References
- 1Aida, T. (2019). Social capital as an instrument for common pool resource management: a case study of irrigation management in Sri Lanka. Oxford Economic Papers, 71(4), 952–978. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpy058
- 2Ando, M. (2008). Possibilities and limitations of restructuring paddy field farming by group farming based on community: Focusing on the regional diversity reflecting its agricultural structure. Journal of Rural Economics, 80(2), 67–77. (in Japanese)
- 3Ando, M. (2010). Abandoned land should be considered for withdrawal from agriculture. The Economist, 88(25), 48–51. (in Japanese)
- 4Angrist, J. D., & Krueger, A. B. (2001). Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 69–85. DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.4.69
- 5Arimoto, Y. (2011).
The impact of farmland readjustment and consolidation on structural adjustment: The case of Niigata, Japan . CEI Working Paper Series No. 2011-3, Hitotsubashi University. - 6Arimoto, Y., & Nakajima, S. (2010). Review of liquidization and concentration of farmland in Japan. Journal of Rural Economics, 82(1), 23–35. (in Japanese)
- 7Buchanan, J. M., & Yoon, Y. J. (2000). Symmetric Tragedies: Commons and anticommons. The Journal of Law and Economics, 43(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1086/467445
- 8Fujie, T. (2016). Farmland, agricultural structure policy, and farmland concentration. Journal of Rural Economics, 88(1), 67–82. (in Japanese)
- 9Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M., Martinez-Gomez, V., & Tudela-Marco, L. (2021). Multi-actor arrangements for farmland management in Eastern Spain. Land Use Policy, 111,
105738 . DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105738 - 10Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
- 11Hayami, Y., & Kawagoe, T. (1989). Farm mechanization, scale economies and polarization: The Japanese experience. Journal of Development Economics, 31(2), 221–239. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(89)90013-8
- 12Hayami, Y. (2009). Social capital, human capital and the community mechanism: Toward a conceptual framework for economists. Journal of Development Studies, 45, 96–123. DOI: 10.1080/00220380802468595
- 13Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review, 111(3), 621–688. DOI: 10.2307/1342203
- 14Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: Information as a common-pool resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 111–145.
- 15Hirahara, S. (2020). Regeneration of underused natural resources by collaboration between urban and rural residents: A case study in Fujiwara district, Japan. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 173–190. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.977
- 16Iba, H., & Sakamoto, K. (2014).
Beyond farming: Cases of revitalization of rural communities through social service provision by community farming enterprises . In S.A. Wolf & A. Bonanno (Eds.), The neoliberal regime in the agri-food sector: Crisis, resilience, and restructuring (pp. 129–149). Routledge. - 17Ishida, M., & Kiminami, A. (1987). The development of organizations and markets in rice production. Journal of Rural Economics, 59, 137–145. (in Japanese)
- 18Kawasaki, K. (2010). The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4), 509–526. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00509.x
- 19Kitano, S. (2020). Determinants of community farm development in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Environmental Information Science, 2020(1), 22–32.
- 20Miyanaga, K., & Shimada, D. (2018). The tragedy of the commons by underuse: Toward a conceptual framework based on ecosystem services and satoyama perspective. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 332–351. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.817
- 21OECD. (2001). Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264192171-en
- 22Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
- 23Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- 24Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton university press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400831739
- 25Ostrom, E. (2006). The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61(2), 149–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.02.008
- 26Parisi, F., Schulz, N., & Depoorter, B. (2005). Duality in property: Commons and anticommons. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(4), 578–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2005.12.003
- 27Piñeiro, V., Martinez-Gomez, V., Meliá-Martí, E., & Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, J. M. (2021). Drivers of joint cropland management strategies in agri-food cooperatives. Journal of Rural Studies, 84, 162–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.003
- 28Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, group size and collective action: The role of institutions in forest management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435–461. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
- 29Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster. DOI: 10.1145/358916.361990
- 30Schlueter, A. (2008). Small-scale European forestry, an anticommons? International Journal of the Commons, 2(2), 248–268. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.42
- 31Shobayashi, M., & Okajima, M. (2014). A new institutional framework related to coordinating land uses for developing rural villages. Water, Land and Environmental Engineering, 82(9), 715–719. (in Japanese)
- 32Takahashi, D. (2012). Farmland liquidization and transaction costs. The Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, 14, 1–19. DOI: 10.18480/jjre.14.1
- 33Takahashi, D., Chang, T., & Shobayashi, M. (2018). The role of formal and informal institutions in farmland consolidation: The case of Shiga prefecture, Japan. International Journal of the Commons, 12(2), 80–107. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.829
- 34Takahashi, T., Matsushita, K., & Nishimura, T. (2021). Community actions against anticommons of forests in contemporary Japan: Case studies of former common forests. Journal of Forest Research, 26(1), 68–74. DOI: 10.1080/13416979.2020.1834715
- 35Takamura, G. (2018). Reexamination of unknown land owner problem: Redefinition of the problem from the anticommons theory. The Journal of the Land Institute, 26(4), 72–90. (in Japanese)
- 36Takamura, G., Nishide, T., Kanazawa, Y., & Hayashi, M. (2021). Bundle of rights reversed: Anticommons in a Japanese common property forest due to legalization. International Journal of the Commons, 15(2), 259–275. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1080
- 37Takayama, T., Matsuda, H., & Nakatani, T. (2018). The determinants of collective action in irrigation management systems: Evidence from rural communities in Japan. Agricultural Water Management, 206, 113–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.031
- 38Takayama, T., Nakatani, T., Senda, T., & Fujie, T. (2021). Less-favored-area payments, farmland abandonment and farm size: Evidence from hilly and mountainous areas in Japan. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 65(3), 658–678. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12425
- 39Takeda, M. (2015). Factors to influence a community’s choice for on-farm irrigation facility management responsibility assignment to all households within the community in Japan: Panel data analysis using rural community cards. Journal of Rural Economics, 87(3), 267–272. (in Japanese)
- 40Wang, X., Yamauchi, F., Huang, J., & Rozelle, S. (2020). What constrains mechanization in Chinese agriculture? Role of farm size and fragmentation. China Economic Review, 62,
101221 . DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2018.09.002 - 41Yamauchi, F., Huang, J., & Otsuka, K. (2021).
Changing farm size and agricultural development in East Asia . In K. Otsuka & S. Fan (Eds.), Agricultural development: New perspectives in a changing world (pp. 79–110). International Food Policy Research Institute. DOI: 10.2499/9780896293830_03 - 42Zang, L., Araral, E., & Wang, Y. (2019). Effects of land fragmentation on the governance of the commons: Theory and evidence from 284 villages and 17 provinces in China. Land Use Policy, 82, 518–527. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.042