Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diversity and Challenges of the Urban Commons: A Comprehensive Review Cover

Diversity and Challenges of the Urban Commons: A Comprehensive Review

Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. 1Aernouts, N., & Ryckewaert, M. (2017). Beyond housing: on the role of commoning in the establishment of a Community Land Trust project. International Journal of Housing Policy (pp. 119). DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2017.1331592
  2. 2Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 9951004. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006
  3. 3Arora, P. (2015). Usurping public leisure space for protest: Social activism in the digital and material commons. Space and Culture, 18(1), 5568. DOI: 10.1177/1206331213517609
  4. 4Artopoulos, G., Charalambous, P., & Wehmeier, C. E. (2019). Immersive computing and crowd simulation techniques in modelling urban commons: The case of Nicosia-Cyprus. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 8(1), 3549. DOI: 10.4018/IJEPR.2019010103
  5. 5Batliboi, R. J., Pradeep, B., Balasubramanian, R., Thakker, K., Agarwal, P., & Trivedi, R. (2016). Localized tech parklets: A concept for a new urban commons. In 2016 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS) (pp. 17). DOI: 10.5220/0005804400710077
  6. 6Baviskar, A. (2011). What the Eye Does Not See: The Yamuna in the Imagination of Delhi. Economic & Political Weekly, 46(50), 4553.
  7. 7Becker, S., Beveridge, R., & Naumann, M. (2015). Remunicipalization in German cities: contesting neo-liberalism and reimagining urban governance? Space and Polity, 19(1), 7690. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2014.991119
  8. 8Becker, S., Naumann, M., & Moss, T. (2017). Between coproduction and commons: understanding initiatives to reclaim urban energy provision in Berlin and Hamburg. Urban Research and Practice, 10(1), 6385. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2016.1156735
  9. 9Berge, E., & McKean, M. (2015). On the commons of developed industrialized countries. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 469485. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.650
  10. 10Bianchi, I. (2018). The post-political meaning of the concept of commons: the regulation of the urban commons in Bologna. Space and Polity, 22(3), 287306. DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2018.1505492
  11. 11Blomley, N. (2008). Enclosure, common right and the property of the poor. Social and Legal Studies, 17(3), 311331. DOI: 10.1177/0964663908093966
  12. 12Bogadi, A. (2017). Building resilience through urban commons: a policy recommendations for atomic shelter management. Tehnicki Glasnik-Technical Journal, 6168, 6366.
  13. 13Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur. Paris, Gallimard.
  14. 14Borch, C., & Kornberger, M. (2015). Urban Commons: Rethinking the City. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315780597
  15. 15Bowers, C. (2009). Educating for a revitalization of the cultural commons. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 196200.
  16. 16Boydell, S., & Searle, G. (2014). Understanding Property Rights in the Contemporary Urban Commons. Urban Policy and Research, 32(3), 323340. DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2014.901909
  17. 17Bresnihan, P., & Byrne, M. (2015). Escape into the city: Everyday practices of commoning and the production of urban space in Dublin. Antipode, 47(1), 3654. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12105
  18. 18Bruun, M. H. (2015). Communities and the commons: Open access and community ownership of the urban commons. In Urban Commons: Rethinking the City (pp. 163180). Routledge.
  19. 19Bunce, S. (2016). Pursuing Urban Commons: Politics and Alliances in Community Land Trust Activism in East London. Antipode, 48(1), 134150. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12168
  20. 20Bussels, M., Van den Broeck, P., Parra, C., & Moulaert, F. (2016). From the Théorie des Cités to the Practice of the Landed Commons. In IV World Planning Schools Congress (Rio de Janeiro 2016).
  21. 21Camps-Calvet, M., Langemeyer, J., Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & March, H. (2015). Sowing resilience and contestation in times of crises: The case of urban gardening movements in Barcelona. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 8(2), 417442. DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v8i2p417
  22. 22Cantone, F., Motta, E., & Marrelli, M. (2014). The smart city as an evolutionary network promoting cultural commons: the Or.C.He.S.T.R.A. project and Naples antique center case study. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 25, 207222.
  23. 23Chatterton, P. (2016). Building transitions to post-capitalist urban commons. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12139
  24. 24Chiu, C., & Giamarino, C. (2019). Creativity, Conviviality, and Civil Society in Neoliberalizing Public Space: Changing Politics and Discourses in Skateboarder Activism From New York City to Los Angeles. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 43(6), 462492. DOI: 10.1177/0193723519842219
  25. 25Colding, J., & Barthel, S. (2013). The potential of “Urban Green Commons” in the resilience building of cities. Ecological Economics, 86, 156166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
  26. 26Colding, J., Barthel, S., Bendt, P., Snep, R., van der Knaap, W., & Ernstson, H. (2013). Urban green commons: Insights on urban common property systems. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 10391051. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.006
  27. 27Comune di Bologna & Urban Center Bologna. (2014). Collaborare è Bologna. Retrieved from http://www.comune.bologna.it/collaborarebologna/collaborare/
  28. 28Conley, A., & Moote, M. A. (2003). Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources. DOI: 10.1080/08941920309181
  29. 29Cooke, B., Landau-Ward, A., & Rickards, L. (2019). Urban greening, property and more-than-human commoning. Australian Geographer. DOI: 10.1080/00049182.2019.1655828
  30. 30Correa, H., Blanco-Wells, G., Barrena, J., & Tacón, A. (2018). Self-organizing processes in urban green commons. The case of the Angachilla wetland, Valdivia-Chile. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 573595. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.856
  31. 31Corsín Jiménez, A. (2014). The right to infrastructure: A prototype for open source urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 342362. DOI: 10.1068/d13077p
  32. 32Crichton, S., Pegler, K., & White, D. (2012). Personal devices in public settings: Lessons learned from an iPod Touch/iPad project. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(1), 2331.
  33. 33Crow, B., Longford, M., Sawchuk, K., & Zeffiro, A. (2008). Voices from beyond: Ephemeral histories, locative media and the volatile interface. Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City (pp. 158178). DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-152-0.ch011
  34. 34Cumbers, A. (2012). Reclaiming Public Ownership Making Space for Economic Democracy. Zed Books Ltd. DOI: 10.1177/0486613415574277
  35. 35D’Ottaviano, C. (2018). Housing cooperatives: a possible alternative. In A. Huron (Ed.), Carving Out The Commons: Tenant Organizing and Housing Cooperatives in Washington, DC. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  36. 36D’Souza, R., & Nagendra, H. (2011). Changes in public commons as a consequence of urbanization: The Agara lake in Bangalore, India. Environmental Management, 47(5), 840850. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9658-8
  37. 37Datta, A. (2013). Encounters with law and critical urban studies: Reflections on Amin’s telescopic urbanism. City, 17(4), 517522. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2013.812364
  38. 38Davy, B. (2014). Polyrational property: rules for the many uses of land. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 472492. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.719
  39. 39DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
  40. 40Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie II. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
  41. 41Derkzen, M., Nagendra, H., Van Teeffelen, A. J. A., Purushotham, A., & Verburg, P. H. (2017). Shifts in ecosystem service supply in deprived urban areas: understanding people’ s responses and consequences for well-being. Ecology and Society, 22(1). DOI: 10.5751/ES-09168-220151
  42. 42Deutsches Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie. (2014). Renewable Energy Sources Act. Retrieved from https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/renewable-energy-sources-act-eeg-2014.html
  43. 43Di Feliciantonio, C. (2017a). Spaces of the Expelled as Spaces of the Urban Commons? Analysing the Re-emergence of Squatting Initiatives in Rome. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(5), 708725. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12513
  44. 44Di Feliciantonio, C. (2017b). The reactions of neighbourhoods to the eviction of squatters in Rome: An account of the making of precarious investor subjects. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(4), 352367. DOI: 10.1177/0969776416662110
  45. 45Durusoy, E., & Cihanger, D. (2016). Historic Landscape vs. Urban Commodity?: The Case of Yedikule Urban Gardens, Istanbul. MEGARON/Yıldız Technical University, Faculty of Architecture E-Journal, 11(1), 125136. DOI: 10.5505/megaron.2016.48343
  46. 46Eynaud, P., Juan, M., & Mourey, D. (2018). Participatory Art as a Social Practice of Commoning to Reinvent the Right to the City. Voluntas, 29(4), 621636. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-0006-y
  47. 47Feinberg, A., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. M. (2020). Commoning toward urban resilience: The role of trust, social cohesion, and involvement in a simulated urban commons setting. Journal of Urban Affairs. DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2020.1851139
  48. 48Feinberg, A., Hooijschuur, E., Rogge, N., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (2020). Sustaining collective action in urban community gardens. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  49. 49Follmann, A., & Viehoff, V. (2015). A green garden on red clay: creating a new urban common as a form of political gardening in Cologne, Germany. Local Environment, 20(10), 11481174. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2014.894966
  50. 50Foster, S. R. (2011). Collective action and the urban commons. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(1), 57133.
  51. 51Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2016). The City as a Commons. Yale Law and Policy Review. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2653084
  52. 52Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2019). Ostrom in the City: Design Principles and Practices for the Urban Commons. In D. Cole, B. Hudson, J. Rosenbloom (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons (pp. 124).
  53. 53Frenzel, F., & Beverungen, A. (2015). Value struggles in the creative city: A People’s Republic of Stokes Croft? Urban Studies, 52(6), 10201036. DOI: 10.1177/0042098014536239
  54. 54Garnett, N. S. (2012). Managing the urban commons. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9156-6
  55. 55Ghorbani, A., & Bravo, G. (2016). Managing the commons: A simple model of the emergence of institutions through collective action. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 200219. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.606
  56. 56Ghorbani, A., Bots, P., Dignum, V., & Dijkema, G. (2013). MAIA: a framework for developing agent-based social simulations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(2), 9. DOI: 10.18564/jasss.2166
  57. 57Giannini, V., & Pirone, M. (2019). Political participation in self-managed social centres. Direct social action and institutionalization in Bologna city. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 3(12), 941969. DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p941
  58. 58Gillespie, T. (2016). Accumulation by urban dispossession: Struggles over urban space in Accra, Ghana. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(1), 6677. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12105
  59. 59Gilmore, A. (2017). The park and the commons: vernacular spaces for everyday participation and cultural value. Cultural Trends, 26(1), 3446. DOI: 10.1080/09548963.2017.1274358
  60. 60Goldman, M. (2015). With the Declining Significance of Labor, Who Is Producing our Global Cities? International Labor and Working-Class History, 87(87), 137164. DOI: 10.1017/S0147547915000034
  61. 61Grabkowska, M. (2018). Urban space as a commons in print media discourse in Poland after 1989. Cities, 72, 122129. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.013
  62. 62Han, D., & Imamasa, H. (2015). Overcoming Privatized Housing in South Korea: Looking Through the Lens of ‘Commons’ and ‘the Common”. In M. Dellenbaugh, M. Kip, M. Schwegmann, & A. Katharina Müller (Eds.), Urban Commons: Moving Beyond State and Market (pp. 91100). DOI: 10.1515/9783038214953-006
  63. 63Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjsf48h
  64. 64Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities. From the right to the city to the right to the urban revolution (Vol. 40). Verso. DOI: 10.4067/S0250-71612014000100013
  65. 65Hess, C. (2008). Mapping the New Commons. Syracuse University: SURFACE (pp. 1418). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1356835
  66. 66Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosures. City, 16(5), 500518. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2012.709403
  67. 67Huron, A. (2015). Working with Strangers in Saturated Space: Reclaiming and Maintaining the Urban Commons. Antipode, 47(4), 963979. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12141
  68. 68Huron, A. (2017). Theorising the urban commons: New thoughts, tensions and paths forward. Urban Studies, 54(4), 10621069. DOI: 10.1177/0042098016685528
  69. 69Huron, A. (2018). Carving Out the Commons: Tenant Organizing and Housing Cooperatives in Washington DC (Vol. 2). University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.5749/j.ctt2121778
  70. 70Jain, A., & Moraglio, M. (2014). Struggling for the use of urban streets: Preliminary (historical) comparison between European and Indian cities. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 513530. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.461
  71. 71Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2006). Empirically Based, Agent-based models. Ecology And Society, 11(2), 37. https://doi.org/yes. DOI: 10.5751/ES-01861-110237
  72. 72Jerram, L. (2015). The false promise of the commons: historical fantasies, sexuality and the ‘really-existing’urban common of modernity. In Urban Commons: Rethinking the City (pp. 4767). Routledge.
  73. 73Kalb, D. (2017). Afterword: Aſter the commons—commoning! Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2017(79), 6773. DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2017.790106
  74. 74Lang, U. (2014). The common life of yards. Urban Geography, 35(6), 852869. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2014.926621
  75. 75Łapniewska, Z. (2017). (Re)claiming space by Urban commons. Review of Radical Political Economics, 49(1), 5466. DOI: 10.1177/0486613415616217
  76. 76Le Galès, P. (1998). Regulations and governance in European cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22(3), 482506. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00153
  77. 77Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris Anthropos.
  78. 78Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace. L’Homme et La Société, 31(1), 1532. DOI: 10.3406/homso.1974.1855
  79. 79Leitheiser, S., & Follmann, A. (2019). The social innovation–(re)politicisation nexus: Unlocking the political in actually existing smart city campaigns? The case of SmartCity Cologne, Germany. Urban Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0042098019869820
  80. 80Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (2018). From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta. Environment and Planning A, 50(2), 437456. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17709279
  81. 81Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. University of California Press (1st ed.). University of California Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520932708
  82. 82Ling, G., Teck, H., Eeda, N., Ali, H., Siong, H. C., & Ali, H. M. (2014). Ostrom’s Design Principles in Residential Public Open Space Governance: Conceptual Framework and Literature Review Contemporary Urban Commons resources, POS. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 1(1), 2737. DOI: 10.11113/ijbes.v1.n1.5
  83. 83Löfgren, O. (2015). Sharing an atmosphere: spaces in urban commons. In Urban Commons: Rethinking the City (pp. 6891). Routledge.
  84. 84McFarlane, C. (2011). One assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204224. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2011.568715
  85. 85McShane, I. (2010). Trojan horse or adaptive institutions? Some reflections on Urban commons in Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 28(1), 101116. DOI: 10.1080/08111140903487711
  86. 86Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 3849. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
  87. 87Middleton, C. A., & Crow, B. (2008). Building Wi-Fi Networks for Communities: Three Canadian Cases. Canadian Journal of Communication, 33(3), 419441. DOI: 10.1109/ISTAS.2008.4559794
  88. 88Montagna, N., & Grazioli, M. (2019). Urban commons and freedom of movement The housing struggles of recently arrived migrants in Rome. Citizenship Studies, 23(6), 577592. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2019.1634375
  89. 89Moss, T. (2014). Spatiality of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 457471. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.556
  90. 90Mukherjee, J., & Chakraborty, G. (2016). Commons vs Commodity: Urban Environmentalisms and the Transforming Tale of the East Kolkata Wetlands. Urbanities-Journal of Urban Ethnography, 6(2), 7891.
  91. 91Mundoli, S., Manjunatha, B., & Nagendra, H. (2015). Effects of urbanisation on the use of lakes as commons in the peri-urban interface of Bengaluru, India. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 7(1), 89108. DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2014.982124
  92. 92Mundoli, S., Manjunatha, B., & Nagendra, H. (2017). Commons that provide: the importance of Bengaluru’s wooded groves for urban resilience. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 9(2), 184206. DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2016.1264404
  93. 93Mundoli, S., Unnikrishnan, H., & Nagendra, H. (2017). The “Sustainable” in smart cities: ignoring the importance of urban ecosystems. Decision, 44(2), 103120. DOI: 10.1007/s40622-017-0152-x
  94. 94Nagendra, H., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India. Ecology and Society, 19(2:67). DOI: 10.5751/ES-06582-190267
  95. 95Newman, A. (2013). Gatekeepers of the urban commons? Vigilant citizenship and neoliberal space in multiethnic Paris. Antipode, 45(4), 947964. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01052.x
  96. 96Ni’mah, N. M., & Lenonb, S. (2017). Urban greenspace for resilient city in the future: Case study of Yogyakarta City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 70(1), 18. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012058
  97. 97Noterman, E. (2016). Beyond Tragedy: Differential Commoning in a Manufactured Housing Cooperative. Antipode, 48(2), 433452. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12182
  98. 98O’Brien, D. T. (2012). Managing the Urban Commons: The Relative Influence of Individual and Social Incentives on the Treatment of Public Space. Human Nature, 23(4), 467489. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9156-6
  99. 99Parker, P., & Johansson, M. (2011). The uses and abuses of Elinor Ostrom’s concept of commons in urban theorizing. International Conference of the European Urban Research Association (EURA) 2011 - Cities without Limits 23–25 June 2011 (pp. 117).
  100. 100Parker, P., & Schmidt, S. (2017). Enabling urban commons. CoDesign, 13(3), 202213. DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2017.1355000
  101. 101Petrescu, D., Petcou, C., & Baibarac, C. (2016). Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information, 44(7), 717736. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
  102. 102Pithouse, R. (2014). An urban commons? Notes from South Africa. Community Development Journal, 49(SUPPL.1), 3143. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsu013
  103. 103Plummer, R., & Armitage, D. (2007). A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: Linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 6274. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.025
  104. 104Quigley, M., Blair, N., & Davison, K. (2018). Articulating a social-ecological resilience agenda for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 23(4), 581602. DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2018.1440176
  105. 105Radywyl, N., & Bigg, C. (2013). Reclaiming the commons for urban transformation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 159170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.020
  106. 106Rao, A. (2013). Re-examining the Relationship Between Civil Society and the Internet: Pessimistic Visions in India’s “IT City.” Journal of Creative Communications, 8(2–3), 157175. DOI: 10.1177/0973258613512562
  107. 107Resilience-Alliance. (2007). Assessing resilience in Social-Ecological Systems – A workbook for scientists. Resilience Assessment (Vol. 22).
  108. 108Robson, J. P., Sinclair, A. J., & Diduck, A. P. (2015). A study of institutional origins and change in a Canadian urban commons. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 698719. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.548
  109. 109Rocha, M. C. F., Pereira, G. C., Loiola, E., & Murgante, B. (2016). Conversation About the City: Urban Commons and Connected Citizenship. In O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Misra, A. M. A. C. Rocha, C. M. Torre, D. Taniar, … S. Wang (Eds.), Computational Science and Its Applications — ICCSA 2016 (pp. 608623). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42092-9_46
  110. 110Rose, C. (1996). Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. Law and History Review (Vol. 16). Westview Press. DOI: 10.2307/744263
  111. 111Ruggiero, L., & Graziano, T. (2018). Culture as a common? Strategies of grassroots resistance and reappropriation in the creative city [Cultura bene comune? Strategie di resistenza e riappropriazione dal basso nella città creativa]. ACME, 17(2), 292324.
  112. 112Safransky, S. (2017). Rethinking Land Struggle in the Postindustrial City. Antipode, 49(4), 10791100. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12225
  113. 113Sancho, G. R. (2014). Networks, insurgencies, and prefigurative politics: A cycle of global indignation. Convergence, 20(4), 387401. DOI: 10.1177/1354856514541743
  114. 114Sassen, S. (2015). Who owns our cities – and why this urban takeover should concern us all. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/nov/24/who-owns-our-cities-and-why-this-urban-takeover-should-concern-us-all
  115. 115Scharf, N., Wachtel, T., Reddy, S. E., & Säumel, I. (2019). Urban Commons for the Edible City-First Insights for Future Sustainable Urban Food Systems from Berlin, Germany. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(4). DOI: 10.3390/su11040966
  116. 116Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., & Penker, M. (2016). Between Participation and Collective Action—From Occasional Liaisons towards Long-Term Co-Management for Urban Resilience. Sustainability, 8(7), 664. DOI: 10.3390/su8070664
  117. 117Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249262. DOI: 10.2307/3146375
  118. 118Sevilla-Buitrago, A. (2014). Central Park against the streets: the enclosure of public space cultures in mid-nineteenth century New York Introduction: parks and the enclosure of. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(2), 151171. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2013.870594
  119. 119Shah, A., & Garg, A. (2017). Urban commons service generation, delivery, and management: A conceptual framework. Ecological Economics, 135, 280287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.017
  120. 120Simpson, T. (2014). Macau metropolis and mental life: Interior urbanism and the Chinese imaginary. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 823842. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12139
  121. 121Smith, M. P. (1998). The global city-whose social construct is it anyway? A comment on White. Urban Affairs Review, 33(4), 482488. DOI: 10.1177/107808749803300403
  122. 122Sobol, A. (2017). Civic participation in terms of common goods, 2(2), 817.
  123. 123Staeheli, L. A., & Mitchell, D. (2006). USA’s destiny? Regulating space and creating community in American shopping malls. Urban Studies. DOI: 10.1080/00420980600676493
  124. 124Stavrides, S. (2016). Common Space: The City as Commons. Zed Books Ltd. DOI: 10.5040/9781350219267
  125. 125Susser, I. (2017a). Commoning in New York City, Barcelona, and Paris. Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2017(79), 622. DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2017.790102
  126. 126Susser, I. (2017b). Introduction: For or against commoning? Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 2017(79), 15. DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2017.790101
  127. 127Susser, I., & Tonnelat, S. (2013). Transformative cities: The three urban commons. Focaal, 2013(66), 105132. DOI: 10.3167/fcl.2013.660110
  128. 128Teli, M., Bordin, S., Menéndez Blanco, M., Orabona, G., & De Angeli, A. (2015). Public design of digital commons in urban places: A case study. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 81, 1730. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.02.003
  129. 129Thompson, E. P. (1966). The Making of the English Working Class. Vintage Books.
  130. 130Tornaghi, C. (2017). Urban Agriculture in the Food- Disabling City: (Re) defining Urban Food Justice, Reimagining a Politics of Empowerment, 49(3), 781801. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12291
  131. 131University of the Aegean. (2017). Assemblage thinking: theory, analysis, practice and governance. In International Symposium. Mytilini, Lesvos. Retrieved from http://assemblage-symposium.aegean.gr/
  132. 132Unnikrishnan, H., Manjunatha, B., & Nagendra, H. (2016). Contested urban commons: Mapping the transition of a lake to a sports stadium in Bangalore. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 265293. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.616
  133. 133Unteidig, A., Domínguez Cobreros, B., Calderon-Lüning, E., & Joost, G. (2017). Digital commons, urban struggles and the role of Design. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3106S3120. DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352818
  134. 134Vitale, T. (2010). Regulation by Incentives, Regulation of the Incentives in Urban Policies. Transnational Corporations Review, 2(2), 3545. DOI: 10.1080/19186444.2010.11658232
  135. 135Vrasti, W., & Dayal, S. (2016). Cityzenship: rightful presence and the urban commons. Citizenship Studies, 20(8), 9941011. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2016.1229196
  136. 136Webster, C. (2007). Property rights, public space and urban design. Town Planning Review, 78(1), 81101. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.78.1.6
  137. 137Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
  138. 138Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice (pp. 179198). DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11
  139. 139Wessendorf, S. (2014). “Being open, but sometimes closed”. Conviviality in a super-diverse London neighbourhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 392405. DOI: 10.1177/1367549413510415
  140. 140Williams, M. J. (2018). Urban commons are more-than-property. Geographical Research, 56(1), 1625. DOI: 10.1111/1745-5871.12262
  141. 141Wise, A. (2013). Hope in a Land of Strangers. Identities, 20(1), 3745. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2012.752372
  142. 142Young, A. (2014). Cities in the city: Street art, enchantment, and the urban commons. Law and Literature, 26(2), 145161. DOI: 10.1080/1535685X.2014.888208
  143. 143Zapata, P., & Zapata Campos, M. J. (2019). Cities, institutional entrepreneurship and the emergence of new environmental policies: The organizing of waste prevention in the City of Gothenburg, Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(2), 339359. DOI: 10.1177/2399654418783205
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1033 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Submitted on: Feb 25, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 15, 2021
Published on: Apr 1, 2021
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Arthur Feinberg, Amineh Ghorbani, Paulien Herder, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.