Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Energy Community Surplus Sharing: Solidarity Strategies for Energy Commons Governance Cover

Energy Community Surplus Sharing: Solidarity Strategies for Energy Commons Governance

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Adams, S., Brown, D., Cárdenas Álvarez, J. P., Chitchyan, R., Fell, M. J., Hahnel, U. J. J., Hojckova, K., Johnson, C., Klein, L., Montakhabi, M., Say, K., Singh, A., & Watson, N. (2021). Social and Economic Value in Emerging Decentralized Energy Business Models: A Critical Review. Energies, 14(23), 7864. 10.3390/en14237864
  2. Athawale, R., & Felder, F. A. (2022). Electric utility death spiral: Revisited in the context of tariff design. The Electricity Journal, 35(1), 107062. 10.1016/j.tej.2021.107062
  3. Baker, S. H. (2017). Unlocking the energy commons: Expanding community energy generation. In M. K. Scanlan (Ed.), Law and Policy for a New Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781786434524.00021
  4. Bauwens, T., & Defourny, J. (2017). Social capital and mutual versus public benefit: the case of renewable energy cooperatives. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 88(2), 203232. 10.1111/apce.12166
  5. Bauwens, T., Wade, R., & Burke, M. (2024). The energy commons: A systematic review, paradoxes, and ways forward. Energy Research & Social Science, 118, 103776. 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103776
  6. Bianchi, A., & Ginelli, E. (2018). The social dimension in energy landscapes. City, Territory and Architecture, 5(1), 9. 10.1186/s40410-018-0085-5
  7. Birch, K., & Muniesa, F. (Eds.) (2020). Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12075.001.0001
  8. Birch, K., & Ward, C. (2022). Assetization and the ‘new asset geographies’. Dialogues in Human Geography, 204382062211308. 10.1177/20438206221130807
  9. Blasch, J., Van Der Grijp, N. M., Petrovics, D., Palm, J., Bocken, N., Darby, S. J., Barnes, J., Hansen, P., Kamin, T., Golob, U., Andor, M., Sommer, S., Nicita, A., Musolino, M., & Mlinarič, M. (2021). New clean energy communities in polycentric settings: Four avenues for future research. Energy Research & Social Science, 82, 102276. 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102276
  10. Boekelo, M., & Kloppenburg, S. (2023). Energy platforms and the future of energy citizenship. Energy Research & Social Science, 102, 103165. 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103165
  11. Brown, D., Hall, S., & Davis, M. E. (2019). Prosumers in the post subsidy era: An exploration of new prosumer business models in the UK. Energy Policy, 135, 110984. 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110984
  12. Brown, D., Hall, S., & Davis, M. E. (2020). What is prosumerism for? Exploring the normative dimensions of decentralised energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101475. 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101475
  13. Burke, M. J. (2021). Energy commons and alternatives to enclosures of sunshine and wind. In A. M. Feldpausch-Parker, D. Endres, T. R. Peterson, & S. L. Gomez, Routledge Handbook of Energy Democracy (1st ed., pp. 200214). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429402302-21
  14. Busch, H., Ruggiero, S., Isakovic, A., & Hansen, T. (2021). Policy challenges to community energy in the EU: A systematic review of the scientific literature. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151, 111535. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111535
  15. Byrne, J., Martinez, C., & Ruggero, C. (2009). Relocating Energy in the Social Commons: Ideas for a Sustainable Energy Utility. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(2), 8194. 10.1177/0270467609332315
  16. Capper, T., Gorbatcheva, A., Mustafa, M. A., Bahloul, M., Schwidtal, J. M., Chitchyan, R., Andoni, M., Robu, V., Montakhabi, M., Scott, I. J., Francis, C., Mbavarira, T., Espana, J. M., & Kiesling, L. (2022). Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 162, 112403. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112403
  17. Castaneda, M., Jimenez, M., Zapata, S., Franco, C. J., & Dyner, I. (2017). Myths and facts of the utility death spiral. Energy Policy, 110, 105116. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.063
  18. Chesser, M., Hanly, J., Cassells, D., & Apergis, N. (2018). The positive feedback cycle in the electricity market: Residential solar PV adoption, electricity demand and prices. Energy Policy, 122, 3644. 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.032
  19. Darmawan. (2019). Designing a Just P2P Energy Trading System.pdf. TU Delft. https://repository.tudelft.nl/record/uuid:0a283319-f406-4aff-b912-25b481983973
  20. Directorate-General for Energy. (2024). Energy sharing for energy communities—A reference guide (Enegy Communities Repository). European Commission. https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20240807074641/https://energy-communities-repository.ec.europa.eu/energy-sharing-energy-communities-reference-guide_en
  21. Dudka, A., Magnani, N., & Koukoufikis, G. (2024). Analysing perspectives on capital, mutual, and general interest: A comparative study of energy cooperatives in Belgium and in Italy. Energy Research & Social Science, 116, 103665. 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103665
  22. Dudka, A., Moratal, N., & Bauwens, T. (2023). A typology of community-based energy citizenship: An analysis of the ownership structure and institutional logics of 164 energy communities in France. Energy Policy, 178, 113588. 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113588
  23. Ellsworth-Krebs, K., & Reid, L. (2016). Conceptualising energy prosumption: Exploring energy production, consumption and microgeneration in Scotland, UK. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(10), 19882005. 10.1177/0308518X16649182
  24. Euler, J. (2019). The Commons: A Social Form that Allows for Degrowth and Sustainability. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 30(2), 158175. 10.1080/10455752.2018.1449874
  25. Fouladvand, J. (2024). Why and how can agent-based modelling be applied to community energy systems? A systematic and critical review. Energy Research & Social Science, 114, 103572. 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103572
  26. Gazmararian, A. F., & Tingley, D. (2024). Reimagining net metering: A polycentric model for equitable solar adoption in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 108, 103374. 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103374
  27. Georgarakis, E., Bauwens, T., Pronk, A.-M., & AlSkaif, T. (2021). Keep it green, simple and socially fair: A choice experiment on prosumers’ preferences for peer-to-peer electricity trading in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 159, 112615. 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112615
  28. Giotitsas, C., Nardelli, P. H. J., Kostakis, V., & Narayanan, A. (2020). From private to public governance: The case for reconfiguring energy systems as a commons. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101737. 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101737
  29. Giotitsas, C., Nardelli, P. H. J., Williamson, S., Roos, A., Pournaras, E., & Kostakis, V. (2022). Energy governance as a commons: Engineering alternative socio-technical configurations. Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102354. 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102354
  30. Giotitsas, C., Pazaitis, A., & Kostakis, V. (2015). A peer-to-peer approach to energy production. Technology in Society, 42, 2838. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.02.002
  31. Gjorgievski, V. Z., Velkovski, B., & Cundeva, S. (2022). Fairness of Sharing Renewable Energy Between Prosumers. 2022 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe), 15. 10.1109/ISGT-Europe54678.2022.9960313
  32. Gollwitzer, L., Ockwell, D., Muok, B., Ely, A., & Ahlborg, H. (2018). Rethinking the sustainability and institutional governance of electricity access and mini-grids: Electricity as a common pool resource. Energy Research & Social Science, 39, 152161. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.033
  33. Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams (1. ed). Palgrave. 10.1057/9780312299064_1
  34. Graeber, D. (2014). On the moral grounds of economic relations: A Maussian approach. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(1), 6577. 10.1177/1468795X13494719
  35. Hahnel, U. J. J., & Fell, M. J. (2022). Pricing decisions in peer-to-peer and prosumer-centred electricity markets: Experimental analysis in Germany and the United Kingdom. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 162, 112419. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112419
  36. Hahnel, U. J. J., Herberz, M., Pena-Bello, A., Parra, D., & Brosch, T. (2020). Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities. Energy Policy, 137, 111098. 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111098
  37. Hall, S., Jonas, A. E., Shepherd, S., & Wadud, Z. (2019). The smart grid as commons: Exploring alternatives to infrastructure financialisation. Urban Studies, 56(7), 13861403. 10.1177/0042098018784146
  38. Hess, D. J. (2016). The politics of niche-regime conflicts: Distributed solar energy in the United States. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 4250. 10.1016/j.eist.2015.09.002
  39. Hirsch, A., Parag, Y., & Guerrero, J. (2018). Microgrids: A review of technologies, key drivers, and outstanding issues. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 402411. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.040
  40. Hiteva, R., & Sovacool, B. (2017). Harnessing social innovation for energy justice: A business model perspective. Energy Policy, 107, 631639. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.056
  41. Hoppe, T., & Warbroek, B. (2021). Agency of citizen collectives in sustainable transitions: The case of renewable energy cooperatives in Europe. In S. Teerikangas, T. Onkila, K. Koistinen, & M. Mäkelä (Eds.), Research Handbook of Sustainability Agency. Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781789906035.00018
  42. Inderberg, T. H. J., Palm, J., & Matthiasen, E. H. (2024). Flexible electricity consumption policies in Norway and Sweden: Implications for energy justice. Energy Research & Social Science, 110, 103466. 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103466
  43. Jogunola, O., Ikpehai, A., Anoh, K., Adebisi, B., Hammoudeh, M., Son, S.-Y., & Harris, G. (2017). State-Of-The-Art and Prospects for Peer-To-Peer Transaction-Based Energy System. Energies, 10(12), 2106. 10.3390/en10122106
  44. Karatani, K. (2014). The structure of world history: From modes of production to modes of exchange (M. K. Bourdaghs, Trans.). Duke University Press. 10.1515/9780822376682
  45. Kooij, H.-J., Oteman, M., Veenman, S., Sperling, K., Magnusson, D., Palm, J., & Hvelplund, F. (2018). Between grassroots and treetops: Community power and institutional dependence in the renewable energy sector in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 5264. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.019
  46. Kubli, M. (2018). Squaring the sunny circle? On balancing distributive justice of power grid costs and incentives for solar prosumers. Energy Policy, 114, 173188. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.054
  47. Kubli, M., Loock, M., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2018). The flexible prosumer: Measuring the willingness to co-create distributed flexibility. Energy Policy, 114, 540548. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.044
  48. Kubli, M., & Puranik, S. (2023). A typology of business models for energy communities: Current and emerging design options. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 176, 113165. 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113165
  49. Laws, N. D., Epps, B. P., Peterson, S. O., Laser, M. S., & Wanjiru, G. K. (2017). On the utility death spiral and the impact of utility rate structures on the adoption of residential solar photovoltaics and energy storage. Applied Energy, 185, 627641. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.123
  50. Libertson, F. (2022). (No) room for time-shifting energy use: Reviewing and reconceptualizing flexibility capital. Energy Research & Social Science, 94, 102886. 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102886
  51. Libertson, F. (2024). Misalignments of theory and practice: Exploring Swedish energy utilities’ understandings of energy justice, flexibility capital, and just energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 111, 103471. 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103471
  52. Londo, M., Matton, R., Usmani, O., Van Klaveren, M., Tigchelaar, C., & Brunsting, S. (2020). Alternatives for current net metering policy for solar PV in the Netherlands: A comparison of impacts on business case and purchasing behaviour of private homeowners, and on governmental costs. Renewable Energy, 147, 903915. 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.062
  53. Long, C., Wu, J., Zhang, C., Thomas, L., Cheng, M., & Jenkins, N. (2017). Peer-to-peer energy trading in a community microgrid. 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 15. 10.1109/PESGM.2017.8274546
  54. Lovati, M., Huang, P., Olsmats, C., Yan, D., & Zhang, X. (2021). Agent Based Modelling of a Local Energy Market: A Study of the Economic Interactions between Autonomous PV Owners within a Micro-Grid. Buildings, 11(4), 160. 10.3390/buildings11040160
  55. Lovati, M., Zhang, X., Huang, P., Olsmats, C., & Maturi, L. (2020). Optimal Simulation of Three Peer to Peer (P2P) Business Models for Individual PV Prosumers in a Local Electricity Market Using Agent-Based Modelling. Buildings, 10(8), 138. 10.3390/buildings10080138
  56. Martin, C. J. (2016). The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics, 121, 149159. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027
  57. Marzban, E., Firoozpour, A., & Marzban, M. (2023). Electricity as a common good/resource: A scenario based approach. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 17(3), 510530. 10.1108/IJESM-08-2021-0020
  58. Mauss, M. (2004). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (Repr). Routledge.
  59. May, R., & Huang, P. (2023). A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for investigating and optimising peer-to-peer prosumer energy markets. Applied Energy, 334, 120705. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120705
  60. Mehta, P., & Tiefenbeck, V. (2022). Solar PV sharing in urban energy communities: Impact of community configurations on profitability, autonomy and the electric grid. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87, 104178. 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104178
  61. Melville, E., Christie, I., Burningham, K., Way, C., & Hampshire, P. (2017). The electric commons: A qualitative study of community accountability. Energy Policy, 106, 1221. 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.035
  62. Mey, F., & Diesendorf, M. (2018). Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark. Energy Research & Social Science, 35, 108117. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.044
  63. Middlemiss, L., Ambrosio-Albalá, P., Emmel, N., Gillard, R., Gilbertson, J., Hargreaves, T., Mullen, C., Ryan, T., Snell, C., & Tod, A. (2019). Energy poverty and social relations: A capabilities approach. Energy Research & Social Science, 55, 227235. 10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.002
  64. Monroe, J., Bolton, E. R., & Berglund, E. Z. (2023). Evaluating Peer-to-Peer Electricity Markets across the U.S. Using an Agent-Based Modeling Approach. Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research, 04(01), 140. 10.21926/aeer.2301017
  65. Monroe, J., Hansen, P., Sorell, M., & Berglund, E. Z. (2020). Agent-Based Model of a Blockchain Enabled Peer-to-Peer Energy Market: Application for a Neighborhood Trial in Perth, Australia. Smart Cities, 3(3), 10721099. 10.3390/smartcities3030053
  66. Montakhabi, M., Van Der Graaf, S., Ballon, P., & Mustafa, M. A. (2020). Sharing Beyond Peer-to-peer Trading: Collaborative (Open) Business Models as a Pathway to Smart Circular Economy in Electricity Markets. 2020 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), 482489. 10.1109/DCOSS49796.2020.00081
  67. Montakhabi, M., Van Der Graaf, S., & Mustafa, M. A. (2023). Valuing the value: An affordances perspective on new models in the electricity market. Energy Research & Social Science, 96, 102902. 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102902
  68. Moret, F., & Pinson, P. (2019). Energy Collectives: A Community and Fairness Based Approach to Future Electricity Markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 34(5), 39944004. 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2808961
  69. Morstyn, T., Farrell, N., Darby, S. J., & McCulloch, M. D. (2018). Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants. Nature Energy, 3(2), 94101. 10.1038/s41560-017-0075-y
  70. Mourik, R. M., Breukers, S., Van Summeren, L. F. M., & Wieczorek, A. J. (2020). The impact of the institutional context on the potential contribution of new business models to democratising the energy system. In Energy and Behaviour (pp. 209235). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818567-4.00009-0
  71. Nax, H. H. (2015). Equity dynamics in bargaining without information exchange. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(5), 10111026. 10.1007/s00191-015-0405-9
  72. Ovaere, M. (2023). Collective energy sharing: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Survey Evidence of the Willingness to Invest. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.4404024
  73. Parag, Y., & Sovacool, B. K. (2016). Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nature Energy, 1(4), 16032. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.32
  74. Pasimeni, F. (2021). The origin of the sharing economy meets the legacy of fractional ownership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128614. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128614
  75. Paudel, A., Chaudhari, K., Long, C., & Gooi, H. B. (2019). Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in a Prosumer-Based Community Microgrid: A Game-Theoretic Model. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(8), 60876097. 10.1109/TIE.2018.2874578
  76. Pieńkowski, D. (2021). Rethinking the concept of prosuming: A critical and integrative perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 74, 101967. 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101967
  77. Pires Klein, L., Allegretti, G., Hes, D., & Melkas, H. (2021). Revealing social values in the context of peer-to-peer energy sharing: A methodological approach. Sustainable Futures, 3, 100043. 10.1016/j.sftr.2021.100043
  78. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (2nd Beacon Paperback ed). Beacon Press.
  79. Poullikkas, A., Kourtis, G., & Hadjipaschalis, I. (2013). A review of net metering mechanism for electricity renewable energy sources. International Journal of Energy and Environment, 4(6).
  80. Powells, G., & Fell, M. J. (2019). Flexibility capital and flexibility justice in smart energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 54, 5659. 10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.015
  81. Pumphrey, K., Walker, S. L., Andoni, M., & Robu, V. (2020). Green hope or red herring? Examining consumer perceptions of peer-to-peer energy trading in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 101603. 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101603
  82. Reuter, E., & Loock, M. (2017). Empowering Local Electricity Markets: A survey study from Switzerland, Norway, Spain and Germany. Institute for Economy and the Environment University of St. Gallen. https://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/server/api/core/bitstreams/f620aaa6-d71c-42a6-bb2a-dd408968d380/content
  83. Ritzel, C., Mann, S., & Van Zyl-Bulitta, V. (2022). Prosuming Alone or Together: A Bisectoral Approach to Conceptualizing the Commons Prosumer. International Journal of the Commons, 16(1), 295309. 10.5334/ijc.1185
  84. Ritzer, G. (2015). Prosumer Capitalism. The Sociological Quarterly, 56(3), 413445. 10.1111/tsq.12105
  85. Ruotsalainen, J., Karjalainen, J., Child, M., & Heinonen, S. (2017). Culture, values, lifestyles, and power in energy futures: A critical peer-to-peer vision for renewable energy. Energy Research & Social Science, 34, 231239. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.08.001
  86. Sahlins, M. (2017). Stone Age Economics. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315184951
  87. Sanayha, M., & Vateekul, P. (2022). Model-Based Approach on Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning With Multiple Clusters for Peer-To-Peer Energy Trading. IEEE Access, 10, 127882127893. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3224460
  88. Schneiders, A., Fell, M. J., & Nolden, C. (2022). Peer-to-peer electricity trading and the sharing economy: Social, markets and regulatory perspectives. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 17(1), 2050849. 10.1080/15567249.2022.2050849
  89. Schreuer, A. (2016). The establishment of citizen power plants in Austria: A process of empowerment? Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 126135. 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.003
  90. Schwidtal, J. M., Piccini, P., Troncia, M., Chitchyan, R., Montakhabi, M., Francis, C., Gorbatcheva, A., Capper, T., Mustafa, M. A., Andoni, M., Robu, V., Bahloul, M., Scott, I. J., Mbavarira, T., España, J. M., & Kiesling, L. (2023). Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 179, 113273. 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113273
  91. Singh, A., Strating, A. T., Romero Herrera, N. A., Mahato, D., Keyson, D. V., & Van Dijk, H. W. (2018). Exploring peer-to-peer returns in off-grid renewable energy systems in rural India: An anthropological perspective on local energy sharing and trading. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 194213. 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.021
  92. Singh, A., Strating, A. T., Romero Herrera, N. A., Van Dijk, H. W., & Keyson, D. V. (2017). Towards an ethnography of electrification in rural India: Social relations and values in household energy exchanges. Energy Research & Social Science, 30, 103115. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.031
  93. Van Summeren, L. F. M., Wieczorek, A. J., Bombaerts, G. J. T., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2020). Community energy meets smart grids: Reviewing goals, structure, and roles in Virtual Power Plants in Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 63, 101415. 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101415
  94. Van Veelen, B. (2017). Making Sense of the Scottish Community Energy Sector – An Organising Typology. Scottish Geographical Journal, 133(1), 120. 10.1080/14702541.2016.1210820
  95. Van Zyl-Bulitta, V. H. (2019). Framing Commons for Society-Technology for Electric Infrastructure Supply Systems. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 10. 10.22545/2019/0113
  96. Wahlund, M., & Palm, J. (2022). The role of energy democracy and energy citizenship for participatory energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science, 87, 102482. 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102482
  97. Wang, J., Wang, Q., Zhou, N., & Chi, Y. (2017). A Novel Electricity Transaction Mode of Microgrids Based on Blockchain and Continuous Double Auction. Energies, 10(12), 1971. 10.3390/en10121971
  98. Watson, N., Gorbatcheva, A., Schneiders, A., Shipworth, D., & Fell, M. (2022). Defining Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading, Community Self-Consumption and Transactive Energy Models: Concept Definition Paper. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.4207445
  99. Wierling, A., Schwanitz, V. J., Zeiß, J. P., Bout, C., Candelise, C., Gilcrease, W., & Gregg, J. S. (2018). Statistical Evidence on the Role of Energy Cooperatives for the Energy Transition in European Countries. Sustainability, 10(9), 3339. 10.3390/su10093339
  100. Wierling, A., Schwanitz, V. J., Zeiss, J. P., Von Beck, C., Paudler, H. A., Koren, I. K., Kraudzun, T., Marcroft, T., Müller, L., Andreadakis, Z., Candelise, C., Dufner, S., Getabecha, M., Glaase, G., Hubert, W., Lupi, V., Majidi, S., Mohammadi, S., Nosar, N. S., … Zoubin, N. (2023). A Europe-wide inventory of citizen-led energy action with data from 29 countries and over 10000 initiatives. Scientific Data, 10(1), 9. 10.1038/s41597-022-01902-5
  101. Wilkinson, S., Hojckova, K., Eon, C., Morrison, G. M., & Sandén, B. (2020). Is peer-to-peer electricity trading empowering users? Evidence on motivations and roles in a prosumer business model trial in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101500. 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101500
  102. Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., Pel, B., & Campos, I. (2021). Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics. Energy Policy, 149, 112053. 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112053
  103. Wolsink, M. (2020). Distributed energy systems as common goods: Socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109841. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109841
  104. Yildiz, Ö., Rommel, J., Debor, S., Holstenkamp, L., Mey, F., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Rognli, J. (2015). Renewable energy cooperatives as gatekeepers or facilitators? Recent developments in Germany and a multidisciplinary research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 5973. 10.1016/j.erss.2014.12.001
  105. Zhang, C., Wu, J., Zhou, Y., Cheng, M., & Long, C. (2018). Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid. Applied Energy, 220, 112. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.010
  106. Zhou, Y., & Lund, P. D. (2023). Peer-to-peer energy sharing and trading of renewable energy in smart communities – trading pricing models, decision-making and agent-based collaboration. Renewable Energy, 207, 177193. 10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.125
  107. Zhou, Y., Wu, J., & Long, C. (2018). Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework. Applied Energy, 222, 9931022. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.089
  108. Zhou, Y., Wu, J., Long, C., Cheng, M., & Zhang, C. (2017). Performance Evaluation of Peer-to-Peer Energy Sharing Models. Energy Procedia, 143, 817822. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.768
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1468 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Aug 30, 2024
|
Accepted on: Apr 7, 2025
|
Published on: Jun 9, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Robert Wade, Francesco Pasimeni, Naud Loomans, Floor Alkemade, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.