Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Promise of Collective Action for Large-Scale Commons Dilemmas: Reflections on Common-Pool-Resource Theory Cover

The Promise of Collective Action for Large-Scale Commons Dilemmas: Reflections on Common-Pool-Resource Theory

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 16 (2022): Issue 1
By: Landon Yoder,  Courtney Hammond Wagner,  Kira Sullivan-Wiley and  Gemma Smith  
Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. 1Anderies, J., & Janssen, M. (2013). Sustaining the commons. Tempe, AZ: Center for Behavior, Institutions, and the Environment, Arizona State University.
    Back to article
  2. 2Anderies, J., Janssen, M., & Schlager, E. (2016). Institutions and the performance of coupled infrastructure systems. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 495. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.651
    Back to article
  3. 3Anderson, T. L., & Libecap, G. D. (2014). Environmental markets: A property rights approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511845734
    Back to article
  4. 4Andersson, K., Benavides, J. P., & Leon, R. (2014). Institutional diversity and local forest governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 36, 61–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.009
    Back to article
  5. 5Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
    Back to article
  6. 6Anthony, D. L., & Campbell, J. L. (2011). States, social capital and cooperation: Looking back on governing the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), 284–302. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.250
    Back to article
  7. 7Araral, E. (2014). Ostrom, Hardin and the commons: A critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environmental Science and Policy, 36, 11–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.011
    Back to article
  8. 8Armitage, D. (2008). Governance and the commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 7–32. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.28
    Back to article
  9. 9Armstrong, A., Stedman, R., & Tucker, G. (2019). Beyond ‘us and them’: Why do landowners disagree about local water pollution? Society & Natural Resources, 32(11), 1200–1221. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2019.1620390
    Back to article
  10. 10Arnott, J. C., & Lemos, M. C. (2021). Understanding knowledge use for sustainability. Environmental Science & Policy, 120, 222–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.016
    Back to article
  11. 11Baggio, J., et al. (2016). Explaining success and failure in the commons: the configural nature of Ostrom’s institutional design principles. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 417–439. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.634
    Back to article
  12. 12Baland, J., & Platteau, J. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources: is there a role for rural communities? Rome: Food & Agriculture Organization.
    Back to article
  13. 13Barnes, A. P., Toma, L., Willock, J., & Hall, C. (2013). Comparing a ‘budge’ to a ‘nudge’: Farmer responses to voluntary and compulsory compliance in a water quality management regime. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 448–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.09.006
    Back to article
  14. 14Barnes, A. P., Willock, J., & Toma, L. (2009). Farmer perspectives and practices regarding water pollution control programmes in Scotland. Agricultural Water Management, 96, 1715–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.07.002
    Back to article
  15. 15Berge, E., & van Laerhoven, F. (2011). Governing the commons for two decades: A complex story. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), 160. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.325
    Back to article
  16. 16Blackstock, K. L., et al. (2010). Understanding and influencing behaviour change by farmers to improve water quality. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 5631–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.04.029
    Back to article
  17. 17Blomquist, W., & Ostrom, E. (1985). Institutional capacity and the resolution of a commons dilemma. Review of Policy Research, 5(2), 383–394. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1985.tb00364.x
    Back to article
  18. 18Bodin, O., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3): 366–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
    Back to article
  19. 19Bonnell, J. E., & Koontz, T. M. (2021). A cross-cultural comparison of government influence on collaborative watershed institutions in Ohio (USA) and the Dominican Republic and implications for decentralization of resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 34(10), 1412–1422. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2021.1951410
    Back to article
  20. 20Breitburg, D., et al. (2018). Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science, 359(6371), eaam7240. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam7240
    Back to article
  21. 21Brugnach, M., & Ingram, H. (2012). Ambiguity: The challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 60–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.005
    Back to article
  22. 22Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross-Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44–55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
    Back to article
  23. 23Burton, R. J. F., & Paragahawewa, U. H. (2011). Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 95–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2010.11.001
    Back to article
  24. 24Carney, J. (1993). Converting the wetlands, engendering the environment: The intersection of gender with agrarian change in the Gambia. Economic Geography, 69(4), 329–48. DOI: 10.2307/143593
    Back to article
  25. 25Cash, D. W., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-01759-110208
    Back to article
  26. 26Clark, W. C., et al. (2016). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4615–22. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900231108
    Back to article
  27. 27Cleaver, F. (2012). Development through bricolage: Rethinking institutions for natural resource management. New York: Routledge.
    Back to article
  28. 28Cleaver, F., & de Koning, J. (2015). Furthering Critical Institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1): 1–18. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.605
    Back to article
  29. 29Cox, M., et al. (2016). Synthesizing theories of natural resource management and governance. Global Environmental Change, 39, 45–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.011
    Back to article
  30. 30Del Corso, J., Nguyen, T. D. P. G., & Kephaliacos, C. (2017). Acceptance of a payment of ecosystem services scheme: The decisive influence of collective action. Environmental Values, 26, 177–202. DOI: 10.3197/096327117X14847335385517
    Back to article
  31. 31Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2002). The drama of the commons. In The Drama of the Commons, 3–36. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
    Back to article
  32. 32Drevno, A. (2016). Policy tools for agricultural nonpoint source water pollution control in the U.S. & E.U. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 27(2), 106–23. DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2014-0177
    Back to article
  33. 33Duncan, R. (2016). Ways of knowing – out-of-sync or incompatible? Framing water quality and farmers’ encounters with science in the regulation of non-point source pollution in the Canterbury Region of New Zealand. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 151–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.004
    Back to article
  34. 34Durant, R. F., Fiorino, D. J., & O’Leary, R (eds.) (2017). Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices, and Opportunities. Second edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Back to article
  35. 35Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (1990). The tragedy of the commons: Twenty-two years later. Human Ecology, 18(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1007/BF00889070
    Back to article
  36. 36Fleischman, F. D., Loken, B., Garcia-Lopez, G. A., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2014). Evaluating the utility of common-pool resource theory for understanding forest governance and outcomes in Indonesia between 1965 and 2012. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 304–36. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.409
    Back to article
  37. 37Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–73. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
    Back to article
  38. 38Forsyth, T., & Johnson, C. (2014). Elinor Ostrom’s legacy: Governing the commons and the rational choice controversy. Development and Change, 45(5), 1093–1110. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12110
    Back to article
  39. 39Friedman, L. M. (2016). Impact: how law affects behavior. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    Back to article
  40. 40Hammond Wagner, C. R. (2019). Governing water quality limits in agricultural watersheds. University of Vermont.
    Back to article
  41. 41Hammond Wagner, C. R., et al. (2020). Evaluating water quality regulation as a driver of farmer behavior: A social-ecological systems approach. Ecology and Society, 25(4), art35. DOI: 10.5751/ES-12034-250435
    Back to article
  42. 42Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–48. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
    Back to article
  43. 43Houck, O. A. (2003). The Clean Water Act TMDL Program: Law, Policy, and Implementation. 2nd Edition. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
    Back to article
  44. 44Howlett, M. (2017). Matching policy tools and their targets: Beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design. Policy & Politics. DOI: 10.1332/030557317X15053060139376
    Back to article
  45. 45Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (2017). The politics of river basin organizations: Institutional design choices, coalitions, and consequences. Ecology and Society, 22(2), 42. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09409-220242
    Back to article
  46. 46IPBES. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. E. S. Brondizio, J. Settele, S. Díaz, & H. T. Ngo (eds.), IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. pp. 1148.
    Back to article
  47. 47IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte, V., et al. (eds.). Cambridge University Press.
    Back to article
  48. 48Ison, R., & Collins, K. (2008). Public policy that does the right thing rather than the wrong thing righter. In: Analysing Collaborative and Deliberative Forms of Governance, 14 Nov 2008, The Australia National University, Canberra, Australia.
    Back to article
  49. 49Jackson, S. (2019). Building trust and establishing legitimacy across scientific, water management and Indigenous cultures. Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 23(1), 14–23. DOI: 10.1080/13241583.2018.1505994
    Back to article
  50. 50Jetoo, S. (2018). Multi-level governance innovations of the Baltic Sea and the North American Great Lakes: new actors and their roles in building adaptive capacity for eutrophication governance. Marine Policy, 98, 237–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.09.020
    Back to article
  51. 51Johnson, C. (2004). Uncommon ground: The ‘poverty of history’ in common property discourse. Development and Change, 35(3), 407–33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00359.x
    Back to article
  52. 52Kerr, J. (2007). Watershed management: Lessons from common property theory. International Journal of the Commons, 1(1), 89–109. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.8
    Back to article
  53. 53Kerr, J. M., Mardhan, M., & Jindal, R. (2014). Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 595–616. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.438
    Back to article
  54. 54Kim, S. Y., et al. (2020). Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy Studies Journal. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12392
    Back to article
  55. 55Koontz, T. M., et al. (2004). Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
    Back to article
  56. 56Kuhfuss, L., et al. (2016). Nudges, social norms, and permanence in agri-environmental schemes. Land Economics, 92(4), 641–55. DOI: 10.3368/le.92.4.641
    Back to article
  57. 57Lal, R., Reicosky, D. C., & Hanson, J. D. (2007). Evolution of the plow over 10,000 years and the rationale for no-till farming. Soil and Tillage Research, 93(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2006.11.004
    Back to article
  58. 58Lebel, L., Nikitina, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Knieper, C. (2013). Institutional fit and river basin governance: A new approach using multiple composite measures. Ecology and Society, 18(1), 1–20. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05097-180101
    Back to article
  59. 59Liu, J., et al. (2007). Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science, 317, 1513–16. DOI: 10.1126/science.1144004
    Back to article
  60. 60Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative Watershed Management: A View from the Grassroots. Russell Sage Foundation. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2004.00069.x
    Back to article
  61. 61Lubell, M. (2013). Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 537–59. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12028
    Back to article
  62. 62Macgregor, C. J., & Warren, C. R. (2006). Adopting sustainable farm management practices within a nitrate vulnerable zone in Scotland: The view from the farm. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 113, 108–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.003
    Back to article
  63. 63Mansbridge, J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science and Policy, 36, 8–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.07.006
    Back to article
  64. 64Margerum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262015813.001.0001
    Back to article
  65. 65Marshall, G. R. (2004). Farmers cooperating in the commons? A study of collective action in salinity management. Ecological Economics, 51, 271–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.016
    Back to article
  66. 66Marshall, G. R. (2008). Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local level. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 75–97. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.50
    Back to article
  67. 67McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (1987). Human ecology and the commons. In The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources. Tucson, Arizona: The University of Arizona Press, 1–34.
    Back to article
  68. 68McGuire, J., Morton, L. W., & Cast, A. D. (2013). Reconstructing the good farmer identity: Shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values, 30, 57–69. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-012-9381-y
    Back to article
  69. 69Meinzen-Dick, R., Digregorio, M., & McCarthy, N. (2004). Methods for studying collective action in rural development. Agricultural Systems, 82(3), 197–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.07.006
    Back to article
  70. 70Melland, A. R., Fenton, O., & Jordan, P. (2018). Effects of agricultural land management changes on surface water quality: A review of meso-scale catchment research. Environmental Science and Policy, 84, 19–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.011
    Back to article
  71. 71Mosse, D. (2003). The rule of water: Statecraft, ecology, and collective action in South India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  72. 72Newig, J., et al. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2). DOI: 10.1111/psj.12209
    Back to article
  73. 73Niemiec, R. M., McCaffrey, S., & Jones, M. S. (2020). Clarifying the degree and type of public good collective action problem posed by natural resource management challenges. Ecology and Society, 25(1), art30. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11483-250130
    Back to article
  74. 74Olivier, T., & Schlager, E. (2021). Rules and the ruled: Understanding joint patterns of institutional design and behavior in complex governing arrangements. Policy Studies Journal. psj.12429. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12429
    Back to article
  75. 75Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    Back to article
  76. 76Orazgaliyev, S., & Araral, E. (2019). Conflict and cooperation in Global Commons: Theory and evidence from the Caspian Sea. International Journal of the Commons, 13(2), 962–76. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.914
    Back to article
  77. 77Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
    Back to article
  78. 78Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104(39), 15181–87. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0702288104
    Back to article
  79. 79Ostrom, E. (2009). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Background Paper to the 2010 World Development Report. DOI: 10.1596/1813-9450-5095
    Back to article
  80. 80Partelow, S. (2018). A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 36. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10594-230436
    Back to article
  81. 81Patterson, J. (2017). Purposeful collective action in ambiguous and contested situations: Exploring ‘enabling capacities’ and cross-level interplay. International Journal of the Commons, 11(1), 248–74. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.696
    Back to article
  82. 82Patterson, J. J., Smith, C., & Bellamy, J. (2013). Understanding enabling capacities for managing the ‘wicked problem’ of nonpoint source water pollution in catchments: A conceptual framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 441–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.033
    Back to article
  83. 83Pickering, J., Hong, J., Stower, R., Hong, D., & Kealley, M. (2018). Using psychology to understand practice change among sugar cane growers. Rural Extension and Innovation Systems Journal, 14(1), 62–72.
    Back to article
  84. 84Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400835157
    Back to article
  85. 85Prokopy, L. S., Mullendore, N., Basier, K., & Floress, K. (2014). A typology of catalyst events for collaborative watershed management in the United States. Society and Natural Resources, 27, 1177–91. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2014.918230
    Back to article
  86. 86Quintana, A., & Campbell, L. M. (2019). Critical commons scholarship: A typology. International Journal of the Commons, 13(2), 1112–27. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.925
    Back to article
  87. 87Ribaudo, M., et al. (2011). Nitrogen in agricultural systems: Implications for conservation policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2115532
    Back to article
  88. 88Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. DOI: 10.1007/BF01405730
    Back to article
  89. 89Robertson, G. P., & Vitousek, P. M. (2009). Nitrogen in agriculture: Balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 97–125. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046
    Back to article
  90. 90Rockström, J., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–75. DOI: 10.1038/461472a
    Back to article
  91. 91Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–68. DOI: 10.1007/BF00136406
    Back to article
  92. 92Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2019). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications, 189–220. In Theories of the policy process. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780367274689-7
    Back to article
  93. 93Sarker, A., Ross, H., & Shrestha, K. K. (2008). A common-pool resource approach for water quality management: An Australian case study. Ecological Economics, 461–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.001
    Back to article
  94. 94Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (2008). Embracing watershed politics. Boulder, Colorado: University Press of Colorado. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt46nvqs
    Back to article
  95. 95Schlager, E., Blomquist, W., & Tang, S. Y. (1994). Mobile flows, storage, and self-organized institutions for governing common-pool resources. Land Economics, 70(3), 294–317. DOI: 10.2307/3146531
    Back to article
  96. 96Shortle, J. S., & Abler, D. G. (2001). Environmental policies for agricultural pollution control. Wallingford: CABI Publishing. DOI: 10.1079/9780851993997.0000
    Back to article
  97. 97Shortle, J. S., & Horan, R. D. (2013). Policy instruments for water quality protection. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1), 111–38. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151903
    Back to article
  98. 98Smith, L. E. D., & Porter, K. S. (2010). Management of catchments for the protection of water resources: Drawing on the New York City watershed experience. Regional Environmental Change, 10, 311–26. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-009-0102-z
    Back to article
  99. 99Steffen, W., et al. (2004). Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/b137870
    Back to article
  100. 100Steffen, W., et al. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. DOI: 10.1177/2053019614564785
    Back to article
  101. 101Steins, N. A., & Edwards, V. M. (1999). Collective action in common-pool resource management: The contribution of a social constructivist perspective to existing theory. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 539–57. DOI: 10.1080/089419299279434
    Back to article
  102. 102Stern, P. C. (2011). Design principles for global commons: Natural resources and emerging technologies. International Journal of the Commons, 5(2), 213–32. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.305
    Back to article
  103. 103Stuart, D., et al. (2015). The need for a coupled human and natural systems understanding of agricultural nitrogen loss. BioScience, 65, 571–78. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biv049
    Back to article
  104. 104Turner, B. L., II, et al. (1990). Two types of global environmental change: Definitional and spatial scale issues in their human dimensions. Global Environmental Change, 1, 14–22. DOI: 10.1016/0959-3780(90)90004-S
    Back to article
  105. 105van Laerhoven, F., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Traditions and trends in the study of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 1(1), 3. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.76
    Back to article
  106. 106van Laerhoven, F., Schoon, M., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2020). Celebrating the 30th anniversary of Ostrom’s Governing the commons: Traditions and trends in the study of the commons, revisited. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 208–24. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1030
    Back to article
  107. 107Varughese, G., & Ostrom, E. (1998). The contested role of heterogeneity. Working paper no. 32. Bloomington, IN: Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University.
    Back to article
  108. 108Villamayor-Tomas, S., et al. (2019). Diagnosing the role of the state for local collective action: Types of action situations and policy instruments. Environmental Science & Policy, 97, 44–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.009
    Back to article
  109. 109Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494–99. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494
    Back to article
  110. 110Wade, R. (1988). Village republics: Economic conditions for collective action in South India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 213.
    Back to article
  111. 111Wang, Y., Zang, L., & Araral, E. (2020). The impacts of land fragmentation on irrigation collective action: Empirical test of the social-ecological system framework in China. Journal of Rural Studies, 78, 234–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.06.005
    Back to article
  112. 112Yoder, L., & Roy Chowdhury, R. (2018). Tracing social capital: How stakeholder group interactions shape agricultural water quality restoration in the Florida Everglades. Land Use Policy, 77(September), 354–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.038
    Back to article
  113. 113York, A. M., et al. (2021). Integrating institutional approaches and decision science to address climate change: A multi-level collective action research agenda. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 52, 19–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.001
    Back to article
  114. 114Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/3807.001.0001
    Back to article
  115. 115Young, O. R. (2010). Institutional dynamics: emergent patterns in international environmental governance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8457.001.0001
    Back to article
  116. 116Young, O. R. (2011). Land use, environmental change, and sustainable development: The role of institutional diagnostics. International Journal of the Commons, 5, 66–85. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.244
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1163 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 8, 2021
Accepted on: Apr 9, 2022
Published on: Apr 27, 2022
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Cooperation,
social dilemma,
global environmental change,
wicked problems,
behavior change,
social-ecological systems

© 2022 Landon Yoder, Courtney Hammond Wagner, Kira Sullivan-Wiley, Gemma Smith, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 16 (2022): Issue 1Next article