Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Review on Methods of Risk Adjustment and their Use in Integrated Healthcare Systems Cover

A Review on Methods of Risk Adjustment and their Use in Integrated Healthcare Systems

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1
    Behrend C Buchner F Happich M Holle R Reitmeir P Wasem J Risk-adjusted capitation payments: how well do principal inpatient diagnosis-based models work in the German situation? Results from a large data set The European Journal of Health Economics 2007 8 1 31 39 10.1007/s10198-006-0004-7
  2. 2
    Reschke P Sehlen S Methoden der Morbiditätsadjustierung 2005 Gesundheits-und Sozialpolitik 10 9
  3. 3
    Bauhoff S Do Health Plans Risk-Select? An Audit Study on Germany’s Social Health Insurance IRB 2010 17130 101
  4. 4
    Gaskins M Busse R Morbidity-based risk adjustment in Germany 2009 Eurohealth 15 3 29
  5. 5
    Göpffarth D Reforming Germany’s risk structure equalization scheme—taking stock at the halfway point Journal of Public Health 2005 13 5 248 256 10.1007/s10389-005-0121-2
  6. 6
    Greiner W Options for a future risc structure compensation in Germany Gesundheitswesen 2006 68 7 442 8 10.1055/s-2006-926889
  7. 7
    Antioch K Walsh M Risk-adjusted capitation funding models for chronic disease in Australia: alternatives to casemix funding The European Journal of Health Economics 2002 3 2 83 93 10.1007/s10198-002-0096-7
  8. 8
    Antioch KM Walsh MK The risk-adjusted vision beyond casemix (DRG) funding in Australia The European Journal of Health Economics 2004 5 2 95 109 10.1007/s10198-003-0208-z
  9. 9
    Donato R Richardson J Diagnosis-based risk adjustment and Australian health system policy Aust Health Rev 2006 30 1 83 99
  10. 10
    Duckett S Agius P Performance of diagnosis-based risk adjustment measures in a population of sick Australians Aust N Z J Public Health 2002 26 6 500 507 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2002.tb00356.x
  11. 11
    Beck K Growing importance of capitation in Switzerland Health Care Manag Sci 2000 3 2 111 119 10.1023/A:1019081021645
  12. 12
    Holly A Gardiol L Eggli Y Yalcin T Ribeiro T Health-based Risk Adjustment in Switzerland: an exploration using medical information from prior hospitalisation 2003 Final report. Research financed by the Swiss National Fund
  13. 13
    Nagy B Brandtmüller Á Implementing Risk Adjusted Capitation Payments with Health Care Reforms in Hungary Journal of Economic Literature 2008 147 160 10.21845/comp/2008/2/8
  14. 14
    Bertko J Current and future use of risk adjustment in the USA Journal of Health Policy, Insurance and Management 2011 May 2011 1 135 138
  15. 15
    Brown J Duggan M Kuziemko I Woolston W How does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program 2011 National Bureau of Economic Research 10.3386/w16977
  16. 16
    Brown J Duggan M Kuziemko I Woolston W Will risk-adjustment decrease health care costs? New evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program 2011b
  17. 17
    Ellis RP Pope GC Iezzoni L Ayanian JZ Bates DW Burstin H Ash AS Diagnosis-based risk adjustment for Medicare capitation payments Health Care Financ Rev 1997 17 3 101 28
  18. 18
    Feldman R Dowd B Wrobel M Risk selection and benefits in the Medicare+ Choice program Health Care Financ Rev 2003 25 1 23 36
  19. 19
    Gorman JK Medicare+ Choice risk adjustment: don’t leave money on the table Healthc Financ Manage 2001 55 8 45 8
  20. 20
    Kan H Does the Medicare Principal Inpatient Diagnostic Cost Group Model Adequately Adjust for Selection Bias? 2002 RAND Graduate School
  21. 21
    Pope GC Adamache KW Walsh EG Khandker RK Evaluating alternative risk adjusters for Medicare Health Care Financ Rev 1998 20 2 109 129
  22. 22
    Gilmer T Kronick R Fishman P Ganiats TG The Medicaid Rx model: pharmacy-based risk adjustment for public programs Med Care 2001 39 11 1188 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00006
  23. 23
    Kuhlthau K Ferris TG Davis RB Perrin JM Iezzoni LI Pharmacy-and diagnosis-based risk adjustment for children with Medicaid Med Care 2005 43 11 1155 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182551.87591.73
  24. 24
    Robst J Development of a Medicaid Behavioral Health Case-Mix Model Evaluation Review 2009 33 6 519 538 10.1177/0193841X09349420
  25. 25
    Welch WP Outpatient encounter data for risk adjustment: strategic issues for Medicare and Medicaid J Ambul Care Manage 2002 25 3 1 10.1097/00004479-200207000-00002
  26. 26
    Best WR Cowper DC The Ratio of Observed-to-Expected Mortality as a Quality of Care Indlcator in Non-Surgical VA Patients Med Care 1994 32 4 390 400 10.1097/00005650-199404000-00007
  27. 27
    Khuri SF Daley J Henderson W Hur K Demakis J Aust JB Chong V Fabri PJ Gibbs JO Grover F The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program Annals of surgery 1998 228 4 491 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006
  28. 28
    Maciejewski ML Liu CF Derleth A McDonell M Anderson S Fihn SD The performance of administrative and self-reported measures for risk adjustment of Veterans Affairs expenditures Health Serv Res 2005 40 3 887 904 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00390.x
  29. 29
    Pietz K Ashton CM McDonell M Wray NP Predicting healthcare costs in a population of veterans affairs beneficiaries using diagnosis-based risk adjustment and self-reported health status Med Care 2004 42 10 1027 35 10.1097/00005650-200410000-00012
  30. 30
    Rosen AK Loveland S Anderson JJ Rothendler JA Hankin CS Rakovski CC Moskowitz MA Berlowitz DR Evaluating diagnosis-based case-mix measures: how well do they apply to the VA population? Med Care 2001 39 7 692 704 10.1097/00005650-200107000-00006
  31. 31
    Sloan KL Sales AE Liu CF Fishman P Nichol P Suzuki NT Sharp ND Construction and characteristics of the RxRisk-V: a VA-adapted pharmacy-based case-mix instrument Med Care 2003 41 6 761 74 10.1097/01.MLR.0000064641.84967.B7
  32. 32
    Aguado A Guino E Mukherjee B Sicras A Serrat J Acedo M Ferro JJ Moreno V Variability in prescription drug expenditures explained by adjusted clinical groups (ACG) case-mix: a cross-sectional study of patient electronic records in primary care BMC Health Serv Res 2008 8 53 10.1186/1472-6963-8-53
  33. 33
    Calderon-Larranaga A Abrams C Poblador-Plou B Weiner JP Prados-Torres A Applying diagnosis and pharmacy-based risk models to predict pharmacy use in Aragon, Spain: the impact of a local calibration BMC Health Serv Res 2010 10 22 10.1186/1472-6963-10-22
  34. 34
    Carlsson L Borjesson U Edgren L Patient based ‘burden-of-illness’ in Swedish primary health care. Applying the Johns Hopkins ACG case-mix system in a retrospective study of electronic patient records Int J Health Plann Manage 2002 17 3 269 82 10.1002/hpm.674
  35. 35
    Engstrom SG Carlsson L Ostgren CJ Nilsson GH Borgquist LA The importance of comorbidity in analysing patient costs in Swedish primary care BMC Public Health 2006 6 36 10.1186/1471-2458-6-36
  36. 36
    Mohamed R Determination of Risk Factors for High-Cost Cases within DRG Systems of Selected European Countries 2009 Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster Universitätsklinikum Münster
  37. 37
    Ghali WA Rothwell DM Quan H Brant R Tu JV A Canadian comparison of data sources for coronary artery bypass surgery outcome “report cards” Am Heart J 2000 140 3 402 8 10.1067/mhj.2000.109222
  38. 38
    Reid RJ MacWilliam L Verhulst L Roos N Atkinson M Performance of the ACG case-mix system in two Canadian provinces Med Care 2001 39 1 86 99 10.1097/00005650-200101000-00010
  39. 39
    Sibley LM Moineddin R Agha MM Glazier RH Risk adjustment using administrative data-based and survey-derived methods for explaining physician utilization Med Care 2010 48 2 175 82 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c16102
  40. 40
    Lamers LM Risk-adjusted capitation payments: developing a diagnostic cost groups classification for the Dutch situation Health Policy 1998 45 1 15 32 10.1016/S0168-8510(98)00031-1
  41. 41
    Persaud D Narine L Cross-national comparison of capitation funding: the American, British and Dutch experience Health Serv Manage Res 1999 12 2 121 35
  42. 42
    Van de Ven WPMM Beck K Van de Voorde C Wasem J Zmora I Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: 6 years later Health Policy 2007 83 2–3 162 179 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.12.004
  43. 43
    Van de Ven WPMM van Vliet RCJA Lamers LM Health-adjusted premium subsidies in the Netherlands Health Affairs 2004 23 3 45 55 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.45
  44. 44
    Chang HY Lee WC Weiner JP Comparison of alternative risk adjustment measures for predictive modeling: high risk patient case finding using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance claims BMC Health Serv Res 2010 10 343 10.1186/1472-6963-10-343
  45. 45
    Chang HY Weiner JP An in-depth assessment of a diagnosis-based risk adjustment model based on national health insurance claims: the application of the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Group case-mix system in Taiwan BMC Med 2010 8 7 10.1186/1741-7015-8-7
  46. 46
    Chern JY Wan TT Begun JW A structural equation modeling approach to examining the predictive power of determinants of individuals’ health expenditures J Med Syst 2002 26 4 323 36 10.1023/A:1015868720789
  47. 47
    Lee WC Huang TP Explanatory ability of the ACG system regarding the utilization and expenditure of the national health insurance population in Taiwan—a 5-year analysis J Chin Med Assoc 2008 71 4 191 9 10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70103-5
  48. 48
    Cid Pedraza C Diagnoses-Based Risk Adjusted Capitation Payments for Improving Solidarity and Efficiency in the Chilean Health Care System: Evaluation and Comparison with a Demographic Model 2011 Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen
  49. 49
    Vargas V Wasem J Using selected diagnoses to improve the Chilean capitation formula 2002
  50. 50
    Shmueli A Messika D Zmora I Oberman B Health care costs during the last 12 months of life in Israel: estimation and implications for risk-adjustment International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 2010 10 3 257 273 10.1007/s10754-010-9080-4
  51. 51
    Yuen EJ Louis DZ Loreto PD Gonnella JS Modeling risk-adjusted capitation rates for Umbria, Italy The European Journal of Health Economics 2003 4 4 304 312 10.1007/s10198-003-0193-2
  52. 52
    Holly R Szczepaniak M The development of the private health insurance and medical services market in Poland in the years 2005–2010 Journal of Health Policy, Insurance and Management 2011 May 2011 1 111 121
  53. 53
    Salchev P Hristov N Georgieva L Possible approaches to benchmarking voluntary health insurance funds in Bulgaria Journal of Health Policy, Insurance and Management 2011 May 2011 1 101 111
  54. 54
    Erler A Beyer M Muth C Gerlach F Brennecke R Garbage in-Garbage out? Validität von Abrechnungsdiagnosen in hausärztlichen Praxen Garbage in-Garbage out? Validity of Coded Diagnoses from GP Claims Records Gesundheitswesen 2009 71 12 823 831 10.1055/s-0029-1214399
  55. 55
    Reschke P Sehlen S Schiffhorst G Schräder WF Lauterbach KW Wasem J Klassifikationsmodelle für Versicherte im Risikostrukturausgleich Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung, Referat Information, Publikation, Redaktion 2005 Bonn Institut für Gesundheits- und Sozialforschung (IGES) Berlin
  56. 56
    Mühlbacher A Integrierte Versorgung: Risikoadjustierung 2006 Berlin ZiG Print 2006–05
  57. 57
    Kronick R Gilmer T Dreyfus T Lee L Improving health-based payment for Medicaid beneficiaries: CDPS Health Care Financ Rev 2000 21 3 29 64
  58. 58
    Trottmann M Weidacher A Leonhardt R Morbiditätsbezogene Ausgleichsfaktoren im Schweizer Risikoausgleich. Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesamts für Gesundheit 2010
  59. 59
    Shanmugam G West M Berg G Additive and logistic EuroSCORE performance in high risk patients Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2005 4 4 299 303 10.1510/icvts.2004.104042
  60. 60
    Roques F Nashef S Michel P Gauducheau E De Vincentiis C Baudet E Cortina J David M Faichney A Gavrielle F Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 1999 15 6 816 823 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00106-2
  61. 61
    Mohr VD Bauer J Döbler K Eckert O Fischer B Woldenga C Qualität sichtbar machen. BQS-Qualitätsreport 2004 2005 Düsseldorf BQS Bundesgeschäftsstelle Qualitätssicherung gGmbH
  62. 62
    Schneeweiss S Sangha O Weiterentwicklung von Krankenhausbetriebsvergleichen: Wie wichtig ist Risiko-Adjustierung für den Krankenhausvergleich 2000 Berlin Springer Krankenhausbetriebsvergleiche
  63. 63
    Nashef S Roques F Michel P Gauducheau E Lemeshow S Salamon R European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE) European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 1999 16 1 9 13 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00134-7
  64. 64
    Mark DB Implications of cost in treatment selection for patients with coronary heart disease Ann Thorac Surg 1996 61 2 s12 s15 10.1016/0003-4975(95)01077-7
  65. 65
    Pope GC Ellis RP Ash AS Ayanian J Bates D Burstin H Iezzoni L Marcantonio E Wu B Diagnostic cost group hierarchical condition category models for Medicare risk adjustment 2000 December Final Report to Health Care Financing Administration
  66. 66
    Zhao Y Ellis RP Ash AS Calabrese D Ayanian JZ Slaughter JP Weyuker L Bowen B Measuring population health risks using inpatient diagnoses and outpatient pharmacy data Health Serv Res 2001 36 6 Pt 2 180 93
  67. 67
    Bundesrat Einbezug eines weiteren Morbiditätsfaktors in den Risikoausgleich. Bericht des Bundesrates in Erfüllung des Postulates 07.3769 der Kommission für soziale Sicherheit und Gesundheit des Ständerates vom 9 2007 November 2007
  68. 68
    World Health Organization The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System with Defined Daily Doses (ATC/DDD) Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/atcddd/en/
  69. 69
    Beck K Trottmann M Auswirkungen eines Hochrisikopools auf die Risikoselektion im Schweizer Krankenversicherungs-Wettbewerb: Eine empirische Klärung 2007 Luzern Schriften des CSS-Instituts für empirische Gesundheitsökonomie
  70. 70
    Clark DO Von Korff M Saunders K Baluch WM Simon GE A chronic disease score with empirically derived weights Med Care 1995 33 8 783 10.1097/00005650-199508000-00004
  71. 71
    Von Korff M Wagner EH Saunders K A chronic disease score from automated pharmacy data J Clin Epidemiol 1992 45 2 197 203 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90016-G
  72. 72
    Ash AS Ellis RP Pope GC Ayanian JZ Bates DW Burstin H Iezzoni LI MacKay E Yu W Using diagnoses to describe populations and predict costs Health Care Financing Review 2000 21 3 7 28
  73. 73
    Pope GC Ellis RP Ash AS Liu CF Ayanian JZ Bates DW Burstin H Iezzoni LI Ingber MJ Principal inpatient diagnostic cost group model for Medicare risk adjustment Health Care Financ Rev 2000 21 3 93 118
  74. 74
    Pope GC Kautter J Ellis RP Ash AS Ayanian JZ Ingber MJ Levy JM Robst J Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model 2004
  75. 75
    Fishman PA Goodman MJ Hornbrook MC Meenan RT Bachman DJ O’Keeffe Rosetti MC Risk adjustment using automated ambulatory pharmacy data: the RxRisk model Med Care 2003 41 1 84 99 10.1097/01.mlr.0000039830.19812.29
  76. 76
    Fishman PA Shay DK Development and estimation of a pediatric chronic disease score using automated pharmacy data Med Care 1999 37 9 874 83 10.1097/00005650-199909000-00004
  77. 77
    Lamers LM van Vliet RCJA van de Ven WPMM Risk-adjusted capitation payment systems for health insurance plans in a competitive market Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 2003 3 5 541 549 10.1586/14737167.3.5.541
  78. 78
    Lamers LM Vliet R Health-based risk adjustment Improving the pharmacy-based cost group The European Journal of Health Economics 2003 4 2 107 114 10.1007/s10198-002-0159-9
  79. 79
    Zhao Y Ash AS Ellis RP Ayanian JZ Pope GC Bowen B Weyuker L Predicting pharmacy costs and other medical costs using diagnoses and drug claims Med Care 2005 43 1 34
  80. 80
    University of California Medicaid Rx Available from: http://medicaidrx.ucsd.edu/
  81. 81
    Glaeske G Anpassung des Klassifikationsmodells RxGroups an die speziellen Voraussetzungen in der GKV 2005 Köln Bundesgesundheitsministerium, Editor
  82. 82
    Lamers LM Risk-adjusted capitation based on the Diagnostic Cost Group Model: an empirical evaluation with health survey information Health Serv Res 1999 33 6 1727 44
  83. 83
    Weiner JP Starfield BH Powe NR Stuart ME Steinwachs DM Ambulatory care practice variation within a Medicaid program Health Serv Res 1996 30 6 751 70
  84. 84
    Dubois MF Dubuc N Kröger E Girard R Hébert R Assessing comorbidity in older adults using prescription claims data Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
  85. 85
    Dubois RW Brook RH Rogers WH Adjusted hospital death rates: a potential screen for quality of medical care Am J Public Health 1987 77 9 1162 6 10.2105/AJPH.77.9.1162
  86. 86
    Kronick R Gilmer T Dreyfus T Ganiats T CDPS-Medicare: The chronic illness and disability payment system modified to predict expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries 2002 Final Report to CMS
  87. 87
    Kahn KL Rogers WH Rubenstein LV Sherwood MJ Reinisch EJ Keeler EB Draper D Kosecoff J Brook RH Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1990 264 15 1969 10.1001/jama.1990.03450150069033
  88. 88
    Eggli Y SQLape® 2012 Available from: http://sqlape.com/index.htm (cited 2012 August, 8)
  89. 89
    Meenan RT Goodman MJ Fishman PA Hornbrook MC O’Keeffe-Rosetti MC Bachman DJ Using risk-adjustment models to identify high-cost risks Med Care 2003 41 11 1301 12 10.1097/01.MLR.0000094480.13057.75
  90. 90
    Starfield B Weiner J Mumford L Steinwachs D Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management Health Serv Res 1991 26 1 53
  91. 91
    Thomas JW Lichtenstein R Including health status in Medicare’s adjusted average per capita cost capitation formula Med Care 1986 259 275 10.1097/00005650-198603000-00008
  92. 92
    Orueta JF Lopez-De-Munain J Báez K Aiarzaguena J Aranguren JI Pedrero E Application of the Ambulatory Care Groups in the Primary Care of a European National Health Care System: Does It Work? Medical Care 1999 37 3 238 248 10.1097/00005650-199903000-00004
  93. 93
    Mühlbacher A Methoden der Risikoadjustierung: Herausforderungen und Alternativen Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 2005 4 2005 540 548
  94. 94
    Ellis RP Risk adjustment in health care markets: Concepts and applications Financing Health Care 2008 177 222
  95. 95
    Beeuwkes Buntin M Garber AM McClellan M Newhouse JP The costs of decedents in the Medicare program: implications for payments to Medicare+ Choice plans Health Serv Res 2004 39 1 111 130 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00218.x
  96. 96
    Rosen AK Loveland SA Anderson JJ Hankin CS Breckenridge JN Berlowitz DR Diagnostic cost groups (DCGs) and concurrent utilization among patients with substance abuse disorders Health Serv Res 2002 37 4 1079 103 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.67.x
  97. 97
    Robst J Levy JM Ingber MJ Diagnosis-based risk adjustment for medicare prescription drug plan payments Health Care Financ Rev 2007 28 4 15
  98. 98
    Barcley T Patterson K An Introduction to diagnosis-based Risk Adjusters. Research Report 1999 Milliman&Robertson
  99. 99
    Hughes JS Averill RF Eisenhandler J Goldfield NI Muldoon J Neff JM Gay JC Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs): a classification system for risk-adjusted capitation-based payment and health care management Med Care 2004 42 1 81 10.1097/01.mlr.0000102367.93252.70
  100. 100
    Kemka JM A new risk management paradigm for managed care Healthc Financ Manage 2000 54 6 41 3
  101. 101
    McClellan M McNeil BJ Newhouse JP Does More Intensive Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Elderly Reduce Mortality? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1994 272 11 859 10.1001/jama.1994.03520110039026
  102. 102
    Leiber S Greß S Heinemann S Explaining Different Paths in Social Health Insurance Countries–Health System Change and Cross-border Lesson-drawing between Germany, Austria and the Netherlands Social Policy & Administration 2015 49 1 88 108 10.1111/spol.12078
  103. 103
    Göpffarth D Bekanntmachung zum Gesundheitsfonds Nr. 1/2012 2011 Bonn Bundesversicherungsamt
  104. 104
    Bundesversicherungsamt So funktioniert der neue Risikostrukturausgleich im Gesundheitsfonds 2008 Berlin
  105. 105
    Konig T National health fund and morbidity-based risk structure equalization with focus on haemophilia Hamostaseologie 2010 30 Suppl 1 S70 5
  106. 106
    Mühlbacher A Integrierte Versorgung: Risikomanagement 2007 32 ZIG Print. 2007–03
  107. 107
    Amelung V Schumacher H Managed Care. Neue Wege im Gesundheitswesen 2004 Wiesbaden Gabler
  108. 108
    Fowles JB Weiner JP Knutson D Fowler E Tucker AM Ireland M Taking health status into account when setting capitation rates: a comparison of risk-adjustment methods JAMA 1996 276 16 1316 1321 10.1001/jama.1996.03540160038030
  109. 109
    Freund T Szecsenyi J Ose D Charakteristika von eingeschriebenen Versicherten eines flächendeckenden Vertrages zur hausarztzentrierten Versorgung Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 2010 105 11 808 811 10.1007/s00063-010-1138-z
  110. 110
    Schone E Brown R Risk Adjustment: What is the Current State of the Art and how can it be Improved? 2013 Pinceton Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2500 | Journal eISSN: 1568-4156
Language: English
Submitted on: Jun 28, 2016
Accepted on: Jun 28, 2016
Published on: Oct 26, 2016
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Christin Juhnke, Susanne Bethge, Axel C Mühlbacher, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.