach. Issue Brief. Integrated Healthcare Association, 2013. Available at: https://www.iha.org/sites/default/files/resources/issue-brief-maternity-bundled-payment-2013.pdf. Accessed Dec. 10, 2018.
  34. 34Arkansas Health Care Payment Improvement Initiative. Principle Accountable Provider Manual: Program Overview. 2016.
  35. 35Arkansas Health Care Payment Improvement Initiative. Principle Accountable Provider Manual: Program Overview. 2017. Available at: https://www.arkansasbluecross.com/doclib/documents/providers/Arkansas%20Health%20Care%20Payment%20Improvement%20Initiative%20Program%20Overview_060817_06_30_2017.pdf. Accessed Dec. 10, 2018.
  36. 36Chernew ME, Golden WE, Mathis CH, Fendrick AM, Motley MW, Thompson JW. The Arkansas Payment Improvement Initiative: Early Perceptions of Multi-Payer Reform in a Fragmented Provider Landscape. The American Journal of Accountable Care, 2015.
  37. 37State of Ohio. Detailed business requirements: perinatal episode. 2017. Available: http://medicaid.ohio.gov/Portals/0/Providers/PaymentInnovation/DBR/Perinatal.pdf. Accessed Dec. 10, 2018.
  38. 38De Brantes F, Love K. A process for structuring bundled payments in maternity care. NEJM Catalyst, 2016. Available at: https://catalyst.nejm.org/bundled-payments-maternity-care/. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  39. 39De Brantes F, Love K. Case study: first-year results of a pilot effort at a nonprofit Medicaid HMO in Texas. 2016.
  40. 40Fish DG. Introduction to Value Based Payments: Maternity Care in Measurement Year 2017. New York: Department of Health; 2017. Available at: https://www.health.ny.gov/facilities/public_health_and_health_planning_council/meetings/2017-03-22/docs/vbp_maternity.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  41. 41New York State Department of Health. Maternity Care Value Based Payment Arrangement. Measurement Year 2018 Fact Sheet. New York: Department of Health; 2018. Available at: https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/redesign/dsrip/vbp_library/2018/docs/2018-02-09_maternity.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  42. 42New York State Department of Health. A Path toward Value Based Payment: Annual Update. June 2016: Year 2. New York State Roadmap for Medicaid Payment Reform. Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment (DSRIP) Program. 2016. Available at: https://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/redesign/dsrip/2016/docs/2016-jun_annual_update.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  43. 43Rubinstein B. Case Study: Maternity Payment and Care Redesign Pilot. Pacific Business Group on Health, 2015. Available at: http://www.pbgh.org/storage/documents/TMC_Case_Study_Oct_2015.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  44. 44Rubinstein B. Call to Member Action: Transform Maternity Care. Four strategies to decrease the C-section rate and reduce hospital C-section variation in California. Pacific Business Group on Health. Available at: http://www.pbgh.org/storage/documents/C-sections-Call_to_Action_Formatted_FINAL.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  45. 45Integrated Healthcare Association: Matrnity and Women’s Health Episode Definitions. Bundled Episode Payment and Gainsharing Demonstration. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2016. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/system/delivery-system-initiative/bozicstudysnapshots/index.html. Accessed Dec. 15, 2019.
  46. 46Kozhimannil KB, Graves AJ, Ecklund AM, Shah N, Aggarwal R, Snowden JM. Cesarean delivery rates and costs of childbirth in a state medicaid program after implementation of a blended payment policy. Medical Care, 2018; 56(8): 658664. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000937
  47. 47Minnesota Health Services and Medical Management Division. Perinatal Practices. 2010. Available at: https://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2010/mandated/100219.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  48. 48Calvin S, Balazovic T. A Single Bundled Payment for Comprehensive Low-Risk Maternity and Newborn Care Provided by Independent Midwife-Led Birth Center Practices that Are Clinically Integrated with Physician and Hospital Services. Minnesota Birth Center; 2017. Available at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/255731/BundledPaymentMNBirthingCenter.pdf. Accessed Dec. 10, 2018.
  49. 49Struijs JN, De Vries EF, De Bruin-Kooistra M, Baan CA. Payment reform in maternity care. What can we learn from initiatives abroad? [in Dutch]. Bilthoven: The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). 2017. Available at: https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2018-11/009961_105550_IVM_001_A4_Brochure_V2_TG.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  50. 50Struijs JN, De Bruin-Kooistra M, Heijink R, Baan CA. The transition towards bundled payments for maternity care [in Dutch]. Bilthoven: The Dutch National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Available at: https://www.rivm.nl/publicaties/op-weg-naar-integrale-bekostiging-van-geboortezorg. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  51. 51Struijs JN and Hargreaves DN. Turning a crisis into a policy opportunity: lessons learned so far and next steps in the Dutch early years strategy. Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2019. 3(2): 6668. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30384-5
  52. 52Struijs JN, De Vries EF, Van Dorst HDCA, Over EAB, Baan CA. Insight in outcomes, utilization and medical spending of maternity care and first experiences with bundled payments [in Dutch]. Bilthoven: The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). 2018. Available at: https://www.rivm.nl/publicaties/geboortezorg-in-beeld-nulmeting-en-eerste-ervaringen-met-werken-met-integrale. Accessed Dec. 10, 2018.
  53. 53Henderson J. Maternity Pathway Bundled Payment. Maternity Pathway Bundled Payment. Department of Health. 2016. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Better-Ways-to-Pay-for-Health-Care-Background-Note-England-Maternity-pathway-bundled-payment.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016288
  54. 54Berry SA, Laam LA, Wary AA, et al. ProvenCare perinatal: a model for delivering evidence/ guideline-based care for perinatal populations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2011; 37(5): 229239. DOI: 10.1016/S1553-7250(11)37030-4
  55. 55Grigg CP, Tracy SK, Tracy M, et al. Evaluating Maternity Units: A prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand - Clinical outcomes. BMJ open, 2017; 7(8).
  56. 56Bailey DJ. Birth outcomes for women using free-standing birth centers in South Auckland, New Zealand. Birth, 2017; 44(3): 246251. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12287
  57. 57Clark. Primary Maternity Services Notice Amendment Notice 2018. In Gazette NZ, 2018. Available at: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/primary-maternity-services-amendment-notice-2018.pdf. Accessed Dec. 15, 2018.
  58. 58Berenson R, Delbanco S, Guterman S, et al. Refining the framework for payment reform. 2016. Health Affairs Blog, Available at: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20160919.056648/full/. Accessed Feb. 05, 2019.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5535 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: May 7, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2021
Published on: Apr 21, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Eline F. de Vries, Zoë T.M. Scheefhals, Mieneke de Bruin-Kooistra, Caroline A. Baan, Jeroen N. Struijs, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.