Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
What Do We Mean by ‘Version’? Actionable Guidelines for the Versioning of Data Cover

What Do We Mean by ‘Version’? Actionable Guidelines for the Versioning of Data

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Agarwal, D., Ayliffe, J., Buck, J.J.H., Damerow, J., Parton, G., Stall, S., Stockhause, M. and Wyborn, L.A.I. (with Complex Citation Working Group Members). (2025). Complex citation working group recommendation. Zenodo. Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.14589694
  2. Altman, M. and King, G. (2007). ‘A proposed standard for the scholarly citation of quantitative data’, D-Lib Magazine, 13(3/4). Available at: 10.1045/march2007-altman
  3. Bellini, E. (2019). ‘A blockchain based Trusted Persistent Identifier system for Big Data in science’, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 44(4), pp. 351–377. Available at: 10.2478/fcds-2019-0018
  4. Bettivia, R.S. (2016). ‘The power of imaginary users: Designated communities in the OAIS reference model’, Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), pp. 1–9. Available at: 10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301038
  5. Buttigieg, P.L., Cristiano, L., Curdt, C., Ihsan, A.Z., Jejkal, T., Koch, C., Mannix, O., Mohr, D. P., Pirogov, A. and Stucky, K.U. (2022). Guidance on versioning of digital assets (Report HMC Paper 3). HMC Office, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research. Available at: 10.3289/HMC_publ_04
  6. Caccetta, M., Collings, S. and Cudahy, T. (2013). ‘A calibration methodology for continental scale mapping using ASTER imagery’, Remote Sensing of Environment, 139, pp. 306–317. Available at: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.011
  7. Carroll, S.R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O.L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J.D., Anderson, J. and Hudson, M. (2020). ‘The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’, Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
  8. Chodacki, J., Buttrick, A., Alperin, J.P., Dean, C. and Mentis, D. (2025). ‘Infrastructure is a collective responsibility – lessons from scholarly publishing and metadata’, LSE Impact – Understanding Impact and Practice in Academic Research. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2025/06/03/infrastructure-is-a-collective-responsibility-lessons-from-scholarly-publishing-and-metadata/ (Accessed: 4 March 2026).
  9. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, AuScope, Northern Territory Geological Survey, Geological Survey of Queensland, Department for Energy and Mining, Government of South Australia, Mineral Resources Tasmania, Government of Tasmania, Geological Survey Victoria, and Geological Survey of Western Australia (2023). AuScope Australian National Virtual Core Library (NVCL) Collection (4.1 TB) [Data set]. NCI Australia. Available at: 10.25914/BZTG-RG43
  10. Consolidation Editorial Group of the IFLA FRBR Review Group, Riva, P., Le Boeuf, P. and Žumer, M. (2024). IFLA Library Reference Model: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information [Reference Model]. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Available at: https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/40.2
  11. Costello, M.J. (2009). ‘Motivating online publication of data’, BioScience, 59(5), pp. 418–427. Available at: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.5.9
  12. Cox, A.M. and Tam, W.W.T. (2018). ‘A critical analysis of lifecycle models of the research process and research data management’, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(2), pp. 142–157. Available at: 10.1108/AJIM-11-2017-0251
  13. Cudahy, T. (2012). Satellite ASTER geoscience product notes for Australia (No. EP125895). Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. Available at: 10.4225/08/584d948f9bbd1
  14. Cudahy, T., Caccetta, M., Lau, I., Rodger, A., Laukamp, C., Ong, C., Chia, J., Collings, S., Rankine, T., Fraser, R., Woodcock, R., Vote, J., Warren, P., Thomas, M., Tyler, I., Mauger, A., Close, D., Jones, M. and Abrams, M. (2020). Satellite ASTER geoscience map of Australia (GeoTIFF Version 3). CSIRO Data Access Portal. Available at: 10.4225/08/51400D6F7B335
  15. Cudahy, T., Caccetta, M., Lau, I., Rodger, A., Laukamp, C., Ong, C., Chia, J., Collings, S., Rankine, T., Fraser, R., Woodcock, R., Vote, J., Warren, P., Thomas, M., Tyler, I., Mauger, A., Close, D., Jones, M. and Abrams, M. (2023). National ASTER map of Australia (Version v1) [Data set]. NCI Australia. Available at: 10.25914/5F224F36EC890
  16. Cudahy, T., Caccetta, M. and Thomas, M. (2012). Satellite ASTER geoscience product (EP-30–07-12–44; Version 1) [GeoTIFF]. Digital Earth Australia. Available at: https://data.dea.ga.gov.au/?prefix=ASTER_Geoscience_Map_of_Australia/ (Accessed: 8 August 2026).
  17. DataCite. (2024). Best practices for tombstone pages. DataCite Support. Available at: https://support.datacite.org/docs/tombstone-pages (Accessed: 9 July 2026).
  18. DataCite Metadata Working Group (with Liffers, M., Robertson, W., Ashton, J., Bernal, I., Devaraju, A., Elger, K., Habermann, T., Harrison, M., Kraus, R., Mathews, I., Medina-Smith, A., Moore, A.V., Padfield, J., Raugh, A., Shallcross, M., Strecker, D., Tarocco, N., Tvrdy, P., Vyčítalová, H., … El-Gebali, S. (2026). DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the Publication and Citation of Research Data and Other Research Outputs v4.7 [Text/html]. DataCite e.V. Available at: 10.14454/qdd3-ps68
  19. DCC. (2010). DCC curation lifecycle model (resources for digital curators). Digital Curation Centre. Available at: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/curation-lifecycle-model (Accessed: 10 August 2012).
  20. Diepenbroek, M., Edmunds, R., Hugo, W. and Mokrane, M. (2014). Guidelines in respect of metadata granularity (Version 2.1) [Technical Report]. World Data System. Available at: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4qnUFYMgSc-SFNORWFialhnZ3c/edit (Accessed: 16 September 2014).
  21. ESIP Data Readiness Cluster. (2023). Checklist to examine AI-readiness for open environmental datasets. Earth Science Information Partners. Available at: https://github.com/ESIPFed/data-readiness (Accessed: 20 December 2023).
  22. Fitzpatrick, B., Pilato, C. M. and Collins-Sussman, B. (2009). Version control with subversion. O’Reilly Media, Inc. Available at: https://svnbook.red-bean.com/ (Accessed: 11 March 2019).
  23. Greenberg, J. (2009). ‘Theoretical considerations of lifecycle modeling: An analysis of the Dryad Repository demonstrating automatic Metadata Propagation, Inheritance, and Value System adoption’, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(3–4), pp. 380–402. Available at: 10.1080/01639370902737547
  24. Grune, D. (1986). Concurrent versions system, a method for independent cooperation (Technical Manual IR 113.). Vrije Universiteit. Available at: https://dickgrune.com/Books/Publications/Concurrent_Versions_System,_a_method_for_independent_cooperation.pdf
  25. ISO. (2019). Date and time—Representations for information interchange. Part 1: Basic rules (ISO 8601-1:2019). ISO. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/70907.html (Accessed: 3 March 2023).
  26. ISO. (2022). Information and documentation—Research activity identifier (RAiD) (ISO 23527:2022; Version 1). Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/75931.html (Accessed: 9 February 2026).
  27. Jenkyns, R., Mathiak, B., McNeill, K., Smith, G., Sun, G., Little, C., Jones, B., Elbert, D., Hellström, M., Schabinger, R. and WG, R.D.G. (2025). Guidance on data granularity: Report of the RDA data granularity WG (RDA 127). Research Data Alliance. Available at: 10.15497/RDA00127
  28. Kale, A., Nguyen, T., Harris, F.C., Li, C., Zhang, J. and Ma, X. (2022). ‘Provenance documentation to enable explainable and trustworthy AI: A literature review’, Data Intelligence, 5(1), pp. 139–162. Available at: 10.1162/dint_a_00119
  29. Kálmán, T., Kurzawe, D. and Schwardmann, U. (2012). ‘European Persistent Identifier Consortium – PIDs für die Wissenschaft‘, In R. Altenhöner and C. Oellers (eds) Langzeitarchivierung von Forschungsdaten—Standards und disziplinspezifische Lösungen. Scivero. pp. 151–168. Available at: https://www.ratswd.de/publikationen/langzeitarchivierung-von-forschungsdaten
  30. Klöcking, M., Lehnert, K.A. and Wyborn, L.A.I. (2025). ‘Geochemical databases’, In A. Anbar and D. Weis (eds) Treatise on Geochemistry 3rd edn, Vol. 8. Elsevier Science. pp. 97–135. Available at: 10.1016/B978-0-323-99762-1.00123-6
  31. Klump, J., Bertelmann, R., Brase, J., Diepenbroek, M., Grobe, H., Höck, H., Lautenschlager, M., Schindler, U., Sens, I. and Wächter, J. (2006). ‘Data publication in the Open Access Initiative’, Data Science Journal, 5, pp. 79–83. Available at: 10.2481/dsj.5.79
  32. Klump, J., Huber, R. and Diepenbroek, M. (2016). ‘DOI for geoscience data—How early practices shape present perceptions. Earth’, Science Informatics, 9(1), pp. 123–136. Available at: 10.1007/s12145-015-0231-5
  33. Klump, J., Pampel, H., Rothfritz, L. and Strecker, D. (2024). Dokumentation des Workshops Forschungsdaten-Publikationen zwischen Dynamik und Persistenz (#PIDsBUA Workshop Report). Berlin University Alliance. Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.12917465
  34. Klump, J., Wyborn, L., Wu, M. and Elger, K. (2025). Data versioning interest group compilation of data versioning use cases (1.3). Research Data Alliance. Available at: 10.15497/RDA00041
  35. Klump, J., Wyborn, L.A.I., Wu, M., Downs, R.R., Asmi, A., Ryder, G. and Martin, J. (2020). Final report of the research data alliance data versioning working group—Principles and best practices in data versioning for all data sets big and small (Working Group Final Report). Research Data Alliance. Available at: 10.15497/RDA00042
  36. Klump, J., Wyborn, L.A.I., Wu, M., Martin, J., Downs, R.R. and Asmi, A. (2021). ‘Versioning data is about more than revisions: A conceptual framework and proposed principles’, Data Science Journal, 20(1), p. 12. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2021-012
  37. Kuprieiev, R., skshetry, Rowlands, P., Petrov, D., Redzyński, P., da Costa-Luis, C., de la Iglesia Castro, D., Schepanovski, A., Shcheklein, I., Gao, Y., Taskaya, B., P, J., Santos, F., Daniele, Lamy, R., Sharma, A., Kaimuldenov, Z., Hodovic, D., Kodenko, N., … Mangal, S. (2026). DVC: Data version control – Git for data & models (Version 3.66.1) [Computer software]. Zenodo. Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.18186937
  38. Lacan, O. (2023). Keep a changelog V1.1.1. Keep a Changelog. Available at: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/ (Accessed: 19 June 2024).
  39. Lemieux, V. L. (2021). ‘Blockchain and recordkeeping: Editorial’, Computers, 10(11), Article 11. Available at: 10.3390/computers10110135
  40. Library of Congress. (2016). BIBFRAME Model, vocabulary, guidelines, examples, analyses. Available at: https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html
  41. Martinez, C. (2017). Reproducible Research Version Control. Data Carpentries. Available at: https://datacarpentry.org/rr-version-control/
  42. Paine, D. and Ramakrishnan, L. (2019). ‘Surfacing data change in scientific work’, In N. Greene Taylor, C. Christian-Lamb, M.H. Martin and B. Nardi (eds), Information in Contemporary Society Vol. 11420. Springer International Publishing. pp. 15–26. Available at: 10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_2
  43. Parsons, M.A., Duerr, R. and Minster, J.B. (2010). ‘Data citation and peer review’, EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 91(34), pp. 297–298. Available at: 10.1029/2010EO340001
  44. Parsons, M.A. and Duerr, R.E. (2005). ‘Designating user communities for scientific data: Challenges and solutions’, Data Science Journal, 4, pp. 31–38. Available at: 10.2481/dsj.4.31
  45. Perez-Riverol, Y., Gatto, L., Wang, R., Sachsenberg, T., Uszkoreit, J., da veiga Leprevost, F., Fufezan, C., Ternent, T., Eglen, S.J., Katz, D.S., Pollard, T.J., Konovalov, A., Flight, R. M., Blin, K. and Vizcaíno, J.A. (2016). ‘Ten simple rules for taking advantage of Git and GitHub’, PLOS Computational Biology, 12(7), p. e1004947. Available at: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004947
  46. Rauber, A., Asmi, A., van Uitvanck, D. and Pröll, S. (2016). Data citation of evolving data: recommendations of the working group on data citation (WGDC) [Technical Report]. Research Data Alliance. Available at: 10.15497/RDA00016
  47. Rauber, A., Parsons, M.A. and Working Group on Data Citation. (2025). Precise, actionable reference to dynamic data: Recommendations of the working group on data citation (WGDC) (Version: 2025-04-04T08:30Z Version 2) (Working Group Recommendation No. RDA00132). Research Data Alliance. Available at: 10.15497/RDA00132
  48. Rochkind, M.J. (1975). ‘The source code control system’, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-1(4), pp. 364–370. Available at: 10.1109/TSE.1975.6312866
  49. Sicilia, M.A., García-Barriocanal, E., Sánchez-Alonso, S. and Cuadrado, J.J. (2019). ‘Decentralized persistent identifiers: A basic model for immutable handlers’, Procedia Computer Science, 14th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems, CRIS2018, FAIRness of Research Information, 146, 123–130. Available at: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.087
  50. Smiraglia, R.P. (2005). ‘Instantiation: Toward a theory’, Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS Actes Du Congrès Annuel de l’ACSI. Annual Conference of CAIS. Available at: 10.29173/cais310
  51. Smiraglia, R.P. (2017). ‘Data and metadata instantiation: Use cases and a conceptual model’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Available at: 10.23106/dcmi.952137983
  52. Soiland-Reyes, S., Sefton, P., Crosas, M., Castro, L.J., Coppens, F., Fernández, J.M., Garijo, D., Grüning, B., La Rosa, M., Leo, S., Ó Carragáin, E., Portier, M., Trisovic, A., RO-Crate Community, Groth, P. and Goble, C. (2022). ‘Packaging research artefacts with RO-Crate’, Data Science, 5(2), pp. 97–138. Available at: 10.3233/DS-210053
  53. Specht, A., Bryceson, K., Cao, S., O’Brien, M., Guru, S.M., Correa, P.P. and Waycott, M. (2025). ‘A collaborative data network for the Asia Oceania Region enabled by emerging technologies to foster innovation in a secure and open environment’, Data Science Journal, 24(1), pp. 1–15. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2025-001
  54. Strecker, D. (2026). ‘How permanent are metadata for research data? Understanding changes in DataCite metadata’, Quantitative Science Studies, 7, 195–213. Available at: 10.1162/QSS.a.407
  55. Treloar, A.E. and Klump, J. (2019). ‘Updating the data curation continuum: Not just data, still focused on curation, more about domains’, International Journal of Digital Curation, 14(1), pp. 87–101. Available at: 10.2218/ijdc.v14i1.643
  56. Tsu, H., Yamaguchi, Y. and Kahle, A.B. (1996). ‘ASTER science mission overview’, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing, 2817, pp. 52–59. Available at: 10.1117/12.255200
  57. UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO recommendation on open science (Programme and Meeting Document SC-PCB-SPP/2021/OS/UROS). UNESCO. Available at: 10.54677/MNMH8546
  58. Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.W., Da Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A.J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C.T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’, Scientific Data, 3(1), p. 160018. Available at: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 37
Submitted on: Apr 23, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 9, 2026
Published on: Sep 22, 2026
Published by: Ubiquity Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jens Klump, Lesley Wyborn, Mingfang Wu, Dorothea Strecker, Heinz Pampel, Laura Rothfritz, published by Ubiquity Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.