Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Collective Action Milieus and Governance Structures of Protected Geographical Indications for Coffee in Colombia, Thailand and Indonesia Cover

Collective Action Milieus and Governance Structures of Protected Geographical Indications for Coffee in Colombia, Thailand and Indonesia

International Journal of the Commons
Volume 14 (2020): Issue 1
By: Xiomara F. Quiñones Ruiz,  Thilo Nigmann,  Christoph Schreiber and  Jeffrey Neilson  
Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. 1Angkasith, P. 2001. “Coffee Production Status and Potential of Organic Arabica Coffee in Thailand.” Paper presented at the First Asian Regional Round-table on Sustainable, Organic and Speciality Coffee Production, Processing and Marketing, 26–28 February, 2001, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
    Back to article
  2. 2ASEAN (ASEAN GI Database Steering Group). 2019. ASEAN GI database. Retrieved from http://www.asean-gidatabase.org/gidatabase/.
    Back to article
  3. 3Barham, E. 2003. “Translating Terroir: The Global Challenge of French AOC Labeling.” Journal of Rural Studies 19(1): 127–138. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9
    Back to article
  4. 4Barjolle, D., X. F. Quiñones-Ruiz, M. Bagal, and H. Comoé. 2017. “The role of the state for geographical indications of coffee: Case studies from Colombia and Kenya.” World Development 98: 105–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.006
    Back to article
  5. 5Biénabe, E., J. Kirsten, and C. Bramley. 2013. “Collective action dynamics and product reputation.” In Developing Geographical Indications in the South, edited by C. Bramley, E. Biénabe, and J. Kirsten, 51–72. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6748-5_3
    Back to article
  6. 6Bowen, S., and T. Mutersbaugh. 2014. “Local or localized? Exploring the contributions of Franco-Mediterranean agrifood theory to alternative food research.” Agriculture and Human Values 31(2): 201–213. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-013-9461-7
    Back to article
  7. 7Boyd, T., P. J. Richerson, R. Meinzen-Dick, T. De Moor, M. O. Jackson, et al. 2015. “Tragedy revisited.” Science 362(6420): 1236–1241. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw0911
    Back to article
  8. 8BPS. 2019. Sensus Pertanian Indonesia Data Finder. Indonesian Statistics Agency, Jakarta. Retrieved from https://st2013.bps.go.id/dev2/index.php/navigation/datafinder.
    Back to article
  9. 9Bray, J. G., and J. Neilson. 2018. “Examining the interface of sustainability programs and livelihoods in the Semendo highlands of Indonesia.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 59(3): 368–383. DOI: 10.1111/apv.12205
    Back to article
  10. 10Brindle, M., and R. Layton. 2017. Social Entrepreneurship for Development: A Business Model. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315646763
    Back to article
  11. 11Damayanti, T. 2018. Pengaruh Sertifikasi Indikasi Geografis Kopi Gayo Terhadap Rantai Nilai Tambah Kopi di Dataran Tinggi Gayo, Aceh. Thesis, Universitas Indonesia.
    Back to article
  12. 12Daviron, B., and S. Ponte. 2005. The Coffee Paradox, Global Markets, Commodity Trade and the Elusive Promise of Development. London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.
    Back to article
  13. 13Doi Tung (Doi Tung Development Project and Mae Fah Luang Foundation under Royal Patronage). 2018. Origin of the Doi Tung Development Project (DTDP). Retrieved from http://www.doitung.org/about_origin_foundation.php.
    Back to article
  14. 14EC (European Commission). 2014a. Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (KAFAE DOI TUNG). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2014:048:0014:0018:EN:PDF.
    Back to article
  15. 15EC (European Commission). 2014b. Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (KAFAE DOI CHAANG) EC No: TH-PGI-0005-0815-27.05.2010. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2014:049:0008:0012:EN:PDF.
    Back to article
  16. 16EC (European Commission). 2017. Regulations Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/870 of 15 May 2017 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Kopi Arabika Gayo (PGI)). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/registeredName.html?denominationId=17500&locale=en.
    Back to article
  17. 17EC (European Commission). 2019. DOOR database. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html?locale=en.
    Back to article
  18. 18Fischer, E. F. 2017. Quality and Inequality: Taste, Value, and Power in the Third Wave Coffee Market. MPlfG Discussion Paper 17(4), Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Retrieved from http://www.mpifg.de/pu/dp_abstracts/dp17-4.asp.
    Back to article
  19. 19FLOCERT. 2019. Customer Search. Retrieved from: https://www.flocert.net/about-flocert/customer-search/.
    Back to article
  20. 20Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five misunderstandings about case-study research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12(2): 219–245. DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363
    Back to article
  21. 21FNC (Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia). 2007. Pliego de Condiciones de la Indicación Geográfica Protegida Café de Colombia. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/documentDisplay.html?chkDocument=664_1_en.
    Back to article
  22. 22FNC (Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia). 2013. Dinámica del Consumo Interno de Café en Colombia. Programa de Promoción de Consumo Toma Café. Retrieved from https://www.federaciondecafeteros.org/static/files/2Dinamica_del_consumo_interno_de_cafe.pdf.
    Back to article
  23. 23FNC (Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia). n.d. Países donde es reconocida la Denominación de Origen Café de Colombia. Retrieved from http://www.cafedecolombia.com/particulares/es/indicaciones_geograficas/Denominacion_de_Origen/do_cafe_de_colombia_en_el_mundo/.
    Back to article
  24. 24Galtier, F., G. Belletti, and A. Marescotti. 2013. “Factors Constraining Building Effective and Fair Geographical Indications for Coffee: Insights from a Dominican Case Study.” Development Policy Review 31(5): 597–615. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12027
    Back to article
  25. 25Giovannucci, D., T. Josling, W. Kerr, B. O’Connour, and M. T. Yeung. 2009. Guide to Geographic Indications. Linking Products and their Origin. Geneva, Switzerland: International Trade Centre. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1736713
    Back to article
  26. 26Grabs, J. 2018. “Assessing the institutionalization of private sustainability governance in a changing coffee sector.” Regulation & Governance, online version. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12212
    Back to article
  27. 27Grabs, J., and S. Ponte. 2019. “The evolution of power in the global coffee value chain and production network.” Journal of Economic Geography 19(4): 803–828. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbz008
    Back to article
  28. 28Huitema, W. K. 1935. De bevolkingskoffiecultuur op Sumatra: met een inleiding tot hare geschiedenis op Java en Sumatra, Doctoral dissertation, H. Veenman and Zonen: Wageningen. Retrieved from https://edepot.wur.nl/51615.
    Back to article
  29. 29ICO (International Coffee Organization). 2018. Monthly Coffee Market Report – December 2018. Retrieved from http://www.ico.org/Market-Report-18-19-e.asp.
    Back to article
  30. 30Indonesia Trademark Law. 2001. Indonesia Trademark Law. Retrieved from https://www.jpo.go.jp/e/system/laws/gaikoku/document/index/indonesia-e_shouhyou.pdf
    Back to article
  31. 31Jaffee, D. 2007. Brewing Justice: Fair Trade Coffee, Sustainability, and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Back to article
  32. 32Jakarta Post. 2008. Dutch company claims international trade rights over Gayo coffee’. February 12, 2008, Jakarta, Indonesia.
    Back to article
  33. 33Kanchanawan, N. 2006. “Romanization, transliteration, and transcription for the globalization of the Thai language.” The Journal of the Royal Institute of Thailand 31(3): 832–841.
    Back to article
  34. 34Marsh, A. 2006. A Review of the Aceh Coffee Industry. Consulting Report for the United Nations Development Program Aceh/Nias Emergency Response and Transitional Recovery (ERTR) Programme.
    Back to article
  35. 35Mawardi, S. 2002. “Kendala Pengembangan Pertanian Organik di Indonesia.” Warta Pusat Penelitian Kopi dan Kakao Indonesia 18(2): 48–57.
    Back to article
  36. 36McGinnis, M. D. 2011. “An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework.” Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 169–183. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x
    Back to article
  37. 37McStocker, R. 1987. “The Indonesian Coffee Industry.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 23(1): 40–69. DOI: 10.1080/00074918712331335121
    Back to article
  38. 38MKPG (Gayo Arabica Coffee Protection Society/Masyarakat Perlindungan Kopi Gayo). 2016. Application for registration of the protected geographical indication Kopi Arabika Gayo (Final Product Specification). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/documentDisplay.html?chkDocument=6117_1_id.
    Back to article
  39. 39Muradian, R., and W. Pelupessy. 2005. “Governing the coffee chain: The role of voluntary regulatory systems.” World Development 33(12): 2029–2044. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.06.007
    Back to article
  40. 40Mutersbaugh, T., D. Klooster, M. C. Renard, and P. Taylor. 2008. “Certifying rural spaces: quality-certified products and rural governance.” Journal of Rural Studies 21(4): 381–388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.10.003
    Back to article
  41. 41Neilson, J., J. Wright, and L. Aklimawati. 2018. “Geographical indications and value capture in the Indonesia coffee sector.” Journal of Rural Studies 59: 35–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.01.003
    Back to article
  42. 42Neilson, J., and Z. J. H. Wang. 2019. “China and the changing economic geography of coffee value chains.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 40(3): 429–451. DOI: 10.1111/sjtg.12279
    Back to article
  43. 43Ngokkuen, C., and U. Grote. 2012. “Challenges and opportunities for protecting geographical indications in Thailand.” Asia-Pacific Development Journal 19(2): 93–123. DOI: 10.18356/671d744f-en
    Back to article
  44. 44Nigmann, T. 2015. Collective action milieus for registering GIs in Thailand: The cases of “Kafae Doi Tung” and “Kafae Doi Chaang”. Unpublished master thesis. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Austria.
    Back to article
  45. 45Noppakoonwong, U., C. Khomarwut, M. Hanthewee, S. Jarintorn, S. Hassarungsee, S. Meesook, C. Daoruang, P. Naka, S. Lertwatanakiat, K. Satayawut, A. P. Pereira, S. M. C. Silva, and V. M. P. Várzea. 2015. “Research and Development of Arabica Coffee in Thailand.” In: Proc. 25th International Conference on Coffee Science (ASIC), 8–13 Sept. 2014, Armenia, Colombia.
    Back to article
  46. 46Ocampo-López, O. L., and L. M. Álvarez-Herrera. 2017. “Tendencia de la producción y el consumo del café en Colombia.” Apuntes CENES 36(64): 139–165. DOI: 10.19053/01203053.v36.n64.2017.5419
    Back to article
  47. 47Office of Agricultural Economics. 2018. Personal email exchange between an officer and one of the authors. April, 21, 2018.
    Back to article
  48. 48Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
    Back to article
  49. 49Ostrom, E. 2007. “Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd edition, edited by P. A. Sabatier, 21–64, Cambridge, MA, USA: Westview Press. DOI: 10.4324/9780367274689-2
    Back to article
  50. 50Ostrom, E. 2010. “Analyzing collective action.” Agricultural Economics 41: 155–166. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x
    Back to article
  51. 51Ostrom, E. 2011. “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 39(1): 7–27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
    Back to article
  52. 52Palacios, M. 1979. El café en Colombia (1850–1970). Una historia económica, social y política. Bogotá: Editorial Presencia Ltda.
    Back to article
  53. 53Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd Edition. London: Sage Publications.
    Back to article
  54. 54Pongsiri, K. 2013. “Market feasibility of new brand coffee house: The case study of Thailand.” International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering 7(8): 1142–1145.
    Back to article
  55. 55Poteete, A. R., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton and Oxford, USA: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400835157
    Back to article
  56. 56Purnomo, M., D. Pardamean, M. R. Utomo, and S. Riyanto. 2019. “Moderating role of connoisseur consumers on sustainable consumption and dynamics capabilities of Indonesian single origin coffee shops.” Sustainability 11(5): 1319. DOI: 10.3390/su11051319
    Back to article
  57. 57Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F., M. Penker, C. R. Vogl, and L. F. Samper-Gartner. 2015. “Can origin labels re-shape relationships along international supply chains? – The case of Café de Colombia.” International Journal of the Commons 9(1): 416–439. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.529
    Back to article
  58. 58Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F., M. Penker, G. Belletti, A. Marescotti, S. Scaramuzzi, E. Barzini, M. Pircher, F. Leitgeb, and L. F. Samper-Gartner. 2016. “Insights into the black box of collective efforts for the registration of geographical indications.” Land Use Policy 57: 103–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.021
    Back to article
  59. 59Reina, M., L. F. Samper, and M. P. Fernández. 2007. La Estrategia Detrás de La Marca. 1st edition, Bogotá: Ediciones B Colombia S.A.
    Back to article
  60. 60Reinecke, J., K. Koen van Bommel, and A. Spicer. 2017. When orders of worth clash: Negotiating legitimacy in situations of moral multiplexity. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 52: 33–72. DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20170000052002
    Back to article
  61. 61Renard, R. D. 2010. Mainstreaming Alternative Development in Thailand, Lao PDR and Myanmar: A Process of Learning. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).
    Back to article
  62. 62Samper, L. F., D. Giovannucci, and L. Marques Vieira. 2017. The Powerful Role of Intangibles in the Coffee Value Chain. Economic Research Working Paper No. 39. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4229&plang=EN.
    Back to article
  63. 63Schreiber, C. 2018. Evolving and interacting quality conventions – a value chain analysis of certified coffee in Aceh, Indonesia. Unpublished master thesis. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Austria.
    Back to article
  64. 64Scott, J., and G. Marshall. 2009. A Dictionary of Sociology. 3rd rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Back to article
  65. 65SIC. n.d. Denominación de Origen. Antes de solicitar denominaciones de origen. Retrieved from https://www.sic.gov.co/denominacion-de-origen/antes-de-solicitar.
    Back to article
  66. 66Teuber, R. 2010. “Geographical indications of origin as a tool of product differentiation: The case of coffee.” Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 22: 277–298. DOI: 10.1080/08974431003641612
    Back to article
  67. 67UNPO (Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization). 2008. Aceh: Gayo Lose Coffee Rights to Dutch Firm. Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://unpo.org/article/7570.
    Back to article
  68. 68van Laerhoven, F., M. Schoon, and S. Villamayor-Tomas. 2020. “Celebrating the 30th Anniversary of Ostrom’s Governing the Commons: Traditions and Trends in the Study of the Commons, Revisited.” International Journal of the Commons 14(1): 208–224. DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1030
    Back to article
  69. 69Vicol, M., J. Neilson, F. Hartatri, and P. Cooper. 2018. “Upgrading for whom? Relationship coffee, value chain interventions and rural development in Indonesia.” World Development 110: 26–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.020
    Back to article
  70. 70Windle, J. 2018. “Why do south-east Asian states choose to suppress opium? A cross-case comparison.” Third World Quarterly 39(2): 366–384. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1376582
    Back to article
  71. 71Yayasan MPKG. 2019. Yayasan Masyarakat Perlindungan Kopi Gayo. Retrieved from https://yayasanmpkg.wordpress.com/.
    Back to article
  72. 72Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Back to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1007 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2019
Accepted on: May 3, 2020
Published on: Jul 22, 2020
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
coffee,
collective action,
EU protected geographical indications,
Colombia,
Indonesia,
Thailand

© 2020 Xiomara F. Quiñones Ruiz, Thilo Nigmann, Christoph Schreiber, Jeffrey Neilson, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2020): Issue 1Next article