References
- 1Borgman, C.L. and Bourne, P.E. (2022) ‘Why it takes a village to manage and share data’, Harvard Data Science Review 4(3). Available at: 10.1162/99608f92.42eec111
- 2Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press. Available at: 10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
- 3Branin, J.J. (2005)
‘Institutional repositories’ , in M.A. Drake (ed.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Oxford: Taylor & Francis pp. 237–248. Available at: 10.1201/9781420068030.ch27 - 4Briney, K.A. (2024) ‘Measuring data rot: An analysis of the continued availability of shared data from a Single University’, PLoS ONE, 19(6):
e0304781 . Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304781 - 5Carroll, S.R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O.L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J.D., Anderson, J. and Hudson, M. (2020) ‘The CARE Principles for Indigenous data governance’, Data Science Journal, 19(43), pp. 1–12. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2020-043
- 6CoreTrustSeal Standards And Certification Board. (2022) CoreTrustSeal requirements 2023–2025. Available at: 10.5281/ZENODO.7051012
- 7Cowles, W. and Hillegas, C. (2022, June 21). ‘TigerData: Partnering to bring data to the center of the research life-cycle [panel presentation]’, Bringing Together Data Management and Computation – Social and Architectural Challenges, Research Data Alliance 19th Plenary, Seoul, S. Korea. Recording available:
https://youtu.be/5LkOQCYer4Q?si=j8lv4XfnG4xvT4dg . - 8Crow, R. (2002, August). ARL bimonthly report 223. The Association of Research Libraries. Available at:
https://sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/instrepo.pdf . - 9Demetres, M.R., Delgado, D. and Wright, D.N. (2020) ‘The impact of institutional repositories: a systematic review’, Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 108(2), 177. Available at: 10.5195/jmla.2020.856
- 10Edwards, P.N., Jackson, S.J., Chalmers, M.K., Bowker, G.C., Borgman, C.L., Ribes, D., Burton, M. and Calvert, S. (2013) Knowledge infrastructures: Intellectual frameworks and research challenges. Available at:
http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97552 . - 11Gentemann, C. (2023, January) ‘Why NASA and federal agencies are declaring this the Year of Open Science’, Nature, 613(7943), pp.
217 . PMID: 36631654. Available at: 10.1038/d41586-023-00019-y - 12Gillis, R. (2017) ‘“Watch your language!”: Word choice in library website usability’, Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 12(1). Available at: 10.21083/partnership.v12i1.3918
- 13Hepburn, P. and Lewis, K.M. (2008) ‘What’s in a name? Using card sorting to evaluate branding in an academic library’s web site’, College & Research Libraries, 69(3), pp. 242–251. Available at: 10.5860/crl.69.3.242
- 14Herndon, J. and O’Reilly, R. (2016)
‘Data sharing policies in social sciences academic journals: Evolving expectations of data sharing as a form of scholarly communication’ , in L. Kellam and K. Thompson (eds.) Databrarianship: The Academic data librarian in theory and practice. Association of College and Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association, pp. 219–243. Available at:https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12792 . - 15Holdren, J.P. (2013, February 22). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available at:
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf . - 16Holtz, E., Cowles, W. and Hillegas, C. (2021, October 27). ‘Bringing light to dark data: A collaborative next-generation storage and metadata project [presentation].’ Educause Annual Conference 2021, Philadelphia, PA. Available at:
https://events.educause.edu/annual-conference/2021/agenda/bringing-light-to-dark-data-a-collaborative-nextgeneration-storage-and-metadata-project . - 17Hudson Vitale, C., Imker, H., Johnston, L.R., Carlson, J., Kozlowski, W., Olendorf, R. and Stewart, C. (2017) SPEC Kit 354: Data curation. Association of Research Libraries. Available at: 10.29242/spec.354
- 18Johnston, L.R. (2020) How a network of data curators can unlock the tremendous reuse value of research data. OCLC NEXT. Available at:
https://blog.oclc.org/next/data-curators-network/ . - 19Johnston, L.R. and Coburn, L. (2020, January 15). Data sharing readiness in academic institutions. Data Curation Network. Available at:
http://hdl.handle.net/11299/211358 . - 20Joo, S., Hofman, D. and Kim, Y. (2019) ‘Investigation of challenges in academic institutional repositories: A survey of academic librarians’, Library Hi Tech, 37(3), pp. 525–548. Available at: 10.1108/LHT-12-2017-0266
- 21Kunze, J., Calvert, S., DeBarry, J.D., Hanlon, M., Janée, G. and Sweat, S. (2017) ‘Persistence Statements: Describing Digital Stickiness’, Data Science Journal, 16(0), p. 39. Available at: 10.5334/dsj-2017-039
- 22Kupersmith, J. (2012) Library terms that users understand. UC Berkeley: Library. Available at:
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3qq499w7 . - 23Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R.R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., et al. (2020) ‘The TRUST Principles for digital repositories’, Scientific Data, 7(1),
144 . Available at: 10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7 - 24Lynch, C.A. (2003) ‘Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age’, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), pp. 327–336. Available at: 10.1353/pla.2003.0039
- 25Marsolek, W., Wright, S.J., Luong, H., Braxton, S.M., Carlson, J. and Lafferty-Hess, S. (2023) ‘Understanding the value of curation: A survey of researcher perspectives of data curation services from six US institutions’, PLOS ONE, 18(11):
e0293534 . Available at: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293534 - 26Miksa, T., Simms, S., Mietchen, D. and Jones, S. (2019) ‘Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans’, PLOS Computational Biology 15(3):
e1006750 . Available at: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750 - 27Narlock, M., Priesman Marquez, R., Herrmann, H. and Ibrahim, M. (2023) Data for “Knowledge Infrastructures Are Growing Up: The Case for Institutional (Data) Repositories 10 Years After the Holdren Memo. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota. Available at: 10.13020/w8nk-d131
- 28National Science Foundation. (2023, January 23). Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG). Available at:
https://new.nsf.gov/policies/pappg/23-1 . - 29Nelson, A. (2022, August 25). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research. The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available at:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-access-Memo.pdf . - 30ORCID US Community. (2024, April 3) NSPM-33 guide. Lyrasis. Available at:
https://orcidus.lyrasis.org/nspm-33-guide/ . - 31Pasquetto, I.V., Borgman, C.L. and Wofford, M.F. (2019) ‘Uses and reuses of scientific data: The data creators’ advantage’, Harvard Data Science Review, 1(2). Available at: 10.1162/99608f92.fc14bf2d
- 32Reiff Conell, S. and Wight, S. (2024) ‘Desirable Characteristics and Trust in Repositories: A Cross-institutional Comparison’, in 18th International Digital Curation Conference. Edinburgh:
Zenodo . Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.10728405 - 33Riley, B. and O’Brien Uhlmansiek, M. (2024, April 26). Connecting DMSPs to research outputs. UC3: California Digital Library. Available at:
https://uc3.cdlib.org/2024/04/26/connecting-dmsps-to-research-outputs/ . - 34Salo, D. (2007) ‘Innkeeper at the roach motel’, Library Trends, 57(2), pp. 98–123. Available at: 10.1353/lib.0.0031
- 35Star, S.L. and Strauss, A. (1999) ‘Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1), pp. 9–30. Available at: 10.1023/A:1008651105359
- 36Stone, S.M. and Lowe, M.S. (2014) ‘Who is citing undergraduate theses in institutional digital repositories? implications for scholarship and information literacy’, College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3–4), pp. 345–359. Available at: 10.1080/10691316.2014.929065
- 37Strecker, D., Pampel, H., Schabinger, R. and Weisweiler, N.L. (2023) ‘Disappearing repositories: Taking an infrastructure perspective on the long-term availability of research data’, Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), pp. 839–856. Available at: 10.1162/qss_a_00277
- 38Whitehead, M. (2023, January 24) ‘The repository ecosystem: Vision and action’, in proceedings of the GREI Workshop. Available at:
https://datascience.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Whitehead-508.pdf . - 39White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). (2022) Desirable characteristics of data repositories for federally funded research. Executive Office of the President of the United States. Available at: 10.5479/10088/113528
- 40Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I.J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N. and Boiten, J.W., et al. (2016) ‘The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship’, Scientific data, 3(1), pp. 1–9. Available at: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- 41Young, É. (2022, October 27). #ORCIDat10: Celebrating 10 years of the ORCID galaxy. ORCID. Available at:
https://info.orcid.org/orcidat10-celebrating-10-years-of-the-orcid-galaxy/ .