Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Community Control in the Housing Commons: A Conceptual Typology Cover

Community Control in the Housing Commons: A Conceptual Typology

Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. 1Aernouts, N., & Ryckewaert, M. (2018). Beyond housing. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(4), 503521. DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2017.1331592
  2. 2Aernouts, N., & Ryckewaert, M. (2019). Reproducing housing commons. Housing Studies, 34(1), 92110. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2018.1432756
  3. 3Angotti, T. (2011). New York for Sale. MIT Press.
  4. 4Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2017). Popular democracy. Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781503600775
  5. 5Barnett, A. J., Partelow, S., Frey, U., García-Lozano, A., del Mar Mancha-Cisneros, M., Oberlack, C., & Whitney, C. K. (2020). Defining success in the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 366387. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.994
  6. 6Bezdek, B. (forthcoming). To have and to hold? Community Land Trust as Commons. In C. Swiney & S. Foster (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on Commons Research Innovations. Cambridge University Press.
  7. 7Bollier, D. (2014). Think like a commoner. New Society Publishers.
  8. 8Borch, C., & Kornberger, M. (Eds.) (2015). Urban commons. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315780597
  9. 9Brandsen, T., Cattacin, S., Evers, A., & Zimmer, A. (2016). Social innovations in the urban context. Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21551-8
  10. 10Bunce, S. (2016). Pursuing urban commons. Antipode, 48(1), 13450. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12168
  11. 11Byrne, D., & Ragin, C. C. (Eds.) (2009). The SAGE handbook of case-based methods. SAGE. DOI: 10.4135/9781446249413
  12. 12Collier, D., LaPorte, J., & Seawright, J. (2012). Putting typologies to work. Political Research Quarterly, 65(1), 217232. DOI: 10.1177/1065912912437162
  13. 13Davis, J. E. (2008). Origins and evolution of the community land trust in the United States. In J. E. Davis (Ed.), The community land trust reader (pp. 347). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  14. 14Davis, J. E., Algeod, L., & Hernandez-Torrales, M. E. (Eds.) (2020). On common ground. Terra Nostra Press.
  15. 15DeFilippis, J. (2003). Unmaking goliath. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203499917
  16. 16DeFilippis, J., Stromberg, B., & Williams, O. R. (2018). W(h)ither the community in community land trusts? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(6), 755769. DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2017.1361302
  17. 17Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2002). The drama of the commons. In National Research Council (Ed.), The Drama of the Commons (pp. 136). The National Academies Press.
  18. 18Elman, C. (2009). Explanatory typologies in qualitative analysis. In D. Byrne & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of case-based method. SAGE.
  19. 19Engelsman, U., Rowe, M., & Southern, A. (2018). Community land Trusts, affordable housing and community organising in low-income neighbourhoods. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 103123. DOI: 10.1080/14616718.2016.1198082
  20. 20German, L. (2018). Catalyzing self-governance. International Journal of the Commons, 12(2), 217250. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.852
  21. 21Gidwani, V., & Baviskar, A. (2011). Urban commons. Review of Urban Affairs, xlvi(50), 4243.
  22. 22Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 12431248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  23. 23Hess, C. (2008, 14–18 July). Mapping new commons [conference presentation]. Presented at The Twelfth Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Cheltenham, UK.
  24. 24Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). Understanding knowledge as a commons. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/6980.001.0001
  25. 25Huron, A. (2018). Carving out the commons: tenant organizing and housing cooperatives in Washington, D.C. University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/j.ctt2121778
  26. 26Larsen, H. G., & Hansen, A. L. (2015). Commodifying Danish housing commons. Geografiska Annaler, 97(3), 263274. DOI: 10.1111/geob.12080
  27. 27Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1937). Some remarks on the typological procedures in social research. Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung, 6, 119139. DOI: 10.5840/zfs193761137
  28. 28Linebaugh, P. (2009). The Magna Carta manifesto. University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520932708
  29. 29Lowe, J. S., & Thaden, E. (2016). Deepening stewardship. Urban Geography, 4, 611628. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1101250
  30. 30Midheme, E., & Moulaert, F. (2013). Pushing back the frontiers of property. Land Use Policy, 35, 7384. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.005
  31. 31Moore, T., & McKee, K. (2012). Empowering local communities? Housing Studies, 27(2), 280290. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2012.647306
  32. 32Moore, T., & Northcott, R. (2010). Delivering homes and assets with communities. University of Salford.
  33. 33Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 19691990. DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279893
  34. 34Nonini, D. (2017). Theorizing the urban housing commons. Focaal, 79, 2338. DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2017.790103
  35. 35Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  36. 36Pickerill, J. (2016). Building the commons in eco-communities. In S. Kirwan, L. Dawney & J. Brigstocke (Eds.), Space, power and the commons (pp. 3167). London: Routledge.
  37. 37Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago University Press.
  38. 38Richardson, L., Durose, C., & Perry, B. (2019). ‘Moving towards hybridity in causal explanation: the example of citizen participation’. Social Policy & Administration, 53(2), 265278. DOI: 10.1111/spol.12481
  39. 39Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods. SAGE.
  40. 40Robinson, J. N. (2020). Capitalizing on community. Politics & Society, 48(2), 171198. DOI: 10.1177/0018578720911472
  41. 41Rosenberg, G., & Yuen, J. (2012). Beyond housing. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  42. 42Rowe, M., Engelsman, U., & Southern, A. (2016). Community land trusts – a radical or reformist response to the housing question today? Acme, 15(3), 590615.
  43. 43Ryan, M. (2016). Qualitative comparative analysis for reviewing evidence and making decisions. In G. Stoker & M. Evans (Eds.), Evidence-based policy making in the social sciences: methods that matter (pp. 83101.) Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t89d4k.12
  44. 44Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods in the social sciences. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139004244
  45. 45Stern, P., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stonich, S. (2002). Knowledge and questions after 15 years of research. In National Research Council (Ed.), The Drama of the Commons (pp. 443490). The National Academies Press.
  46. 46Tummers, L., & MacGregor, S. (2019). Beyond wishful thinking. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 6283. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.918
  47. 47Westerink, J., Termeer, C., & Manhoudt, A. (2020). Identity conflict? International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 388403. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.997
  48. 48Williams, O. R. (2018). Community control as a relationship between a place-based population and institution. Local Economy, 33(5), 45976. DOI: 10.1177/0269094218786898
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1093 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 25, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 25, 2021
Published on: Sep 17, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Catherine Durose, Liz Richardson, Max Rozenburg, Matt Ryan, Oliver Escobar, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.