Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Governance and Deforestation: Understanding the Role of Formal Rule-Acknowledgement by Residents in Brazilian Extractive Reserves Cover

Governance and Deforestation: Understanding the Role of Formal Rule-Acknowledgement by Residents in Brazilian Extractive Reserves

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. 1Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: context, methods and politics. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 32, 243262. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
  2. 2Andersson, K. (2013). Local Forest Governance and the Role of External Organizations: Some Ties Matter More than Others. World Development, 43, 226237. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.09.001
  3. 3Arima, E., Barreto, P., Araújo, E., & Soares-Filho, B. (2014). Public Policies Can Reduce Tropical Deforestation: Lessons and Challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy, 41, 465473. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.026
  4. 4Armenteras, D., Espelta, J., Rodrigues, N., & Retana, J. (2017). Deforestation Dynamics and Drives in Different Forest Types in Latin America: Tree Decades of Studie. (1980–2010). Global Environmental Change, 46, 139147. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.002
  5. 5Arts, B., Behagel, J., Bommel, S., Koning, J., & Turnhout, E. (2013). Forest and Nature Governance: a practice-based approach. Springer: Dordrecht. ISBN 978-94-007-5113-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2
  6. 6Ascher, W. (1999). Why Governments Waste Natural Resources: Policy Failures in Developing Countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN-10: 0801860962
  7. 7Banana, A. Y., Vogt, N. D., Bahati, J., & Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W. (2007). Decentralized governance and ecological health: why local institutions fail to moderate deforestation in Mpigi district of Uganda. Scientific Research and Essays, 2(10), 434445.
  8. 8Barber, C., Cochrane, M., Souza-Jr, C., & Laurance, W. (2014). Roads, Deforestation, and the Mitigating Effect of Protected Areas in the Amazon. Biological Conservation, 177, 203209. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004
  9. 9Beaumont, N. J., Mongruel, R., & Hooper, T. (2018). Practical application of the ecosystem service approach (ESA): lessons learned and recommendations for the future. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 13, 6878. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2018.1425222
  10. 10Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Dudley, N., Jaeger, T., Lassen, B., Pathak Broome, N., Phillips, A., & Sandwith, T. (2013). Governance of Protected Areas: from understanding to action. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 20, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xvi + 124pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1608-4
  11. 11Castello, L., Mc Grath, D., Hess, L., Coe, M., Lefebvre, P., Petry, P., Macedo, M., Renó, V., & Arantes, C. (2013). The Vulnerability of Amazon Freshwater Ecosystems. Conservation Letters, 6, 217229. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12008
  12. 12Castro, F., Hogenboom, B., & Baud, M. (2016). Environmental Governance in Latin America. Palgrave MACMILLAN: New York. DOI: 10.1057/9781137505729
  13. 13Cole, D., & McGinnis, M. (2015). Elinor Ostrom and the Blommington School of Political Economy: resource governance. Boulder: Lexington Books. ISBN: 978-0-7391-9108-8
  14. 14Cole, D., & McGinnis, M. (2017). Elinor Ostrom and the Blommington School of Political Economy: a framework for policy analysis. Boulder: Lexington Books. ISBN-10: 9780739191118
  15. 15Dhiaulhaq, A., De Bruyn, T., & Gritten, D. (2015). The Use and Effectiveness of Mediation in Forest and Land Conflict Transformation in Southeast Asia: Case Studies from Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand. Environmental Science & Policy, 45, 132145. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.009
  16. 16Dietz, T., Stern, P., & Ostrom, E. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302, 19071912. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091015
  17. 17FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (2016). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: how are the world’s forests changing? Roma: FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109283-5
  18. 18Favero, M., Gatto, P., Deutsch, N., & Pettenella, D. (2016). Conflict or Synergy? understanding interaction between municipalities and village commons in polycentric governance of mountain areas in the veneto region, Italy. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.470
  19. 19Fovargue, R., Bode, M., & Armsworth, P. R. (2017). Size and spacing rules can balance conservation and fishery management objectives for marine protected areas. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55: 10501059. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13043
  20. 20Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., Smolinski, S. L., Huitema, D., & Armitage, D. 2017. “Learning Our Way Out of Environmental Policy Problems: A Review of the Scholarship.” Policy Science, 137. DOI: 10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0
  21. 21Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research: principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN-10: 0521676568. DOI: DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803123
  22. 22Gerring, J. (2012). Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN-10: 9780521132770
  23. 23Gibbs, H., Munger, J., Roe, L., Barreto, P., Pereira, R., et al. (2015a). Did Ranchers and Slaughterhouses Respond to Zero-Deforestation Agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters, 9, 110.DOI: 10.1111/conl.12175
  24. 24Gibbs, H., Rausch, L., Munger, J., Schelly, I., & Morton, D., et al. (2015b). Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science, 347: 377378. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa0181
  25. 25Gibson, C. C., McKean, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.) (2000). People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance. Mit Press. ISBN: 0-262-07201-7. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/5286.001.0001
  26. 26Goetter, J. F., & Neudert, R. (2016). New rules are not rules: Privatization of pastoral commons and local attempts at curtailment in southwest Madagascar. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 617641. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.743
  27. 27Gomes, C., Vladjenec, J., & Perez, S. (2012). Rubber Tapper Identities: Political-Economic Dynamics, Livelihood, Shifts, and Environmental Implications in a Changing Amazon. Geoforum, 43, 260271. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.005
  28. 28Gray, N. (2016). The Role of Boundary Organizations in Co-Management: examining the politics of knowledge integration in a marine protected area in Belize. International Journal of the Commons, 10, 10131034. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.643
  29. 29Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. (2019) Working on learning: how the institutional rules of environmental governance matter. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 106123. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1473244
  30. 30Humphries, S., Holmes, T., Kainer, K., Koury, C., Cruz, E., & Rocha, R. (2012). Are Community-based Forest Enterprises in the Tropics Financially Viable? Case Studies from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, 77, 6273. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.018
  31. 31IMAZON (Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia). (2015). Deforestation Report for the Brazilian Amazon – SAD. Belém: IMAZON. <https://imazon.org.br/en/publicacoes/deforestation-report-for-the-brazilian-amazon-september-2015-sad/>.
  32. 32INPE/PRODES (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais). (2018). Monitoramento da Floresta Amazônica Brasileira por Satélite – projeto PRODES. São Paulo: INPE. <http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes>.
  33. 33IPAM (Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia). (2013). The increase in deforestation in the Amazon in 2013: A point off the curve or out of control?. Brasília: IPAM, IMAZON, ISA. <https://ipam.org.br/bibliotecas/the-increase-in-deforestation-in-the-amazon-in-2013-a-point-off-the-curve-or-out-of-control/>.
  34. 34Jaramillo-Giraldo, C., Soares-Filho, B., Ribeiro, S., & Gonçalvez, R. (2017). Is It Possible to Make Rubber Extraction Ecologically and Economically Viable in the Amazon? The Southern Acre and Chico Mendes Reserve Case Study. Ecological Economics, 134, 186197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.035
  35. 35Kere, E., Choumert, J., Motel, C., Combes, J., & Schwartz, S. (2017). Adressing Contextual and Location Biases in the Assessment of Protected Areas Effectiveness on Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazônia. Ecological Economics, 136, 148158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.018
  36. 36Kiser, L. L., & Ostrom, E. (1982). The Three Worlds of Action: a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage. ISBN-10: 0803918178
  37. 37Krishna, V., Kubitza, C., Pascual, U., & Qaim, M. (2017). Land Markets, Property Rights and Deforestation: insights from Indonesia. World Development, 99, 335349. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.018
  38. 38Krott, M., & Giessen, L. (2014). Learning from Practices: Implications of the Practice Based Approach for Forest and Environmental Policy Research. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 1216. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.013
  39. 39Loft, L., Mann, C., & Hansjürgens, B. (2015). Challenges in ecosystem services governance: multi-levels, multi-actors, multi-rationalities. Ecosyst. Serv., 16, 150157. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.002
  40. 40London, S., Rojas, M., Martin, M., Scordo, F., Cisneros, M., Bustos, M., Perillo, G., & Piccolo, M. (2017). Characterization of an Artisanal Fishery in Argentina Using the Social-Ecological Systems Framework. International Journal of the Commons, 11, 169. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.534
  41. 41Matson, P., Clark, W., & Andersson, K. (2016). Pursuing Sustainability: a guide to the science and practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN-10: 0691157618
  42. 42McGinnis, M. (2011). An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 169183. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x
  43. 43McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-Ecological System Framework: Initial Changes and Continuing Challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2): 30. DOI: 10.5751/ES-06387-190230
  44. 44Messier, C., Puettmann, K., Andersson, K., Brotons, L., Tittler, R., Parrott, L., & Levin, S. (2015). From Management to Stewardship: Viewing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems in an Uncertain World. Conservation Letters, 8, 368377. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12156
  45. 45Moran, E. (2016). Roads and Dams: Infraestructure-driven Transformations in the Brazilian Amazon. Ambiente e Sociedade, 19, 207220. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422ASOC256V1922016
  46. 46Moutinho, P., Guerra, R., & Azevedo-Ramos, C. (2016). Achieving Zero Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: What is Missing? Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, 125. DOI: 10.12952/journal.elementa.000125
  47. 47Nahuelhual, L., Saavedra, G., Henríquez, F., Benra, F., Vergara, X., Perugache, C., & Hasen, F. (2018). Opportunities and limits to ecosystem services governance in developing countries and indigenous territories: The case of water supply in Southern Chile. Environmental Science & Policy, 86, 1118. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.012
  48. 48Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., et al. (2014). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344, 11181123. DOI: 10.1126/science.1248525
  49. 49Nogueira, E., Yanai, A., Vasconcelos, S., Graça, A., & Fearnside, P. (2018). Brazil’s Amazonian Protected Areas as a Bulwark Against Regional Climate Chance. Regional Environmental Chance, 18, 573579. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-017-1209-2
  50. 50Noguera-Mendez, P., Molera, L., & Semitiel-Garcia, M. (2016). The Role of Social Learning in Fostering Farmers’ Pro-Environmental Values and Intentions. Journal of Rural Studies, 46, 8192. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.003
  51. 51Nolte, C., Agrawal, A., Silvius, K. M., & Soares-Filho, B. S. (2013). Governance regime and Location Influence Avoided Deforestation Success of Protected Areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201214786. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1214786110
  52. 52Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN-10: 0691122385
  53. 53Ostrom, E. (2007). Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Second Edition. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780367274689
  54. 54Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 325, 419422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133
  55. 55Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the Commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316423936
  56. 56Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsalk, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. (2002). The Drama of the Commons. Washington: National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/10287
  57. 57Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Walker, J. M., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.9739
  58. 58Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (2003). Trust and Reciprocity: interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research. New York: Russel Sage Foundation. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610444347
  59. 59Paavola, J. (2007). Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecological Economics, 63, 9310. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.026
  60. 60Patterson, J., & Beunen, R. (2019). Institutional work in environmental governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 111. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2018.1538328
  61. 61Pfaff, A., Robalino, J., Lima, E., Sandoval, C., & Herrera, L. D. (2014). Governance, location and avoided deforestation from protected areas: greater restrictions can have lower impact, due to differences in location. World Dev., 55, 720. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.011
  62. 62Poteete, A., Ostrom, E., & Janssen, M. (2011). Working Together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. UK: Princenton University Press. ISBN: 9780691146041. DOI: 10.1515/9781400835157
  63. 63PPCDAM (Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal). (2016). Planos de Ação para a Prevenção e o Controle do Desmatamento: contexto e análise. Brasília: MMA. <https://www.mma.gov.br/informma/item/616-prevenção-e-controle-do-desmatamento-na-amazônia>.
  64. 64Ratner, B. et al. (2017). Facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogue to manage natural resource competition: A synthesis of lessons from Uganda, Zambia, and Cambodia. International Journal of the Commons, 11, 733753. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.748
  65. 65Reydon, B., Fernandes, V., & Telles, T. (2015). Land tenure in Brazil: the Question of Regulation and Governance. Land Use Policy, 42, 509516. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.007
  66. 66Ribeiro, B., Veríssimo, A., & Pereira, K. (2005). Deforestation in Protected Areas in the Brazilian Amazon: the case of Rondônia. Belém: IMAZON. <https://imazon.org.br/en/publicacoes/deforestation-in-protected-areas-in-the-brazilian-amazon-the-case-of-rondonia/>.
  67. 67Rochedo, P., Soares-Filho, B., Schaeffer, R., Viola, E., Szklo, A., Lucena, A., Koberle, A., Davis, J., Rajão, R., & Rathmann, R. (2018). The Treat of Political Bargaining to Climate Mitigation in Brazil. Nature Climate Change, 8, 695698. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0213-y
  68. 68Salvini, G., van Paassen, A., Ligtenberg, A., Carrero, G. C., & Bregt, A. K. 2016. A Role-Playing Game as a Tool to Facilitate Social Learning and Collective Action Towards Climate Smart. Agriculture: Lessons Learned from Apui, Brazil. Environmental Science and Policy, 63, 113121. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.016
  69. 69Schmitt, J. (2015). Crime sem Castigo: a efetividade da fiscalização ambiental para o controle do desmatamento na Amazônia. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, Brasília. <http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/19914>.
  70. 70Short, A. G., & Duane, T. P. 2016. Learning to Listen: How Collaborative Dialogue in Regulation Influences Landowner Adoption of Best Management Practices on Unregulated Lands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34, 320339. DOI: 10.1177/0263774X15614654
  71. 71Soares-Filho, B., Moutinho, P., Nepstad, D., Anderson, A., Rodrigues, H., Garcia, R., Dietzsch, L., Merry, F., Bowman, M., Hissa, L., Silvestrini, R., & Maretti, C. (2010). Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. PNAS, 24, 1082110826. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913048107
  72. 72Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., et al. (2014). Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science, 344, 363364. DOI: 10.1126/science.1246663
  73. 73Solorzano, C., & Fleischman, F. (2018). Institutional legacies explain the comparative efficacy of protected areas: Evidence from the Calakmul and Maya Biosphere Reserves of Mexico and Guatemala. Global Environmental Change, 50, 278288. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.011
  74. 74Spracklen, B. D., Kalamandeen, M., Galbraith, D., Gloor, E., & Spracklen, D. V. (2015). A global analysis of deforestation in moist tropical forest protected areas. PLoS One, 10, 116. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143886
  75. 75Stewart, D., & Shamdani, P. (2015). Focus Group: Theory and Practice. Washington DC: SAGE Publications. ISBN-10: 0761925821
  76. 76TCU (Tribunal de Contas da União). (2013). Amazônia Unidades de Conservação: Auditoria coordenada. Brasília: TCU. <https://portal.tcu.gov.br/biblioteca-digital/auditoria-coordenada-em-unidades-de-conservacao-da-amazonia.htm>.
  77. 77Tschopp, M., Bieri, S., & Rist, S. (2018). Quinoa and production rules: how are cooperatives contributing to governance of natural resources? International Journal of the Commons, 12, 402427. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.826
  78. 78Tucker, C. (2008). Changing Forests: Collective Action, Common Property and Coffee in Honduras. Netherlands: Springer Academic Press. ISBN-10: 9048177812
  79. 79Tucker, C. (2010). Learning on Governance in Forest Ecosystems: Lessons From Recent Research. International Journal of the Commons, 4, 687706. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.224
  80. 80Vadjunec, J. M. (2011). Extracting a Livelihood: Institutional and Social Dimensions of Deforestation in the Chico Mendes Extractive Reserve, Acre, Brazil. Journal of Latin American Geography, 10, 151174. DOI: 10.1353/lag.2011.0007
  81. 81Vogt, N., Banana, Y., Gombya-Ssembajjwe, W., & Bahati, J. (2006). Understanding the stability of forest reserve boundaries in the West Mengo region of Uganda. Ecology and Society, 11, 38. <http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art38/>. DOI: 10.5751/ES-01713-110138
  82. 82Wehkamp, J., Koch, N., Lübbers, S., & Fuss, S. (2018). Governance and deforestation—a meta-analysis in economics. Ecological economics, 144, 214227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.030
  83. 83Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. E. (2013). Generalizing the core design principles for the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, S21S32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.010
  84. 84Worboys, G. L., Lockwood, M., Kothari, A., Feary, S., & Pulsford, I. (eds.) (2015) Protected Area Governance and Management. Canberra: ANU Press. DOI: 10.22459/PAGM.04.2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.966 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Mar 2, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 2, 2020
Published on: Mar 4, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Mauro Guilherme Maidana Capelari, Ricardo Corrêa Gomes, Suely Mara Vaz Guimarães de Araújo, Peter Newton, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.