Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bundle of Rights Reversed: Anticommons in a Japanese Common Property Forest Due to Legalization Cover

Bundle of Rights Reversed: Anticommons in a Japanese Common Property Forest Due to Legalization

Open Access
|Aug 2021

References

  1. 1Berge, E., & Mckean, M. (2015). On the commons of developed industrialized countries. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 469485. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.650
  2. 2Bromley, D. W. (2009). Formalising property relations in the developing world: The wrong prescription for the wrong malady. Land use policy, 26(1), 2027. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.02.003
  3. 3Buchanan, J. M., & Yoon, Y. J. (2000). Symmetric tragedies: Commons and anticommons. The Journal of Law and Economics, 43(1), 114. DOI: 10.1086/467445
  4. 4CAPRi. (2010). Resources, Rights and Cooperation: A Sourcebook on Property Rights and Collective Action for Sustainable Development.
  5. 5Chang, Y. C. (2012). Tenancy in “anticommons”? A theoretical and empirical analysis of co-ownership. Journal of Legal Analysis, 4(2), 515553. DOI: 10.1093/jla/las011
  6. 6Cornu, M., Orsi, F., & Rochfeld, J. (ed.) (2017). Dictionnaire des biens communs. PUF.
  7. 7Dixon, K. (2007). Working with mixed commons/anticommons property: Mobilizing customary land in Papua New Guinea the Melanesian way. Harv. Envtl. L. Rev., 31, 219278.
  8. 8Ehrlich, E. (1913). Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. Duncker and Humblot.
  9. 9Fukuda, J., & Kawasaki, H. (2015). A survey of the profit-sharing plantation contracts with many landowners by the prefectural plantation agencies and the possible solutions for the revision of such contracts. Ringyo-keizai Kenkyu, 61(3), 1223 (in Japanese).
  10. 10Gierke, O. V. (1868). Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht Bd.1, Weidmann.
  11. 11Habermas, J. (1986). Law as medium and law as institution. Dilemmas of law in the welfare state, 203220. DOI: 10.1515/9783110921526.203
  12. 12Handa, R. (2010). The historical root of the modernization of common property forests. Iriai Rinya Kenkyu, 30, 2431 (in Japanese).
  13. 13Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 12431248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  14. 14Heller, M. A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons: Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard law review, 621688. DOI: 10.2307/1342203
  15. 15Hirahara, S. (2020). Regeneration of Underused Natural Resources by Collaboration Between Urban and Rural Residents: A Case Study in Fujiwara District, Japan. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 173190. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.977
  16. 16Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Lj, 23, 1659. DOI: 10.2307/785533
  17. 17Inoue, M. (2013). Eclectic collaborative commons as an integration of closure and openness. Local commons and democratic environmental governance, 1939.
  18. 18Inoue, M., & Miyauchi, T. (ed.) (2001). Sociology of the Commons, Shinyosha (in Japanese).
  19. 19Kaino, M. (1943). The Study of Japanese Commons/Iriai, Nihonhyoronsha (in Japanese).
  20. 20Kawashima, T. (1983). Rights of Customary Law-Kawashima Takeyoshi’s Writings Vol. 8. Iwanamishoten (in Japanese).
  21. 21Kuroki, S., Kumagai, K., & Nakao, H. (1975). National Survey on Common Property Forests. Seikosha (in Japanese).
  22. 22Larson, A. M. (2012). Tenure rights and access to forests: A training manual for research. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
  23. 23McKean, M. A. (1992). Management of traditional common lands (Iriaichi) in Japan. Making the commons work: Theory, practice, and policy, 6398.
  24. 24Meinzen-Dick, R., & Mwangi, E. (2009). Cutting the web of interests: Pitfalls of formalizing property rights. Land use policy, 26(1), 3643. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.06.003
  25. 25Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (1962). 1960 National Census Report on Forestry-Customary Forests (in Japanese).
  26. 26Miyanaga, K., & Shimada, D. (2018). ‘The tragedy of the commons’ by underuse: Toward a conceptual framework based on ecosystem services and satoyama perspective. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 332351. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.817
  27. 27Nakao, H. (2003). Legal issues of common property forests. Keiso shobo (in Japanese).
  28. 28National Research Committee for Codes. (1893[1956]). National Survey on Customary Forests and Grasslands. Reprinted by Minpou Seiritsukatei Kenkyukai (in Japanese).
  29. 29Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
  30. 30Ostrom, E., Cox, M., & Schlager, E. (2014). An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework and Introduction of the Social-Ecological Systems Framework. Theories of the Policy Process, 267306.
  31. 31Rokumoto, K. (1986). Sociology of Law. Yuhikaku (in Japanese).
  32. 32Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land economics, 249262. DOI: 10.2307/3146375
  33. 33Schlueter, A. (2008). Small-scale European forestry, an anticommons? International Journal of the Commons, 2(2), 248268. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.42
  34. 34Shimada, D. (2014). External impacts on traditional commons and present-day changes: a case study of iriai forests in Yamaguni district, Kyoto, Japan. International Journal of the Commons, 8(1), 207235. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.348
  35. 35Suehiro, I. (1924). Legal issues in rural areas. Kaizosha (in Japanese).
  36. 36Takahashi, T., Matsushita, K., Yoshida, Y., & Senda, T. (2019). Impacts of 150 years of modernization policies on the management of common forests in Japan: a statistical analysis of micro census data. International Journal of the Commons, 13(2), 10211034. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.936
  37. 37The Tokyo Foundation. (2014). Unclear Ownership on Japanese Land and Crisis of Dead Land (in Japanese).
  38. 38van Laerhoven, F., Schoon, M., & Villamayor-Tomas, S. (2020). Celebrating the 30th anniversary of Ostrom’s Governing the Commons: Traditions and trends in the study of the commons, revisited. International Journal of the Commons, 14(1), 208224. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1030
  39. 39Vasile, M. (2018). Formalizing commons, registering rights: The making of the forest and pasture commons in the Romanian Carpathians from the 19th century to post-socialism. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 170201. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.805
  40. 40von Benda-Beckmann, F. et als. (Eds.). (1999). Property rights and economic development: land and natural resources in Southeast Asia and Oceania. Routledge.
  41. 41Yamashita, U. (2016). Current situations of multiple co-owner’ common forest and the institution of authorized community organization. Toshimondai, 107(11), 8190 (in Japanese).
  42. 42Yamashita, Y. (2012). The reality of disappearing villages. Chikuma Shoten (in Japanese).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1080 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Sep 21, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 9, 2021
Published on: Aug 30, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Gakuto Takamura, Takashi Nishide, Yusuke Kanazawa, Masahide Hayashi, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.