Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Anatomy of Change: A Scoping Review of Surgical Curriculum Renewal Processes Cover

The Anatomy of Change: A Scoping Review of Surgical Curriculum Renewal Processes

Open Access
|Dec 2025

Abstract

Purpose: Renewal of surgical curricula is critical in maintaining relevance to contemporary healthcare needs. A curriculum document usually describes its purpose, intended outcomes, content, methods, and assessment and evaluation processes. The document may also consider cultural, professional, political, and social contexts. While there are published curriculum development approaches, guidance on renewal processes is limited. This scoping review aims to synthesise literature on surgical curriculum renewal, to understand the key elements of this process, and identify areas for improvement.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted by the core author team, with co-creation involving a Knowledge User Group (KUG). Seven databases were searched for sources published since 2003. Sources relating to curriculum renewal were included, and data were extracted via iterative and consultative processes involving both core authors and the KUG. Themes were identified via qualitative content analysis and thematic mapping of reported features.

Results: Eighteen sources were included from an originally identified 2359 articles. Six models of curriculum development were characterised, yet no curriculum renewal model was delineated. Terminology was inconsistent. Primary participants (trainees and trainers) tended to be consulted but not included in curriculum renewal teams. Factors including participant engagement, educational support, and financial resources were identified as enablers in particular environments, and considered as barriers in other contexts. Drivers for renewal included changes in surgical education and training; in surgical practice; and, participant concerns.

Discussion: Addressing identified barriers can transform them into catalysts for change. Greater standardisation of terminology in surgical curriculum renewal is needed. The field would benefit from purpose-built frameworks, educational scholarship, co-design, and the implementation of strategies to ensure barriers to renewal become enablers of the surgical curriculum renewal process.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/g7cyhd05 | Journal eISSN: 2212-277X
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 22, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 17, 2025
Published on: Dec 5, 2025
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Marc A. Seifman, Robyn Woodward-Kron, Roi Y. Kagan, Kirsten Dalrymple, Aimee K. Gardner, Ian Incoll, Lars Konge, John T. Paige, Debra Nestel, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.