Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Constitutionality and the Co-Management of Protected Areas: Reflections from Cameroon and Myanmar Cover

Constitutionality and the Co-Management of Protected Areas: Reflections from Cameroon and Myanmar

Open Access
|Oct 2019

References

  1. 1Acciaioli, G. (2009). Conservation and community in the Lore Lindu National Park: Customary custodianship, multi-ethnic participation, and resource entitlement. In C. Warren, & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Community, environment and local governance in Indonesia: Locating the commonwealth (pp. 88118). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  2. 2Agrawal, A. (2005a). Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822386421
  3. 3Agrawal, A. (2005b). Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India. Curr. Anthropol., 46(2), 161190. DOI: 10.1086/427122
  4. 4Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. (1999). Accountability in Decentralization: A Framework with South Asian and West African Environmental Cases. Journal of Development Areas, 33, 473502.
  5. 5Alemayehu, N. A., Vandenabeele, N., & Arts, B. (2015). Performance of participatory forest management in Ethiopia: Institutional arrangement versus local practices. Critical Policy Studies, 120.
  6. 6Andersen, K. E. (2015). Study of Upland Customary Communal Tenure in Chin and Shan States. Yangon, Myanmar: Livelihoods and Food Security Trust Fund (LIFT). Retrieved from https://www.lift-fund.org/my/node/5831
  7. 7Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18, 8698. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
  8. 8Ashenafi, Z. T., & Leader-Williams, N. (2005). Indigenous common property resource management in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Human Ecology, 33(4), 539563. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-005-5159-9
  9. 9Asmamaw, A., & Auch, E. (2016). Participative Innovation Platforms (PIP): Guidelines for analysis and development of commercial forest product value chains in Sudan and Ethiopia. CHAINS Working Paper; 3rd Edition. CHAnces IN Sustainability: Promoting natural resource based product chains in East Africa (CHAINS). Tharandt, Germany: Technische Universität Dresden.
  10. 10Aung, M. (2007). Policy and practice in Myanmar’s protected area system. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(2), 188203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.016
  11. 11Aung, P. S., Adam, Y. O., Pretzsch, J., & Peters, R. (2015). Distribution of forest income among rural households: A case study from Natma Taung national park, Myanmar. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 24(3), 190201. DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2014.976597
  12. 12Ballet, J., Kouamékan, J., Koffi, M., & Komena, K. B. (2009). Co-management of natural resources in developing countries: The importance of context. Économie international, 120, 5376.
  13. 13Benson, C. (2012). Conservation NGOs in Madang, Papua New Guinea: Understanding Community and Donor Expectations. Society & Natural Resources, 25(1), 7186. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.603141
  14. 14Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1997). Participation in conservation: Why, what, when, how? In: G. Borrini-Feyerabend (Ed.), Beyond fences: Seeking social sustainability in conservation (pp. 2031). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  15. 15Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Farvar, M. T., Nguinguiri, J. C., & Ndangang, V. A. (2007). Comanagement of Natural Resources: Organising, Negotiating and Learning-by-Doing. Heidelberg (Germany): GTZ and IUCN, Kasparek Verlag. Reprint 2007 [first publication in 2000].
  16. 16Brockington, D. (2002). Fortress Conservation. The Preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oxford: James Currey.
  17. 17Brown, D., & Schreckenberg, K. (2001). Community forestry: facing up to the challenge in Cameroon. London, UK: ODI.
  18. 18Bruns, B. R. (2008). Aiding Adaptive Co-management in Irrigation: Governing Shared Resources: Connecting Local experience to Global Challenges. Presented at the Biennial Global Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons. England: Cheltenham, July 14 to18, 2008.
  19. 19Buchenrieder, G., & Balgah, R. A. (2013). Sustaining livelihoods around community forests. What is the potential contribution of wildlife domestication? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 51(1), 5784. DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X12000596
  20. 20Campbell, B., Sayer, J. A., Frost, P., Vermeulen, S., Pérez, M. R., & Prabhu, A. C. (2001). Assessing the performance of natural resource systems. Ecol. Soc., 5(2), 22. DOI: 10.5751/ES-00316-050222
  21. 21Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 6576. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008
  22. 22Chabwela, H. N., & Haller, T. (2010). Governance issues, potentials and failures of participative collective action in the Kafue Flats, Zambia. International Journal of the Commons, 4(2), 621642. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.189
  23. 23Connick, S., & Innes, J. E. (2003). Outcomes of collaborative water policy making: Applying complexity thinking to evaluation. J. Environ. Plan. Manag, 46(2), 177197. DOI: 10.1080/0964056032000070987
  24. 24Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., Balmford, A., Donald, P. F., Funder, M., Jones, J. P. G., & Yonten, D. (2009). Local participation in natural resource monitoring: A characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology, 23(1), 3142. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x
  25. 25Devitt, P. (1988). The People of the Korup Protected Area. Report on phase 1 of the Socio-Economic Survey. WWF and Republic of Cameroon
  26. 26Diaw, M. C., & Tiani, A. M. (2010). Fences in Our Heads: A Discourse Analysis of the Korup Resettlement Stalemate. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 29(2–4), 221251. DOI: 10.1080/10549810903548138
  27. 27Ensminger, J. (1992). Making a Market. The Institutional Transformation of an African Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. 28Faye, P. (2016). Adding Scepticism About ‘Environmentality’: Gender Exclusion Through a Natural Resources Collectivization Initiative in Dionewar, Senegal. In P. Bose, & H. van Dijk (Eds.), Drylands Forests: Management and Social Diversity in Asia and Africa (pp. 95114). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19405-9_5
  29. 29Faye, P., Haller, T., & Ribot, J. (2017). Shaping Rules and Practice for More Justice? Local Conventions and Local Resistance in Eastern Senegal. Human Ecology, 8, 111. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-017-9918-1
  30. 30Fischer, A., Wakjira, D. T., Weldesemaet, Y. T., & Ashenafi, Z. T. (2014). On the interplay of actors in the co-management of natural resources – A dynamic perspective. World Development, 64, 158168. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.05.026
  31. 31Fletcher, F. (2017). Environmentality unbound: Multiple governmentalities in environmental politics. Geoforum, 85, 311315. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.009
  32. 32Fon, F. (2013). An analysis of co-management on the development and preservation of natural resources on the Mt. Cameroon National Park. Wildlife Specialists Training College. Retrieved from http://www.ecoledefaune.org/internal_images/rapport-b2-forlemu-fon.pdf
  33. 33Fondufe, S. L., Kimengsi, J. N., & Gwan, S. A. (2016). Strengthening women’s participation in the sustainable management of the Bimbia-Bonadikombo Community Forest of Cameroon: Challenges and blueprints. International Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 2(4), 2429. DOI: 10.11634/233028791503745
  34. 34Forest Department. (2015). National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan for Myanmar (2015–2020). Nay Pyi Taw. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/mm/mm-nbsap-v2
  35. 35Forest Department. (2017). Natma Taung National Park: Five Years Management Plan (2018–2023). Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar.
  36. 36Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87104). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  37. 37Frame, T. M., Gunton, T., & Day, J. C. (2004). The role of collaboration in environmental management: An evaluation of land and resource planning in British Columbia. J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 47(1), 5982. DOI: 10.1080/0964056042000189808
  38. 38Galvin, M., & Haller, T. (Eds.) (2008). People, protected areas and global change: Participatory conservation in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe. Bern, Switzerland: Geographica Bernensia.
  39. 39Geiser, U., & Rist, S. (Eds.) (2009). Decentralisation meets local complexity: Local struggles, state decentralisation and access to natural resources in South Asia and Latin America. Bern, Switzerland: Geographica Bernensia.
  40. 40Gondo, T. (2011). Adaptive Co-management of Natural Resources: A Solution or Problem? Journal of Human Ecology, 33(2), 119131. DOI: 10.1080/09709274.2011.11906354
  41. 41Haller, T. (2001). Rules which pay are going to stay: Indigenous institutions, sustainable resource use and land tenure among the Ouldeme and Platha, Mandara Mountains, Northern Cameroon. Bulletin de l’APAD. http://journals.openedition.org/apad/148 Accessed 29/01/18
  42. 42Haller, T. (2007). Understanding Institutions and Their Links to Resource Management from the Perspective of New Institutionalism. Retrieved from http://www.north-south.unibe.ch/content.php/publications
  43. 43Haller, T. (Eds.) (2010). Disputing the Floodplains: Institutional Change and the Politics of Resource Management in African Floodplains. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004185326.i-454
  44. 44Haller, T. (2013). The Contested Floodplain. Institutional Change of the Commons in the Kafue Flats, Zambia. Lanham: Lexington, Rowman & Littlefield.
  45. 45Haller, T., Acciaioli, G., & Rist, S. (2016). Constitutionality: Conditions for Crafting Local Ownership of Institution-Building Processes. Society & Natural Resources, 29(1), 6887. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1041661
  46. 46Haller, T., Belsky, J. M., & Rist, S. (2018). The constitutionality approach: Conditions, opportunities, and challenges for bottom-up institution building. Human ecology, 46(1), 12. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-018-9966-1
  47. 47Haller, T., & Chabwela, H. (2009). Managing common pool resources in the Kafue Flats, Zambia: From common property to open access and privatisation. Development Southern Africa, 26(4), 555567. DOI: 10.1080/03768350903181340
  48. 48Haller, T., & Galvin, M. (2011). Challenges for participatory conservation in times of global change: Lessons from a comparative analysis and new developments. In U. Wiesmann, & H. Hurni (Eds.), Research for sustainable development: Foundations, experiences, and perspectives (pp. 467503). Bern, Switzerland: Geographica Bernensia.
  49. 49Haller, T., & Merten, S. (2018). Crafting our own rules: Constitutionality as a bottom-up approach for the development of by-laws in Zambia. Human ecology, 46(1), 313. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-017-9917-2
  50. 50Hulme, D., & Murphree, M. (Eds.) (2001). African Wildlife and Livelihoods. Portsmouth, UK: Heinemann.
  51. 51Istituto Oikos, & BANCA. (2011). Myanmar Protected Areas: Context, Current Status and Challenges. Retrieved from http://www.istituto-oikos.org/files/download/2012/MyanmarProtectedAreas
  52. 52Kimengsi, J. N. (2014). Threats to Ecotourism Development and Forest Conservation in the Lake Barombi Mbo Area of Cameroon. Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy, 17(4), 213230. DOI: 10.1080/13880292.2014.957033
  53. 53Kimengsi, J. N., & Balgah, R. A. (2017). Repositioning Local Institutions in Natural Resource Management: Perspectives from Sub-Saharan Africa. Schmollers Jahrb. J. Context. Econ, 137, 149172. DOI: 10.3790/schm.137.1-2.149
  54. 54Kimengsi, J. N., & Moteka, P. N. (2018). Revisiting participatory forest management and community livelihoods in the Kilum-Ijim montane forest landscape of Cameroon. International Journal of Global Sustainability, 2(1), 3955. DOI: 10.5296/ijgs.v2i1.12766
  55. 55Kimengsi, J. N., Pretzsch, J., Auch, E., & Balgah, R. A. (2019). WWF’s Green Business Model in Protected area conservation and Livelihoods Sustenance in Cameroon: The need for a shift in approach? Environment & Natural Resources Research, 9(1) 924. DOI: 10.5539/enrr.v9n1p9
  56. 56Larson, A., & Ribot, J. (2004). Democratic decentralization through a natural resource lens: An introduction. European Journal of Development Research, 16(1), 125. DOI: 10.1080/09578810410001688707
  57. 57Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press,.
  58. 58Lund, J. F., & Bluwstein, J. (2018). When conservation research goes awry: A reply to Mascia and Mills. Conservation Letters, 11(3), e12461. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12461
  59. 59Lund, J. F., Rutt, R. L., & Ribot, J. (2018). Trends in research on forestry decentralization policies. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 32, 1722. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.003
  60. 60Mbile, P., Vabi, M., Meboka, M., Okon, D., Arrey-Mbo, J., Nkonghoe, F., & Ebong, E. (2005). Linking management and livelihood in environmental conservation: Case of the Korup National Park Cameroon. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(1), 113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.01.009
  61. 61Meek, C. L. (2013). Forms of collaboration and social fit in wildlife management: A comparison of policy networks in Alaska. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 217228. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.003
  62. 62Mustalahti, I. (2006). How to handle the stick: Positive processes and crucial barriers of participatory forest management. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 16(2), 151165. DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2006.9752553
  63. 63Ngai, S. G. (1993). Report on the field survey to the Natma Taung proposed national park. Myanmar: Yangon.
  64. 64Nijborg, W. (2000). Evaluation of the resettlement process: The case of Korup National Park with emphasis on the Ikondokondo I Pilot Scheme. Unpublished report, Korup Project, Mundemba, Cameroon.
  65. 65Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 7590. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
  66. 66Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  67. 67Oyono, P. R. (2004). The social and organisational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon’s forest management decentralisation model. The European Journal of Development Research, 16(1), 174191. DOI: 10.1080/09578810410001688798
  68. 68Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. (2007). A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological economics, 61(1), 6274. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.025
  69. 69Plummer, R., Baird, J., Armitage, D., Bodin, Ö., & Schultz, L. (2017). Diagnosing adaptive comanagement across multiple cases. Ecology and Society, 22(3). DOI: 10.5751/ES-09436-220319
  70. 70Plummer, R., Baird, J., Dzyundzyak, A., Armitage, D., Bodin, Ö., & Schultz, L. (2017). Is adaptive co-management delivering? Examining relationships between collaboration, learning and outcomes in UNESCO biosphere reserves. Ecological Economics, 140, 7988. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.028
  71. 71Plummer, R., Crona, B., Armitage, D., Olsson, P., Tengö, M., & Yudina, O. (2012). Adaptive comanagement: A systematic review and analysis. Ecology and Society, 17(3). DOI: 10.5751/ES-04952-170311
  72. 72Pretzsch, J. (2005). Forest related rural livelihood strategies in national and global development. Forest Trees Livelihoods, 15, 115127. DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2005.9752515
  73. 73Pretzsch, J. (2014). Paradigms of Tropical Forestry in Rural Development. In J. Pretzsch, D. Darr, H. Uibrig, & E. Auch (Eds.), Forests and rural development (pp. 749). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41404-6
  74. 74Pretzsch, J., & Auch, E. (forthcoming). Methodological lessons from research on rural innovation and adaptation: A plea for constructivist and action-oriented research approaches in forestry. Tropical Forestry Focus. Institute for International Forestry and Forest Products. Tharandt, Germany: Technische Universität Dresden.
  75. 75Pretzsch, J., Darr, D., Lindner, A., Uibrig, H., & Auch, E. (2014). Prospects for forest-based rural development. In J. Pretzsch, D. Darr, H. Uibrig, & E. Auch (Eds.), Forests and rural development (pp. 375384). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41404-6
  76. 76PSMNR. (2012). Collaborative management approach and conservation incentives concept. Programme for the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources (PSMNR), Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife (MINFOF).
  77. 77Rao, M., Htun, S., Platt, S. G., Tizard, R., Poole, C., Myint, T., & Watson, J. E. M. (2013). Biodiversity conservation in a changing climate: A review of threats and implications for conservation planning in Myanmar. Ambio, 42(7), 789804. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-013-0423-5
  78. 78Ratner, B. D., Burnley, C., Mugisha, S., Madzudzo, E., Oeur, I., Kosal, M., Rüttinger, L., Chilufya, L. N., & Adriázola, P. (2017). Facilitating multistakeholder dialogue to manage natural resource competition: A synthesis of lessons from Uganda, Zambia, and Cambodia. International Journal of the Commons, 11(2), 733753. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.748
  79. 79Ribot, J. C. (1999). Decentralization, participation, and accountability in Sahelian forestry legal instruments of political-administrative control. Africa, 69(1), 139. DOI: 10.2307/1161076
  80. 80Ribot, J. C. (2002). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. DOI: 10.1057/9781403981288_6
  81. 81Rist, S., Chiddambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., & Wiesmann, U. (2006). “It was hard to come to mutual understanding…”—The multidimensionality of social learning processes concerned with sustainable natural resource use in India, Africa and Latin America. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 19(3), 219237. DOI: 10.1007/s11213-006-9014-8
  82. 82Rist, S., Chiddambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), 2337. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006
  83. 83Sayer, J. A. (1983). A survey of Natma Taung (Mount Victoria), Southern Chin Hills. Myanmar: Yangon.
  84. 84Schmidt-Soltau, K., & Brockington, D. (2007). Protected Areas and Resettlement: What Scope for Voluntary Relocation? World Development, 35(12), 21822202. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.008
  85. 85Schultz, L., Duit, A., & Folke, C. (2011). Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Development, 39(4), 662671. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.014
  86. 86Sekhar, N. U. (2000). Decentralized natural resource management: From state to co-management in India. Journal of environmental planning and management, 43(1), 123138. DOI: 10.1080/09640560010793
  87. 87Shackleton, S., Campbell, B., Wollenberg, E., & Edmunds, D. (2002). Devolution and community-based natural resource management: Creating space for local people to participate and benefit? London: ODI. DOI: 10.4314/zsn.v36i1.18553
  88. 88Smedstad, J. A., & Gosnell, H. (2013). Do adaptive comanagement processes lead to adaptive comanagement outcomes? A multicase study of long-term outcomes associated with the National Riparian Service Team’s place-based riparian assistance. Ecology and Society, 18(4). DOI: 10.5751/ES-05793-180408
  89. 89SPECTRUM. (2015). Participatory Monitoring and Management (PMM) in Natmataung National Park, Chin State, Myanmar. Retrieved from https://spectrumsdkn.org/en/news/55-community-knowledge-in-natmataung.
  90. 90Tint, K., Springate-Baginski, O., & Gyi, M. K. K. (2011). Community forestry in Myanmar: Progress and potentials. Yangon: ECCDI.
  91. 91Watson, E. (2003). Examining the potential of indigenous institutions for development: A perspective from Borana, Ethiopia. Development and Change, 34(2), 287309. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7660.00306
  92. 92Yami, M., Vogl, C., & Hausera, M. (2009). Comparing the effectiveness of informal and formal institutions in sustainable common pool resources management in Sub-Saharan Africa. DOI: 10.4103/0972-4923.64731
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.934 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2018
Accepted on: Jun 18, 2019
Published on: Oct 30, 2019
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2019 Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi, Pyi Soe Aung, Jürgen Pretzsch, Tobias Haller, Eckhard Auch, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.