Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT Cover

Evaluation is Key: Providing Appropriate Evaluation Measures for Participatory and User-Centred Design Processes of Healthcare IT

International Journal of Integrated Care
Volume 21 (2021): Issue 2
By: Lorenz Harst,  Bastian Wollschlaeger,  Jule Birnstein,  Tina Fuchs and  Patrick Timpel  
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. 1World Health Organisation (WHO). Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions: Building Blocks for Action [Internet]. 2002 [zitiert 29. Juli 2019]. Verfügbar unter: http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/icccreport/en/.
    Back to article
  2. 2Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Social Science & Medicine. 1 September 2013; 93: 86–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.036
    Back to article
  3. 3Timpel P, Lang C, Wens J, Contel JC, Gilis-Januszewska A, Kemple K, u. a. Individualising Chronic Care Management by Analysing Patients’ Needs – A Mixed Method Approach. International Journal of Integrated Care. 13 November 2017; 17(6): 2. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3067
    Back to article
  4. 4Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, Rossing P, Mingrone G, Mathieu C, u. a. 2019 update to: Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia. 1 Februar 2020; 63(2): 221–8. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-019-05039-w
    Back to article
  5. 5Sood S, Mbarika V, Jugoo S, Dookhy R, Doarn CR, Prakash N, u. a. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2007; 13(5): 573–590. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0073
    Back to article
  6. 6Goyal S, Nunn CA, Rotondi M, Couperthwaite AB, Reiser S, Simone A, u. a. A Mobile App for the Self-Management of Type 1 Diabetes Among Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 19 Juni 2017; 5(6): e82. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.7336
    Back to article
  7. 7Holmen H, Wahl AK, Cvancarova Smastuen M, Ribu L. Tailored Communication Within Mobile Apps for Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review. Journal of medical Internet research. 23 Juni 2017; 19(6): e227. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7045
    Back to article
  8. 8Årsand E, Demiris G. User-centered methods for designing patient-centric self-help tools. Informatics for health & social care. September 2008; 33(3): 158–69. DOI: 10.1080/17538150802457562
    Back to article
  9. 9Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, Cox CE, Duker P, Edwards L, u. a. National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support. Diabetes Care. 1 Januar 2014; 37(Supplement 1): S144–53. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-S144
    Back to article
  10. 10American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2016 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes. Januar 2016; 34(1): 3–21. DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.34.1.3
    Back to article
  11. 11Lie SS, Karlsen B, Oord ER, Graue M, Oftedal B. Dropout From an eHealth Intervention for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study. Journal of medical Internet research. Mai 2017; 19(5): e187–e187. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7479
    Back to article
  12. 12Mangin D, Parascandalo J, Khudoyarova O, Agarwal G, Bismah V, Orr S. Multimorbidity, eHealth and implications for equity: a cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives on eHealth. BMJ Open. 12 2019; 9(2): e023731. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023731
    Back to article
  13. 13Lyles CR, Allen JY, Poole D, Tieu L, Kanter MH, Garrido T. “I Want to Keep the Personal Relationship With My Doctor”: Understanding Barriers to Portal Use among African Americans and Latinos. Journal of medical Internet research. Oktober 2016; 18(10): e263–e263. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5910
    Back to article
  14. 14Garcia-Jimenez M, Calvo-Friedman A, Singer K, Tanner M. Patient Experiences with the Use of Telephone Interpreter Services: An Exploratory, Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speaking Patients at an Urban Community Health Center. Narrative inquiry in bioethics. 2019; 9(2): 149–62. DOI: 10.1353/nib.2019.0027
    Back to article
  15. 15Otto L, Harst L. Bringing telemedicine into regular care: Theoretical underpinning for user-centred design processes. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Xi’an, China; 2019.
    Back to article
  16. 16Harst L, Lantzsch H, Scheibe M. Theories Predicting End-User Acceptance of Telemedicine Use: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2019; 21(5): e13117. DOI: 10.2196/13117
    Back to article
  17. 17Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 29 September 2008; 337. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655
    Back to article
  18. 18Norman DA, Draper SW. User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. USA: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.; 1986. DOI: 10.1201/b15703
    Back to article
  19. 19European Committee for Standardization. ISO 9241-210:2019(en), Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems [Internet]. 2011 [zitiert 15. November 2019]. Verfügbar unter: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-210:ed-2:v1:en.
    Back to article
  20. 20Harte R, Glynn L, Rodríguez-Molinero A, Baker PM, Scharf T, Quinlan LR, u. a. A Human-Centered Design Methodology to Enhance the Usability, Human Factors, and User Experience of Connected Health Systems: A Three-Phase Methodology. JMIR Human Factors. 2017; 4(1): e8. DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.5443
    Back to article
  21. 21González-Ortiz LG, Calciolari S, Goodwin N, Stein V. The Core Dimensions of Integrated Care: A Literature Review to Support the Development of a Comprehensive Framework for Implementing Integrated Care. Int J Integr Care. 2018; 18(3). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4198
    Back to article
  22. 22Goodwin N. Improving Integrated Care: Can Implementation Science Unlock the ‘Black Box’ of Complexities? Int J Integr Care. 2019; 19(3). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4724
    Back to article
  23. 23Sanders EBN. From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections. CRC Press; 2002.
    Back to article
  24. 24Swinkels ICS, Huygens MWJ, Schoenmakers TM, Oude Nijeweme-D’Hollosy W, van Velsen L, Vermeulen J, u. a. Lessons Learned From a Living Lab on the Broad Adoption of eHealth in Primary Health Care. J Med Internet Res. 29 März. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9110
    Back to article
  25. 25Esser PE, Goossens RH. A framework for the design of user-centred teleconsulting systems. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2009; 15(1): 32–9. DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2008.080601
    Back to article
  26. 26Taylor HA, Sullivan D, Mullen C, Johnson CM. Implementation of a user-centered framework in the development of a web-based health information database and call center. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 1 Oktober 2011; 44(5): 897–908. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.03.001
    Back to article
  27. 27Schnall R, Rojas M, Bakken S, Brown W, Carballo-Dieguez A, Carry M, u. a. A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps). Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 1 April 2016; 60: 243–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002
    Back to article
  28. 28Wodchis WP, Ashton T, Baker GR, Sheridan N, Kuluski K, McKillop A, u. a. A Research Program on Implementing Integrated Care for Older Adults with Complex Health Needs (iCOACH): An International Collaboration. Int J Integr Care. 2018; 18(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4160
    Back to article
  29. 29Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. Juni 2009; 26(2): 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
    Back to article
  30. 30Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2000; 2(1): 1–10.
    Back to article
  31. 31Sutcliffe A, Thew S, De Bruijn O, Buchan I, Jarvis P, McNaught J, u. a. User engagement by user-centred design in e-Health. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 13 September 2010; 368(1926): 4209–24. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0141
    Back to article
  32. 32LeRouge C, Ma J, Sneha S, Tolle K. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 1 November 2013; 82(11): e251–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.006
    Back to article
  33. 33Hennemann S, Beutel ME, Zwerenz R. Drivers and Barriers to Acceptance of Web-Based Aftercare of Patients in Inpatient Routine Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Journal of medical Internet research. 23 Dezember 2016; 18(12): e337. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6003
    Back to article
  34. 34Wöckl B, Yildizoglu U, Buber I, Aparicio Diaz B, Kruijff E, Tscheligi M. Basic senior personas: a representative design tool covering the spectrum of European older adults. In: Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility – ASSETS ’12. Boulder, Colorado, USA: ACM Press; 2012. S. 25. DOI: 10.1145/2384916.2384922
    Back to article
  35. 35Gemert-Pijnen JE van, Nijland N, Limburg M van, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, u. a. A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011; 13(4): e111. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1672
    Back to article
  36. 36Elavsky S, Smahel D, Machackova H. Who are mobile app users from healthy lifestyle websites? Analysis of patterns of app use and user characteristics. Translational behavioral medicine. Dezember 2017; 7(4): 891–901. DOI: 10.1007/s13142-017-0525-x
    Back to article
  37. 37Gray CS, Gravesande J, Hans PK, Nie JX, Sharpe S, Loganathan M, u. a. Using Exploratory Trials to Identify Relevant Contexts and Mechanisms in Complex Electronic Health Interventions: Evaluating the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool. JMIR Formative Research. 2019; 3(1): e11950. DOI: 10.2196/11950
    Back to article
  38. 38van der Weegen S, Verwey R, Spreeuwenberg M, Tange H, van der Weijden T, de Witte L. The Development of a Mobile Monitoring and Feedback Tool to Stimulate Physical Activity of People With a Chronic Disease in Primary Care: A User-Centered Design. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2013; 1(2): e8. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.2526
    Back to article
  39. 39Snyder C, Safari an OMC. Paper Prototyping. Burlington, Massachusetts: Morgan Kaufmann; 2003.
    Back to article
  40. 40Bolle S, Romijn G, Smets EMA, Loos EF, Kunneman M, van Weert JCM. Older Cancer Patients’ User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study. J Med Internet Res. 25 2016; 18(7): e208. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5618
    Back to article
  41. 41Georgsson M, Staggers N, Årsand E, Kushniruk A. Employing a user-centered cognitive walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation. J Biomed Inform. März 2019; 91: 103110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103110
    Back to article
  42. 42Lewis JR. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 1 Januar 1995; 7(1): 57–78. DOI: 10.1080/10447319509526110
    Back to article
  43. 43Agnisarman S, Narasimha S, Madathil KC, Welch B, Brinda FNU, Ashok A, u. a. Toward a More Usable Home-Based Video Telemedicine System: A Heuristic Evaluation of the Clinician User Interfaces of Home-Based Video Telemedicine Systems. JMIR Human Factors. 2017; 4(2): e11. DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.7293
    Back to article
  44. 44Kabeza CB, Harst L, Schwarz PEH, Timpel P. Assessment of Rwandan diabetic patients’ needs and expectations to develop their first diabetes self-management smartphone application (Kir’App). Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology. 1 Januar 2019; 10: 2042018819845318. DOI: 10.1177/2042018819845318
    Back to article
  45. 45Timpel P, Oswald S, Schwarz PEH, Harst L. Mapping the Evidence on the Effectiveness of Telemedicine Interventions in Diabetes, Dyslipidemia, and Hypertension: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020; 22(3): e16791. DOI: 10.2196/16791
    Back to article
  46. 46Kabeza CB, Harst L, Schwarz PEH, Timpel P. A qualitative study of users’ experiences after 3 months – the first Rwandan diabetes self-management Smartphone application “Kir’App”. Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism; 2019. DOI: 10.1177/2042018820914510
    Back to article
  47. 47Evans R, Brockman R, Grey J, Bell S, Harding S, Gunnell D, u. a. A cluster randomised controlled trial of the Wellbeing in Secondary Education (WISE) Project – an intervention to improve the mental health support and training available to secondary school teachers: protocol for an integrated process evaluation. Trials. 4 Mai 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2617-4
    Back to article
  48. 48Schoultz M, Macaden L, Hubbard G. Participants’ perspectives on mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a qualitative study nested within a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 19 Januar 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-015-0041-z
    Back to article
  49. 49Hayashi A, Yamaguchi S, Waki K, Fujiu K, Hanafusa N, Nishi T, u. a. Testing the Feasibility and Usability of a Novel Smartphone-Based Self-Management Support System for Dialysis Patients: A Pilot Study. JMIR research protocols. 20 April 2017; 6(4): e63. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.7105
    Back to article
  50. 50OECD. Health at a Glance 2019 [Internet]. 2019. Verfügbar unter: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/4dd50c09-en.
    Back to article
  51. 51Miani C, Ball S, Pitchforth E, Exley J, King S, Roland M, u. a. Organisational interventions to reduce length of stay in hospital: a rapid evidence assessment; 2014. DOI: 10.3310/hsdr02520
    Back to article
  52. 52Bankston-White C, Birmingham J. Case Management Directors: How to Manage in a Transition-Focused World: Part 1. Professional Case Management. April 2015; 20(2): 63–78. DOI: 10.1097/NCM.0000000000000078
    Back to article
  53. 53Åhsberg E. Discharge from hospital – a national survey of transition to out-patient care. Scand J Caring Sci. Juni 2019; 33(2): 329–35. DOI: 10.1111/scs.12625
    Back to article
  54. 54Mehta RL, Baxendale B, Roth K, Caswell V, Le Jeune I, Hawkins J, u. a. Assessing the impact of the introduction of an electronic hospital discharge system on the completeness and timeliness of discharge communication: a before and after study. BMC Health Serv Res. 5 September 2017; 17. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2579-3
    Back to article
  55. 55Brooke J. SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In: Usability Evaluation In Industry. 1. Aufl. London: CRC Press; 1996.
    Back to article
  56. 56Maeder AJ, Williams PAH. Health Smart Homes: New Challenges. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2017; 166–169. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-166
    Back to article
  57. 57Haux R, Koch S, Lovell NH, Marschollek M, Nakashima N, Wolf K-H. Health-Enabling and Ambient Assistive Technologies: Past, Present, Future. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. August 2016; 25(S 01): S76–91. DOI: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s008
    Back to article
  58. 58Bekiaris A, Mourouzis A, Maglaveras N. The REMOTE AAL Project: Remote Health and Social Care for Independent Living of Isolated Elderly with Chronic Conditions. In: Stephanidis C, Herausgeber (ed.). Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction Context Diversity. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. S. 131–40. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21666-4_15
    Back to article
  59. 59Wollschlaeger B, Kabitzsch K. Navigating the Jungle of Assistance Systems: A Comparison of Standards for Assistance Functionality. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies – Volume 5: HEALTHINF. SciTePress; >2019. S. 359–366. DOI: 10.5220/0007397903590366
    Back to article
  60. 60Wollschlaeger B, Kabitzsch K. Automated Engineering for Health Smart Homes: Find a Way in the Jungle of Assistance Systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 16 Juni 2020; 270: 828–32. DOI: 10.3233/SHTI200277
    Back to article
  61. 61Debong F, Mayer H, Kober J. Real-World Assessments of mySugr Mobile Health App. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019; 21(S2): S235–40. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0019
    Back to article
  62. 62Perimal-Lewis L, Maeder A, Gordon S, Tieman J. A Tablet-Based Memory Enhancement Application for Older Users: Design Approach. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2020. DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2020.427
    Back to article
  63. 63Nadal C, Doherty G, Sas C. Technology acceptability, acceptance and adoption – definitions and measurement. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19) Symposium: Workgroup on Interactive Systems in Healthcare (WISH). ACM; 2019.
    Back to article
  64. 64User-Centered Design Basics [Internet]. Usability.gov. Department of Health and Human Services; 2017 [zitiert 25. März 2020]. Verfügbar unter: /what-and-why/user-centered-design.html.
    Back to article
  65. 65Greenbaum J, Kyng M. Design at work cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ [u.a.]: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1991.
    Back to article
  66. 66Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness. The Milbank Quarterly. 1996; 74(4): 511–44. DOI: 10.2307/3350391
    Back to article
  67. 67Steele Gray C, Wodchis WP, Baker GR, Carswell P, Kenealy T, McKillop A, u. a. Mapping for Conceptual Clarity: Exploring Implementation of Integrated Community-Based Primary Health Care from a Whole Systems Perspective. Int J Integr Care. 21 März 2018; 18(1): 14. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3082
    Back to article
  68. 68Roberts A, Philip L, Currie M, Mort A. Striking a balance between in-person care and the use of eHealth to support the older rural population with chronic pain. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2015; 10: 27536. DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v10.27536
    Back to article
  69. 69Giguere AMC, Lawani MA, Fortier-Brochu E, Carmichael PH, Legare F, Kroger E, u. a. Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 25 Juni 2018; 19(1): 332. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1
    Back to article
  70. 70Dalton H, Read DMY, Booth A, Perkins D, Goodwin N, Hendry A, u. a. Formative Evaluation of the Central Coast Integrated Care Program (CCICP), NSW Australia. Int J Integr Care. 2019; 19(3). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4633
    Back to article
  71. 71van der Heide I, Snoeijs S, Quattrini S, Struckmann V, Hujala A, Schellevis F, u. a. Patient-centeredness of integrated care programs for people with multimorbidity. Results from the European ICARE4EU project. Health Policy. 2018; 122(1): 36–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.005
    Back to article
  72. 72Timpel P, Harst L. Research Implications for future telemedicine studies and innovations. Eur J Public Health. 1 November 2019; 29(Supplement_4). DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.098
    Back to article
  73. 73Langbecker D, Caffery LJ, Gillespie N, Smith AC. Using survey methods in telehealth research: A practical guide. J Telemed Telecare. Oktober 2017; 23(9): 770–9. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X17721814
    Back to article
  74. 74Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, Lynch J, Hughes G, A’Court C, u. a. Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017; 19(11): e367. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8775
    Back to article
  75. 75Morozov S, Guseva E, Ledikhova N, Vladzymyrskyy A, Safronov D. Telemedicine-based system for quality management and peer review in radiology. Insights Imaging. 1 Juni 2018; 9(3): 337–41. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-018-0629-y
    Back to article
  76. 76Read DMY, Dalton H, Booth A, Goodwin N, Hendry A, Perkins D. Using the Project INTEGRATE Framework in Practice in Central Coast, Australia. Int J Integr Care. 2019; 19(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.4624
    Back to article
  77. 77van Dyk L, Schutte CSL. Development of a maturity model for telemedicine. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering. Juli 2012; 23(2): 61–72. DOI: 10.7166/23-2-330
    Back to article
  78. 78Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th edition. New York: Free Press; 2003. XXI, 551 S.: Ill., graph. Darst., Kt.
    Back to article
  79. 79Hastall M, Dockweiler C, Mühlhaus J. Achieving end user acceptance: Building blocks for an evidence-based user-centered framework for health technology development and assessment. Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction Human and Technological Environments [Internet]. 2017 [zitiert 3. Januar 2018]; Verfügbar unter: https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/publication/2911802. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58700-4_2
    Back to article
  80. 80Boehm BW. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer. Mai 1988; 21(5): 61–72. DOI: 10.1109/2.59
    Back to article
  81. 81Schwaber K. SCRUM Development Process. In: Sutherland J, Casanave C, Miller J, Patel P, Hollowell G, Herausgeber (eds.), Business Object Design and Implementation. London: Springer; 1997. S. 117–34. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0947-1_11
    Back to article
  82. 82Ruparelia NB. Software development lifecycle models. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 11 Mai 2010. DOI: 10.1145/1764810.1764814
    Back to article
  83. 83van den Kieboom RC, Bongers IM, Mark RE, Snaphaan LJ. User-Driven Living Lab for Assistive Technology to Support People With Dementia Living at Home: Protocol for Developing Co-Creation–Based Innovations. JMIR Res Protoc. 28 Januar 2019. DOI: 10.2196/preprints.10952
    Back to article
  84. 84National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Evidence standards framework for digital health technologies. NICE; 2019.
    Back to article
  85. 85Southam-Gerow MA, Dorsey S. Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research in Dissemination and Implementation Science: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2 November 2014; 43(6): 845–50. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2014.930690
    Back to article
  86. 86Martínez-Alcalá CI, Muñoz M, Monguet-Fierro J. Design and Customization of Telemedicine Systems. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine; 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/618025
    Back to article
  87. 87Maurik IS van, Visser LN, Pel-Littel RE, Buchem MM van, Zwan MD, Kunneman M, u. a. Development and Usability of ADappt: Web-Based Tool to Support Clinicians, Patients, and Caregivers in the Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease. JMIR Formative Research. 2019; 3(3): e13417. DOI: 10.2196/13417
    Back to article
  88. 88McCurdie T, Taneva S, Casselman M, Yeung M, McDaniel C, Ho W, u. a. mHealth Consumer Apps: The Case for User-Centered Design. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology. 1 Januar 2012; 46(s2): 49–56. DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-46.s2.49
    Back to article
  89. 89Taylor DP, Bray BE, Staggers N, Olson RJ. User-Centered Development of a Web-Based Preschool Vision Screening Tool. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 2003: 654–8.
    Back to article
  90. 90Vilardaga R, Rizo J, Zeng E, Kientz JA, Ries R, Otis C, u. a. User-Centered Design of Learn to Quit, a Smoking Cessation Smartphone App for People With Serious Mental Illness. JMIR Serious Games. 2018; 6(1): e2. DOI: 10.2196/games.8881
    Back to article
  91. 91Zhou L, DeAlmeida D, Parmanto B. Applying a User-Centered Approach to Building a Mobile Personal Health Record App: Development and Usability Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2019; 7(7): e13194. DOI: 10.2196/13194
    Back to article
  92. 92Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth Interventions: The Need for Continuous Systemic Evaluation. PLOS Medicine. 18 August 2009; 6(8): e1000126. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126
    Back to article
  93. 93Vermeulen J, Neyens JC, Spreeuwenberg MD, van Rossum E, Sipers W, Habets H, u. a. User-centered development and testing of a monitoring system that provides feedback regarding physical functioning to elderly people. Patient Prefer Adherence. 27 August 2013; 7: 843–54. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S45897
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5529 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 16, 2021
Published on: Jun 21, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Healthcare IT,
user-centred design,
implementation,
evaluation,
acceptance

© 2021 Lorenz Harst, Bastian Wollschlaeger, Jule Birnstein, Tina Fuchs, Patrick Timpel, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 21 (2021): Issue 2Next article