Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Professional Care Networks of Frail Older People: An Explorative Survey Study from the Patient Perspective Cover

Professional Care Networks of Frail Older People: An Explorative Survey Study from the Patient Perspective

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. 1Rechel B, et al. Ageing in the European Union. Lancet, 2013; 381(9874): 131222. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067361262087X?via%3Dihub. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62087-X
  2. 2OECD. Ageing: Debate the Issues. in OECD Insights. 2015, Paris: OECD. DOI: 10.1787/9789264242654-en
  3. 3Clegg A, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet, 2013; 381(9868): 75262. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673612621679?via%3Dihub. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9
  4. 4OECD. Integrating social services for vulnerable groups. 2015, Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264233775-en
  5. 5Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications–a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care, 2002; 2: e12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1480401/pdf/ijic2002-200212.pdf. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.67
  6. 6Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ, 2000; 320(7234): 56972. http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/320/7234/569.full.pdf. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.569
  7. 7Bartlett M, et al. Health service use in the older person with complex health needs. Aust Health Rev, 2017. http://www.publish.csiro.au/ah/AH16286.
  8. 8Osborn R, et al. Older Americans Were Sicker And Faced More Financial Barriers To Health Care Than Counterparts In Other Countries. Health Aff (Millwood), 2017; 36(12): 21232132. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1048
  9. 9Tsakitzidis G, et al. Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2016; 16(2). DOI: 10.5334/ijic.2017
  10. 10Balard F, et al. Case management for the elderly with complex needs: cross-linking the views of their role held by elderly people, their informal caregivers and the case managers. BMC Health Serv Res, 2016; 16(1): 635. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101789/pdf/12913_2016_Article_1892.pdf. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1892-6
  11. 11Mulvale G, Embrett M, Razavi SD. ‘Gearing Up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Fam Pract, 2016; 17: 83. https://bmcfampract.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-016-0492-1. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0492-1
  12. 12van Dongen JJJ, et al. Interprofessional primary care team meetings: a qualitative approach comparing observations with personal opinions. Family Practice, 2016; 34(1): 98106. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw106
  13. 13Pullon S, et al. Observation of interprofessional collaboration in primary care practice: A multiple case study. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 2016; 30(6): 787794. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1220929
  14. 14Blom JW, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of proactive and multidisciplinary integrated care for older people with complex problems in general practice: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Age and Ageing, 2018; 47(5): 705714. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy091
  15. 15Park NS, et al. Associations of a social network typology with physical and mental health risks among older adults in South Korea. Aging Ment Health, 2018; 22(5): 631638. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13607863.2017.1286456?needAccess=true. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1286456
  16. 16Metzelthin SF, et al. Effectiveness of interdisciplinary primary care approach to reduce disability in community dwelling frail older people: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Research, Clinical Ed.), 2013; 347: f5264. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy091
  17. 17Fiori KL, Antonucci TC, Cortina KS. Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2006; 61(1): P2532. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/61.1.P25
  18. 18Rogers A, et al. Brief encounters: what do primary care professionals contribute to peoples’ self-care support network for long-term conditions? A mixed methods study. BMC family practice, 2016; 17(1): 21. https://bmcfampract.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-016-0417-z. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-016-0417-z
  19. 19Litwin H, Attias-Donfut C. The inter-relationship between formal and informal care: a study in France and Israel. Ageing & Society, 2009; 29: 7191. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/7398EA22E8FFCC59F4CD4B8A3AA4A0CB/S0144686X08007666a.pdf/div-class-title-the-inter-relationship-between-formal-and-informal-care-a-study-in-france-and-israel-div.pdf.
  20. 20Bonsang E. Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? J Health Econ, 2009; 28(1): 14354. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18950879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.002
  21. 21Janse B, et al. Formal and informal care for community-dwelling frail elderly people over time: A comparison of integrated and usual care in the Netherlands. Health Soc Care Community, 2018; 26(2): e280e290. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/hsc.12516. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12516
  22. 22Bate P, Robert G. Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual Saf Health Care, 2006; 15(5): 30710. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2565809/pdf/307.pdf. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016527
  23. 23Brocklehurst PR, et al. How do we incorporate patient views into the design of healthcare services for older people: a discussion paper. BMC Oral Health, 2018; 18(1): 61. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889523/pdf/12903_2018_Article_513.pdf. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0513-7
  24. 24Luxford K, Safran DG, Delbanco T. Promoting patient-centered care: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers in healthcare organizations with a reputation for improving the patient experience. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2011; 23(5): 510515. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr024
  25. 25Newbould J, et al. Experiences of care planning in England: interviews with patients with long term conditions. BMC Fam Pract, 2012; 13: 71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22831570. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-71
  26. 26Walker KO, Stewart AL, Grumbach K. Development of a survey instrument to measure patient experience of integrated care. BMC Health Serv Res, 2016; 16: 193. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890282/pdf/12913_2016_Article_1437.pdf. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1437-z
  27. 27Valente TW. Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. 2010: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301014.003.0003
  28. 28Litwin H, Stoeckel KJ, Confidant network types and well-being among older europeans. Gerontologist, 2014; 54(5): 76272. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4229891/pdf/gnt056.pdf. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnt056
  29. 29Wenger GC. A network typology: From theory to practice. Journal of Aging Studies, 1991; 5(2): 147162. DOI: 10.1016/0890-4065(91)90003-B
  30. 30Li T, Zhang Y. Social network types and the health of older adults: Exploring reciprocal associations. Social Science & Medicine, 2015; 130: 5968. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.007
  31. 31Burholt V, Dobbs C. A support network typology for application in older populations with a preponderance of multigenerational households. Ageing Soc, 2014; 34(7): 11421169. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102105/pdf/S0144686X12001511a.pdf. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X12001511
  32. 32Park NS, et al. Social network types, health, and well-being of older Asian Americans. Aging Ment Health, 2018: 110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13607863.2018.1506751?needAccess=true.
  33. 33Franchini M, et al. Integrated information for integrated care in the general practice setting in Italy: using social network analysis to go beyond the diagnosis of frailty in the elderly. Clinical and translational medicine, 2016; 5(1): 24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4963353/pdf/40169_2016_Article_105.pdf. DOI: 10.1186/s40169-016-0105-6
  34. 34Jacobs M, et al. Linkages between informal and formal care-givers in home-care networks of frail older adults. Ageing & Society, 2016; 36(8): 16041624. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X15000598
  35. 35Perry BL, Pullen E, Pescosolido BA. At the intersection of lay and professional social networks: how community ties shape perceptions of mental health treatment providers. Glob Ment Health (Camb), 2016; 3: e3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314740/pdf/S2054425115000254a.pdf. DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2015.25
  36. 36Kelley K, et al. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in health care, 2003; 15(3): 261266. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031
  37. 37Van Weel C, Schers H, Timmermans A. Health care in the Netherlands. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2012; 25(Suppl 1): S12S17. https://www.jabfm.org/content/25/Suppl_1/S12.short. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110212
  38. 38van Kempen JA, et al. Development of an instrument for the identification of frail older people as a target population for integrated care. British Journal of General Practice, 2013; 63(608): e22531. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582982/pdf/bjgp63-e225.pdf. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X664289
  39. 39Lutomski JE, et al. Validation of the Care-Related Quality of Life Instrument in different study settings: findings from The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS). Quality of Life Research, 2014. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-014-0841-2. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0841-2
  40. 40Moerman M, et al. Volwassenen- en ouderenmonitor GGD Gelderland-Zuid. Een gezondheidsonderzoek onder volwassen inwoners van regio Gelderland-Zuid naar gezondheid, welzijn, wonen, zorg en leefstijl. [Adult and elderly monitor community health service Gelderland-Zuid. A health survey among adult residents of the Gelderland-Zuid region into health, well-being, housing, care and lifestyle.]. 2014, Public Health Service Gelderland Zuid: Nijmegen [in Dutch].
  41. 41Peters LL, et al. Measurement properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2012; 13(6): 54651. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861012001144. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.04.007
  42. 42Uijen AA, et al. Measuring continuity of care: psychometric properties of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract, 2012; 62(600): e94957. http://bjgp.org/content/bjgp/62/600/e949.full.pdf. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12X652364
  43. 43Lemmens LC. Polyfarmacie bij kwetsbare ouderen: Inventarisatie van risico’s en mogelijke interventiestrategieën. 2013, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport.
  44. 44Beaulieu MD, et al. The team climate inventory as a measure of primary care teams’ processes: validation of the French version. Healthc Policy, 2014; 9(3): 4054. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999572/pdf/policy-09-040.pdf. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2014.23730
  45. 45van Asselt-Goverts AE, Embregts PJ, Hendriks AH. Social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities: characteristics, satisfaction, wishes and quality of life. J Intellect Disabil Res, 2015; 59(5): 45061. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/doSearch?AllField=10.1111%2Fjir.12143. DOI: 10.1111/jir.12143
  46. 46Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L. UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis (Version 6.102). Harvard, ma: analytic technologies. 2002. http://www.analytictech.com/.
  47. 47Bidart C, Degenne A, Grossetti M. Personal networks typologies: A structural approach. Social Networks, 2018; 54: 111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873315302057. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.11.003
  48. 48Freeman L. Visualizing social networks. Journal of social structure, 2000; 1(1). https://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume1/Freeman.html.
  49. 49Fu L, et al. An exploration of the Facebook social networks of smokers and non-smokers. PLoS One, 2017; 12(11): e0187332. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5667804/pdf/pone.0187332.pdf. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187332
  50. 50Weenink JW, et al. Patient Care Teams in treatment of diabetes and chronic heart failure in primary care: an observational networks study. Implement Sci, 2011; 6: 66. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-6-66. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-66
  51. 51Scott J, et al. Social network analysis as an analytic tool for interaction patterns in primary care practices. Ann Fam Med, 2005; 3(5): 4438. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1466914/pdf/0030443.pdf. DOI: 10.1370/afm.344
  52. 52Luque JS, et al. Social network characteristics and cervical cancer screening among Quechua women in Andean Peru. BMC Public Health, 2016; 16: 181. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4765061/pdf/12889_2016_Article_2878.pdf. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-2878-3
  53. 53Koetsenruijter J, et al. Social support and health in diabetes patients: an observational study in six European countries in an era of austerity. PloS one, 2015; 10(8): e0135079. https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-7525-12-29. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135079
  54. 54Litwin H, Shiovitz-Ezra S. Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. Gerontologist, 2011; 51(3): 37988. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3095651/pdf/gnq094.pdf. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnq094
  55. 55Cornwell B, et al. Social Networks in the NSHAP Study: rationale, measurement, and preliminary findings. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2009; 64(Suppl 1): i4755. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2763519/pdf/gbp042.pdf. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbp042
  56. 56Libbon R, et al. Family Skills for the Resident Toolbox: the 10-min Genogram, Ecomap, and Prescribing Homework. Acad Psychiatry, 2019; 43(4): 435439. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40596-019-01054-6.pdf. DOI: 10.1007/s40596-019-01054-6
  57. 57Rempel GR, Neufeld A, Kushner KE. Interactive use of genograms and ecomaps in family caregiving research. J Fam Nurs, 2007; 13(4): 40319. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1074840707307917. DOI: 10.1177/1074840707307917
  58. 58Bonecutter FJ, Gleeson, JP. Gleeson Genograms and ecomaps: tools for developing a broad view of family, 2019. [cited 2019-29-11]; Available from: https://tnchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Genograms-and-Ecomaps.pdf.
  59. 59Fooks C, et al. New Voices, New Power, New Ways of Working: Bringing integrated care to the National Health Service in England. Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont.), 2019; 21(4): 32. https://www.longwoods.com/content/25743. DOI: 10.12927/hcq.2019.25743
  60. 60Sadler E, et al. Disciplinary power and the process of training informal carers on stroke units. Sociology of health & illness, 2018; 40(1): 100114. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9566.12625. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12625
  61. 61Borgatti SP, et al. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 2009; 323(5916): 892895. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/323/5916/892. DOI: 10.1126/science.1165821
  62. 62Hengelaar AH, et al. Exploring the collaboration between formal and informal care from the professional perspective-A thematic synthesis. Health Soc Care Community, 2017. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/hsc.12503. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12503
  63. 63Stephan A, et al. Successful collaboration in dementia care from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and informal carers in Germany: results from a focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res, 2015; 15: 208. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-0875-3. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0875-3
  64. 64Wittenberg Y, et al. Informal caregivers’ views on the division of responsibilities between themselves and professionals: A scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2017. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hsc.12529. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12529
  65. 65Netherlands Inistitute for Health Services Research [NIVEL]. Nivel primary care registrations. 2018. [webpage on the internet]. [cited 2019 dec 12]; Available from: https://nivel.nl/nl/nivel-zorgregistraties-eerste-lijn/contacten-huisartsenpraktijk [in Dutch].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4721 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 7, 2019
Accepted on: Mar 9, 2020
Published on: Apr 1, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Sietske M. Grol, Gerard R. M. Molleman, Michel Wensing, Anne Kuijpers, Joni K. Scholte, Maria T. C. van den Muijsenbergh, Nynke D. Scherpbier, Henk J. Schers, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.