References
- 1Amblard, L. (2021). Collective action as a tool for agri-environmental policy implementation. The case of diffuse pollution control in European rural areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 280,
111845 . 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111845 - 2Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society, 9(1), 1–17.
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/ (accessed on 2 May 2021). - 3Angel, S. (2017). Urban forms and future cities: a commentary. Urban Planning, 2(1), 1–5. 10.17645/up.v2i1.863
- 4Arias, R. (2018). Estudios Ambientales y Plan de Acción para la recuperación del espejo de agua y la Capacidad Hidráulica de los Cuatro Reservorios Localizados en el Campus de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali.
- 5Ban, N. C., Evans, L. S., Nenadovic, M., & Schoon, M. (2015). Interplay of multiple goods, ecosystem services, and property rights in large social-ecological marine protected areas. Ecology and Society, 20(4). 10.5751/ES-07857-200402
- 6Binder, C. R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W. G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4). 10.5751/ES-05551-180426
- 7Brady, U., & Ratajczyk, E. (2015). Challenges and opportunities in coding the Commons: problems, procedures, and potential solutions in large-N comparative case studies.
https://seslibrary.asu.edu/sites/default/files/ijc-coding-manual.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2022). - 8Colding, J. (2011).
Creating incentives for increased public engagement in ecosystem management through urban commons . In Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity and Social-Ecological Resilience (pp. 101–124). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139017237.008 - 9Contreras, R. (2006). Plan de Manejo Ambiental Humedal Marañón, El Hormiguero, Cali.
https://www.cvc.gov.co/ecopedia/sites/default/files/archivosAdjuntos/29_pmi_maranon_doc_general.pdf (accessed on 9 March 2023). - 10Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. 10.1038/387253a0
- 11CVC. (2006). Plan de Manejo Ambiental Humedal Navarro.
https://ecopedia.cvc.gov.co (accessed on 9 March 2021). - 12CVC. (2010). Plan de Manejo Ambiental Laguna de Charco Azul. CVC.
https://www.cali.gov.co/dagma/publicaciones/138913/humedal-charco-azul-cali/ (accessed on 11 May 2021). - 13D’Souza, R., & Nagendra, H. (2011). Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: The Agara lake in Bangalore, India. Environmental Management, 47(5), 840–850. 10.1007/s00267-011-9658-8
- 14DAGMA. (2012a). Plan de Manejo Ambiental Humedal Ecoparque Lago de Las Garzas. DAGMA.
https://www.cali.gov.co/dagma/publicaciones/138919/ecoparque-lago-de-las-garzas-cali/ (accessed on 11 May 2021). - 15DAGMA. (2012b). Plan de Manejo Ambiental Humedal La Babilla—Zanjón del Burro. DAGMA. 2012.
https://www.cali.gov.co/dagma/publicaciones/138918/humedal-la-babilla-cali/ (accessed on 7 April 2021). - 16DAGMA. (2018a). Actualización de Inventario de Humedales Urbanos de Santiago de Cali y Lineamientos para su conservación en predios privados. DAGMA.
https://www.cali.gov.co/dagma/publicaciones/138055/humedales-de-santiago-de-cali/ (accessed on 23 January 2021). - 17DAGMA. (2018b). Plan de Manejo Ambiental Humedales de la Universidad del Valle, Sede Meléndez. Inter-Administrative Contract 4133.010.26.1.875–2018 DAGMA-University del Valle.
- 18DAP. (2022). Cali en Cifras 2022.
http://www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/137803/documentos-de-cali-en-cifras/ (accessed on 11 May 2023). - 19De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
- 20Delgado-Serrano, MdM., & Ramos, P. (2015). Making Ostrom’s framework applicable to haracterize social ecological systems at the local level. The Commons Journal, 9(2), 808–830. 10.18352/ijc.567
- 21Díaz-Pinzón, L., Sierra, L., & Trillas, F. (2022). The Economic Value of Wetlands in Urban Areas: The Benefits in a Developing Country. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). 10.3390/su14148302
- 22Escobedo, F. J., Clerici, N., Staudhammer, C. L., & Corzo, G. T. (2015). Socio-ecological dynamics and inequality in Bogotá, Colombia’s public urban forests and their ecosystem services. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(4), 1040–1053. 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.011
- 23Frey, U. J. (2017). A synthesis of key factors for sustainability in social–ecological systems. Sustainability Science, 12(4), 507–519. 10.1007/s11625-016-0395-z
- 24Herrera, V. (2024). Citizen-Led Environmental Governance: Regulating Urban Wetlands in South America. Studies in Comparative International Development. 10.1007/s12116-023-09420-0
- 25IPBES. (2019). The global assessment report of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services E. S. Brondízio, J. Settele, S. Díaz & H. T. Ngo (Eds.).
www.ipbes.net (accessed on 11 May 2023). - 26Jorda-Capdevila, D., & Rodríguez-Labajos, B. (2015). An ecosystem service approach to understand conflicts on river flows: local views on the Ter River (Catalonia). Sustainability Science, 10(3), 463–477. 10.1007/s11625-014-0286-0
- 27Marshall, G., & Scott, J. (1998). A dictionary of sociology. Oxford University Press Oxford. ISBN:
978-0-19-953300-8 . - 28Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis. In Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. 10.4135/9781446282243.n12
- 29McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and society, 19(2). 10.5751/ES-06387-190230
- 30MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water. World Resources Institute.
https://millenniumassessment.org/en/ (accessed on 23 January 2021). - 31Méndez, P. F., Isendahl, N., Amezaga, J. M., & Santamaría, L. (2012). Facilitating transitional processes in rigid institutional regimes for water management and wetland conservation: Experience from the Guadalquivir Estuary. Ecology and Society, 17(1). 10.5751/ES-04494-170126
- 32Mukhija, V. (2005). Collective action and property rights: A planner’s critical look at the dogma of private property. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 972–983. 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00632.x
- 33Nagendra, H., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecology and Society, 19(2). 10.5751/ES-06582-190267
- 34Nazmul Haque, M., & Sharifi, A. (2024). Justice in access to urban ecosystem services: A critical review of the literature. Ecosystem Services, 67. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101617
- 35Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. 10.1126/science.1172133
- 36Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 3, 641–672. 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
- 37Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
- 38Ostrom, E., Agrawal, A., Blomquist, W., Schlager, E., & Tang, S. Y. (1989). CPR Coding Manual.
https://seslibrary.asu.edu/sites/default/files/cprcodingmanual-fullwcovercopytoc.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2022). - 39Partelow, S., & Winkler, K. J. (2016). Interlinking ecosystem services and Ostrom’s framework through orientation in sustainability research. Ecology and Society, 21(3). 10.5751/ES-08524-210327
- 40Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. (4th ed.) Sage publications. ISBN:
9781483376059, 1483376052 . - 41POT. (2014). Acuerdo N° 0373 de 2014 por medio del cual se adopta la revisión ordinaria de contenido de largo plazo del Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial del Municipio de Santiago de Cali. Consejo Santiago de Cali.
https://www.cali.gov.co/planeacion/publicaciones/106497/pot_2014_idesc/ (accessed on 21 April 2021). - 42Ramsar. (2018). Perspectiva mundial sobre los humedales. Conveción de Ramsar Sobre Los Humedales,
88 .https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/gwo_s.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2021). - 43Ramsar. (2021). Global Wetland Outlook: Special Edition 2021.
https://www.global-wetland-outlook.ramsar.org/report-1 (accessed on 11 May 2023). - 44Rodríguez-Labajos, B., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2015).
Political ecology of water conflicts . In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water (Vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 537–558). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 10.1002/WAT2.1092 - 45Sierra, L., Marin, W., Castro, L. G., & Hernández-Manrique, O. L. (2021). Economic valuation of benefits in freshwater ecosystems: Complex wetlands system belonging to the san juan river in the Magdalena medio region, Colombia. Sustainability, 13(10). 10.3390/su13105374
- 46Tabares-Mosquera, M., Zapata-Caldas, E., & Buitrago-Bermudez, O. (2020). Valuation of Ecosystem Services for the Identification of Metropolitan Ecological Structures: the Case of Cali, Colombia. Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica, 46(2), 603–631. 10.18172/cig.3952
- 47TEEB. (2010). The Ecological and Economic Foundation.
https://teebweb.org/publications/teeb-for/research-and-academia/ (accessed on 8 February 2021). - 48UNEP-WCMC. (2016). El Estado de la Biodiversidad en América Latina y el Caribe.
https://www.cbd.int/gbo/gbo4/outlook-grulac-es.pdf (accessed on 11 May 2023). - 49Verd, J. M., & Lozares, C. (2016). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa: fases, métodos y técnicas. Síntesis. ISBN:
978-84-907793-8-5 . - 50Villamayor-Tomas, S., Oberlack, C., Epstein, G., Partelow, S., Roggero, M., Kellner, E., Tschopp, M., & Cox, M. (2020).
Using case study data to understand SES interactions: a model-centered meta-analysis of SES framework applications . In Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (Vol. 44, pp. 48–57). Elsevier B.V. 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.05.002