References
- Alstyne, M. V., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Electronic communities: Global village or cyberbalkanization? Proceedings of the International Conference of Information System.
- Arazy, O., Ortega, F., Nov, O., Yeo, L., & Balila, A. (2015). Functional roles and career paths in wikipedia. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1092–1105. 10.1145/2675133.2675257
- Bateman, P. J., Gray, P. H., & Butler, B. S. (2011). Research note - the impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Information Systems Research, 22(4), 841–854. 10.1287/isre.1090.0265
- Bauwens, M. (2015). The political economy of peer production. CTheory, 12–21.
- Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders. studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press.
- Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s penguin, or, linux and “the nature of the firm”. Yale law journal, 369–446. 10.2307/1562247
- Benkler, Y. (2017). Law, innovation, and collaboration in networked economy and society. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 231–250. 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113340
- Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. Journal of political philosophy, 14(4). 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x
- Benkler, Y., Shaw, A., & Hill, B. M. (2015).
Peer production: A form of collective intelligence . In T. Malone & M. Bernstein (Eds.), Handbook of collective intelligence (Vol. 175). MIT Press. - Bessen, J. (2006).
Open source software: Free provision of complex public goods . In The economics of open source software development (pp. 57–81). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-044452769-1/50003-2 - Bezroukov, N. (1999). Open source software development as a special type of academic research.
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/696/606 - Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.). (2012) The Wealth of the Commons: A World beyond Market and State. Leveller Press.
https://wealthofthecommons.org/essay/introduction-commons-transformative-vision - Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2019). Free, fair, and alive: The insurgent power of the commons. New Society Publishers.
- Borzillo, S., Stéphane, A., & Schmitt, A. (2011). A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core. European Management Journal, 29(1), 25–42. 10.1016/j.emj.2010.08.004
- Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The economic journal, 112(483), F419–F436. 10.1111/1468-0297.00077
- Butler, B., Joyce, E., & Pike, J. (2008). Don’t look now, but we’ve created a bureaucracy: The nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 1101–1110. 10.1145/1357054.1357227
- Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler S., & Kraut, R. (2007).
Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? In S. Weisband (Ed.),. Leadership at a distance: Research in Technologically Supported Work (pp. 171–194). Lawrence Erlbaum. - Caffentzis, G., & Federici, S. (2014). Commons against and beyond capitalism. Community development journal, 49(suppl_1), i92–i105. 10.1093/cdj/bsu006
- Carillo, K., Huff, S., & Chawner, B. (2017). What makes a good contributor? Understanding contributor behavior within large Free/Open Source Software projects–A socialization perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(4), 322–359. 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.03.001
- Carlsen, A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., & Mortensen, T. F. (2020). From ideas of power to the powering of ideas in organizations: Reflections from follett and foucault. European Management Journal, 38(6), 829–835. 10.1016/j.emj.2020.03.006
- Chatterton, P., & Pusey, A. (2020). Beyond capitalist enclosure, commodification and alienation: Postcapitalist praxis as commons, social production and useful doing. Progress in Human Geography, 44(1), 27–48. 10.1177/0309132518821173
- Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N. (2022). Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization. Journal of management, 48(1), 147–184. 10.1177/01492063211045023
- Chesbrough, H. (2023). Measuring the economic value of open source (tech. rep.). The Linux Foundation.
- Clément, M., & Guitton, M. J. (2015). Interacting with bots online: Users’ reactions to actions of automated programs in Wikipedia. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 66–75. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.078
- Cohendet, P., Créplet, F., & Dupouet, O. (2001).
Interactions between epistemic communities and communities of practice as a mechanism of creation and diffusion of knowledge . In J.-B. Zimmermann & A. Kirman (Eds.), Interaction and market structure. Springer. - Crowston, K., & Fagnot, I. (2018). Stages of motivation for contributing user-generated content: A theory and empirical test. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 109, 89–101. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.08.005
- Dang Nguyen, G., Dejean, S., & Jullien, N. (2017). Do open online projects create social norms? Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(1), 1–26. 10.1017/S1744137417000182
- Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2019). Common: On revolution in the 21st century. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- de Vaujany, F.-X., Fomin, V. V., Haefliger, S., & Lyytinen, K. (2018). Rules, practices, and information technology: A trifecta of organizational regulation. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 755–773. 10.1287/isre.2017.0771
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
- Dulong de Rosnay, M., & Stalder, F. (2020). Digital commons. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1–22. 10.14763/2020.4.1530
- Fitzgerald, B. (2006). The transformation of open source software. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 587–598. 10.2307/25148740
- Follett, M. P. (1919). Community is a process. The Philosophical Review, 28(6), 576–588. 10.2307/2178307
- Foray, D. (2004). The Economics of Knowledge. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/2613.001.0001
- Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2008). Why do people write for Wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open-content publishing. Proceedings of 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1–11.
- Forte, A., Larco, V., & Bruckman, A. (2009). Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), 49–72. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260103
- Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. 10.1086/448181
- Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (2014). Governing knowledge commons. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.001.0001
- Gächter, S. (2014). Human Prosocial Motivation and the Maintenance of Social Order. The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law, 28. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199945474.013.0002
- Gawer, A. (2022). Digital platforms and ecosystems: Remarks on the dominant organizational forms of the digital age. Innovation, 24(1), 110–124. 10.1080/14479338.2021.1965888
- Geiger, R. S. (2014). Bots, bespoke, code and the materiality of software platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 17(3), 342–356. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.873069
- Georgiou, A., & Arenas, D. (2023). Community in organizational research: A review and an institutional logics perspective. Organization Theory, 4(1), 26317877231153189. 10.1177/26317877231153189
- Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2003). Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 153–172. 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00157-5
- Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday, 2(4).
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/519/440 - Greenstein, S., Gu, Y., & Zhu, F. (2016, October). Ideological segregation among online collaborators: Evidence from wikipedians (Working Paper No. 22744). National Bureau of Economic Research. 10.3386/w22744
- Halfaker, A., Geiger, R. S., Morgan, J. T., & Riedl, J. (2013). The rise and decline of an open collaboration system how Wikipedia’s reaction to popularity is causing its decline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 664–688. 10.1177/0002764212469365
- Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., Kraut, R., & Riedl, J. (2009). A jury of your peers: Quality, experience and ownership in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on wikis and open collaboration, wikisym 2009. 10.1145/1641309.1641332
- Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., & Riedl, J. (2011). Don’t bite the newbies: How reverts affect the quantity and quality of wikipedia work. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration. 10.1145/2038558.2038585
- Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An internet-based survey of contributors to the linux kernel. Research Policy, 32, 1159–1177. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7
- Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007a). Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. from Theory to Practice (pp. 3–26). 10.7551/mitpress/6980.003.0003
- Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.). (2007b). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. from Theory to Practice. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6980.001.0001
- Kamata, M., Kato, D., Kunieda, K., & Yamada, K. (2010). Web community contributor’s motivation: Japanese wikipedia case study. In Proc. of the iadis int. conf. collaborative technologies 2010, proc. of the iadis int. conf. web based communities 2010, part of the mccsis 2010 (pp. 29–33).
- Kapczynski, A. (2010).
Access to knowledge: A conceptual genealogy . In G. Krikorian & A. Kapczynski (Eds.), Access to knowledge in the age of intellectual property (pp. 17–56). Zone Books. - Lakhani, K., & Wolf, R. (2005). Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. In J. Feller, et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on free and open source software (pp. 3–22). 10.7551/mitpress/5326.003.0005
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press.
- Laval, C. (2016). “commun” et “communauté”: Un essai de clarification sociologique. SociologieS, Dossiers: Des communs au commun: un nouvel horizon sociologique?
https://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/5677 - Lessig, L. (2002). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. Vintage.
- Liang, C., Chen, C., & Hsu, Y. (2008). The participation motivation and work styles of the administrators for chinese wikipedia. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 46(1), 81–110.
- MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., & Baldwin, C. Y. (2006). Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Management Science, 52(7), 1015–1030. 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0552
- Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663765
- McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (1996). Design principles for local and global commons. The international political economy and international institutions, 2, 465–493.
https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/items/80b557a3-e101-46ff-8bca-fe3fa75d59b4 - Merton, R. K. (1957). Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American sociological review, 22(6), 635–659. 10.2307/2089193
- Mindel, V., Mathiassen, L., & Rai, A. (2018). The sustainability of polycentric information commons. MIS Quarterly, 42(2), 607–631. 10.25300/MISQ/2018/14015
- Mullins, N. C. (1972). The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology. Minerva, 51–82. 10.1007/BF01881390
- Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674041660
- O’Mahony, S. (2003). Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work [Open Source Software Development]. Research Policy, 32(7), 1179–1198. 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00048-9
- O’Mahony, S. (2007). The governance of open source initiatives: What does it mean to be community managed? Journal of Management and Governance, 11(2), 139–150. 10.1007/s10997-007-9024-7
- Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- Ostrom, E. (1999). Design principles and threats to sustainable organizations that manage commons. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, W99-6.
- Ostrom, E. (2003). How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of theoretical politics, 15(3), 239–270. 10.1177/0951692803015003002
- Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400831739
- Ostrom, E. (2008). Design principles of robust property-rights institutions: What have we learned. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington school of political economy: Resource governance, 2, 215–248. 10.5040/9781666993882.ch-008
- Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. 10.1126/science.1172133
- Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy studies journal, 39(1), 7–27. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
- Palazzi, M. J., Cabot, J., Izquierdo Canovas, J. L., Solé-Ribalta, A., & Borge-Holthoefer, J. (2019). Online division of labour: Emergent structures in open source software. Scientific reports, 9(1),
13890 . 10.1038/s41598-019-50463-y - Pazaitis, A., Kostakis, V., & Drechsler, W. (2022). Towards a theory of value as a commons. International Journal of the Commons, 16(1). 10.5334/ijc.1153
- Pentzold, C. (2011). Imagining the Wikipedia community: What do Wikipedia authors mean when they write about their “community”? New Media & Society, 13(5), 704–721. 10.1177/1461444810378364
- Polanyi, M. (1962). The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory. Minerva, 1(1), 54–73. 10.1007/BF01101453
- Potts, J. (2018). Governing the innovation commons. Journal of Institutional Economics, 14(6), 1025–1047. 10.1017/S1744137417000479
- Rifkin, J. (2014). The zero marginal cost society: The internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. St. Martin’s Press.
- Rocher, G. (2012). Introduction à la sociologie générale (3rd ed.). Éditions Hurtubise.
- Rullani, F., & Haefliger, S. (2013). The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation. Research Policy, 42(4), 941–953. 10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.008
- Safner, R. (2016). Institutional entrepreneurship, Wikipedia, and the opportunity of the commons. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1–29. 10.1017/S1744137416000096
- Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land economics, 249–262. 10.2307/3146375
- Schweik, C. M., & English, R. (2013). Preliminary steps toward a general theory of internet-based collective-action in digital information commons: Findings from a study of open source software projects. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2). 10.18352/ijc.397
- Seabright, P. (2012). The company of strangers: A natural history of economic life. Princeton University Press.
- Sen, A., Atkisson, C., & Schweik, C. (2022). Cui bono: Do open source software incubator policies and procedures benefit the projects or the incubator? International Journal of the Commons, 16(1). 10.5334/ijc.1176
- Shah, S. K. (2006). Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development. Management Science, 52(2), 1000–1014. 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553
- Shaikh, M., & Henfridsson, O. (2017). Governing open source software through coordination processes. Information and Organization, 27(2), 116–135. 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.04.001
- Shaw, A., & Hill, B. M. (2014). Laboratories of oligarchy? how the iron law extends to peer production. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 215–238. 10.1111/jcom.12082
- Shinn, T., & Ragouet, P. (2005). Controverses sur la science. pour une sociologie transversaliste de l’activité scientifique. Éditions Raisons d’Agir.
- Steinmacher, I., Conte, T., Gerosa, M. A., & Redmiles, D. (2015). Social barriers faced by newcomers placing their first contribution in open source software projects. Proceedings, 1379–1392. 10.1145/2675133.2675215
- Terranova, T. (2012). Attention, economy and the brain. Culture Machine, 13.
- Terranova, T. (2022). After the internet: Digital networks between capital and the common (Vol. 33). Semiotext(e) intervention series.
- Trzeciak, M., Sienkiewicz, Ł. D., & Bukłaha, E. (2022). Enablers of open innovation in software development micro-organization. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 174. 10.3390/joitmc8040174
- van Knippenberg, D., Dahlander, L., Haas, M. R., & George, G. (2015). Information, attention, and decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 649–657. 10.5465/amj.2015.4003
- Vibert, S. (2016). L’institution de la communauté. SociologieS, Dossiers: Des communs au commun: un nouvel horizon sociologique? URL:
https://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/5683 - von Hippel, E. (2002). Open source software as horizontal innovation networks- by and for users. MIT Sloan School of Management W.P, 4366-02. 10.2139/ssrn.328900
- von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223. 10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992
- West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry & Innovation, 15(2), 223–231. 10.1080/13662710802033734
- Zheng, L., Albano, C. M., Vora, N. M., Mai, F., & Nickerson, J. V. (2019). The roles bots play in wikipedia. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–20. 10.1145/3359317
- Zhou, M., & Mockus, A. (2014). Who will stay in the floss community? modelling participant’s initial behaviour. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 41(1), 89–99. 10.1109/TSE.2014.2349496
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1691 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Page range: 468 - 483
Submitted on: Dec 2, 2025
Accepted on: Jul 19, 2026
Published on: Sep 8, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Nicolas Jullien, Karine Roudaut, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.