References
- 1Anderies, J. M. (2014). Embedding built environments in social–ecological systems: resilience-based design principles. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 130–142. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2013.857455
- 2Barnaud, C., Corbera, E., Muradian, R., Salliou, N., Sirami, C., Vialatte, A., & Reyes-García, V. (2018). Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09848-230115
- 3Barton, D. N., Benavides, K., Chacon-Cascante, A., Le Coq, J.-F., Quiros, M. M., Porras, I., … Ring, I. (2017). Payments for Ecosystem Services as a Policy Mix: Demonstrating the institutional analysis and development framework on conservation policy instruments. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(5), 404–421. DOI: 10.1002/eet.1769
- 4Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2009). A Systematic Approach to Institutional Analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s Grammar. Political Research Quarterly. DOI: 10.1177/1065912909334430
- 5Beckmann, V., Eggers, J., & Mettepenningen, E. (2009). Deciding how to decide on agri-environmental schemes: the political economy of subsidiarity, decentralisation and participation in the European Union. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(5), 689–716. DOI: 10.1080/09640560902958289
- 6Bennett, D. E., & Gosnell, H. (2015). Integrating multiple perspectives on payments for ecosystem services through a social—ecological systems framework. Ecological Economics, 116, 172–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.019
- 7Carter, D. P., Weible, C. M., Siddiki, S. N., & Basurto, X. (2016). Integrating core concepts from the institutional analysis and development framework for the systematic analysis of policy designs: An illustration from the US National Organic Program regulation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(1), 159–185. DOI: 10.1177/0951629815603494
- 8Chan, K. M., Anderson, E., Chapman, M., Jespersen, K., & Olmsted, P. (2017). Payments for ecosystem services: Rife with problems and potential—for transformation towards sustainability. Ecological Economics, 140, 110–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029
- 9Cleaver, F., & Whaley, L. (2018). Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance: a critical institutional reading. Ecology and Society, 23(2). DOI: 10.5751/ES-10212-230249
- 10Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation. The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books Ltd.
- 11Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A Grammar of Institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. DOI: 10.2307/2082975
- 12Davies, B., Blackstock, K., Brown, K., & Shannon, P. (2004).
Challenges in creating local agri-environmental cooperation action amongst farmers and other stakeholders . Aberdeen: The Macaulay Institute. - 13Froger, G., Méral, P., & Muradian, R. (2016). Vers une prise en compte de la diversité des arrangements institutionnels et des pratiques dans l’analyse des paiements pour services environnementaux. Développement Durable et Territoires. Économie, Géographie, Politique, Droit, Sociologie, 7(1). Retrieved from
https://developpementdurable.revues.org/11163?lang=en - 14Gerber, J. D., Nahrath, S., Reynard, E., & Thomi, L. (2008). The role of common pool resource institutions in the implementation of Swiss natural resource management policy. International Journal of the Commons, 2(2), 222–247. DOI: 10.18352/ijc.44
- 15Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Muradian, R. (2015). In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of market-based instruments in ecosystem services governance. Ecological Economics, 117, 217–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.016
- 16Grima, N., Singh, S. J., Smetschka, B., & Ringhofer, L. (2016). Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosystem Services, 17, 24–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.010
- 17Jeswiet, S., & Hermsen, L. (2015). Agriculture et faune: une relation d’interdépendance. Statistique Canada.
- 18Kiser, L., Ostrom, E., & Ostrom, E. (1982). Strategies of political inquiry (pp. 179–222). Beverley Hills, CA, and London: Sage Publications.
- 19Kolinjivadi, V., Zaga-Mendez, A & Dupras, J. (2019). Putting nature ‘to work’ through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Tensions between autonomy, voluntary action and the political economy of agri-environmental practice. Land use policy, 81, 324–336. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.012
- 20Kuhfuss, L., Préget, R., Thoyer, S., Hanley, N., Coent, P. L., & Désolé, M. (2016). Nudges, Social Norms, and Permanence in Agri-environmental Schemes. Land Economics, 92(4), 641–655. DOI: 10.3368/le.92.4.641
- 21Larbi-Youcef, Y. (2017).
Les politiques agroenvironnementales au Québec: Enjeux, perspectives et rocommandations . Master thesis. Université de Sherbrooke. Centre Universitaire de formation en environnement.https://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/bitstream/handle/11143/10467/Larbi_Youcef_Yasmina_MEnv_2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y - 22Lavallée, S., & Dupras, J. (2016). Regards sur les systémes de paiements pour services écosystémiques en milieu agricole au Québec. Développement Durable et Territoires. Économie, Géographie, Politique, Droit, Sociologie, 7(1). Retrieved from
http://developpementdurable.revues.org/11210 - 23Lehner, B., Gombault, C., Mehdi, B., Michaud, A., Beaudin, I., Sottile, M.-F., … others. (2014). Increasing agricultural watershed resilience to climate change and land use change using a water master plan: A case study for the Missisquoi Bay. Retrieved from
http://www.ouranos.ca/media/publication/379_RapportLehner2013.pdf - 24Lien, A. M., Schlager, E., & Lona, A. (2018). Using institutional grammar to improve understanding of the form and function of payment for ecosystem services programs. Ecosystem Services, 31, 21–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.011
- 25McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013). Examining equity: a multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 416–427. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
- 26Mettepenningen, E., Vandermeulen, V., Delaet, K., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Wailes, E. J. (2013). Investigating the influence of the institutional organisation of agri-environmental schemes on scheme adoption. Land Use Policy, 33, 20–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.004
- 27Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ). (2013). Prime-vert.
- 28Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ). (2017a). Guide administratif 2017–2018 – Mesure 4201 – Aménagement de bandes riveraines élargies. Volet 1–Prime- Vert 2013–2018.
https://www.agrireseau.net/agroenvironnement/documents/Volet1_Guide_4201_Bande_riveraine_elargie_version_14juillet_2014_logos.pdf - 29Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ). (2017b). Guide administratif 2017–2018 – Mesure 4203: Aménagements favorisant la biodiversité. Volet 1–Prime–Vert 2013–2018.
https://www.agrireseau.net/references/6/2017-2018_Volet1_Guide_4203_Amenagements_favorisant_Biodiversite_vs12jui___.pdf - 30Morisset, M., & Couture, J.-M. (2010). Politique et Syndicalisme Agricoles Au Québec. Les Presses de l’Universite Laval.
- 31Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological economics, 69(6), 1202–1208. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006
- 32Muradian, R., & Rival, L. (2012). Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 93–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009
- 33Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400831739
- 34Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., … & Maris, V. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 7–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
- 35Potter, C. A., & Wolf, S. A. (2014). Payments for ecosystem services in relation to US and UK agri-environmental policy: disruptive neoliberal innovation or hybrid policy adaptation? Agriculture and human values, 31(3), 397–408. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-014-9518-2
- 36Prager, K., & Freese, J. (2009). Stakeholder involvement in agri-environmental policy making—learning from a local-and a state-level approach in Germany. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2), 1154–1167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.05.005
- 37Prager, K., Reed, M., & Scott, A. (2012). Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale—rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy, 29(1), 244–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.012
- 38Primmer, E., Jokinen, P., Blicharska, M., Barton, D. N., Bugter, R., & Potschin, M. (2015). Governance of ecosystem services: a framework for empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 16, 158–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.002
- 39Riley, M. (2016). How does longer term participation in agri-environment schemes [re]shape farmers’ environmental dispositions and identities? Land Use Policy, 52, 62–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.010
- 40Ring, I., & Barton, D. N. (2015). Economic instruments in policy mixes for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem governance. Handbook of Ecological Economics, 413–449. DOI: 10.4337/9781783471416.00021
- 41Ross, H., Buchy, M., & Proctor, W. (2002). Laying down the ladder: a typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management. Australian journal of environmental management, 9(4), 205–217. DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2002.10648561
- 42Schauppenlehner-Kloyber, E., & Penker, M. (2016). Between participation and collective action—from occasional liaisons towards long-term co-management for urban resilience. Sustainability, 8(7), 664. DOI: 10.3390/su8070664
- 43Schleyer, C., & Plieninger, T. (2011). Obstacles and options for the design and implementation of payment schemes for ecosystem services provided through farm trees in Saxony, Germany. Environmental Conservation, 38(4), 454–463. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892911000361
- 44Shapiro-Garza, E. (2013). Contesting the market-based nature of Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services programs: Four sites of articulation and hybridization. Geoforum, 46, 5–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.018
- 45Siddiki, S., Basurto, X., & Weible, C. M. (2012). Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance: The case of Colorado aquaculture. Regulation & Governance, 6(2), 167–188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01132.x
- 46Terrado, M., Tauler, R., & Bennett, E. M. (2015). Landscape and local factors influence water purification in the Monteregian agroecosystem in Québec, Canada. Regional Environmental Change, 15(8), 1743–1755. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-014-0733-6
- 47Uthes, S., & Matzdorf, B. (2013). Studies on agri-environmental measures: a survey of the literature. Environmental Management, 51(1), 251–266. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9959-6
- 48Van Hecken, G., Bastiaensen, J., & Windey, C. (2015). Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate. Ecological Economics, 120, 117–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.012
- 49Vatn, A. (2005). Institutions and the Environment. Edward Elgar.
- 50Vatn, A. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1245–1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
- 51Westerink, J., Melman, D. C., & Schrijver, R. A. (2015). Scale and self-governance in agri-environment schemes: experiences with two alternative approaches in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(8), 1490–1508. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2014.932762
- 52Wunder, S. (2013). When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. Conservation letters, 6(4), 230–237. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12034
- 53Wunder, S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117, 234–243. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016
- 54Zaga-Mendez, A. (2016). Hog farmers’ compliance and the role of agro-environmental institutions in the Missisquoi Bay (McGill University). Retrieved from
http://oatd.org/oatd/record?record=oai%5C%3Adigitool.library.mcgill.ca%5C%3A139022