References
- 1Adhikari, B., & Lovett, J. C. (2006). Institutions and collective action: Does heterogeneity matter in community-based resource management? The Journal of Development Studies, 42(3), 426–445. DOI: 10.1080/00220380600576201
- 2Agrawal, A. (2007). Forests, governance, and sustainability: Common property theory and its contributions. International Journal of the Commons, 1(1), 111–136. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.10
- 3Agrawal, A., & Goyal, S. (2001). Group size and collective action third-party monitoring in common-pool resources. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 63–93. DOI: 10.1177/0010414001034001003
- 4Agrawal, A., & Haas, P. M. (2000).
Small is beautiful, but is larger better? Forest-management institutions in the Kumaon Himalaya, India . In People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance (pp. 57–86). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. - 5Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29(4), 485–514. DOI: 10.1177/0032329201029004002
- 6Agrawal, A., & Yadama, G. (1997). How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Development and Change, 28(3), 435–465. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00050
- 7Antinori, C., & Bray, D. B. (2005). Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial Firms: Economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Development, 33(9), 1529–1543. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.011
- 8Antinori, C., & Rausser, G. C. (2010). The Mexican common property forestry sector.
- 9Beck, T., & Demirguc-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2931–2943. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.05.009
- 10Carías Vega, D. E., & Keenan, R. J. (2016). Situating community forestry enterprises within New Institutional Economic theory: What are the implications for their organization? Journal of Forest Economics, 25, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2016.07.001
- 11Carias Vega, D., & Keenan, R. J. (2016a). Agents or stewards in community forestry enterprises? Lessons from the Mayan Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Land Use Policy, 52, 255–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.016
- 12Carias Vega, D., & Keenan, R. J. (2016b). Transaction costs and the organization of CFEs: Experiences from ejidos in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Forest Policy and Economics, 70, 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.011
- 13Casari, M., & Tagliapietra, C. (2018). Group size in social-ecological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2728–2733. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713496115
- 14Chen, J., & Innes, J. L. (2013). The implications of new forest tenure reforms and forestry property markets for sustainable forest management and forest certification in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 129(Supplement C), 206–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.007
- 15Chhatre, A., & Agrawal, A. (2008). Forest commons and local enforcement. PNAS, 105(36). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803399105
- 16China Forest Bureau. (2014). The eight national forest resources inventory (in Chinese). Forest Resource Management, 1, 1–2.
- 17Compilation Committee of China Forestry Handbook. (2017). China Forestry Handbook (2nd ed.) (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishing House.
- 18Compilation Committee of Fujian District Records. (1996). Fujian District Records: Forestry (1st ed.) (in Chinese). Beijing: Fangzhi Publishing House.
- 19Cubbage, F. W., Davis, R. R., Rodríguez Paredes, D., Mollenhauer, R., Kraus Elsin, Y., Frey, G. E., Salas, D. N. C., et al. (2015). Community Forestry Enterprises in Mexico: Sustainability and Competitiveness. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 34(6–7), 623–650. DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2015.1040514
- 20Gautam, A. P. (2007). Group size, heterogeneity and collective action outcomes: Evidence from community forestry in Nepal. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(6), 574–583. DOI: 10.1080/13504500709469756
- 21Gerring, J. (2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803123
- 22Haines, A. L., Kennedy, T. T., & McFarlane, D. L. (2011). Parcelization: Forest Change Agent in Northern Wisconsin. Journal of Forestry, 109(2), 101–108.
- 23He, B. (2007). Rural democracy in China. DOI: 10.1057/9780230607316
- 24He, J., & Sikor, T. (2017). Looking Beyond Tenure in China’s Collective Forest Tenure Reform: Insights from Yunnan Province, Southwest China. International Forestry Review, 19(1), 29–41. DOI: 10.1505/146554817820888609
- 25Ho, P. (2006). Credibility of institutions: Forestry, social conflict and titling in China. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 588–603. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.05.004
- 26Hyde, W. F. (2018). The experience of China’s forest reforms: What they mean for China and what they suggest for the world. Forest Policy and Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.009
- 27Hyde, W. F., & Yin, R. (2018). 40 Years of China’s forest reforms: Summary and outlook. Forest Policy and Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.008
- 28Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 213–239. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020607.095522
- 29Lin, J. Y. (1993). Exit rights, exit costs, and shirking in agricultural cooperatives: A reply. Journal of Comparative Economics, 17(2), 504–520. DOI: 10.1006/jcec.1993.1039
- 30Liu, C., Wang, S., Liu, H., & Zhu, W. (2017). Why did the 1980s’ reform of collective forestland tenure in southern China fail? Forest Policy and Economics, 83, 131–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.07.008
- 31Liu, D. (2001). Tenure and Management of Non-State Forests in China since 1950: A Historical Review. Environmental History, 6(2), 239–263. DOI: 10.2307/3985086
- 32Macqueen, D., Bolin, A., Greijmans, M., Grouwels, S., & Humphries, S. (2018). Innovations towards prosperity emerging in locally controlled forest business models and prospects for scaling up. World Development. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.004
- 33Meng, Y., Liu, J., & Long, H. (2015). The conditions for successful management of community forest resources: Based on comparative research of two collective forest farms in Shaxian of Fujian Province (in Chinese). Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 15(6), 87–94.
- 34Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups.
- 35Orozco-Quintero, A., & Davidson-Hunt, I. (2010). Community-based enterprises and the commons: The case of San Juan Nuevo Parangaricutiro, Mexico. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 8–35. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.138
- 36Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- 37Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
- 38Partelow, S., Abson, D. J., Schlüter, A., Fernández-Giménez, M., von Wehrden, H., & Collier, N. (2019). Privatizing the commons: New approaches need broader evaluative criteria for sustainability. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.938
- 39Perez-Verdin, G., Kim, Y.-S., Hospodarsky, D., & Tecle, A. (2009). Factors driving deforestation in common-pool resources in northern Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1), 331–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.001
- 40Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435–461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
- 41Putterman, L. (1987). The incentive problem and the demise of team farming in China. Journal of Development Economics, 26(1), 103–127. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(87)90054-X
- 42Qin, P., Carlsson, F., & Xu, J. (2011). Forest tenure reform in China: A choice experiment on farmers’ property rights preferences. Land Economics, 87(3), 473–487. DOI: 10.3368/le.87.3.473
- 43Rahman, H. M. T., Hickey, G. M., & Sarker, S. K. (2012). A framework for evaluating collective action and informal institutional dynamics under a resource management policy of decentralization. Ecological Economics, 83, 32–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.018
- 44Ray, B., & Bhattacharya, R. N. (2011). Transaction costs, collective action and survival of heterogeneous co-management institutions: Case study of forest management organisations in West Bengal, India. The Journal of Development Studies, 47(2), 253–273. DOI: 10.1080/00220381003706692
- 45Song, Y., Wang, G., Burch, W. R., & Rechlin, M. A. (2004). From innovation to adaptation: Lessons from 20 years of the SHIFT forest management system in Sanming, China. Forest Ecology and Management, 191, 225–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.12.007
- 46Taylor, P. L. (2003). Reorganization or Division? New Strategies of Community Forestry in Durango, Mexico. Society & Natural Resources, 16(7), 643–661. DOI: 10.1080/08941920309183
- 47Wilshusen, P. R. (2010). The Receiving End of Reform: Everyday Responses to Neoliberalisation in Southeastern Mexico. Antipode, 42(3), 767–799. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00772.x
- 48Xie, L., Berck, P., & Xu, J. (2016). The effect on forestation of the collective forest tenure reform in China. China Economic Review, 38, 116–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2015.12.005
- 49Xu, J. T., Sun, Y., Jiang, X., & Li, J. (2008). Collective forest tenure reform in China: Analysis of pattern and performance (in Chinese). Forestry Economics, 9, 27–38.
- 50Yang, W., Liu, W., Viña, A., Tuanmu, M.-N., He, G., Dietz, T., & Liu, J. (2013). Nonlinear effects of group size on collective action and resource outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(27), 10916–10921. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1301733110
- 51Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications.
- 52Yiwen, Z., Kant, S., & Liu, J. (2019). Principal-agent relationships in rural governance and benefit sharing in community forestry: Evidence from a community forest enterprise in China. Forest Policy and Economics. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.010
- 53Zhao, G. (2018). Study on Advancing Fujian’s Collective Forest Tenure Reform (in Chinese). Forest Resource Management, 2, 13–17.