Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘We Are Not Bad People’- Bricolage and the Rise of Community Forest Institutions in Burkina Faso Cover

‘We Are Not Bad People’- Bricolage and the Rise of Community Forest Institutions in Burkina Faso

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. 1Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: context, methods, and politics. Annual review of anthropology, 32(1), 24362. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
  2. 2Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006). Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya. World development, 34(1), 14966. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013
  3. 3Arts, B., Behagel, J., Van Bommel, S., de Koning, J., & Turnhout, E. (2012). Forest and nature governance: A practice based approach. Vol. 14: Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2
  4. 4Balkin, J. M. (1994). Ideology as Cultural Software. Cardozo L. Rev, 16, 1221.
  5. 5Balooni, K., Lund, J. F., Kumar, C., & Inoue, M. (2010). Curse or blessing? Local elites in joint forest management in India’s Shiwaliks. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.217
  6. 6Battilana, J. (2006). Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization, 13(5), 65376. DOI: 10.1177/1350508406067008
  7. 7Bodin, Ö., & Prell, C. (2011). Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511894985
  8. 8Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford university press.
  9. 9Carstensen, M. B. (2011). Paradigm man vs. the bricoleur: bricolage as an alternative vision of agency in ideational change. European political science review, 3(1), 14767. DOI: 10.1017/S1755773910000342
  10. 10Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European journal of development research, 14(2), 1130. DOI: 10.1080/714000425
  11. 11Cleaver, F. (2007). Understanding agency in collective action. Journal of human development, 8(2), 22344. DOI: 10.1080/14649880701371067
  12. 12Cleaver, F. (2012). Development through bricolage: rethinking institutions for natural resource management. Routledge.
  13. 13Cleaver, F. D., & De Koning, J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 118. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.605
  14. 14Coccia, M. (2018). An introduction to the theories of institutional change. Journal of Economics Library, 5(4), 33744.
  15. 15de Koning, J. (2014). Unpredictable outcomes in forestry—Governance institutions in practice. Society & Natural Resources, 27(4), 35871. DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2013.861557
  16. 16De Moor, T., Laborda-Pemán, M., Lana-Berasain, J. M., Van Weeren, R., & Winchester, A. (2016). Ruling the Commons. Introducing a new methodology for the analysis of historical commons. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 529. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.760
  17. 17Faggin, J. M., & Behagel, J. H. (2018). Institutional bricolage of Sustainable Forest Management implementation in rural settlements in Caatinga biome, Brazil. International Journal of the Commons, 12(2), 27599. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.872
  18. 18Funder, M., & Marani, M. (2015). Local bureaucrats as bricoleurs. The everyday implementation practices of county environment officers in rural Kenya. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 87106. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.526
  19. 19Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration Polity. Cambridge, UK.
  20. 20Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203793206
  21. 21Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 5982. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
  22. 22Gutu, T., Wong, S., & Kinati, W. (2014). Institutional bricolage as a new perspective to analyse institutions of communal irrigation: Implications towards meeting the water needs of the poor communities in rural Ethiopia. Pinnacle agricultural research & management, 14.
  23. 23Hagaman, A., & Wutich, A. (2017). How many interviews are enough to identify metathemes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) landmark study. Field methods, 29(1), 2341. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X16640447
  24. 24Haller, T. (2010). Chapter One. Institutional Change, Power And Conflicts In The Management Of Common-Pool Resources In African Floodplain Ecosystems: An Introduction. In Disputing the Floodplains (pp. 175). Brill. DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004185326.i-454.8
  25. 25Hassenforder, E., & Barone, S. (2019). Institutional arrangements for water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 35(5), 783807. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2018.1431526
  26. 26Heinmiller, B. T. (2009). Path dependency and collective action in common pool governance. International Journal of the Commons, 3(1), 13147. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.79
  27. 27Ingram, V. J., Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., & Dietz, A. J. (2015). A fine mess: Bricolaged forest governance in Cameroon. International Journal of the Commons, 9, 24. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.516
  28. 28Johnson, C. (2012). Bricoleur and bricolage: From metaphor to universal concept. Paragraph, 35(3), 35572. DOI: 10.3366/para.2012.0064
  29. 29Leach, M., Mearns, R., & Scoones, I. (1999). Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World development, 27(2), 22547. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00141-7
  30. 30Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: actor perspectives. Routledge.
  31. 31Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A gradual theory of institutional change. In Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511806414
  32. 32North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of economic perspectives, 5(1), 97112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97
  33. 33North, D. C. (1993). Five propositions about institutional change. Economics Working Paper Archive at WUSTL.
  34. 34Ostrom, E. (2005). Self-governance and forest resources. Terracotta reader: A market approach to the environment, 12.
  35. 35Peters, G. B. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Printer.
  36. 36Sandström, E., Ekman, A.-K., & Lindholm, K-J. (2017). Commoning in the periphery – The role of the commons for understanding rural continuities and change. International Journal of the Commons, 11(1), 508. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.729
  37. 37Scott, J., & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE publications.
  38. 38Sehring, J. (2009). Path Dependencies and Institutional Bricolage in Post-Soviet Water Governance. Water alternatives, 2(1).
  39. 39Verzijl, A., & Dominguez, C. (2015). The powers of water-user associations: on multiplicity, fluidity, and durability in the Peruvian Andes. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 10728. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.537
  40. 40Weiland, S., & Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2010). Change in forest governance in developing countries–in search of sustainable governance arrangements. International Journal of the Commons, 4(2). DOI: 10.18352/ijc.258
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1061 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 5, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2020
Published on: Sep 25, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Mawa Karambiri, Maria Brockhaus, Jenniver Sehring, Ann Degrande, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.