References
- 1Adaman, F., Akbulut, B., & Kocagoz, U. (Eds.) (2017).
Musterekler: Catiskilar, Hatlar, Imkanlar [Commons: Conflicts, Lines, Possibilities] . In Herkesin Herkes Icin: Musterekler Uzerine Elestirel Bir Antoloji [Everyone’s for Everyone: A Critical Anthology on the Commons], Istanbul: Metis Press, 13–23. - 2Ahlers, R., & Zwarteveen, M. (2009). The Water Question in Feminism: Water Control and Gender Inequities in a Neo-Liberal Era. Gender, Place & Culture, 16(4), 409–426. DOI: 10.1080/09663690903003926
- 3Akbulut, B. (2014). Kuresel, Ozel ve Kamusal Mallar [Global, Private and Public Goods], Access date: 14.04.2015, 5th Green Economy Conference, Istanbul.
http://tr.boell.org/tr/2014/11/05/kuresel-ozel-ve-kamusal-mallar . - 4Akbulut, B. (2017).
Savunudan Inşaaya Musterekler [Commons from advocacy to construction] . In Herkesin Herkes Icin: Musterekler Uzerine Elestirel Bir Antoloji [Everyone’s for Everyone: A Critical Anthology on the Commons], Istanbul: Metis Press, 279–295. - 5Akcay, E., & Kocagoz, U. (2018). Bir siyaset rasyonalistesi olarak mustereklestirme [Commoning as a political rationality], Felsefelogos, 68, 31–41.
- 6Angus, I. (2008). The Myth of the Tragedy of the Commons.
https://climateandcapitalism.com/2008/08/25/debunking-the-tragedy-of-the-commons/ . - 7Bayraktar, U. (2020). Kentte Musterekler Siyaseti: Citli Mustereklerden Paylasim Aglarina [The Politics of the Commons in the City: From Enclosed Commons to Sharing Networks]. Ortaklasa: Kenti Mustereklestirmek, 11–18.
- 8Benlisoy, S. (2014). Musterekler Uzerinde Piyasa Baskisi [Market Pressure on the Commons], Access date: 14.04.2015,
http://tr.boell.org/tr/2014/11/05/musterekler-uzerinde-piyasa-baskisi . 5th Green Economy Conference, Istanbul. - 9Berkay, F. (2010).
Kadinlar Dogaya Sahip Cikiyor [Women Protect Nature] . In Kadinlar Ekolojik Donusumde [Women in Ecological Transformation] (ed. E. Degirmenci). Istanbul: Yeni Insan Press. - 10Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2015). Patterns of Commoning. Amherst, MA; Jena, Germany; Chiang Mai, Thailand: The Commons Strategies Group.
- 11Caffentzis, G., & Federici, S. (2014). Commons against and beyond capitalism. Community Development Journal, 49, 92–105. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsu006
- 12Castree, N., & Braun, B. (Eds.). (1998). Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium (p. 3). London: Routledge.
- 13Castree, N., & Braun, B. (2001). Social nature. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
- 14Christophers, B. (2018). The new enclosure: The appropriation of public land in neoliberal Britain. Verso Trade.
- 15Clement, F., Harcourt, W. J., Joshi, D., & Sato, C. (2019). Feminist political ecologies of the commons and commoning. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.972
- 16De Angelis, M. (2004). Separating the doing and the deed: Capital and the continuous character of enclosures. Historical Materialism, 12(2), 57–87. DOI: 10.1163/1569206041551609
- 17De Angelis, M. (2012). Crisis, movements, commons. Borderlands e-journal, 11.
- 18De Angelis, M., & Harvie, D. (2014). The commons. The Routledge Companion to Alternative Organization, London: Routledge, 280–294.
- 19De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia sunt communia: On the commons and the transformation to postcapitalism. Zed Books Ltd. DOI: 10.5040/9781350221611
- 20Dobson, A. [1995] (2012). Green political thought. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203131671
- 21Durmaz Ekenler, M. S. (2020). Musterek Mekanlar Olarak Topluluk Bahceleri [Community Gardens as Common Spaces], Ortaklasa: Kenti Mustereklestirmek, 118–124.
- 22EEA Report (1999). Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
- 23Esteves, A. M. (2018). Towards “qualitative growth”-oriented collective action frameworks: articulating Commons and Solidarity Economy. Towards “qualitative growth”-oriented collective action frameworks: articulating Commons and Solidarity Economy.
- 24Federici, S. (2010).
Feminism and the Politics of the Commons . In Uses of a Whirlwind, Movement, Movements, and Contemporary Radical Currents in the United States, edited by Craig Hughes, Stevie Peace and Kevin Van Meter for the Team Colors Collective. Oaskland: AK Press, 2010. - 25Firat, B. O. (2018). Park, mera, sinema: musterekleri mulkiyetle birlikte dusunmek [Park, pasture, cinema: contemplating the commons with property]. Felsefelogos, 68, 101–118.
- 26Firat, B. O. (2020). Kentsel Musterekler [Urban Commons]. Ortaklasa: Kenti Mustereklestirmek, 33–40.
- 27Garner, R. (1996). Environmental politics. Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-15011-3
- 28Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
- 29Harris, L. M. (2009). Gender and Emergent Water Governance: Comparative Overview of Neoliberalized Natures and Gender Dimensions of Privatization, Devolution and Marketization. Gender, Place and Culture, 16(4), 387–408. DOI: 10.1080/09663690903003918
- 30Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International journal of urban and regional research, 27(4), 939–941. DOI: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x
- 31Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso books.
- 32Hazar, D. (2020).
Women in the Axis of the Enclosure of Rural-Ecological Commons . Academic Studies in Architecture, Planning and Design, Gece Publishing, 25–54. - 33Hazar, D., & Velibeyoglu, K. (2019). Sustainable Management of Rural-Ecological Commons: Recommendations on eDPSIR Causal Networks. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 20(1), 348–357.
- 34Hazar Kalonya, D., & Ozcam, Z. (2021). Wind Farm Conflicts on the Rural-Ecological Commons: The Case of Karaburun. Online Journal of Art and Design, 9(1), 294–313.
- 35Heynen, N., Kaika, M., & Swyngedouw, E. (2006).
Urban political ecology . In the nature of cities: Urban political ecology and the politics of urban metabolism. Routledge, 1–20. - 36Isla, A. (2009).
Who pays for the Kyoto Protocol? Selling oxygen and selling sex in Costa Rica . Eco-Sufficiency and Global Justice: Women Write Political Ecology. London: Pluto, 199–217. - 37Kadirbeyoglu, Z. (2010).
Yerel Direnis ve Degisim: Bergama Ornegi [Local Resistance and Change: Bergama Example] . In Kadinlar Ekolojik Donusumde [Women in Ecological Transformation] (ed. E. Degirmenci), Istanbul: Yeni Insan Press. - 38Karakaya Ayalp, E. (2020). Tarımsal gıda sistemleri dönüşüyor mu? Izmir’de alternatif gıda inisiyatifleri [Agro food system transitions? Alternative agro food initiatives in Izmir]. Toplum ve Bilim, 153, 49–81.
- 39Kawano, E. (2018). Solidarity economy: Building an economy for people & planet. The Next System Project.
https://thenextsystem.org/learn/stories/episode-16-resist-build-discussing-solidarity-economy-w-emily-kawano . Access date: 11.02.2021. - 40Kaya, I. A., & Erol, N. K. (2016). Conflicts over Locally Unwanted Land Uses (LULUs): reasons and solutions for case studies in Izmir (Turkey). Land Use Policy, 58, 83–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.011
- 41Kocagoz, U. (2015). Rationality of the politics of commons, MSc. Thesis, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul.
- 42Kone, A. C. (2020). Dayanışma Ekonomisi [Solidarity Economy]. Ortaklasa: Kenti Mustereklestirmek, 73–80.
- 43Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville (The right to the city). París: An.
- 44Malthus, T. [1789] (2013). An essay on the principle of population vol. 1. Cosimo.
- 45Marx, K. [1867] (2011). Capital: Volume I, trans. Alaattin Bilgi. Ankara: Sol Press.
- 46Matthew, R. A. (2002). Environment, Population and Conflict: New Modalities of Threat and Vulnerability in South Asia. Journal of International Affairs, 235–254.
- 47Midnight Notes Collective. (1990). The new enclosures. Midnight Notes, 10, 1–9.
- 48MTM. (2020).
Media Monitoring Center ,https://www.medyatakip.com.tr/en_ . Istanbul, Turkey. - 49Nightingale, A. J. (2019). Commoning for inclusion? Political communities, commons, exclusion, property and socio-natural becomings. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 16–35. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.927
- 50Niemeijer, D., & Groot, R. S. (2008). Framing Environmental Indicators: Moving from Causal Chains to Causal Networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(1), 106. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-006-9040-9
- 51Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- 52Ostrom, E. (2002). Reformulating the commons, Ambiente & Sociedade, 10, 5–25. DOI: 10.1590/S1414-753X2002000100002
- 53Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review, 2.2, 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/19186444.2010.11658229
- 54Penpecioglu, M. (2013). Large-Scale Urban Projects, Production of Space and Neo-liberal Hegemony: A Comparative Study of Izmir. Megaron, 8(2), 97. DOI: 10.5505/megaron.2013.87597
- 55Rocheleau, D. (2008). Political Ecology in the Key of Policy: From Chains of Explanation to Webs of Relation. Geoforum, 39(2), 716–727. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.02.005.
- 56Roussopoulos, D. (2015). Politik Ekoloji: İklim Krizi ve Yeni Toplumsal Gündem [Political Ecology: Climate Crisis and New Social Agenda] (F. D. Elhüseyni, Trans.). İstanbul: Sümer Press.
- 57Santos Junior, O. A. (2014). Urban common space, heterotopia and the right to the city: reflections on the ideas of Henri Lefebvre and David Harvey. urbe. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Urbana, 6(2), 146–157. DOI: 10.7213/urbe.06.002.SE02
- 58Sato, C., & Alarcon, J. S. (2019). Toward a postcapitalist feminist political ecology’s approach to the commons and commoning. International Journal of the Commons, 13(1), 36–61. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.933
- 59Seckin, E. (2016). An Analysis of Selected Cases of Environmental Movements in Turkey through an Ecofeminist Approach. MSc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Institute of Science, Ankara.
- 60Shiva, V. (1992).
Women’s Indigenous Knowledge and Biodiversity Conservation. India International Centre Quarterly Vol. 19 No. 1/2 . Indigenous Vision: Peoples of India Attitudes to the Environment (Spring–Summer 1992), 205–214. - 61Stavrides, S. (2016). Common space: The city as commons. Zed Books Ltd. DOI: 10.5040/9781350219267
- 62Stavrides, S. (2020). The Right to the City-as-Common, 8th November World Town Planning Day Colloqium, UCTEA Chamber of City Planners,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OiuvfNJvSk&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3Gpbojt1ajXmWWQrQNMsIwz6bclKOoWM-HjppaSPiX6RQfhF9Mdb9dRCs , Access date: 08.11.2020. - 63Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226817439.001.0001
- 64Turk, O. (2018). Yeni Toplumsal Hareketlerde Kadin Olmak Uzerine Turkiye’den Bir Ornek [An Example About Being A Woman in New Social Movements From Turkey], MSc. Thesis, Istanbul Bilgi University, Institute of Graduate Programs, Istanbul.
- 65Walljasper, J. (2014).
“On the commons” . In Müş tereklerimiz, Paylaştığımız Her Şey, ed. Bengi Akbulut. Istanbul: Metis Press, 25–26. - 66Url-1: Chipko Movement, India.
https://kuzeyormanlari.org/2015/11/11/agaclara-sarilarak-onlari-koruyan-cesur-yurekliler/ . Access date: 26.02.2019. - 67Url-2: Green Belt Movement, Kenya.
http://www.womenaid.org/press/info/development/greenbeltproject.html . Access date: 16.11.2020.